Re: Monsters
Sorry, it was more the tone.
I have a tendency to fix your typos.
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Sorry, it was more the tone.
Well, doing this was an experiment - going back to Trey's adage -trying to get you kids to check out something you might not have otherwise. Maybe nobody will, but that'd be a shame.
I'm definitly incredibly interested but it seems that the people in charge don't feel like letting me see it. So I think I'm gonna take matters into my own hands when I get home. <Insert evil laugh here>
But seriously I'm sick of this...helloooo torrents.
Well, doing this was an experiment - going back to Trey's adage -trying to get you kids to check out something you might not have otherwise. Maybe nobody will, but that'd be a shame.
And my point is, if you want me to try something that I otherwise might not, you should try to pitch the movie a bit. Not just tell me that it'll help your business if I throw money at it, not just copy-paste the ad copy, but actually tell me what about it might interest me. If I tell someone to check out Down In Front, I don't just tell them 'listen to it because it'll support podcasting; do a Google search if you want to know what it is.'
I'm not sure what exactly you want us to say. It's a movie a guy made for seven something grand. It's an indie science fiction do-it-yourself film. The story is such and such and such and such (copy and paste from whatever website you prefer).
Would you like our thoughts on it as a movie and a story? Because we have that. In podcast form.
It's a notable film of modern cinema. One we feel deserves some attention. If you value our judgment in these areas, then check it out. If not, *shrug*
Last edited by Brian (2010-11-01 06:33:51)
Damn it Gregory! It's the internet, google that shit yourself. Now quit being a bitch and move on.
On the topic at hand, I thought it was a nice flick. Had a couple of moments that were hard to follow. Like the night vision thing. That confused me. What happened there? Without spoiling it for those who haven't seen it of course...(this should be fun!)
I'm not sure what exactly you want us to say. It's a movie a guy made for seven something grand. It's an indie science fiction do-it-yourself film. The story is such and such and such and such (copy and paste from whatever website you prefer).
Would you like our thoughts on it as a movie and a story? Because we have that. In podcast form.
It's a notable film of modern cinema. One we feel deserves some attention. If you value our judgment in these areas, then check it out. If not, *shrug*
See, that's basically what wanted from Teague in the original post. I'm not going to listen to the podcast without watching the movie first, and I'm not going to watch the movie unless someone can actually tell me 'it's a good movie that you should watch.' If you read the thread, you'll see that nobody actually bothered to say that. And a quick Google search that I did found no one that actually recommended it, either.
If you read the thread, you'll see that nobody actually bothered to say that. And a quick Google search that I did found no one that actually recommended it, either.
Us recording a commentary and urging people to watch it doesn't qualify?
Gregory Harbin wrote:If you read the thread, you'll see that nobody actually bothered to say that. And a quick Google search that I did found no one that actually recommended it, either.
Us recording a commentary and urging people to watch it doesn't qualify?
You've recorded commentaries for Transformers 2 and Surrogates. Also, all of your urging seems to be along the lines of "Support this because it's an indie film" not "go see this because it's good."
Can we stop this, please? Greg, you sounded like a dick in your first post and sounded more like a dick as things progressed, that's why I treated you like a dick and not someone innocently asking for more information about the movie. I liked "Monsters," I recommend that folks watch it. It's a slow paced sci fi film that lets you soak in its universe, and that appeals to me. Moving on.
I love it when Teague reacts to something like he's trying to get poop off his hand.
I tried to buy this on iTunes (my first), but something went wrong and it didn't work. But before trying again, I looked at the reviews and checked elsewhere. Gareth Edwards says his budget was a lot more than the $15000 equipment costs being floated on the Tubes but "way less than $500,000." That's still a very impressive effects film.
Now, Edward Burns is saying he made Nice Guy Johnny for $25 grand, but it's not an effects film. However, a lot of reviews say the Monsters trailer is a major bait-and-switch regarding the eponymous effects.
So, meh. If I see it, it will be only on Down in Front's vaguely-implied recommendation. However, I've watched plenty of schlock made for less than half a million dollars in my time, and this has got to be better than most of that. Something Weird Video, anyone?
It's a slow paced sci fi film that lets you soak in its universe, and that appeals to me. Moving on.
So it's another Dark City. Good!
Greg, you sounded like a dick in your first post and sounded more like a dick as things progressed, that's why I treated you like a dick and not someone innocently asking for more information about the movie.
So you made assumptions about what I was asking rather than just spending thirty seconds answering a legitimate question that other people in this thread also had? Nice.
Whereas you could have spent thirty seconds or less Googling the film instead of demanding that we get down and beg you to watch/listen.
If you don't want to watch it then don't. This thread is for the people who do.
Whereas you could have spent thirty seconds or less Googling the film instead of demanding that we get down and beg you to watch/listen.
I Googled the film. Nothing I saw made me want to watch the film. So I thought I'd ask the people who are telling me I should watch it why they think so. But those people decided to insult me. Weird.
