I'd volunteer, but I've already enrolled for VFX shots and stills and I want to see these done before committing to anything else. I too know what happens when I volunteer to do things (so does Writhyn).
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by Saniss
I'd volunteer, but I've already enrolled for VFX shots and stills and I want to see these done before committing to anything else. I too know what happens when I volunteer to do things (so does Writhyn).
The more I learn about the world of state secrets, the more I'm made queasy by my previous admiration of Edward Snowden. I still think he's a very intelligent guy and a talented speaker, but... yeah, hard no.
Sidetracking here: care to elaborate? I know next to nothing about all this, my only association with Snowden is "Hackerish dude hailed as a superhero for David-vs-Goliathing against governments".
Thank you, Marty. The community will remember your sacrifice.
I can't wait for this. Not usually a big fan of Franco/Rogers stuff, but this one should be great. Solid material to work with, the whole The Room phenomenon is just so intruiguing. Franco is barely recognizable as Wiseau.
...on the Noah DiF about watering (heh) down...
This is it. This is the pun of all puns.
Everyone disable your accounts. It's over.
(not participating; I just wanted to drop this)
The New-Yorker: I Watched “Die Hard” for the First Time
Interesting review, but ultimately a view of the film I strongly disagree with.
How does the elevator shaft scene make McClane superheroic? He almost dies here, and almost purely by chance manages to get a grip on a vent opening. The film makes a point of having McClane be resourceful, but human. He doesn't have a "spare, elemental power that disperses ludicrously when the police arrive". He gets things done while he can, but ends up out of his depth. Jeez, watch Die Hard 4 and you'll see a ridicously superheroic McClane.
I don't really like the second part about the pop-cultural references either. The author makes it sound like a completely commercial move and the product of a global wave of nostalgia. What if pop-cultural references are simply a way for the writers to ground their character in the real world? Make them a little bit less an entity of fiction and fantasy, but someone you can relate to more easily? The part about a common nostalgia for the fifties in the wake of the sixties is interesting, but I don't see how it applies to Die Hard. I don't like the underlying feeling of exploitation.
Last thing- the idea of a culture of violence and of violence as redemption. Die Hard is a violent film, there's no denying that. The way for the hero to move things forwards is to kill. But:
...it is only by means of his heroic effort to fight the terrorists that McClane saves his marriage, just as Al, through violence, saves his police-hood—in effect, his manhood.
I completely disagree. Violence is a side-effect arising from context. McClane doesn't save his marriage by shooting up bad guys. He saves it by coming incredibly close to death, which makes him reflect on his life and realize things. The bathroom scene, his lowest point - it's his moment of resolution. You don't see Holly hanging on to him like the original Star Wars poster, the damsel in distress who's looking up to the hero who just butchered a bunch of german thugs. They have a moment of crisis, fearing for their lives. Anybody will reflect on their life and put aside petty arguments in such moments, at least for a while. McClane and Holly are simply happy to be alive, and get a chance to work things out in a different state of mind from that moment on.
Al doesn't redeem himself by killing Kraut Jesus - again, context. He surpasses a fear, something that had been holding him back for years. It's a matter of self-confidence. Anyone here who has never experienced this? Didn't think so.
Anyway, thought I'd write these few words because this review challenged my view of Die Hard as a flawless and honest movie, but in the end, it remains unchanged and I think its author has a very biased look on it.
Thoughts?
...and sheer chutzpah.
Dear diary,
Today I learned a new word.
Know your guitar tunings, kids.
Teague: in unrelated news, I just came up with a handy mnemonic device for remembering guitar tuning.
Teague: I mean... I myself don't benefit from it, because I already know standard tuning. but.
Teague: the strings are tuned to EADGBE.
Teague: usually the mnemonic you hear is something like "eddie ate dynamite, good bye eddie" or something. no sir.
Teague: I nominate "eat a dick, get bent, etc."
Writhyn: Well obviously the first one doesn't work because Eddie can damn well eat dynamite and be fine.
Teague: true fact.
Regan: To throw in a topical one... Europeans All Despise Great Britain's Exit.
Teague: hahaha.
I am, thanks to Zach Braff.
The Fleet Foxes are hard to define, because I think they're absolutely unique. You could say they're folk music, but really, they're doing their own thing. They're a Seattle band that comes and goes depending on what they feel like doing. They hadn't released anything since 2011, and got back together for a new release that got out only a few weeks ago.
My girlfriend introduced me to them a few months ago and they've quickly become a major influence for me and what defines me in music. There's a purity and intensity in the emotions they communicate through their vocal harmonies and instrumental work that I've never seen anywhere else. Robin Pecknold's (founding member, lead singer and sole writer) voice is absolutely incredible. He's a very inspiring guy. Socially anxious, he has a world of his own and fully expresses himself through his music. Starting live performances was very hard for him, but he does it 150%. We're seeing them next november and it hurts to wait until then.
