Re: Man of Steel

Holden wrote:

http://i.qkme.me/3uv9zu.jpg

I was dragged by my friends to this piece of Hollywood mainstream garbage and right away I knew I was in for two hours of hell. First of all, I never see movies, I only experience films. Movies are rubbish for the uncultured masses but I went to see this anyway at the insistence of my friends. To make matters worse, they were vehement about seeing it in 3D, or as I like to call it "pleb-o-vision".

As soon as the movie started, the entire audience clapped. I'm not kidding. They actually clapped at a movie screen. I thought the internet was only joking about this sort of thing but the audience clapped throughout the whole movie whenever their peabrains understood the atrociously constructed plot. It was truly an eye opening experience. I have never been surrounded by so many philistines at the same time.

The movie itself was an abomination. Man Of Steel exists purely to make money through merchandise sales and the cheap exploitation of a pre-sold franchise. The entire Superman series has always been commercialized trash that appeals to children. The very fact adults flock to see and discuss this series is revolting. Unsurprisingly, there is no artistry whatsoever in this latest installment. Things blow up, the one dimensional antagonist screams a lot and the characters (I use that term loosely) speak with the cadence of robots, including one groan inducing line by a female soldier about Superman's attractiveness. Speaking of which, most of the audience were on dates and I shudder to think what will happen when they inevitably mate; they're probably already having unprotected sex just as Superman and Lois Lane promoted.

After the end credits rolled, my friends excitedly discussed the nonsense that just occurred on screen with dissection and banter back and forth as if it were a Fellini film. I felt nothing but pity for them. They'll never understand and appreciate cinema like I do; they're doomed to be mindless drones for the rest of their lives.

I drove home by myself as they went to the local diner to further discuss the movie, as if it couldn't be explained with 20 seconds of grunting. As I sit here in retrospective, I truly wonder if the anti-intellectual have fully taken over our world.

Re: Man of Steel

Ewing wrote:
Holden wrote:

http://i.qkme.me/3uv9zu.jpg

I was dragged by my friends to this piece of Hollywood mainstream garbage and right away I knew I was in for two hours of hell. First of all, I never see movies, I only experience films. Movies are rubbish for the uncultured masses but I went to see this anyway at the insistence of my friends. To make matters worse, they were vehement about seeing it in 3D, or as I like to call it "pleb-o-vision".

As soon as the movie started, the entire audience clapped. I'm not kidding. They actually clapped at a movie screen. I thought the internet was only joking about this sort of thing but the audience clapped throughout the whole movie whenever their peabrains understood the atrociously constructed plot. It was truly an eye opening experience. I have never been surrounded by so many philistines at the same time.

The movie itself was an abomination. Man Of Steel exists purely to make money through merchandise sales and the cheap exploitation of a pre-sold franchise. The entire Superman series has always been commercialized trash that appeals to children. The very fact adults flock to see and discuss this series is revolting. Unsurprisingly, there is no artistry whatsoever in this latest installment. Things blow up, the one dimensional antagonist screams a lot and the characters (I use that term loosely) speak with the cadence of robots, including one groan inducing line by a female soldier about Superman's attractiveness. Speaking of which, most of the audience were on dates and I shudder to think what will happen when they inevitably mate; they're probably already having unprotected sex just as Superman and Lois Lane promoted.

After the end credits rolled, my friends excitedly discussed the nonsense that just occurred on screen with dissection and banter back and forth as if it were a Fellini film. I felt nothing but pity for them. They'll never understand and appreciate cinema like I do; they're doomed to be mindless drones for the rest of their lives.

I drove home by myself as they went to the local diner to further discuss the movie, as if it couldn't be explained with 20 seconds of grunting. As I sit here in retrospective, I truly wonder if the anti-intellectual have fully taken over our world.

You could post this verbatim on /tv/ and everyone would wholeheartedly agree with you.

I have yet to see Man of Steel. I'm holding out to see it with my dad.

"The Doctor is Submarining through our brains." --Teague

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Man of Steel

Wow. I don't like that Ewing, that Ewing is a bit of a dick.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Man of Steel

Ewing wrote:
Holden wrote:

http://i.qkme.me/3uv9zu.jpg

I was dragged by my friends to this piece of Hollywood mainstream garbage and right away I knew I was in for two hours of hell. First of all, I never see movies, I only experience films. Movies are rubbish for the uncultured masses but I went to see this anyway at the insistence of my friends. To make matters worse, they were vehement about seeing it in 3D, or as I like to call it "pleb-o-vision".

As soon as the movie started, the entire audience clapped. I'm not kidding. They actually clapped at a movie screen. I thought the internet was only joking about this sort of thing but the audience clapped throughout the whole movie whenever their peabrains understood the atrociously constructed plot. It was truly an eye opening experience. I have never been surrounded by so many philistines at the same time.

