Re: Release, Record: 11/9

...do you mean Sat the 9th? Or did I miss it today?

ZangrethorDigital.ca

552

Re: Release, Record: 11/9

Let's assume it's Saturday, and if the kids don't show we'll run our own really awful commentary.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Release, Record: 11/9

Dammit
i have a wedding to go to that day

Protection and power are overrated. I think you are very wise to choose happiness and love. -Uncle Iroh

Thumbs up Thumbs down

554

Re: Release, Record: 11/9

MadBadCoyote wrote:

Dammit
i have a wedding to go to that day

Skip it; statistically both parties will have another go in a few years anyway.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Release, Record: 11/9

im in for these.  gonna have hangover but it'll be worth it.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Release, Record: 11/9

Could be an interesting double bill, for the Harry Potter fans. I'll probably be there regardless, weather permitting.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Release, Record: 11/9

Anyone seen this?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wizard_people_dear_readers


I set up a screening in college then couldn't make it - been meaning to revisit it since.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Release, Record: 11/9

Hurray for Harry! Sort of....

I'm of two minds about the Potter films. I never had any interest in the books, but I've mostly enjoyed the movies, but not as much as I'd like. After the first one, I thought, 'Cool! So Harry is just starting to learn magic and will grow into a kick-ass wizard in the next couple of films!"

Then the second film came out, and it was still set in the school, and Harry didn't really do any magic, but he did wield a sword. And I thought, 'Okay, so he'll start whippin' out spells next time and start exploring the wizarding world."

And then the third one came out, and it was STILL set in the school. And the whole plot CLIMAXES with Harry casting ONE spell while Hermione runs around accomplishing all kinds of secret shit. And I was like, "Okay, really? This is the great Harry Potter that everyone talks about like he's the MESSIAH?"

Now we're SEVEN movies in, and it's STILL Sweet Valley High with wands that shoot phaser blasts. About all the magic Harry can accomplish is knocking people down. And he still doesn't know SHIT compared to JK Rowling—I mean "Hermione".

But I've long since settled into enjoying the films as a bit of murky fluff.

Warning: I'm probably rewriting this post as you read it.

Zarban's House of Commentaries

Re: Release, Record: 11/9

You'll enjoy this last one, then, the entire movie is gonna be errbody blowing the school to shit.

Teague Chrystie

I have a tendency to fix your typos.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Release, Record: 11/9

Zarban wrote:

Hurray for Harry! Sort of....

I'm of two minds about the Potter films. I never had any interest in the books, but I've mostly enjoyed the movies, but not as much as I'd like. After the first one, I thought, 'Cool! So Harry is just starting to learn magic and will grow into a kick-ass wizard in the next couple of films!"

Then the second film came out, and it was still set in the school, and Harry didn't really do any magic, but he did wield a sword. And I thought, 'Okay, so he'll start whippin' out spells next time and start exploring the wizarding world."

And then the third one came out, and it was STILL set in the school. And the whole plot CLIMAXES with Harry casting ONE spell while Hermione runs around accomplishing all kinds of secret shit. And I was like, "Okay, really? This is the great Harry Potter that everyone talks about like he's the MESSIAH?"

Now we're SEVEN movies in, and it's STILL Sweet Valley High with wands that shoot phaser blasts. About all the magic Harry can accomplish is knocking people down. And he still doesn't know SHIT compared to JK Rowling—I mean "Hermione".

But I've long since settled into enjoying the films as a bit of murky fluff.

I'd say you missed a fair amount of the point of Harry Potter, though that's no surprise since you've just watched the movies. I recommend reading the books, but you aint gonna!

Imagination will often carry us to worlds that never were. But without it we go nowhere. - Carl Sagan

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Release, Record: 11/9

FixedR6 wrote:

N.b. Non Australian readers may be puzzled by Maggot1300's cordial reply in Strine. Wukkas > no wuckin' furries > no fuckin' worries.

