51

(1,649 replies, posted in Off Topic)

52

(109 replies, posted in Off Topic)

About that life capsule thing:

Let's do some math. There are three dudes piloting the ship, there's Vickers, there's nongeologist and unbiologist that get killed, there's Shaw and Halloway. There's David. I think there's some asian chick or something? I can't remember. That makes, what... ten? What happens to asian chick? Does she get killed? What about the medical staff? The four or five guys that are helping the old man puppet put his slippers on. Did they all go into the alien ship at the end? Did the engineer kill them all? I only recall the engineer killing like three people.

Were those other people still on the ship when they drove it into the other ship?

It doesn't really matter much, just...  if they weren't on the ship or were in a buggy, like...  waiting outside for the old dude to finish having his body replaced or whatever the fuck he thought was gonna happen in there...  I dunno...

And, avatar, I really don't get how the critics out there can let this movie get off. This fucking movie may as well be called Transformers 2. It's so broken. All it has going for it are the camera work and effects and ... some of the acting, but the acting really doesn't matter. The characters are ALL either stupid or hopelessly broken themselves. Their motivations are all screwed up, their actions often make no sense at all... It doesn't even matter that they're performed well. I almost can't tell if they're well performed or not, cause I can't figure out what they're supposed to be doing / feeling / wanting / etc.

It's like instead of pandering down to people with fart jokes, racist humor and pointless scenes of cool over-the-top action, this movie is pandering UP to snobby arthouse critics by giving them pointless metaphor, bullshit philosophy and confusingly bizarre sequences that OBVIOUSLY have to mean SOMETHING...  right?

53

(133 replies, posted in Off Topic)

litomnivore wrote:
avatar wrote:

They assume it's some sort of sci-fi 'Mulholland Drive' that's supposed to be mysterious and leave questions unanswered. If only that was the worst of its sins. Haven't they seen LOST?
It must be a sign of insecurity to assume the movie is smarter than you, rather than they just didn't know what they were doing. The dazzling production values (like Inception) give the illusion that its very sophisticated, and  a sprinkling of references to 'deep topics' is sufficient to pass for profundity.

Laying aside Prometheus's various problems (which left me merely disappointed, instead of angry) and focusing on this, it's no bad thing for a film to ask questions it doesn't answer in order to make you think. It is a bad thing when the film doesn't answer any, especially the central question that motivates the plot—who made us and why?

Well, we know who the movie says made us, and the 'why' part I'm fine with not having an answer, or getting only vague ones. People ask that question all the time. It's the other 5,000 questions in the movie that bother me.

Seriously, it's hilarious that now that we have the ability to FINALLY watch older movies on awesome TVs in HD, now the god damn TVs don't fit THEM anymore, either.

TV aspect ratios are now totally different than any film ratio ever used.

Also, all of Pixar's films that I've seen have done the full frame widescreen thing in HD. There's no way those movies are screened like that in theaters. It kinda bugs me. I think most animated films have been that way.

55

(109 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Most of those directors probably don't have an army of people questioning everything they do now, either. If there's anything Lucas has taught us, it's that surrounding yourself with people who will kiss your ass all the time is the worst thing you can do. That and when you're young and only have a few above-average movies under your belt, your actors are more willing to work outside your expectations as well. If some film making legend like Woody Allen tells you how a scene goes, you probably just do that, cause the guy's Woody Allen. Who the fuck are you to question him? But that's often how the best performances happen. Achieving that legendary status probably makes people afraid to stand their ground on things like that.

With this flick, I think it was more a case of people being impressed with the performance of Star Trek and Lost and the desire to get the guy who wrote those to write this flick as well. From interviews I've read, I can only assume that the script they started out with was maybe decent, but relied on the previously established Alien lore. It still had all of that weird space jesus stuff in it where the engineers created life, it just dealt with it while adhering to the previous films' rules. Lindelhof got a chance to read the script and wrote an e-mail that basically said "That's great, but here's how I'd do it:", and then he pulled a bunch of bullshit out of his ass to make an impression. Then he got the job and had to actually write all that bullshit and... well...

... Prometheus.

That age thing better be wrong, tho, or I'm completely fucked tongue

I have just watched a "Fullscreen / Widescreen" movie...  Dirty Harry on Netflix instant. It plays at 16:9, but the actual aspect of the film is more like 2.33:1. They made it fit my HD monitor. Technically, this can still be labeled as "widescreen".

I am now fucking terrified that this will start happening on bluray.

57

(62 replies, posted in Episodes)

I was only joking about that whole sarcasm tag thing. As dorkman pointed out, my idea was really dumb.