The movie itself was an abomination. Man Of Steel exists purely to make money through merchandise sales and the cheap exploitation of a pre-sold franchise. The entire Superman series has always been commercialized trash that appeals to children. The very fact adults flock to see and discuss this series is revolting. Unsurprisingly, there is no artistry whatsoever in this latest installment. Things blow up, the one dimensional antagonist screams a lot and the characters (I use that term loosely) speak with the cadence of robots, including one groan inducing line by a female soldier about Superman's attractiveness. Speaking of which, most of the audience were on dates and I shudder to think what will happen when they inevitably mate; they're probably already having unprotected sex just as Superman and Lois Lane promoted.

After the end credits rolled, my friends excitedly discussed the nonsense that just occurred on screen with dissection and banter back and forth as if it were a Fellini film. I felt nothing but pity for them. They'll never understand and appreciate cinema like I do; they're doomed to be mindless drones for the rest of their lives.

I drove home by myself as they went to the local diner to further discuss the movie, as if it couldn't be explained with 20 seconds of grunting. As I sit here in retrospective, I truly wonder if the anti-intellectual have fully taken over our world.

Lot of long words in there, miss. We're naught but humble pirates smile
http://cdn3.hark.com/images/000/250/682/250682/original.jpg

God loves you!

Thumbs up +1 Thumbs down

Re: Man of Steel

And that would kill him...

Imagination will often carry us to worlds that never were. But without it we go nowhere. - Carl Sagan

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Man of Steel

Again, Larry Niven worked this all out decades ago in Man of Steel, Woman of Kleenex

Re: Man of Steel

Sounds like the Twilight conundrum all over again. Kristen Stewart gutted like a trout.

We saw Clark Kent focus his senses in Man of Steel. It only took Zod a few moments get used to it too. It'll be alright on the night.

Just like having a 'safe word', Louis Lane can just reach for some kryponite by the bed, to calm him down after the 15th straight hour.

not long to go now...

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Man of Steel

There was a scene deleted from the theatrical version of Hancock about the whole superhuman having sex with a normal person thing-

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Man of Steel

"My Super Ex Girlfriend" had a similar scene. Couldn't find the clip but the final words in the scene are these:
"I'll get you a new one."
"Bed or penis?"

God loves you!

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Man of Steel

RedLetterMedia reviews MAN OF STEEL.

http://redlettermedia.com/half-in-the-bag-man-of-steel/

86

Re: Man of Steel

I just got back from the movie, and overall I thought it was an decent movie. Despite it being an origin movie, I felt it presented the growth of Clark in an interesting way that would have felt more stale had it been told in a linear fashion. The first two-thirds of the movie really captured and held my interest, and allowed time to get to know the characters as opposed to presenting them as props for the story to happen to. However, the action scenes felt confusing with the constant motion and lack of visibility as to what was happening, and by the end of the final battle I really didn't care about what was happening.

Overall, I liked the movie but wish the action scenes had been less extravagant to the point of excess. The score by Zimmer was extremely restrained; however, the theme he wrote served the style of the movie well. I appreciated that the style was not dark and gritty, but merely presented Superman in a serious fashion. I don't know if I'd watch it again for sometime, but this movie was a good surprise considering I paid little heed to the trailers and talk in the months leading up to its release.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Man of Steel

Dan wrote:

I felt it presented the growth of Clark in an interesting way that would have felt more stale had it been told in a linear fashion...

I think the non-linear presentation simply was meant to trick us into thinking there was any growth at all.



I wrote a Thing. Teague asked me to post it here on the forum - but I don't want to decimate this thread with it so i'm going to start a new thread for it and simply post this link - http://friendsinyourhead.com/forum/view … 215#p37215 - here.

Re: Man of Steel

lol

Re: Man of Steel

Well, hmm.   I'm only eight minutes in, but I'm starting to think he didn't like it.

Re: Man of Steel

Xtroid wrote:

lol


http://i.imgur.com/bzlHzDq.jpg?1

Last edited by Sam F (2013-06-22 20:05:17)

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Man of Steel

Just got back. Good movie.

Things I liked:

- Casting. Pretty much all the parts are perfectly cast. Kevin Costner and Michael Shannon in particular knock it out of the park.

- Direction. Snyder did a really solid job. This should prove to his detractors that he isn't a slave to style and flash.

- Nods. The little references to other DC universe characters were fun and not distracting.

Things that were meh:

- Score. I didn't hate it like a lot of you guys, but it was so goddamn repetitive. I swear Zimmer plays the same snippet of the theme about 500 times. It wasn't as oppressive as his TDKR score, though. So at least there's that.

