Re: #44 - Disney Buys Lucasfilm

I'll be the first to admit that I have a lot of disdain for modern movies and modern movie culture in general atm, so that might be tainting my view to the more extremist point of view, but I did sincerely mean what I said in my rant about wanting to enjoy movies again...anyways.

I do agree that the version of Star Trek we got, was among the better versions we could have gotten. And I actually really liked Star Trek when I first saw, honestly I still kinda do. But it was also my first exposure to JJ, but after going through and watching more of his stuff, he really kinda feels like a solidly based director that has a few very select skills on his belt that he relies on and uses effectively, but he doesn't really step outside of those few select tools so his stuff ends up having a very singular and similar ring to them.

Maybe more news will help, but as it stands I can't help but see this as the studios taking the safest route they can find, and if they are already playing it safe this early on, it doesn't really inspire me to great heights about the final product we're going to get.

ZangrethorDigital.ca

327

Re: #44 - Disney Buys Lucasfilm

Well, Disney didn't buy Star Wars to be all risky and edgy with it.    They bought it to sell it to as many people as possible.    Of all the potential directors on the scale from incompetent hack to reliably commercial to genius, divided by who's available right now - Abrams is a solid choice.     

And let's not forget the original Star Wars was just a goofy yarn about pirates and robots and samurai and a space monkey that made going to the movies fun again.   (If you weren't around in the Seventies, you just can't understand how unusual THAT was).

Based on his track record thus far, Abrams' movies are fun, well-crafted, smarter than most, and tell a decent story with engaging characters at the core.    What else does a Star Wars movie need to be?

Re: #44 - Disney Buys Lucasfilm

BDA, I couldn't agree with you more.

I am so fucking tired of "competent" and "average" summer action movies with no vision, originality, or personality to them. The whole Comic Book movie explosion was honestly the worst thing that could've happened to blockbuster film-making. The 90s had its share of shitty action movies and die hard knock-offs, but at least every movie was self-contained and tried to 100% deliver on its premise (I'm thinking of stuff like The Rock, Con Air, Face/Off, Speed). Now everything is a goddamn origin story, or a setup for a more interesting story that "we'll totally get around to in the sequel guys".

If anybody except James Cameron had made Avatar, it would've ended before the big battle even took place, with a post-credits scene hinting at what was to come. I miss movies that just go all out and deliver on their premise, walking out of the theater feeling satisfied instead of thinking "well the sequel will probably be good".

My specific fear about the new Star Wars is that we'll get a situation similar to Tron Legacy. That's a dangerously close parallel, where it's taking a 40 year old franchise and trying to make a direct sequel to it while also re-introducing it as a big Disney franchise. That's a movie that is to me at least, totally boring, that doesn't at all deliver on the promise of it's premise, and seems to exist to setup a better sequel in the future instead of being a good adventure movie on its own. I really, really hope that doesn't happen here. The smartest thing they could do is to really tell a good self-contained Star Wars story, with a satisfying finale that ties up everything from THIS movie, instead of leaving us hanging.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: #44 - Disney Buys Lucasfilm

bullet3 wrote:

My specific fear about the new Star Wars is that we'll get a situation similar to Tron Legacy. That's a dangerously close parallel, where it's taking a 40 year old franchise and trying to make a direct sequel to it while also re-introducing it as a big Disney franchise.

This triggered something I hadn't really thought about yet. You guys keep talking about the fact that just doing what the originals did and replicating that sense of fun and adventure is the obvious path, that is all it needs to be. But that treads a dangerously thin line. If you are trying to replicate that sense of whatever it was that made the originals so great, you are half a micron away from screwing it up entirely because the entire movie is going to be judged against the originals on every frame. It has to be nailed perfectly, but if you just go all out, set it 300 years after yavin, make it about bounty hunters and we never even see a a jedi, just do something crazy, then you are setting your own rules. You might lose a few people who think Star Wars is only about the Jedis, but you gain all the people who think it's just a great movie on it's own and just like being in THAT universe.

