426

(12 replies, posted in Off Topic)

See, the Ewok eyes I don't mind, The weird noise that Obi-Wan makes I don't mind, even the fact that greedo shoots first I don't mind, but adding lines you don't need that weaken the climactic moment of the whole trilogy? Shoving CGI animals into the foreground and background of shots doing silly things and being distracting, ruining the composition of the shot? Adding a redundant scene of Jabba the Hut, where he just goes over the exact same dialogue line for line from the previous scene? Adding a shot of R2D2 hovering down a flight of stairs for no reason other than to just have R2D2 use the hover jets in the old movie?

I mean, it's a good thing R2 really needed to get down those stairs, right? Cause we needed to see that shot where he does that, even though chronologically that's the very last time he ever uses them. And there are some times when using them would have probably been pretty useful as well. He could have just hovered over to the shore on Degobah instead of falling into the water and being eaten, right? He could have gotten off Jabba's barge without diving dome-first into the sand, right? But no, going down the stairs is the important thing. So long as he can do that, I'm good. I'm so glad they didn't cut that pointless shot out of the movie, proper editing be damned.

And I never understood something about the Jabba scene in ANH. They have Jabba repeat the same dialogue as greedo from the previous scene, right? Except both of those characters are speaking some gibberish language that maybe a dozen people on the planet are nerdy enough to actually learn. Why didn't they just change the fucking subtitles so one of the characters was saying something different? Or, barring that, why not just change the dialogue for Jabba altogether? It's an inserted shot, right? You have some guy that does Jabba's voice, right? Make his dialogue different from the dialogue in the previous scene!

Or better yet, cut the redundant scene out of your god damn movie.

And the thing is, why the hell is he trying to 'fix' a series of films that are so popular to begin with? I mean, clean them up and make them look good, make reasonable alterations to improve or append the older effects, makeup, costumes, whatever. But to actually take scenes you cut out of the movie because they were redundant or pointless and put them back in doesn't "improve" the films. It "makes them worse".

Like I said in the other thread, Star Wars is the only reason I still have a VCR in my house.

Well, that and my old porn collection. Can you believe there are so few reliable retailers for 1960's and 70's bondage porn on DVD?

Edit, I take back the Greedo shooting first thing. That does bother me a lot.

427

(1,649 replies, posted in Off Topic)

haha, nope, it's just making the rounds. I would like to go there, tho.

428

(1,019 replies, posted in Episodes)

oh god, why do you do these things on the weekends I have to work!?

429

(1,649 replies, posted in Off Topic)

430

(1,649 replies, posted in Off Topic)

431

(44 replies, posted in Episodes)

I was kinda hoping you guys would continue the talk about Tarantino's little universe when you started talking about the cop, but since you didn't bring it up, I guess I will - though maybe you bring it up in volume two, when Sam Jackson is actually talking:

There's a theory that would have you believe that Tarantino's films all exist in the same universe. They are all interconnected in some way. You have to exclude Jackie Brown from this, as that was based on a book and not set in his universe.

Do you guys put any stock into this theory? I mean, we know at least that Reservoir Dogs and Pulp Fiction have to exist in the same universe, since there's a Vega brother in each film. I think it's safe to also assume that Kill Bill and Death Proof exist in the same universe, as the cop and his son show up in both. He uses the same brand names in his movies. Personally, I like the idea a lot, so until he comes out and says it's not so, or he does something that would definitely prevent that theory from working I'm gonna just go along with the notion that this is all one big universe and he's just showing us all how fucking awesome the universe in his head is.

432

(44 replies, posted in Episodes)

I fucking love Quentin Tarantino. I even liked Death Proof. I think it's his weakest film, but I still liked it.

As for Kill Bill, I like both volumes pretty evenly. The second one is a lot more talky and slower, but what it lacks in energy and gore it more than makes up for with tension. There are three or four scenes in that movie that are spectacularly tense and unnerving. That more than anything is what I love about Tarantino's films. All of his flicks - even True Romance - has one or several of those intense scenes where it's just some people sitting and talking at a table, but he does it so well and keeps ramping up the tension that you're locked in a death-grip, unable to look away. No matter what movie he makes, I guarantee you one of the standout scenes in it is going to be a few people sitting at a table and talking. Most writers avoid that shit like the plague and try to keep their characters moving around and doing stuff during the talky bits, but Qt says "nope, they just sit down and have some coffee and stare into each other's souls".