- Opening Krypton stuff. It just didn't grab me at all. Mostly I was just confused. And since Jor-El recaps all of this to Clark later, you could cut basically all of it and lose nothing of substance.

- Lois. The movie places her in danger in ways that get increasingly harder to buy. I guess this comes with the territory of doing a Superman movie, but it stood out to me.

Things I hated with all my soul:

- The structure. That first scene of Clark flying all over the world should have been joyous. But we know so little about who he is at that point that it just comes across as arbitrary. A linear structure would have given him a much clearer arc, but it's halfway through the movie before adult Clark has any sort of character or personality attached to him. This was a major mistake in my opinion. I'd like to see a recut of the film that puts it in order, to see if the story flows better.

- The product placement. This is the first time that product placement really bothered me in a movie. I mean, did we really need a shot of Faora where a MASSIVE SEARS LOGO is taking up the entire screen behind her? There's way too much stuff like that.

All in all, though, I thought it was pretty successful, even if the plot was a little convoluted.

"The Doctor is Submarining through our brains." --Teague

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Man of Steel

I was shocked by the lack of slow motion.

Was this really directed by Zack Snyder?

Re: Man of Steel


http://generatormeme.com/media/created/42jnek.jpg

Re: Man of Steel

Wow.

Re: Man of Steel

I completely agree. Made a comment a couple of pages back about how all these recent blockbuster movies have our heroes fail to stop millions of people dying. That's not how I would define a hero.

Imagination will often carry us to worlds that never were. But without it we go nowhere. - Carl Sagan

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Man of Steel

Terence Stamp is awesome- click

Thumbs up Thumbs down

97

Re: Man of Steel

redxavier wrote:

I completely agree. Made a comment a couple of pages back about how all these recent blockbuster movies have our heroes fail to stop millions of people dying. That's not how I would define a hero.

I saw MoS again yesterday, and our hero truly does seem indifferent to the thousands of people that must have perished during his Earthly battles. Yeah, that's no hero.

So far, the only halfway-coherent argument I've seen in favor of what Nolan/Goyer/Snyder might have been doing with all that destruction has been made by Richard Brody, the guy who blogs about movies for The New Yorker (note: Brody is kinda snooty, even by The New Yorker standards, and I often find his opinions goofy):

The destruction wrought on Earth by the malicious Zod is one thing, but when the newly dubbed Superman stands up to his father’s killer and Earth’s ravager, each zooming chase through the air and each blow landed wreaks horrific destruction. I found myself thinking of Gog and Magog, of Sodom and Gomorrah, of the Flood, and remembering that the term “Biblical” implies catastrophe, suggests an unfathomably large, and therefore legendary, devastation. Beware, Goyer and Nolan seem to warn, of the morally motivated conflict that you yearn to fight and win; beware of thinking in terms of realizing good or vanquishing evil on a grand, mythic scale, because when forces that hold the world in the balance do battle, even the winners are losers.

[My italics.]

http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/m … erego.html

I mean, I understand what he's saying, but it never occurred to me that that's what Nolan/Goyer "seem to warn" with the presentation of all that collateral damage. To me, the film appears downright oblivious to the fact that every building toppled has many living, breathing human beings in it.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Man of Steel

Maybe it's not a conscious story choice on their part, but a result of a little desensitisation caused by the frequency of catastrophic destruction we've seen on the screen over the years, from 2012, Transformers 3, Avengers etc. and the fact that it's all done in computers with nary a practical effect involved - no blowing up a building or model and no actors/extras being directed on a set to be killed.

I suspect that the creative teams behind GI Joe Retaliation, Star Trek Into Darkness and Man of Steel either aren't even aware of the scale of collateral damage in their movies. It's just a wow moment.

Imagination will often carry us to worlds that never were. But without it we go nowhere. - Carl Sagan

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Man of Steel

http://www.shortpacked.com/comics/2013-06-24-theliewetellourselves.png

I write stories! With words!
http://www.asstr.org/~Invid_Fan/

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Man of Steel

I really identify with the last line of that comic.

I honestly don't think it is any sort of warning of trying to wage battle on an epic level brings collateral damage, though it is an interesting thought. Even if MoS was trying to say that, Avengers, Iron Man, GI JOE, Star Trek Into Darkness, Transformers (all seven of them), A Good Day to Die Hard, World War Z, Olympus Has Fallen, The Dark Knight Rises, etc. are not sending that message. Heck, even ROTS had the opening scene that rather than Anakin landing on a runway, they smash through Coruscant's cityscape.

No, I don't really think Hollywood understands collateral damage

God loves you!

Thumbs up Thumbs down