This is why we can't have nice words.

Zarban: You should check out the books. One of the central themes, which isn't really covered in the films, is that destiny is kind of bullshit, and the only thing that makes Harry "special" is that everyone has decided he is, beginning with Voldemort. It's actually mentioned that the prophecy in Order of the Phoenix could have applied to Harry or, of all people, Neville Longbottom. It's almost completely arbitrary that he decided it meant Harry and tried to kill him, and a TOTAL fluke that he failed. Everyone is talking about Harry like he's the Messiah -- but they've completely misread the situation.

Point is, it's a "greatness thrust upon him" type situation, with everyone just kind of expecting him to show up and save them and not realizing they should probably explain how. Harry spends the series becoming the hero everyone believes he is, which I think is far more interesting than if he just started that way.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Release, Record: 11/9

redxavier wrote:

I'd say you missed a fair amount of the point of Harry Potter

It's about some teen wizards who repeatedly use almost no magic to discover the dark secret of a succession of Defense Against the Dark Arts teachers. And then they go camping for a whole movie. Right? smile

Dorkman wrote:

Harry spends the series becoming the hero everyone believes he is, which I think is far more interesting than if he just started that way.

Movie SEVEN: Hermione has made all the preparations. Hermione leads their escapes and picks their locations. Hermione knows how to make their camp undetectable. Hermione explains the plot to Harry. Hermione makes the disguise potion. Hermione saves Ron's arm. Hermione disguises Harry from the snatchers.

Harry... has to be saved from drowning after diving into a frozen pond alone to retrieve a sword that appeared to him without his doing anything.

That Hermione is gonna make a hell of a wizard some day. Harry? Not so much.

Last edited by Zarban (2011-07-08 18:55:03)

Warning: I'm probably rewriting this post as you read it.

Zarban's House of Commentaries

Re: Release, Record: 11/9

Just because she's read more books than Harry doesn't make her better at magic. She says as much in Movie 1. She may be a quick thinker, which is fine, but I don't see her completing the mission without Harry.

"The Doctor is Submarining through our brains." --Teague

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Release, Record: 11/9

Well, that's another recurring point in the story, which is that Harry can't do this alone, and one of the things that makes him the thematic foil to the villain is that he sees and appreciates and encourages the strengths of those around him, whereas the villain wants to be the mostest and bestest all by himself.

Things would probably be much easier for everyone if Hermione could just face Voldemort herself and be done with it. Harry's not especially smart or talented, and he knows that. But she's not the hero, for better or worse; she's one of Harry's mentor characters. She's there to help him do what he, and only he, has ultimately gotta do.

P.S. Trying to type "Zarban" on my phone, autocorrect keeps changing it to "Zar an." It simply will not tolerate the B. I don't know.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Release, Record: 11/9

I'm going to stop now because the idea that Michael is engaged in a Harry Potter debate via his phone makes me sad.

Again, I LIKE the movies. I just wish Harry weren't constantly having things explained to him by Hermione and used magic more that wasn't just knocking people down.

Last edited by Zarban (2011-07-08 22:11:29)

Warning: I'm probably rewriting this post as you read it.

Zarban's House of Commentaries

Re: Release, Record: 11/9

HARRY POTTER IS SERIOUS BUSINESS ZAR AN

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Release, Record: 11/9

Dorkman wrote:

HARRY POTTER IS SERIOUS BUSINESS ZAR AN

Sometimes I wish I could ReTweet forum posts.

Posted from my iPad
http://trek.fm

Thumbs up Thumbs down

568

Re: Release, Record: 11/9

Seconded.  Dorkman wins the page.

Re: Release, Record: 11/9

Thirded.


And slightly more on topic. love the books, loathe most of the movies.

ZangrethorDigital.ca

Re: Release, Record: 11/9

Dorkman wrote:
FixedR6 wrote:

N.b. Non Australian readers may be puzzled by Maggot1300's cordial reply in Strine. Wukkas > no wuckin' furries > no fuckin' worries.