Is that really such a wild idea? I don't think so.

ZangrethorDigital.ca

Re: #44 - Disney Buys Lucasfilm

Well, I don't necessarily agree with that either, at least for these first 3 (god that does feel weird even saying that). 

The originals aren't that sacred to me, only 2 of them are any good in my opinion, so if they can capture the spirit of the originals and blow our minds with 40 years of vfx innovation, that could be a big success.
I actually really like the idea of getting the original cast back, which it sounds like it will be the case.

Just imagine, whoever is the big bad in this one has been tearing shit up the whole movie, and Luke has to finally come in and face off with him. Tells Han and everyone to leave them, walks forward and pulls out that green sabre. Could be amazing if handled right. If handled wrong, could be Tron Legacy.

Last edited by bullet3 (2013-01-27 09:13:40)

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: #44 - Disney Buys Lucasfilm

bullet3 wrote:

The originals aren't that sacred to me, only 2 of them are any good in my opinion, so if they can capture the spirit of the originals and blow our minds with 40 years of vfx innovation, that could be a big success.

I think we're agree in spirit on the main point. I just think that the line between capturing the spirit of the originals, and having it feel like they were trying to capture the spirit of the originals (Thus causing a Tron Legacy thing) is a whole lot thinner than you do.

If they do pull it off, it could be great, it's just walking that line is a lot scarier place when so much is riding on being able to pull off every single moment exactly right, is my point.

Well...that...and I really don't want the old cast back. Their story is done, I want something new and fresh, give me Bounty Hunters, give me assassins and smugglers, give me tales of the once powerful order of jedi knights lost to time and their abandoned relics haunting the more desolate planets of the galaxy, or go the other direction, give me stories of the days when the Sith were plentiful and ruled the galaxy. Give me something that doesn't revolve around the 6 characters we've already spent 6 movies with.

ZangrethorDigital.ca

Re: #44 - Disney Buys Lucasfilm

Tentpoles will always be safe. If that bothers you, stop watching them.

Thumbs up +3 Thumbs down

Re: #44 - Disney Buys Lucasfilm

https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/424571_380135345415727_559357524_n.jpg

---------------------------------------------
I would never lie. I willfully participate in a campaign of misinformation.

Re: #44 - Disney Buys Lucasfilm

Trey wrote:

Well, Disney didn't buy Star Wars to be all risky and edgy with it.    They bought it to sell it to as many people as possible.    Of all the potential directors on the scale from incompetent hack to reliably commercial to genius, divided by who's available right now - Abrams is a solid choice.     

And let's not forget the original Star Wars was just a goofy yarn about pirates and robots and samurai and a space monkey that made going to the movies fun again.   (If you weren't around in the Seventies, you just can't understand how unusual THAT was).

Based on his track record thus far, Abrams' movies are fun, well-crafted, smarter than most, and tell a decent story with engaging characters at the core.    What else does a Star Wars movie need to be?

I think Trey is right. Disney is working from a business model and they went with someone they are confident will produce a good product to sell.

I personally think that while American society isn't nearly as jaded as the 70's (Trey has spoken to that point in most of the SW commentaries) its getting pretty jaded. That is why something that is fun, perhaps with even a simple story, sounds like a good idea to me.

Personally, I am sick of dystopian worlds were death stalks every corner, Earth is shattered husk, and humanity lives on the ragged edge. Dystopia has its place as a story, but its getting pretty old.

So, why not do what George did originally, which was base it off of 40's sci-fi, a little political satire in there (Vietnam being an inspiration for the Rebels, small guy versus big guy)? Give me giant space ships that are incredible and characters who are real facing problems I can understand. I think the spirit of the originals is far more simple than people realize.

I honestly don't see asking much more.

God loves you!

Thumbs up Thumbs down

335

Re: #44 - Disney Buys Lucasfilm

fireproof78 wrote:

Disney is working from a business model and they went with someone they are confident will produce a good product to sell.