Totally cool of you to implement that, tho, Holden. You are awesome.

58

(9 replies, posted in Off Topic)

The only down side to these type of cross-pollinated mythologies that go on for decades through different writers is that certain people/stories/things get referenced so often that fifty years later, you've heard them mentioned a thousand times in a variety of media and people can't figure out that it's not real. I'm sure there are people out there who think the necronomicon is a real thing, because it's easily the most referenced thing Lovecraft ever came up with. I'm not entirely certain that he's the one who came up with it, given that he and his buddies did so much referencing of each others' work.

I always thought that would be a cool thing to do with your movies too. Kinda like how QT and RR sometimes toss one of the others' characters into their films.

That does make it perfectly clear. What an honest poster.

Saw two more movies tonight:

1) They Saved Hitler's Brain: The cinema snob made me do it. The movie looked pretty funny, and it is. He spoiled most of the funny parts, but the scene where the dude slaps the girl is so god damn funny. That chick literally does nothing but scream and make hilarious surprised / horrified facial expressions throughout the entire film, save for the beginning where she acts like a prostitute. There's a lot of funny in there.

2) The Werewolf Of Washington - Starring Dean Stockwell circa 1974. Starts out really slow and boring for the first 15 or 20 minutes. I was about to turn it off, but some old lady with a shopping cart found the first victim behind a car and did this amazing, ten second "I'm about to scream!" face, and then screamed three times. Then it got a little boring for a couple more minutes until a guy picked up a phone, said "uh-huh?" hung up and told the guy he was with that the first victim - who was the wife of the secretary of state or something - was dead...  and "had her guts ripped out". And then the movie basically became a comedy. Literally. And it's really not half bad, aside from the fact that half the jokes are Nixon references and the other half are slapstick that goes on for WAY too long, then keep going in a very un-funny way, and then KEEP GOING until they manage to become funny purely because they've gone on for so long.

I mean...  I got this thing in one of those collections of crap horror movies of 50 movies for ten bucks, but this isn't a horror film. It's completely comedy by the end... not very good comedy, but comedy. There are four or five bits, tho, that are fucking hysterical, and I would actually recommend watching it. It's on Youtube all over the place, given that it's probably public domain.

Both are definitely good movies to get some buddies, get some alcohol and laugh you ass off.

61

(62 replies, posted in Episodes)

Maybe we could make a   tag, where each letter between them is given a random color. This would create a 'rainbow of sarcasm', signifying that you were, in fact, not being serious about that.

62

(62 replies, posted in Episodes)

Dean wrote:

How I'd "fix" this flick.

Tons of awesome.

I want to see that version of the movie now. Only thing I'd change is the little cube. Instead of floating around, how about it rolls and bounces along the ground? You could have a scene where the kids have to sneak around a group of soldiers while the cube just bounces through them. Soldiers don't notice cause it's on the ground and they're preoccupied with trying to find the alien, but the kids have to get around them without being spotted and then have to find the cube again on the other side.

Movies like that tended to be about how kids can see something while adults will overlook it. A scene like that would be reinforcing that general theme, which the movie kinda has now, and which your version definitely has going for it.

63

(133 replies, posted in Off Topic)

"If there is anybody who is known for inevitable disappointment, it’s me. I’m Mr. Inevitable Disappointment!"
- Damon Lindelhof.

64

(133 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Whose decision was it to have Lindelhof go over the script? Also, what are the odds of being able to find Spaiht's script floating around on the interwebs somewhere?

65

(133 replies, posted in Off Topic)

So apparently there's a new Prometheus-related viral going on that came from the film. At the end there's a Weyland logo with a date and a timeline url. 10-11-12. In the timeline, that represents the date that Weyland Industries was officially incorporated. I'm trying to relate that to Jesus somehow, but I can't...

Some people seem to think it's the date that the DVD is going to come out. I dunno if that's true or not. I haven't heard anything at work about when they expect to release the thing. That date lands on a thursday, tho, which isn't your typical DVD release day. So I dunno. Right now the only thing that would make me care at all is if the REAL movie comes out on that date, and that this movie was just some expensive, elaborate practical joke or something.

66

(62 replies, posted in Episodes)

Teague wrote:

Special screw-Zarbans to Zarban for peer-pressuring nice, normal people into just doing commentaries all the time. neutral

Wait... was he successful?

67

(109 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Yeah, it feels sort of desperate for people to claim that this film is a deconstruction or parody, or that the twenty minutes that got cut will somehow explain the 90 billion nonsensical things going on in here. Like people really desperately love Scott's old sci-fi films and need this flick to be at that same level. It's been 30 years, tho. That guy is gone.


