From what I understand you have to break in the nibs, though. There was a comic strip artist who would use "breaking in new pen tips" as an excuse to just do a pretty picture for that day's comic instead of doing the actual comic.
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by Invid
From what I understand you have to break in the nibs, though. There was a comic strip artist who would use "breaking in new pen tips" as an excuse to just do a pretty picture for that day's comic instead of doing the actual comic.
I saw Cleanflix a few months ago, the doc about the Utah company which would edit R rated movies for you. An interesting subject, and I kind of agree with the idea:I grew up watching Blues Brothers, MASH, and other stuff edited for TV, but can't, yet, show the same movies to my niece because there are no edited versions. Even if the original director created one (Landis shot non-nude scenes for Animal House, for example, for the TV edit, and Reitman filmed alternate takes for Ghostbusters to get rid of the swearing)
The documentary, though... not good. It relies heavily on interviews with a couple guys, then levels a horrible charge at one of them which has nothing to due with the subject. Either find another talking head to replace him, or don't bring that thing up. You're left with some basic information, and that's about it.
Since they haven't pre-announced what's getting released when for awhile, the odds of me having the movie is pretty low. Eventually I'll get the disk from Netflix, but often my first listen will be without the movie.
I suddenly pictured a scene where she realizes that message, and lets go... only to realize she's now floating free in space, and the point was more psychological and not literal ![]()
So, you're talking about a new version of King Kong or Mothra vs Godzilla, basically. Human greed brings monster destruction on a city.
We tell the story from Godzilla's point of view.
Godzilla is on an island, just chilling. He has his son, Minilla, with him. One day, Godzilla senses some other monster intruding on his territory so goes off to fry the insolent fuckers. While he's gone, a team of humans show up and capture little Minilla, taking him back with them.
Godzilla is furious. He's never bothered the humans. Never even paid much attention to the little creatures. Now they have his SON? This is war! He sets off to get his kid back.
The humans are truly evil. They try and stop him with things which float, things which fly, all of which throw exploding fire at him. It hurts, but not as much as he hurts them. The weapons used get bigger and bigger. Godzilla begins to slow. He's injured. Seriously. The idea he might not survive crosses his mind. If he can save his son, though. If he can get him back to the sea. Minilla will live. That is all that matters. With another heroic push, Godzilla makes it to the prison where they were holding Minilla. Godzilla rips open the cell.
Minilla is dead. Dissected. As are a baby Rodan and Mothra.
Oh, Humanity is so dead. Godzilla lets out a cry unheard since the dawn of Man. From the far corners of the Earth, the other creatures respond. As the screen fades out, we see a Godzilla, rejuvenated with a Holy Purpose, marching across the countryside towards a city. The cries of other monsters come to us, louder.
It is the end of Humanity.
Your Monty Pythons and your South Parks travel the same ground.
Sort of a "Musk and Me"?
Yes, but not everything people say is true.
It's an article from last July, reacting to Disney news that the new Star Wars would include model work. Basically, models are cheaper and often look more real, but there are lots of limitations.
Was he sued for ripping himself off?
It's a good example of a movie without a plot. It has a STORY, but not a real plot. It's a fun contrast to the overtly complicated movies we're getting now.
I have a general question. I've heard many say, including you guys, that Gravity really has to be seen in 3D for it to work. I didn't, which probably explains my feelings towards the film
However, unless 3D TV REALLY catches on, from this point forward very few of those watching the movie will see the 3D version. I therefore wonder if it will have any more lasting impact than Avatar did. It's certainly not unwatchable the same way, say, How The West Was Won is (the three strip, curved screen image doesn't convert to flat letterbox well), but does a filmmaker have any obligation to "future proof" their film so it has a life beyond the theater? The answer used to be, "no", as they were competing against TV and home video didn't exist. Now, however...
He seemed right based on the little I've read of the book, but it's very possible the "real" Constantine isn't a character who you'd like. I think most of the fan hype is just excitement that they're actually trying to do the character. That that character might not be interesting to most viewers is never a fanboy concern ![]()
When it came out, a critic mentioned that Buckaroo Banzai seemed to be trying to be a cult film, at a time when cult films were those movies which had failed yet later found an audience. I do agree with some of that, as much as I love the film. It is trying too hard.
This is the first I've heard of Fateful Findings. I'll have to keep my eye out for it.
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by Invid
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.
Currently installed 9 official extensions. Copyright © 2003–2009 PunBB.