301

(9 replies, posted in Off Topic)

302

(262 replies, posted in Episodes)

I'm likely alone on this, but I think Rises is the best of the trilogy. For some reason that I've never quite been able to articulate, I found BB to have an underwhelming third act. The action on the train seems off and the plot seems a bit too implausible. Dark Knight seemed a little too self-indulgent and it suffers from being an obvious middle film (the ending isn't that great).

Come to think of it, I don't think any of the Batman films are that great.

303

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Before Gravity at the IMAX I had a rare (for me) opportunity to watch this trailer in 3d and it looked awful. Really gimmicky 3D and the fast action bits were very disorientating and indistinguishable.

Remember those holograms that would occasionally get put on the front of a VHS tape or toy package? You would look at them one way and a part of the image would show, changing the angle show another part. It reminded of that, a completely artificial representation of 3D. The dwarves stand on a cliff rock like they're on a part of the screen that is a pop-up book.

Needless to say, I'll be going to the 2D normalovision showing again, and hoping that someone, somewhere managed to reign in PJ's taste for the excessive.

305

(44 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I believe the Despecialised Editions are the best currently out there, and I would highly recommend them to most people (especially over the awful official versions that LFL put out a few years back as an 'extra').

Regarding the special, I could only bare to watch the first few minutes before running for the hills. One might think that the prequels are the worst thing to happen to Star Wars but... the Holiday Special really is that bad.

307

(15 replies, posted in Episodes)

I agree, the first one is still the best. It wasn't just Tom Cruise being an invincible superhero, it had the best story, one of the most often referenced scenes (hanging from ceiling), and had an interesting bunch of characters (the original team, then the new team) and antagonists.

The trailer for II was amazing, but the film itself is a little indulgent (at one point it becomes a montage of Cruise taking out hapless henchmen guarding tunnels) and suffers because the story just isn't that great. There's a few great moments though.

I don't really remember anything from III, other than it again recycles the traitor aspect (this organisation is worst than the Los Angeles CTU!) and has Seymour Hoffman playing a scary man. Quite forgettable.


I confess to being surprised at how well received this one was with the crew. Its major flaw is the non-entity that is the antagonist, who's barely in it and doesn't really seem to do anything. So I remember it feeling very much a vehicle for Tom Cruise to do cool shit rather than a story about something (especially compared to the first, with its NOC list). Even the disavowed angle is weak, since it's not like he's a fugitive or stuck in captivity (and they still get nice toys).

308

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

310

(45 replies, posted in Movie Stuff)

Re: it opening in China.

I'd put money down that someone deliberately changed the cause of the Kessler effect in the movie as a strike on a satellite by a Chinese missile (as happened in real life) to a Russian missile, just so that the movie was more consumable in that massive market.
(And also that their Tiangong station is actually up there and completed, though the film does takes place in a near future when the shuttles are still active beyond STS-135.)

Anyhow, nice review Dorkman.

311

(349 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Probably because of the insane wait between books?

312

(473 replies, posted in Episodes)

I still can't entirely believe it's happening....

What a steal! I should probably track this down as I was waiting for this edition and I loved the extras overload on the LOTR discs.

314

(6 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I know nothing about Kaufman, but just reading that article has me interested. What an accomplishment that would be? Only... I can't really imagine it being a 'prank' (almost 30 years is little too long for it to have much relevance). The article mentions that his father had recently died, was there some conflict between them that would have motivated him to stay hidden all this time?

On another note, and speaking as someone who has two brothers, I'm struggling to imagine how I would feel not really knowing for certain whether one of them was alive or dead, and having someone come up to me claiming that my brother is actually alive, after almost 30 years, is either in really poor taste or potentially a source of becoming actually quite hurt - but then, maybe the relationship between the brothers here was always a weird one.

315

(649 replies, posted in Off Topic)

316

(649 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Depending on the time, I'd love to join this one. From X-Wing to Force Unleashed smile

That was the way I saw it as well.

So... perfECT!

Well, I've only seen it the once and didn't notice anything especially egregrious about that scene. I thought Bulloch's performance was pretty great throughout, it seemed like a real, genuine character - her voice would break a little when she raised it and the range of emotions that played out on her face on her journey home and in her eyes was exemplary.

Do you really mean it was awful, or was it actually just less awesome than the rest of the movie?

319

(449 replies, posted in Off Topic)

320

(373 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Wait, back up a bit, what is the archeological evidence you speak of? Just that you've said that there is evidence quite a few times so far, and yet I'm not sure that you've actually ever pointed towards it or mentioned the specifics.

Just saw it today and wow, is this the best movie of all time ever in the history of the universe or what?

Sure you can quibble and nitpick (I did on a couple of things) but what a spectacular, beautiful, tense movie. I literally cannot remember the last time I was so enthralled by a story and in sheer awe of what I was seeing. That I saw it at the IMAX in 3D was the cherry on the proverbial icing.

Loved all the details and most of all how it trusted the audience to understand what was going on. There seemed very little pandering to idiots. I would bet that in any other movie, Stone would have commented to herself on how she was feeling the effects of gravity as she lay on that beach trying to get up.

To borrow a phrase; Gravity is a perfect movie and if you don't agree then you're Hitler.

322

(373 replies, posted in Off Topic)

323

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

324

(373 replies, posted in Off Topic)

What I find fascinating was that Christianity sprung from the belief that Jesus was the promised Messiah, and yet the people that came up with the prophecy and were waiting for the messiah don't believe he was the messiah and still don't. I always thought this was somewhat of a red flag.

And I love how the guys that came up with this monotheistic, Abrahamic god lark were initially polytheists (like most early civilisations), which is completely at odds with the biblical story.

325

(373 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Makes you wonder doesn't it? The level of dissonance that would require (although hell forms the key incentive for believing and converting others). I postulate the rather crazy idea that the majority don't really believe any of it. Or at least, the air of certainty is a smokescreen and like everybody else on this blue marble, believers are shit scared (perhaps more so).