That's what I'm afraid of. SW is a perfect platform to launch insane amounts of merch from. It's in Disney's best intrest to make the movie as generic and simple as possible but cram everything and anything that can later be sold as a toy/prop/whatever. It doesn't have to be good to sell and that's the problem.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: #44 - Disney Buys Lucasfilm

Lamer wrote:

That's what I'm afraid of. SW is a perfect platform to launch insane amounts of merch from. It's in Disney's best intrest to make the movie as generic and simple as possible but cram everything and anything that can later be sold as a toy/prop/whatever. It doesn't have to be good to sell and that's the problem.

I may be just spewing optimistic speculation here, and have no experience making movie for a company but here's a thought I had:

If Disney just wanted to make toy commercials, like Lucas did, then they would not have gone out and found, courted and hired a writer working on other science fiction films, and only loosely associated with Disney or a director who is very busy working on another huge science fiction franchise.

So, while there is room for the business model to be same old, same old, different day, Disney is clearly putting more in to this than than just a toy making machine. They obviously could have brought on any number of writers and directors they had in their back pocket-they didn't need to go out and find someone.

The other thing is, Star Wars is already toy fodder-Lucas did that, so if that happens, not only will I not be surprised, it will be no worse than were the franchise is now.

Regarding the story, Disney is known for taking classic stories and turning them in to something else, different and a little new.  So, more potential exists for them to say, well what if it is a princess (or prince) in distress, like the original, but now do something new.

Reading the "Making of Star Wars" you realize that Lucas' original ideas were a lot of themes revolving around a princess being captured and rescued. That's Disney's bread and butter.

God loves you!

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: #44 - Disney Buys Lucasfilm

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BBeljuYCUAEz2MR.jpg

---------------------------------------------
I would never lie. I willfully participate in a campaign of misinformation.

Re: #44 - Disney Buys Lucasfilm

1) Every movie is a crap shoot. The only thing you can do to shift the odds is to start with proven material and hire proven cast and crew. Disney is doing that.

2) Hollywood in general is desperately trying to give you people exactly what you want as fast as they can, as well as they can.

You liked the superhero stuff? Here—have a dozen more. You didn't like Hulk? We'll MAKE IT OVER AGAIN. You like cerebral sci fi like Philip K Dick? Here's Inception, Looper, Total Recall, Chronicle, In Time, Source Code, The Adjustment Bureau, and whatever the fuck Charlie Kaufman does.

You're nostalgic for the '80s? How about remakes of everything that was popular only with big budgets? Plus, we'll keep the old franchises alive with new entries. You like books? We'll do all the Harry Potter, Twilight, Hunger Games... whatever sold over a million copies.

You want original stuff? WE GOT STUFF WE CAN'T EVEN EXPLAIN: Drive, Splice, The Fountain, Cloud Atlas, Cabin in the Woods, Abraham Lincoln as a vampire killer, joke trailers turned into action movies, military stroke jobs, martial arts movies with big budgets, cowboys and aliens together, remakes of successful European and Asian movies you didn't watch because you won't watch anything with subtitles.... YOU NAME IT.

ANYTHING and ANYBODY you like, we'll do more of that. And we'll hire directors who know what they're doing, and we'll give them big budgets and total control. You didn't like the Star Wars prequels? We'll pay billions for the franchise and give it to somebody who SEEMS to know what he's doing. WHAT MORE CAN YOU ASK FOR?!

I have my personal doubts about new Star Wars, but everybody seems to be trying make good movies these days, Battleship aside.

Last edited by Zarban (2013-01-29 01:07:01)

Warning: I'm probably rewriting this post as you read it.

Zarban's House of Commentaries

Re: #44 - Disney Buys Lucasfilm

It was an interesting rant but this part stood out to me...

