326

(16 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Lest someone rifle my bowels for mentioning McKee, I DO agree with his definition of what an act is - a major reversal.  Be it the character or situation, that's generally how I feel my way around the breaks.

But this is a really smart thread, and I don't want to ruin it with stupidity.  So E=MC[]ed.

327

(34 replies, posted in Episodes)

I don't know about UC Manhattan, but UC Chicago has some equally stupid drinking traditions.  I think on some primal level, people just think secret handshakes are super cool.

Even with the books I haven't seen a single Potter movie.  So this question probably wasn't designed for me.

329

(34 replies, posted in Episodes)

With respect to the opening comments you guys had, my theory for why Last Crusade is more satisfying is pretty simple.  It's a more traditional 3 act structure versus the serial/cliffhanger 5-7 acts of Raiders.  So it feels more cohesive and easily digestible.

330

(102 replies, posted in Off Topic)

The main problem with those movies, especially Daredevil and FF: Product Placement, is they're not telling good, human stories. 

Daredevil frustrates me to no end.  You have a lawyer who KNOWS he's right (a secondary power of his is essentially being a lie detector), and when he loses a case, it's a reminder of what a failure he is.  If a killer gets away, its all on him.  So then he dresses up, steps outside the legal system he swore to, and beats the shit out bad guys.

I've always seen Daredevil as someone who hates himself for his own inadequacy and failures - be it in the courtroom or his blindness or his father's death. 

The movie we got didn't come close to any of that.  It was a tonal mess, and everything felt tacked on in post production.  Not just scenes.  The whole movie seemed like an after thought.

331

(11 replies, posted in Off Topic)

This. Again. I will be buried in this.

http://img703.imageshack.us/img703/1705/dscn08431.jpg

332

(78 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Teague wrote:

the "your mom" joke has become easy.

Your mom has become easy.

333

(44 replies, posted in Episodes)

Confused Matthew is very confused.

334

(431 replies, posted in Off Topic)

It's easier to paste the insert from my authorized biography's cover.

High Praise for iJim:

"(iJim) is singular when it comes to good looks and charm. A synergy unmatched. It's Paul Walker meets Bill Clinton. I wish he were the leading man in my life."
-Audrey Hepburn

"Whoever said smart = geek never met iJim."
-Stephen William Hawking

"Such a sweetheart."
iJim's Parole Officer

"Not only is he a member, he is our most valued one."
Steve Hudson
President of Hair Club for Men

335

(47 replies, posted in Episodes)

Anyone have any thoughts on color temperature in this movie?  We're on the boarder of Cause Kubrick is a Genius film school reading, but there are numerous shots where he moves us through incandescent, fluorescent and daylight.  I'm almost 100% sure that they're different temps and not gels.

There are shots that, specifically for scenes moving in and out of the Colorado room, make me feel ill.  Intentional or not would you say?

336

(78 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Holden, I love the new design.  A lot.  It fills the browser space beautifully, and I second John's remarks on the bokeh.  And everything is more intuitive.

And thanks, guys.  Obviously if it wasn't for your quotes, I wouldn't have done it.  Just WAY too much stuff to shift through.  Hell, even WITH the quotes is was almost too much to shift through.

I used an HVX200 w/Redrock and an assortment of prime nikon lenses for most of the montage.  Everything else, the video-y looking stuff, is an HPX.   But I've decided I need a RED.  So now I have to choose one.

I also used a crane on a dolly for several shots, including the Stay Puft shot.  I also had a skate dolly, most notably for the Transformers shot.  Also a couple lowell light kits and just, you know, led flashlights.  It was all cut on FCP.

And Teague is, among his many other skills, a great editor.  He suggested a cool 60-70 seconds worth of cuts (which I resisted initially) that improved this thing by 400%.

337

(5 replies, posted in Off Topic)

BUT I'M A SYMPATHIZER!  Provided we're talking about getting corporations out of Congress and ending our effective plutocracy.  /Politics

Seriously though, some of those people couldn't even afford body wash.  Socialize deodorant, please.

338

(5 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I live in Chicago and a whole bunch of Occupy protests are happening on my block, so I've been grabbing some fantastic B-Roll of angry mobs and police on horses lined up in the middle of broadways and other really great stuff.  I figure that kind of thing could be useful for a zombie apocalypse short or something. 

My question, now that I have this awesome footage, is whether or not I can even use it without consent forms. 