It's pretty obnoxious to say we "reallllllly need to tell you what 'Monsters' is" if you already Googled it. And if you hadn't, it's obnoxious that you hadn't bothered to Google before posting.
Here, I'll save you the time. You shouldn't see it. Specifically you, Gregory Harbin, shouldn't see it.
There, all settled. No one is asking Gregory to see a movie he isn't interested in. Let's move on.
Such a weird way to run a website.
*sigh*
Alright, so you understand why this has happened to you, who came in and politely asked about the movie, let's run play-by-play.
We'll establish that a not-dickish way to acquire the knowledge you wanted in the first place would go something like:
"I don't know much about Monsters, what's it about?"
What you said was:
"You realllllllllly gotta tell me what 'Monsters' is before I'm going to care."
That's the first post you made on this subject. For some reason which I won't speculate on, nobody replied to your comment. Later, replying to nobody, you say:
And yet $8 is way too much if no one has bothered to make me care about seeing it. I mean, I get 'help the indie filmmaking' as an argument, but, as far as me being a filmGOER, and not a filmMAKER, I'm more likely to want to see a movie that costs $300 million than one that cost $15K, so why would I spend my $8 on one of those instead of one of those?
This is a fair enough point, but as Brian brought up later, we advocate movies, and explain our reasoning in podcast form, and I'm gonna give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you've listened before and know how the podcast works. The podcast that we provide in high quality on a weekly basis at absolutely no cost to you ('weird way to run a website,' indeed), which was waiting for you to press play. Where, by 3:30 in, you would have heard me say
It's a good movie, it's kind of a Cloverfieldy District 9-y thing with giant aliens, which is freaking awesome. The movie itself, I actually like it a lot...
I know you listen to episodes for movies you haven't seen, I'm not sure why this time that stopped you fully in your tracks.
Monsters is about...what. What is it? Tell me what it is.
You can't convince someone to watch a movie just because it's an indie movie. That is not a credential, that's a handicap.[...]
Nope, not interested.
We get it. You're so not interested you're coming all the way back around to defiantly proclaim you're not interested. So you're not interested. End of story.
I know you listen to episodes for movies you haven't seen, I'm not sure why this time that stopped you fully in your tracks.
This is the first time you've done a movie that I've never even heard of before. I was hoping that when you finally posted the release thread, you'd include some sort of description or explanation of why the movie is worth checking out, if it was.
I didn't start out being uninterested, I started out just not knowing what it was. When I did a Google search to find out what it was, all I found was people saying it was mediocre at best.
So I continued to try to get from someone here a description of the movie or a recommendation that wasn't 'buy this movie to support indie movies.'
You pull my 'Nope, not interested' completely out of context to help your point. I wasn't uninterested because it was an indie movie, I was uninterested because the review I found (it has a 62 on Metacritic, including reviews such as "Wait a second, is this a horror movie or an episode of The Hills?") gave me the impression that the movie wasn't worth looking into. And yet, I still asked you guys for a recommendation, because I trust your judgement.
But as ShadowDuelist said:
You've recorded commentaries for Transformers 2 and Surrogates. Also, all of your urging seems to be along the lines of "Support this because it's an indie film" not "go see this because it's good."
Last edited by Gregory Harbin (2010-11-02 04:13:59)
Wow, we're just like a real family around here, aren't we.
I originally wrote a slightly longer post, but I'll sum it up. I'd see it simply because I think (hope) it will be important in the future, as an example of effects movies that did it cheap, and did it well.
We all here love movies, but not all movies are loved by all. Still there are those that the general consensus is that, if you really love movies, you need to see these certain films, even if you don't have any particular interest in them. For my part, I say this is one of those.
I feel like this thread could have gone better, and it's my fault. Sorry everybody, sorry Greg.
Wow, we're just like a real family around here, aren't we.
Yeah, and Gregory has turned into the whiney brat 4 year old that refuses to go through potty training...
I feel like this thread could have gone better, and it's my fault. Sorry everybody, sorry Greg.
don't let him spoil it for you Fig... He doesn't deserve that kinda place. Gregory is officially on my troll list.
Last edited by switch (2010-11-02 05:46:01)
Performance art, i love it. You tell em Greg, we're on your side. Hey, at least they didn't yell at you to shut up with a straight face for saying "this is the worst commentary ever " while they were waiting around during the live chat; and this shortly after they started taking donations based on your suggestion.
We all here love movies, but not all movies are loved by all. Still there are those that the general consensus is that, if you really love movies, you need to see these certain films, even if you don't have any particular interest in them. For my part, I say this is one of those.
Good post. I might actually check out the film now. It's downloaded now, anyway.
Hey, at least they didn't yell at you to shut up with a straight face for saying "this is the worst commentary ever
" while they were waiting around during the live chat; and this shortly after they started taking donations based on your suggestion.
Whoa, when did this happen?
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.
Currently installed 9 official extensions. Copyright © 2003–2009 PunBB.