Mykonos is probably my favourite, because when the second part kicks in, followed by the powerful "You go wherever you go today", it pretty much makes my heart escape my body and start a life of its own.
Same thing with the instrumental Heard Them Stirring which gives me visions of... mystical mountains. I don't know. It speaks to me.
And a last one, because White Winter Hymnal is probably their most famous.
If nothing else, if you're a sucker for incredible vocal harmonies like I am, you absolutely need to listen to everything they do. They're on Spotify.
PS: Shut up Martin.
Turns out there's a simple online tool to reverse lines in a text.
This week, Teague struggles with an existential mathematics crisis.
Teague: anybody know a good method of deriving an answer like "-6" to describe a difference between two numbers?
Teague: if the first number is 6, and the second number is 0, I want a mathematical operation to arrive at "-6," indicating the distance and direction to travel away from the second number to arrive at the first.
Teague: not quite like modulo; modulo's the shit, but I don't know how to rig it to do this.
Teague: I'll always be comparing two numbers, I'll always want to know what additive/subtractive operation I would need to do to the second number to arrive back at the first.
Teague: first number: 7. second number: 4. answer would be +3, because to make the second number into the first number I'd need to add 3.
Teague: any ideas?
Teague: huh. holden wins.
Teague: the answer is very simple, and it makes me feel like a total idiot. I mean, I do feel kind of vindicated, because I had the good sense to suspect there'd be an answer. that's something, right?
Teague: anyway. no. yeah, you just do (second number - first number) * -1.
Teague: (Y - X) * -1
Teague: X = 5, Y = 2; answer I'd want would be +3. run through, we get +3.
Teague: X = 2, Y = 5; answer I'd want would be -3. run through, we get -3.
Teague: actually. ... ... ...
Teague: ...
Teague: ...
Teague: ...
Teague: you could also just do X - Y.
Teague: *sees self out in complete shame*
Yeah, just ask them for the Black Lodge starter pack.
(a rumor says your your room might disappear for the next 25 years, but I wouldn't pay it much credit)
These microfigures are adorable.
DAMMIT I WANT THIS
We discussed this a while ago. If Teague is down for the modeling of the ship, then I'd be happy to create some sort of realistic environment rendering (such as a looping shot of the asteroid situation to use as video support for the episodes).
That dog deserves an oscar nomination.
I like this one. He seems likeable. I like him.
I'd love to hang out, even more so if you're a motion designer and storyboard artist, but since I'm 5,506 miles from you, this probably won't happen anytime soon. But we have a forum! Yay!
This made me angry, and I never even had any intention of watching this movie.
"What the fuck?"
Yes, strange premise. The trailer promises the weirdest film you've seen in a while: Paul Dano stranded on an island, finds a dead Daniel Radcliffe whom through bonding he can slowly bring back to life (and be multi-purpose: work as a fart-propelled speedboat, shoot stuff from his mouth, you name it).
Yes, it is that weird. But behind all this is a very deep film about embracing your weirdness and every part of you you're repressing in front of a judging society. It is a very intimate indie movie brilliantly acted, absurd, and dramatic. The directors said they wanted to make a movie where "the first fart makes you laugh and the last fart makes you cry." I think this nicely encapsulates what this movie is: much more than a 1h37 fart joke.
There are some exceptions...
...Game of Thrones...
Game of Thrones was a groundbreaker but it's very quickly become a typical example of what you're describing: great production value, infinite dullness. Plot and character consistency may not be amongst its problems, but it's consistently not a very good adaptation.
I see Game of Thrones as a catalyst for bigger TV productions, but as you've pointed out, budget isn't quality. Hell, if there's one that could be considered an actual groundbreaker, it's Twin Peaks, and I'm pretty sure it didn't have much to work with. Turns out author-driven shows tend to be more faithful and expressive than studio-driven shows. Ring a bell?
That is entirely possible. It's a friend of a friend who works there. Some data exactitude might have been lost along the way.
(I also happen to know the gal who made the alien's drool simulations)
I will not be fooled twice. I haven't forgotten Prometheus, Ridley. And this trailer is promising the same thing: incredible visuals, lame-ass script. This one doesn't even seem to try doing anything new. "Let's come to this remote planet, find a weird old wreckage, find weird stuff, then out pops an alien, or maybe several, and we're screwed, lol".
Cool insider VFX fact, though : there was a daily at one of the studios working on this flick that was dedicated to... the alien's dick. Yes, the alien has a winkle. And the daily was pretty much three renderings of the dick in different sizes, to decide which one to keep.
I'll take Snickers over Mars any day.
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by Saniss
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.
Currently installed 9 official extensions. Copyright © 2003–2009 PunBB.