This is why we can't have nice words.

now im confused... what's wrong with wukkas??  its a grouse saying wink

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Release, Record: 11/9

**Possible (semantic) Spoiler warning for the movies and books, just in case**

HP has loads of depth present within the books, so much that encyclopedic ones have been written by many just to explain parts of said depth. The books, in those cases (both the canon and...extracurricular ones) have the ability to flesh that out with no real worry as to length. *eyes Book 5/OotP somewhat fondly* This:

Zarban wrote:

I just wish Harry weren't constantly having things explained to him by Hermione and used magic more that wasn't just knocking people down.

is a near direct result of Kloves having the task of compacting most of those layers of depth into an incredibly limited space while ALSO having the responsibility of communicating them to people who have not read/listened to the books and all of the backstory in detail. Hermione's (and several others') explaining has plenty of wiggle room in JKR's arena, but much less so in the movies. If I recall correctly, Emma is given other characters' lines/perspectives sometimes to serve that purpose.

The "knocking-down magic" stems from the book series being (at least at first) geared toward children (Now, that's most likely just one aspect of it, but.). Harry doesn't use anything stronger than Expelliarmus and Stupefy as his signatures because, as far as we see in the majority of the books, that's the most he was taught. Expelliarmus in Lockhart's Dueling Club - courtesy of Snape, where it blasted Lockhart pretty far off - and Stupefy because it was a submissive maneuver used (and the first one he's seen and heard the incantation to) in the Quidditch World Cup aftermath. Since those were the first offensive spells he was exposed to, they become his bread-and-butter for offense pretty much until he splits off from Hogwarts in DH. Then the more...complicated spells he learns after that are either from battle observation, or field necessity and Hermione/Ron/Other Significant Person using them with the incantations audible or shown to him (after which point, he is able to put them to use himself).

As for the rest of it, Harry's been put on a pedestal by the rest of the Wizarding World, who idolize him for something he has no idea how he accomplished or how to give a repeat performance, as it were. This gives him gigantic expectations to fulfill. Dumbles' reluctance to train him due to the man's (understandable) emotional attachment to preserving Harry's innocence provides severe setbacks to this. As a result, Harry needs a complex support system to fill in the gaps. Yet, the wider World sees nothing of that, they only get that "Ooh, he defeated the evil dictator before, so he MUST know how to do it again!" - with the cocktail of yellow journalism and a press monopoly thrown in to skew public opinion. As the series moves forward, he gleans the knowledge from his support system to finally do his task in the end like Mike said, but he would never have gotten that far without his friends and haphazard experiences each year filling in the gap left by Dumbledore's too-little-too-late training.

Dorkman wrote:

HARRY POTTER IS SERIOUS BUSINESS ZAR AN

Trufax. *nods* smile

572

Re: Release, Record: 11/9

Quick question (then I'll scroll up to see if it's been answered already): which versions of HP1+2 are you doing, cos I've just spied some extended versions.

btw: we don't need a twitter account to listen, right ?!

Last edited by Fido (2011-07-09 15:09:07)

Jason doesn't teleport.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Release, Record: 11/9

No Twitter account needed, Fido.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Release, Record: 11/9

Harry Potter is that film series that everyone on the planet has seen but I haven't bothered. The early films looked OK in the trailers...  for kid's movies. By the fourth or fifth one they started getting really dark and action-oriented, and looked more interesting to me, but I figured I'd have to watch the previous three or four flicks to figure out what the hell was going on, so I just never did.

The last one's coming out, tho, and I have all of them on bluray, so I may as well watch them all now.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

575

Re: Release, Record: 11/9

Jimmy B wrote:

No Twitter account needed, Fido.

merci bocu smile

Jason doesn't teleport.

Thumbs up Thumbs down