351

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

https://www.showbizjunkies.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/the-other-side-of-the-win-poster.jpg

Damn.

Fucking revelatory in the context of the period—if this had been released in 1976 as Welles intended, it would have broken people's brains. The documentary/found-footage conceit is already like nothing else from that time, but throw in an editing style that's most accurately described as F for Fake on steroids and it becomes unreal. The film-within-a-film, even though it's designed to poke fun at the New Wave, is unbelievably pretty—for someone who insisted on shooting on black-and-white for the majority of his career, Welles is a master of color.

In terms of content, I want to take time (and rewatches) to digest, but it's far and away Welles' funniest movie. He's taking shots at everyone, including himself, and refuses to let up for nearly two hours. Huston is, of course, fantastic, but Bogdanovich is maybe even better, and the two characters' relationship is even more poignant if you're familiar with the relationship Bogdanovich and Welles shared.

Of course, we'll never truly know what Welles' definitive version of the film would have been, and the bits and pieces that remind us of this are a bit jarring—Bogdanovich had to rewrite the opening narration, as Welles never recorded it, and its casual mention of cell phone cameras is so fucking weird. But in a way that's the perfect capstone to the man's career—his filmography is a collection of ghosts, movies that were robbed of their definitive versions or made on shoestring budgets or simply thrown away. In any case, I'm comfortable with calling it one of my favorites of his, and I suspect my appreciation will only grow upon further viewings.

Got to fly out to San Francisco and see it on a theatre screen, which I'll be eternally grateful for. It just felt right (she said, the pretentious ass). Pairs very well with the bummer of a companion documentary They'll Love Me When I'm Dead, which is also on Netflix and examines all the rotten luck that prevented Welles from finishing the film while he was alive.

Thoughts tomorrow, but for now: Holy god those last ten minutes are some horrifying shit, Chrystie.

YESSSSS (required lc letters here)

Oh hey, I'm back, about streaming this time because Filmstruck is being shut down by Warner.

The FilmStruck indie, arthouse and classic film subscription-streaming service will shut down next month, Turner and Warner Bros. Digital Networks announced Friday.

The move appeared to be the latest by WarnerMedia, under AT&T’s ownership, to streamline operations by cutting niche-oriented business ventures. Two sources familiar with the decision said the plan to kill FilmStruck was made prior to AT&T’s closing the Time Warner deal; in any case, the strategy aligns with the new WarnerMedia blueprint to shift resources to mass-market entertainment services.

[. . .]

In a statement, Turner and WB Digital Networks said, “We’re incredibly proud of the creativity and innovations produced by the talented and dedicated teams who worked on FilmStruck over the past two years. While FilmStruck has a very loyal fanbase, it remains largely a niche service. We plan to take key learnings from FilmStruck to help shape future business decisions in the direct-to-consumer space and redirect this investment back into our collective portfolios.” [Emphasis mine.]

Our cultural heritage is being held hostage by people who will gladly let it fall by the wayside to save a few dollars.

The most frustrating thing about this is Netflix could take the budget for ONE SHOW out of the hundreds they produce and use it to expose so many classic movies to modern audiences, but they just don't give a damn. There's less than 20 movies on there from before 1980 at any given time, and meanwhile they're choking everyone's feeds with gallons and gallons of medicore–terrible content. I used to collect physical media just because I preferred the feel of it, but at this point I'm also doing so out of the knowledge that the arbiters of our artistic past all too often just don't give a shit about it.

355

(209 replies, posted in Creations)

Sad Max: Forte Road

356

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/3/39/A_Star_is_Born.png/220px-A_Star_is_Born.png

The meet-cute first act is sooo good, but after that it dives into a heap of cliches, trading in potential greatness for competence. Still, a lot to like here, especially in the performances—Sam Elliott's impact in just a few minutes of screentime should be enough to get him the supporting Oscar, and Cooper and Gaga are both excellent.

The songs are a pretty mixed bag—after months of hoping this wouldn't be the next La La Land, sigh—but Gaga's voice is a punch to the throat. If nothing else, take three minutes out of your day and listen to her performance of "La Vie en Rose"—it's her first number in the movie, and god damn.

Ashamed and Unfueled: The Teague Chrystie Story

Bringing this back from the grave because Disney is talking about rebooting the Pirates of the Caribbean franchise with the writers of Deadpool and Zombieland.

