*gives switch some karma*
thanks to the three people who gave me karma!
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by switch
*gives switch some karma*
thanks to the three people who gave me karma!
question: how come I have no karma?
alrighty then!
here's my list
1: Unforgiven (You guys need to do one western before you hit LOTR)
2: Close Encounters of the Third Kind (Just want to hear everyone's thoughts on probably Speilberg's best flick)
3: Cowboys vs. Aliens (Trey said that CVA had everything wrong going on in that movie, You guys tend to do the better comm when you do a movie like this or Surrogates.)
4: The Dark Knight (You must talk about the awful bat-voice)
5: Who Framed Roger Rabbit (I think you guys have only done one Zemekis Flick)
6: Batman Returns (Trey's stories are entertaining)
I should have been clearer with my question. I wasn't asking about your reasoning fro going pc over mac so much as desktop vs. laptop at home...
thanks guys! Teague, what's your reasoning behind going for a desktop PC? I'm curious about Brian and Eddie's answer since the two of them edit shows and stuff.
I'd love to hear Trey and Eddies take on Sergio Leone and his spaghetti westerns!
Just thought I'd ask outta curiosity. Some of the people on tis here forum actually work in the industry and I was wondering which you do your work on. I use a desktop at the office for editing myself. I am wondering though if laptops are able to do any heavy lifting at all now... I can see a day when laptops will be the big workhorse machines.
I am curious partly because the mac pro may only get one more upgrade and then will go EOL. I'm not sure on that, but that's the interwebs for ya. Plus, desktop workstations are friggin expensive! 2500 bucks just for an entry-level mac pro?! Now granted, I purchased one in 2008, but still... And the PC side isn't much cheaper. So the question is, are laptops capable of doing the heavy stuff in regards to CGI and high-end editorial?
I'd like to throw the Outlaw Josey Wales in there. Ya'll haven't done a western yet, and Clint Eastwood is a must if you cover those movies! I know Trey has suggested Unforgiven in the past. Dude what are you waiting for?
Joe wrote:I'm still getting my degree, Switch how much overlap with film does yours have?
The degree program wasn't really centered around film specifically. We learned the same basic process of pre-production, production,and post. Which in my opinion, if you don't have that basic knowledge going in, you really don't have even a little drive for this in you. I would say the program I went to had very little overlap with film. We did cover the basics of shooting and cutting. My professor started in new back when they still used film for some things, so he would tell me some thnigs about film, since he knew that was what I was after.
In reality, the degree is more of a back-up plan. It generally gets my foot in the door... so to speak.
fun fact: one of the directors behind 24, Jon Casser i beleive, said that he started as a news cameraman. I can't find the source, but i do remember him saying something akin to that.
i have a broadcasting degree. Not the journalism side if that's what you mean... But most of my classes centered around news and news-related production...
After looking into things further, I'm going to partially correct my pervious statement. Budgets are important to the networks, at least to a degree. It appears that the networks use a shows budget as a way of determining whether or not a show stays on the air in relation to the amount of revenue the network makes off of advertisers during said shows airtime (well, duh, that's sorta a no-brainer; [switch you idiot!]). That's a mouthful, and not very clear. allow me to illustrate: Let's use terra nova as our example since it seems to be the most talked about show on this sight in terms of it being "the worst junk on tv".
According to wikipedia, Terra Nova has an average budget of around 4 million per episode*. That would mean that the network would need to make at least 4 million from advertisers during the shows 1 hour time slot. That's around 4 breaks during the 1 hour slot yes? say four spots per break and that's roughly $250,000 per spot. I'd want more than six million people seeing my spot if I have to shell out 250 grand to fox to show the spot during Terra Nova!
Trey wrote:It still adds up to what you said - if you want to make a show for a more niche audience, work in cable. You'll have less money to play with, but a better chance at staying on the air.
This is what doesn't make much sense to me. Is Terra Nova really that much more expensive to produce than Game of Thrones? Is Playboy Club more expensive than Walking Dead?
And if so, why don't the networks just slash budgets across the board, since it's obviously a simple thing to produce quality shows on a budget only supported by a couple million people.
the budget isn't as important to the networks as the ratings. remember, the neilsen ratings determine how much advertisers have to pay to air their spots during breaks. The advertisers want as many people as possible to see their ads so they will pay up the nose to put their ad in a show that has say 12 million viewers. Tera nova is in trouble becuase not enough people are watching it. And in turn not enough people will be watching that budweiser ad that plays during the third break. Shows get cancelled because the network can't charge the advertisers as much money for that tv real estate.
I'm sure the shows budget factors in there somewhere... Movies tend to make a bigger deal about budget than tv maybe? I know that makes no sense, but hardly anything does in tv land.
Seth, did you do work on Covert Affairs? I was flipping through the channels the other day and caught the show in one of those car scenes you were talking about during one of the intermissions. I believe it was the one where you all talked about bad effects jobs or something along those lines. I ask because in the shots I saw, the background outside the car was in perfect focus as was the foreground inside the car.
I share the same sentiment. Critics have been railing about the death of desktop PCs for so long that it's hard to take any of this too seriously.
actually, the sales data that I looked at here: http://macpro.macrumors.com/ shows a decline in sales of mac pro desktops. The reason behind the decline could be any number of things. The article seems to suggest that Apple sees it as "people don't want to buy mac pros anymore because they don't need them." I don't really think so. I think the reason mac pro sales have declined is because 1. people are waiting for the upgrade 2. The mac pro they picked up 2 to 3 years ago still does the job 3. mac pros are fucking expensive. Again, there could be other reasons why we see those figures.
Heard this from a work buddy of mine who's in charge of IT here. I've read rumors like this since maybe two years ago. Just as a thought experiment, what would this mean to those in our respective industries. Why do we need Desktop PCs or workstations for our work and what would we need to fill the void if this does happen?
My buddy says that manufacturers are going to focus on Tablets and Laptops. I'm a bit skeptical about rumors like these... I don't think we need another curveball thrown at us after what happened with FCPX.
do you have any screen capture software? maybe you could play the video on your comp while recording it to a suitable format at the same time. Or something like that... If all else fails at least...
any i/o connections on these cameras? Have you tried playing the footage back in VLC?
yes, I did miss the link while it was up. Only because I was not aware of it while it was up. I figured it would be available this week or next though...
I can't watch them. says the video is set to private. But I like what you did with the Halp video. That was sweet.
That actually would be a fun writing exercise for me! I'm gonna try my hand at Terra Blanca!
Is that okay with you Michael? Just for the fun of it, plus, I haven't written anything really involved in awhile...
I'd keep the geekza episode. you're only going to have one episode where trey reacts to a movie he's never seen when the title of said movie is Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull. Besides, it was a good episode. That alone makes it worth keeping
add to the whole editing discussion, the role of psychology in crafting the story during editing. Basically, a general idea of the process an editor goes through in choosing which shots to put together to create a certain effect in an audience. Whether that effect is emotional or what not. Make sense?
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by switch
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.
Currently installed 9 official extensions. Copyright © 2003–2009 PunBB.