Zarban wrote:

ANYTHING and ANYBODY you like, we'll do more of that. And we'll hire directors who know what they're doing, and we'll give them big budgets and total control. You didn't like the Star Wars prequels? We'll pay billions for the franchise and give it to somebody who SEEMS to know what he's doing. WHAT MORE CAN YOU ASK FOR?!

I have my personal doubts about new Star Wars, but everybody seems to be trying make good movies these days, Battleship aside.

clap

God loves you!

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: #44 - Disney Buys Lucasfilm

http://img203.imageshack.us/img203/1646/zarbspeech.jpg





EDIT:
http://imageshack.us/a/img837/8031/zarbspeech2.jpg

Teague Chrystie

I have a tendency to fix your typos.

Thumbs up +2 Thumbs down

Re: #44 - Disney Buys Lucasfilm

Zarban wrote:

You want original stuff? WE GOT STUFF WE CAN'T EVEN EXPLAIN: Drive, Splice, The Fountain, Cloud Atlas, Cabin in the Woods, Abraham Lincoln as a vampire killer,

Cloud Atlas and Abraham Lincoln Vampire Hunter were based on books and....*shuffles uncomfortably*..... you already mentioned.....ummmm.....you already mentioned books and listed those.......ahem....listed those as original stu....but they were both printed in the last ten years, so you can still call them original, I guess but they were.....you know what? I shall.....I'll be over here......in the corner.....I, ummmm, yeah....carry on.....*slinks off to the corner*....

http://www.empireonline.com/forum/upfiles/smiley/augen14.gif

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: #44 - Disney Buys Lucasfilm

Jimmy B wrote:

Cloud Atlas and Abraham Lincoln Vampire Hunter were based on books

As was DRIVE.

He also lists "remakes" under the "original" category... :forshame:

Thumbs up +1 Thumbs down

Re: #44 - Disney Buys Lucasfilm

*swoops in to Zarban defense and replaces "original" with "different"*

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: #44 - Disney Buys Lucasfilm

Dorkman wrote:
Jimmy B wrote:

Cloud Atlas and Abraham Lincoln Vampire Hunter were based on books

As was DRIVE.

He also lists "remakes" under the "original" category... :forshame:

big_smile

I didn't know Drive was based on a book either....*hangs head*

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: #44 - Disney Buys Lucasfilm

Can I get a hell yeah?

FOCUSING ON STAR WARS: EPISODE VII, LUCASFILM POSTPONES EPISODES II AND III 3D

---------------------------------------------
I would never lie. I willfully participate in a campaign of misinformation.

Re: #44 - Disney Buys Lucasfilm

http://i620.photobucket.com/albums/tt281/Lorean11/Doctor%20Who/hellyeah.gif

Re: #44 - Disney Buys Lucasfilm

AshDigital wrote:

Can I get a hell yeah?

You can have this-

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: #44 - Disney Buys Lucasfilm

By "original", the imaginary movie studio head just meant stuff that wasn't from traditional comic books, the '80s, or a hugely popular book series.

He didn't mean ORIGINAL original. That's contrary to the idea of starting with proven material, except where the writer himself is a proven commodity.

Last edited by Zarban (2013-01-29 01:08:25)

Warning: I'm probably rewriting this post as you read it.

Zarban's House of Commentaries

Re: #44 - Disney Buys Lucasfilm

You're right, though, that Disney does deserve credit for what they're doing. We talk about them feeding us Star Wars until we die, but at least they respect us enough to generate new Star Wars content for us to consume. They could easily have just put out T-shirts of Mickey dressed as Luke and kept re-releasing the existing films in 3D and on Blu-ray and in 4K and upside down and inside out. They may be milking a cash cow, but at least they're trying to give us fresh milk instead of trying to sell us the old milk again and again.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: #44 - Disney Buys Lucasfilm

Kathleen Kennedy on Abrams and Star Wars and stuff- click

Last edited by Jimmy B (2013-01-31 21:00:39)

Thumbs up Thumbs down