Granted, they're all hippies and probably couldn't afford lawyers, but just in case...

339

(32 replies, posted in Episodes)

After Hours is, hands down, Marty's best.  I'm glad someone else feels the same.  Bringing Out the Dead is also criminally underrated.

And I love, with a burning passion, The Rock.  Please don't Doty me, Eddie.

340

(9 replies, posted in Creations)

I really dig Double Digits.  Like a mix of Gorillaz and The Doors.  If someone remade Apoc. Now, that would be the track for when Sheen loses it in his hotel room.

Nice.

341

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

Fixed makes a good point about The Fountain (I would have said UHF).  And that was a top 10 episode for me.

Eddie wrote:
Gregory Harbin wrote:
maul2 wrote:

Maybe it's just the film school in me, I've had to sit through more than one exciting lecture on the hazards of using illegal software for personal gain. That... or the horror stories from people who get caught for much much less heinous infringements (music, anyone?) and get raked over the coals.

Let me stop you right there. Film school?

Film school.

Show of hands, guys, of who thinks film school actually helps anyone make money.

Without school I would not have gotten my internship, without my internship my career would not have happened.
doty

Plus, in terms of fallback positions, there is no difference between a degree in film studies, lit, or sociology.  They all equally qualify you for a job managing a Target.  And even that's not the end of the road - one of my best friends majored in dance and she's in med school now.

So whatever.  Film studies make as much sense as anything else.

343

(30 replies, posted in Episodes)

Faldor wrote:

Its much calmer than the New York subway suggesting I "STAND CLEAR OF THE CLOSIN' DAWS!"

Maybe, but not standing clear of the closin doors is a good way to remove the head or destroy the brain.

Jasper Johns is obviously still alive.  For THAT particular study he ran the regression analysis on contemporary artists.  But he's designed dozens of studies, including dead artists.

Galenson decided to test the robustness of his conclusions about artists’ life cycles by looking at variables other than price. Art history textbooks presumably reflect the consensus among scholars about which works are important. So he and his research assistants gathered up textbooks and began tabulating the illustrations as a way of inferring importance. (The methodology is analogous to Google’s PageRank system: The more books that “linked” to a particular piece of art, the more important it was assumed to be.)

When Galenson’s team correlated the frequency of an image with the age at which the artist created it, the same two contrasting graphs reappeared. Some artists were represented by dozens of pieces created in their twenties and thirties but relatively few thereafter. For other artists, the reverse was true.

Bottom line, there is hope for old people.

That said, studies like these always remind me of how Steve Pinker (accurately) described Malcolm Gladwell - beware the minor genius who unwittingly demonstrates the hazards of statistical reasoning.

EDIT:  Not that I think Galenson's study is flawed.  In fact, if I could find a hole in any of his work that would be an instant PhD.  Just on matters of art in general I'm leery of MATLAB.  Math is witchcraft.

EDIT EDIT: In fact, I know some people who would love to punch holes in Galenson's work and face.  He once told the kid next to me in class that he'd be a competent ditch-digger.  And he took one girl's 30 page final, didn't write a single note, and simply taped a match to the last page.

EDIT EDIT EDIT: And he was one of the nice professors.  The average GPA in that department was 2.5.  Like it should be.  One of the more famous papers from the dept. was one bashing Harvard's grade inflation.  Walking the walk...

EDIT EDIT EDIT EDIT:  I'm just going to turn this post into my mirco blog.  Come back soon for updates.

EDIT EDIT EDIT EDIT EDIT:  I own Lethal Weapon 1,2, & 4, but not 3.  Is the quality differential so great as to exclude 3?  Dunno, but my free market has spoken.

EDIT:  My little sister is taking a human sexuality class.  Thankfully, what you learn in college isn't applicable in the real world.

EDIT: Spousal abuse is funny! http://blogs.houstonpress.com/hairballs … _sad_f.php

EDIT:  Remember they had to call the Ghostbusters cartoon the REAL Ghostbusters because of copyright?  Think that's why it's called Real Steel?  Is Shaq that litigious?

EDIT:  It's not even Christmas at Radio City but these Raisinettes are dancing in my mouth.

EDIT:  I wanted to visualize a fight between Ayn Rand and Marx, so I was going to throw their books in the dryer.  But Atlas Shrugged would probably win.  Not even the same weight class.  Can't have that.

