301

(36 replies, posted in Creations)

How bout that Seahawk copilot, huh? Oh yeah.

302

(111 replies, posted in Episodes)

I regret lots of things. Mostly the experiments. The horrible experiments.

303

(75 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I can haz chatroom?

304

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

Blueshifted. When it's coming toward you, it's a blueshift because the waves are getting shorter.

I could get behind Spider, any episode that shines a light on a little known but well deserving corner of the space program (which, admittedly, quite a few).

305

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

*Poof*

I'm sure we'll do Right Stuff eventually; don't know if we'll ever do From the Earth to the Moon, as much as I love it and as big of an influence as it's been, I don't know if I have twelve some hours of space talk in me (let alone anyone else), especially since the basis of most of what I know is from Earth to the Moon and the book it was based on, A Man on the Moon.

A couple choice episodes might be fun though, I'd love to do That's All There Is; it'd be great to introduce people to the coolness incarnate that is the crew of Apollo 12.

306

(51 replies, posted in Episodes)

DorkmanScott wrote:
Gregory Harbin wrote:

A studio didn't give Roland Emmerich money. Roland Emmerich made 2012 with his own production company, Centropolis.

Do you have a source for this, or is this just how you think film financing works?

I'd really like an answer to this question, actually.

Just read Chapter 7, where Harry shows Draco pictures of the Apollo program and explains to him the power of scientific progress.

I'm just going to go ahead and pretend that this is the actual Harry Potter, if that's cool with everyone.

I have never cared about Harry Potter and have only watched the films on the insistence of various lady friends (and that riff track thing with Teague and Hanel).

But I love this. I love this a lot.

I wish this was a billion dollar franchise spanning seven films over a decade.

EDIT: Three chapters in, love it love it love it.

309

(15 replies, posted in Episodes)

Zarban wrote:

Sculptor story is bullshit, by the way.

Oh?

310

(15 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Down In Front at the movies.

"Subscribe to that on iTunes."

311

(48 replies, posted in Episodes)

They're in the dick room. Seriously guys, it's crazy in there.

312

(36 replies, posted in Creations)

Teague and I are about to watch it the whole way through for the first time.

Weeee!

313

(24 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Zarban wrote:
Down in Front wrote:

Porn.

/this has been a serious suggestion

I got interviewed by an NPR producer researching the fan-made commentary scene to see what we kids were up to,

Inquiring minds want to know...


...did you plug us?

smile

314

(54 replies, posted in Episodes)

Gregory Harbin wrote:

If you read the thread, you'll see that nobody actually bothered to say that. And a quick Google search that I did found no one that actually recommended it, either.

Us recording a commentary and urging people to watch it doesn't qualify?

315

(54 replies, posted in Episodes)

I'm not sure what exactly you want us to say. It's a movie a guy made for seven something grand. It's an indie science fiction do-it-yourself film. The story is such and such and such and such (copy and paste from whatever website you prefer).

Would you like our thoughts on it as a movie and a story? Because we have that. In podcast form.

It's a notable film of modern cinema. One we feel deserves some attention. If you value our judgment in these areas, then check it out. If not, *shrug*

316

(54 replies, posted in Episodes)

Well, doing this was an experiment - going back to Trey's adage -trying to get you kids to check out something you might not have otherwise. Maybe nobody will, but that'd be a shame.

317

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

Jeffery Harrell wrote:

I like "Close Encounters" a lot because it's the anti-Spielberg film. I mean, think about it. Roy becomes so obsessed with the lights in the sky and his visions of Devil's Tower that be loses his family … and whoom. They're just gone from the story, man, never to be seen or heard from again.

I love the fact that a guy who's made a hell of a career exploring the theme of family and how it's the most important thing in life turned around and made a movie the theme of which can be summed up as "Disregard females, acquire aliens."

It is a remarkable anomaly. Every movie the man has made has "absent father" issues and yet Close Encounters has a father actively abandoning his family as a completely incidental and uncommented on aspect of the plot.

318

(313 replies, posted in Off Topic)

1. All conspiracy theories are actually just one big cover up to make sure the public never learns the truth, which is that the world isn't perfect and nobody's in charge.

319

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

I saw it at the New Bev not too long ago (no one ever comes to see old movies with me), but it was the extended cut or some such. I was amazed to see all these additional scenes from Truffuat's and the government's point of view that completely destroys the suspense of the gas mask scene and AND show the INSIDE of the spaceship at the end. Amazed I tell you, amazed.

320

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

Teague doesn't like Close Encounters.

321

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

No, no, it's Mike's idea. Too many cooks and all that.

322

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

DorkmanScott wrote:

Who's in?

Totally.

323

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

With regards to adapting stage works for the screen, Sydney Lumet talks about filming "12 Angry Men" in his book, "Making Movies" by using lenses, composition, staging, and so forth to tell the story.

Don't have it in front of me to quote, but well worth the read.

324

(1,019 replies, posted in Episodes)

Quite possibly.

325

(1,019 replies, posted in Episodes)

I think I have (though I might be confusing it with an older one). Never seen it though.