I am so fucking sick of this shit. Five more Harry Potter movies. Three MCU movies a year. A new installment of Star Wars every year from now til doomsday (and I like the sequels). An ugly, plastic live-action remake of every single animated Disney movie. A PG-13 cut of Deadpool 2 released the same year as the original film. The level of content cannibalism we've hit is just demoralizing. Nothing much original to add, since we've had this conversation countless times, but with Disney officially buying Fox, who were doing the most of any big studio to fund interesting/independent films, it's just gonna get worse and worse. They've paid lip service to the notion of continuing Fox Searchlight's work, but if Disney ever actually funds a movie like The Tree of Life or 12 Years a Slave I'll eat my hat.

359

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

https://samuelrookeblog.files.wordpress.com/2017/02/cta_1123_original.jpg?w=274&h=406

"orson welles has the biggest dick of them all. it's insaen" —Willow Catelyn Maclay

Seriously underrated this on my first watch a couple of years ago. Welles' performance as Falstaff is fucking unreal—he's great in a lot of other movies, but even his best performances tend to be "Orson Welles with [x] veneer." Not so here—he is Falstaff, the Platonic ideal of the character. And the central Battle of Shrewsbury remains breathtaking over fifty years later—the editorial feat of making less than 200 extras appear to be armies of thousands is just . . . God, what do you even say?

Also, I feel like this film is probably definitive evidence that no movie should be longer than two hours (I say as someone who loves quite a few three-hour movies). Orson Welles folded both parts of Henry IV and bits and pieces of three other plays into one two-hour movie and in doing so made one of the best Shakespeare films ever. Bad Times at the El Royale had to be 140 minutes why, exactly?

360

(356 replies, posted in Off Topic)

You tweeted about how great this album was earlier this year, and, you being the musical authority 'round these here parts, I duly looked her up. Looking at my post I suppose my phrasing implied more mutual agency than actually existed, but hey, we're retroactively having the conversation now tongue

I always love it when an artist has an album like that—something that's just clearly in a realm the rest of their still-very-good material doesn't reach. I have that exact same feeling about Rilo Kiley—their first three albums are various degrees of great, but The Execution of All Things is just this monolith of emotional catharsis that the others can't touch.

361

(356 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Got turned onto Tiny Vipers by one Alex Ruger—had to settle into liking her stuff (very stripped-down, cyclical neofolk), but the atmosphere is truly haunting and some of the lyrics are just beautiful.


362

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/b0/9f/86/b09f865f5411b4e785997cc8b552372c.jpg

. . . huh.

The moon landing sequence by itself is gorgeous, though that was a given going in. The rest . . . I'm not really a fan of Ryan Gosling outside of The Nice Guys, and he was just straight sleepwalking through this. I can't particularly blame him—the screenplay drastically underwrites every single character, and he gets the worst of it. His Neil Armstrong is basically an empty shell, a protagonist whose self I couldn't tell you a single thing about. Claire Foy does her best with a similarly empty role and gets better results, but she can't overcome the fact that there's no emotional throughline here. Though the screenplay certainly seems to think there is—tries to make us think toward the end that the whole movie has been about Armstrong's grief for his dead daughter and the whole thing is so blatantly manipulative I had to roll my eyes.

Also meh on the filmmaking itself. This movie seems to take all the wrong lessons from Dunkirk, a film that I love—it's so focused on trying to communicate the visceral experience of space travel that it overplays its hand to an insane degree. Whole sequences are basically just collections of shaky closeups, to the point that it's impossible to tell what's going on. And the sound mix is absolutely obnoxious—maybe I'm just getting too old for this, but the monotonous shriek of everything was just an irritant rather than immersive in any way. Chazelle is so focused on trying to pound an EXPERIENCE into you that he ends up managing to evoke nothing at all.

The film stock was pretty, anyway—very nice grain.

I dunno, I'm being too hard on it—I can't say it's a bad film, just a thoroughly mediocre one with some cool moments. Half of it is trying and failing to be a Christopher Nolan film, and the other half is trying and failing to be the off-kilter arthouse biopic that Jackie was but with an absolutely by-the-numbers script, and it just doesn't gel.

For better or worse, Whiplash is still Chazelle's best movie. It's kind of adolescent but doesn't pretend to be anything more than it is, an exercise in ratcheting up tension with broad character beats that are redeemed by the performers. La La Land is gorgeous visually but absolutely lifeless, and First Man is that same melody in a different key. (Had to slip a musical thing in there somewhere.)

363

(991 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I like how Jack Graham put it on Twitter: "I'm expecting Chibnall's Doctor Who to be mediocre. But after years of the show being mediocre, pretentious AND obnoxious, just-mediocre will be a breath of fresh air."