EDIT: A great revenge gag would be to throw popcorn into a convertible when a lot of pigeons are around.

EDIT: Ebert gave the first Human Centipede 0 stars, and he has the option of choosing what to review... so why would he go see Human Centipede 2?  Did he genuinely think the franchise was capable of course correction?  Also, why am I reading Ebert?

EDIT: I know of a dude who has a PhD in astronomy and is now getting dual graduate degrees in landscape architecture and in regional planning.  I don't know what his master plan is, but I can't wait to find out.

EDIT: Where is my minority report!? http://news.cnet.com/8301-31921_3-20117 … detection/

EDIT: Patton Oswalt gets mentioned a lot, and today's commentary moved me to check him out.  Dorkman is right.  He's not very funny.  In fact, he's a lot like Dane Cook only with fewer adverbs, adjectives, and cocaine.  One of his better bits was the misuse of the time machine, and there's a lot of, "you saw that movie too!?" call and response.  Same shit when he says, "in a bathrobe watching Princess Bride."  People lost their shit when he mentioned that movie.  No punchline.  Anywhere.  Fuck you.

EDIT: If this excessive, self-indulgent miscarriage of forum post wasn't proof enough, let's solidify my mindlessness -  CNN ran a headline: "Transgendered vet describes 'pain'" and I totally thought it was going to be a story about a veterinarian.

One of my favorite professors did a lot of research on the idea of artistic creativity and output.  I thought maybe you guys would like to read an article Wired did with him a few years ago:

http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/14.07/genius.html

A good setup snippet:

Galenson collected data, ran the numbers, and drew conclusions. He selected 42 contemporary American artists and researched the auction prices for their works. Then, controlling for size, materials, and other variables, he plotted the relationship between each artist’s age and the value of his or her paintings. On the vertical axis, he put the price each painting fetched at auction; on the horizontal axis, he noted the age at which the artist created the work. When he tacked all 42 charts to his office wall, he saw two distinct shapes.

For some artists, the curve hit an early peak followed by a gradual decline. People in this group created their most valuable works in their youth – Andy Warhol at 33, Frank Stella at 24, Jasper Johns at 27. Nothing they made later ever reached those prices. For others, the curve was more of a steady rise with a peak near the end. Artists in this group produced their most valuable pieces later in their careers – Willem de Kooning at 43, Mark Rothko at 54, Robert Motherwell at 72. But their early work wasn’t worth much.

346

(5 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Trey - Very informative.  But lets say for argument's sake that Landis was found guilty - you don't think he'd deserve jail time?  I'm not saying 20-life.  But Michael Vick time... 18 months, say.

Zarban - Isn't California that state thats always on fire?

347

(5 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Wouldn't be the crux of any case, but I wouldn't call it immaterial - it shows a recklessness and a disregard for the rules when it comes to the kids' welfare (the reason the rules exist).  That Landis is a loose cannon.  And several people on set warned Landis of the dangers of that particular stunt, and even Landis said there is a chance the helo could be crashed by the stunt.

348

(5 replies, posted in Off Topic)

The jury didn't think he was liable, and while I haven't read anything more than a few articles, I'm not sure I agree.  Considering safety should always be the director's main concern during a major stunt sequence.  I understand that accidents happen, but he broke several rules to facilitate this accident - he brought in minors to work illegal hours, and didn't inform the parents of the explosives required for the scene.  That second fact ALONE makes him a major bastard.

Landis seems to blame the helicopter's design AND the pyro guy.

Anyway, thoughts?

The Third Man on DVD was such a muddy image.  I haven't checked out the blu ray yet, but it HAS to be better.  And Gone with the Wind and Wizard of OZ are gorgeous.  And even if they weren't, I'd rather see fly-away hairs and costume zippers over pixels the size of my hand when I'm using a projector.

I'm trying to listen to as many commentaries as I can this weekend.  I've identified three movies that are so special to me I refuse to listen to what anyone else has to say about them.

Fight Club, Seven, and for whatever reason, Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind.  I don't even think Spotless is that great, but it hit me viscerally when I first watched it.  I was surprised when I couldn't pull the trigger on that one.

The reserve is some mix of not being able to participate in the conversation, dismay at the reality of not being the only person to have insight on Fincher, and this: 

http://www.theonion.com/articles/i-appr … -th,16208/

I also hesitated for a long time on Ghostbusters.

Anyone else encounter this really weird roadblock?