Blade Runner was not good at all when it came out.

68

(1,649 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Yeah, the Moon Hoax video is a joke, and it gets more and more obvious as it goes. "That ship in that movie looked just like ours! It had a point at the top... it had... rockets... It was exactly the same!"

69

(133 replies, posted in Off Topic)

That video could have been an hour long and they still wouldn't have asked all the questions you could ask about the things that don't make sense in that film.

70

(9 replies, posted in Off Topic)

A while back I was in one of the bigger book stores and saw a giant hardcover collection of Lovecraft stuff that included pretty much all of his shorts, Mountains of madness and Shadow over Innsmouth, along with a couple of draft versions of Innsmouth that were... interesting.

Cost me about $10. Worth every penny.

As for where to start with the cthulu mythos, Call of Cthulu is the place to start. Lovecraft's books aren't really in any sort of sequential order or anything. There are things mentioned in the various stories that tie them together, but the name "Cthulu Mythos" is kindof a misnomer, as Call of Cthulu is really the only book that deals directly with Cthulu. Lovecraft just liked to sprinkle little bits of things here and there. Re-referencing things in various stories that none of them ever fully go into. Probably gave it all the name "Cthulu Mythos" cause Cthulu is one of the few beings or creatures or whatever that actually HAS a name. Most of his stuff is written in the first person, so if the dude writing it doesn't know what to call something, it's just refered to as "that horrifyingly ancient creature that scares the ever loving shit out of me". To paraphrase.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/d/d8/Tianasquare.jpg

Seen that photo before? Newspapers printed a very cropped version of that photo, and that's the version that most people have seen

This is the uncropped version of one of the other shots from that roll:
http://i.minus.com/iHHVQwK8L6s3u.jpg
Linked, because it's fucking huge. The guy's not just standing in front of three or five or even ten tanks. He's standing in front of a fucking army.

Balls.

72

(133 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I've never done a star wars prequel review.

Unless you count posting "It sucked" on a forum. In that case, never mind.

73

(1,649 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Hey space guys / moon hoax guys. Watch this. Give it at least 20 minutes. You'll want to finish it.
(sorry for the poor quality, I'll see if I can find a better copy on youtube...

If Kubrik was known for anything, it was for taking liberties with adaptations tongue

Well, that and tripping balls.

75

(133 replies, posted in Off Topic)

This is probably the first time I've disagreed with Stocklasa's opinion of a film, being that he didn't mind the fact that the story was incomprehensible due to the neat scenes and stuff. Kinda hypocritical, but I get it if people wanna like the movie for that, cause some of the scenes are pretty cool.

I just can't let it go.

The most important thing for me in a movie are the characters. In this movie there's not one character that feels realistic at all. They all feel pretty good at the beginning of the movie, like they're working on putting some character into them, you know? But by the end of the movie, every single one of the characters has gone off the rails, and some of them are apparently supposed to be totally different characters than what I thought they were going to be.

The dude with the mohawk...  I thought at the beginning of the movie that he was some hired muscle or something. He's kinda brooding and dark, he tells that one dude to eat shit and die, basically, he's 'in it for the money'... the only smart thing he does is question the 'evidence' in the briefing, but all of them do that because that's the logical thing to do. Then you find out that he's a geologist, and NOT ONCE does he say or do anything even remotely having to do with geology. He's not interested in the brand new planet they've found, he's not interested in the structure they're in, he's not interested in fucking anything. Ever. He doesn't even pick up a rock to take a look. He may as well have said "I'm the pope" because his character shares about as much with a pope as it does with a geologist. Same with the biologist. Same with the two nameless co-pilots.

Even David and Elizabeth - the two characters everyone's raving about - are complete ciphers. In some movies that would be awesome, but in this movie nothing at all works. Even the scary bits are let down a lot by the fact that I don't give two shits about any of the characters. The only bit that works is the ... THAT scene... and it only works because of the shit that has happened to that character in the prior few scenes. After ...  THAT scene... she goes back to being totally idiotic again.

Like I said, the writing in this is some of the worst I've seen. It's super-cool that they managed to weave such a neat jesus / greek myth parallel into the movie and gave a potential source for those myths to have sprung from, but that's supposed to be extra-added bonus content to the main course, which should have been some story about characters in a situation. There's a ton of different things you could do with the basic setup of "humans find cave paintings pointing them to some distant star system, so they go there". You could have made it any number of movies, but you teased me a hard sci-fi horror / thriller, and you gave me a greek myth as painted by Pablo Picasso.