364

(24 replies, posted in Off Topic)

*against better judgment wanders into the thread after holding off for days* Also worth noting that economic growth = / = a better economic situation for the majority of the population. Sluggish recovery from the 2008 crash doesn't really mean all that much if most of it is centered around massive corporations and the wealthiest of the wealthy rather than stable growth of longterm jobs.

Also (I'm sure many of us on the forum can speak to this), it's quite possible that a significant amount of job "growth" we're seeing is workers taking on multiple jobs to try and stay afloat. Which, not ideal.

Trump isn't solely to blame there—the Obama administration took a lot of half measures and reaped the whirlwind—but he most definitely isn't helping and will almost undoubtedly make things actively worse in the long run, to BDA's point.

365

(164 replies, posted in Off Topic)

https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/81+HloHHyuL._RI_.jpg

Bob Odenkirk is all-timer levels of good in this season, and he still might not even be the best performer on the show.

I won't be able to make this statement definitively until the series is over (fifth and what I'm thinkin' is the final season will be happening sometime a year from now), but I think this is better than Breaking Bad. It's far less big and flashy but it's rooted down to its bones in character, and the way it's slid over the course of four seasons from mostly comedy to full-on nihilistic tragedy is astounding. It's so much more deeply sad than BB because there's not even the possibility of hope. Jimmy McGill is gonna become Saul Goodman and all we can do is watch and hope to God he doesn't wreck too many more people on his way down.

366

(108 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Kneel Before Rod!

367

(356 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Propagandhi is heavier than my usual, but their lyrics are great and this song in particular is appropriate to today's occasion.

SPOILER Show
Circa 1992, Hitchens faxed his copy through as regards Columbus Day.
And if you'll permit me the conceit of a posthumous critique, I'll paraphrase:
"My colourful, exotic friend; respectable, well spoken — unlike the rest of them —
As you know I'm colour-blind, and you're a credit to your kind;
This silly talk of resurgence, ceremony, communion with an unconquered natural world;
Tell me, where is your gratitude for all we've done for you? This paradise. Eden. Empire. Kingdom.
This boundless epoch we've bestowed upon your savage, empty lands;
Well, of course mistakes were made! But as far as human progress goes,
Welcome to a slightly higher plane of innovation and opportunity for your trampled communities.
The treaties that we broke; the lands that we filched; the settlements put to the torch; the children we abused; all for your own good, of course.
It just happens to to be the way history has been made. Just don't play with a toy gun or change lanes without signalling.
Don't comply, don't resist, cuz it don't make no difference.
Comply? Resist? No difference. Resist? Comply? You die.
The funny names you give your kids; the silly ways you do your hair; the jungle music that you blare; we snicker and we sneer
For they do not revere the incessant gadgetry we incessantly deploy to incessantly extract and incessantly destroy.
You don't worship us. Oh why don't you worship us? Resist? Comply? You die."

Well goddammit.

369

(1,649 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Just finished the first volume of Simon Callow's biography of him, and my favorite thing about this is that it's almost definitely bullshit. Orson hadn't prepared for the broadcast at all beforehand and the writer of the script, Howard Koch, had chosen the news-bulletin format because he couldn't find any other way to adapt the novel that wasn't desperately boring. Everyone at the Mercury, Orson included, was appalled when they heard they'd been taken seriously, but Orson just folded it right into his personal legend once everything blew over. Fakes on top of fakes—little wonder F for Fake is probably his best film besides Kane.

370

(39 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Yikes, I pity you guys trying to record all three hours of Button.

371

(20 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Yo, DocSub doesn't come around here much (read: ever) anymore, but they still do great writing on film/games/etc. and are currently taking commissions. If you send them three dollars through their Ko-Fi page, they'll review any film you choose on their Medium blog. Dewit!

372

(39 replies, posted in Off Topic)

iirc you said Green Mile was missing half an hour and Dead Man's Chest was unsalvageable.

373

(39 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Step right up, step right up, get yer bootleg DIFs here!

That drive folder has the unreleased New Moon commentary, the Red State and "Yosemite Is Fucking Intense" sub-missions, and the original Harry Potter and the Philocerer's Stone/Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull commentaries.

374

(39 replies, posted in Off Topic)

If anyone does want any specific episodes in the interim, lemme know—I've got every episode in my library (even New Moon tongue ) and will happily do some Google driving.

Oh hey, Netflix is literally writing their series with algorithms now. Nothing to worry about here, I'm sure. (From an interview about the development of Maniac with Cary Fukunaga.)

https://scontent-ort2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/42784010_1556437771124147_2847908735697813504_o.jpg?_nc_cat=100&oh=9d5ba9792027ee1ba25f412384952554&oe=5C21C10E