Topic: Mission Impossible: Ghost Protocol

And here's the video we talk about right after the unpause point.

Teague Chrystie

I have a tendency to fix your typos.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Mission Impossible: Ghost Protocol

Timing an action sequence to music is normal - timing the prison breakout scene to source music was unusual.  That's the characters timing their actions as opposed to the filmmakers.  The only precedent I can think of is Hudson Hawk.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Mission Impossible: Ghost Protocol

this episode isn't working on your iTunes Feed can you fix it?

I'm Batman

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Mission Impossible: Ghost Protocol

It's fixed. Sorry about that.

"Most people don't even know what sysadmins do, but trust me, if they all took a lunch break at the same time they wouldn't make it to the deli before you ran out of bullets protecting your canned goods from roving bands of mutants."

-- http://stilldrinking.org/programming-sucks

Re: Mission Impossible: Ghost Protocol

It was in the itunes DIF feed, which is still working.

I write stories! With words!
http://www.asstr.org/~Invid_Fan/

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Mission Impossible: Ghost Protocol

I reckon the opening to Mission Impossible II (forget about the rest of the movie) is still up there with anything else in the series...

Check out the jump & slip at 1m:23s

not long to go now...

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Mission Impossible: Ghost Protocol

I had the misfortune of seeing Mission: Impossible 2 on my Birthday. What a self-indulgent mess that movie is. I'd put the rest of the films on about equal footing, in terms of quality. I do think Ghost Protocol is marginally better than the others, though. The action set pieces alone are fantastic, and this one doesn't have Ving Rhames in it (I preferred his more serious turn in the Dawn Of The Dead remake).

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Mission Impossible: Ghost Protocol

I will go on record as defending MI-2 to an extent. On a rewatch, it's got an hour of nothingness in the middle, and John Woo is held-back by the PG-13, but it's got a really memorable goofy personality and style (and a really awesome Hans Zimmer score). I still prefer MI-2 to MI-3, which may be more "competent", but is completely forgettable, and suffers from a lot of Abrams tropes I really dislike (the flashforward, stupid unexplained mcguffin, everyone crying all the time instead of actual character development, shaky camera-work).  MI-2 at least has the distinction of going completely for broke, between the car chase ballet, constant slo-motion, and the nutso motorcycle chase at the end. It's one of the worse Woo movies, but he's still one of the all time greats at staging a setpiece.

I'm surprised at all the bashing of the original Mission Impossible, as I think it's by far the best in the series. It takes a much grittier approach and feels more like a real hardcore spy movie, versus a dumb blockbuster. Ghost Protocol is good, but it has a basically non-existent villain, and everything after Dubai is really disappointing (MI-3 has a similar problem after the bridge sequence).

I will say, I really like that the series changes up directors and aesthetics with every movie, as it keeps it fresh each time out. MI-1 is super de-palma with all the extended suspense and paranoia. MI-2 is a hard-turn into a crazy melodramatic slo-motion bullet opera, MI-3 is basically a feature version of Alias, and Ghost Protocol is super bouncy and light almost adventure-comedy.

So your favorite will probably just end up being whichever one's aesthetic genre appeals to you the most.

Last edited by bullet3 (2013-09-17 23:55:07)

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Mission Impossible: Ghost Protocol

The main thing that stood out for me in MI-2 was the sheer balls it took to rip off Notorious.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Mission Impossible: Ghost Protocol

That remains actually one of my most wished for director's cuts. Allegedly, Woo's original cut of the film was 3.5 hours long and R-rated, the studio took it away from him, cut the action scenes way down, and chopped it into 2 hours and got that PG-13.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Mission Impossible: Ghost Protocol

I just finished listening to this, and for me this was a super fun episode to record.  There were three end of year mixtape highlights for me.

Eddie Doty

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Mission Impossible: Ghost Protocol

the run that ends with "...the amount of semen in the chest cavity..." would be my pick.

And then sharks.

Re: Mission Impossible: Ghost Protocol

I'm not sure where the tangent came from but I loved that Tip Toes came up in the conversation.  I saw a trailer for that movie when it was released and had to have it.  It's ridiculous but it's a movie I pass out on occasion because nobody has seen it.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Mission Impossible: Ghost Protocol

http://www.gametrailers.com/videos/doce … a-sequence

I think this was the episode where you guys talked about the awful video game scene in some TV show. I know it was a recent one. Anyway, this is it. Enjoy.

"The Doctor is Submarining through our brains." --Teague

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Mission Impossible: Ghost Protocol

My favorite in the series will always be the first one.  Better development of dramatic tension.  Better cinematography.  oh and Henry Czerny.

Bloggy:  Inf0verload

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Mission Impossible: Ghost Protocol

I agree, the first one is still the best. It wasn't just Tom Cruise being an invincible superhero, it had the best story, one of the most often referenced scenes (hanging from ceiling), and had an interesting bunch of characters (the original team, then the new team) and antagonists.

The trailer for II was amazing, but the film itself is a little indulgent (at one point it becomes a montage of Cruise taking out hapless henchmen guarding tunnels) and suffers because the story just isn't that great. There's a few great moments though.

I don't really remember anything from III, other than it again recycles the traitor aspect (this organisation is worst than the Los Angeles CTU!) and has Seymour Hoffman playing a scary man. Quite forgettable.


I confess to being surprised at how well received this one was with the crew. Its major flaw is the non-entity that is the antagonist, who's barely in it and doesn't really seem to do anything. So I remember it feeling very much a vehicle for Tom Cruise to do cool shit rather than a story about something (especially compared to the first, with its NOC list). Even the disavowed angle is weak, since it's not like he's a fugitive or stuck in captivity (and they still get nice toys).

Imagination will often carry us to worlds that never were. But without it we go nowhere. - Carl Sagan

Thumbs up Thumbs down