433

(47 replies, posted in Episodes)

Kon's films and that show he did have a lot of weird mental stuff going on. The main character in Perfect Blue is an actress in a show about herself being a murderer and then people start getting murdered in reality and it messes her head all up to where she can't keep the acting and the reality straight in her head. Paranoia Agent deals with a number of mental / social stigma but mostly in subplots...  i think...  It's been a while since I saw it and it seems to do the same thing in the last couple episodes that Paprika did in the final act.

I didn't really like Paprika all that much. I should try watching it again, tho. I think I was pretty drunk the first time I saw it. From what I remember, tho, it seems to do the opposite of what inception does. In a dream, anything and everything can happen. That's a really cool way to do it, but there's a danger of pulling stuff out of your ass whenever you need it. I can't remember enough of Paprika to say if that happened at all, tho. It was definitely surreal.

434

(47 replies, posted in Episodes)

435

(47 replies, posted in Episodes)

436

(27 replies, posted in Off Topic)

The guys who run Disney now are the exact opposite sort of people Disney himself was, in a business sense. Disney made a masterpiece once every three or four years. These guys want to crank out three or four piles of shit every year because they know people will go see them.

If you think about it, they're kinda modelling their business on The Asylum. Bigger budgets, and more time per film, but that's about the only difference.

437

(11 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I feel the same as Fixed, tho I will agree with the idea that other film makers need to stop ripping it off every time they want to make a dark sci-fi film.

438

(2 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I enjoyed watching it. I thought the casting was great, and that Sean William Scott was amazingly good. I thought the Rock did OK as well. It was nice to see both of them acting so far outside their typecast norm. The only casting I hated was Cheri Oteri, because Cheri Oteri.

I honestly can't remember the plot(s), aside from the Sean Scott + The Rock relationship and how there are two Sean Scotts running around. The rest of the movie is fuzzy, and it feels like the weird time paradox/vortex plot only really takes up like 10% of the movie. It feels like there's 90% of movie there that's trying to do something besides tell a story. I guess Donnie Darko was the same way. I don't really 'like' either of the two flicks, tho they are kinda interestingly shot and acted.

Does "The Box" have the same sort of weirdness going on? I avoided it because of Richard Kelly's prior inability to make a film that makes much sense.

439

(1,019 replies, posted in Episodes)

440

(1,019 replies, posted in Episodes)

A Few Good Men was good. Now go beat the demons out of Teague so he can return to us.

Get well soon, man.

441

(1,019 replies, posted in Episodes)

A Few Good Men is one of those movies that I've always meant to get around to watching, but haven't. So glad I decided to swing by the forum again tonight tongue

442

(14 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Maybe a regular old talky-talk podcast where the panel just talks about movies / random stuff for a half hour or something. Wouldn't have to be a regular thing, just once in a while. Whenever something worth talking about pops up, but not worth talking about for two full hours of commentary.

I wouldn't want you guys to burn out on talking about movies and stuff, tho. When it becomes too much like work it stops being fun.

443

(9 replies, posted in Off Topic)

444

(8 replies, posted in Creations)

A few things stick out to me. The color grading doesn't match from the CG to the live action, but you already mentioned it wasn't finished. Another thing that bugs me is the lighting on the landing shot. With the light source in the shot the way it is, the door section of the ship shouldn't be receiving any direct light at all. That said, I doubt too many other people will be bugged by that. The only other crit I can offer is that the smoke clouds in the landing shots (both the hovering up to the bridge and the actual landing) look too saturated to me.

Minor things, really. Are you gonna post it up after you get the sound in there? I was making sound effects for it in my head while I watched it tongue

Awesome short, man. I like how you do the breakdown visualization.

445

(14 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I think it was mentioned during one of the other shows that they'd have to tackle this one eventually just because it's one of those movies that you can either embrace it's weirdness and love it to death or you can't and you hate it with a passion. I haven't seen it, myself. It sounds like something I'd like, tho.

446

(33 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I'm sick and bored.

447

(33 replies, posted in Off Topic)

448

(1,649 replies, posted in Off Topic)

449

(47 replies, posted in Episodes)

I had one more thing to add to this thread a while back and didn't want to dredge up the topic just for this:

The only thing in the movie that had perplexed me was the story Ofelia tells to her unborn brother about the rose that could give eternal life. I couldn't figure out why it was in there, and then it dawned on me. The baby is the rose. I suppose you could look at the rose story as some kind of metaphor for life in general as well. People sought the rose because it gave eternal life, but the thorns gave instant death. But the two are inseparable. You can't have life without death, yeah? So maybe it's like a story about how dumb it is to want eternal life. Like, this Captain guy just wanted his name and memory to go on, yeah? So that's why he wanted the kid, but he obviously got stuck by a thorn instead.

I still don't know what all that crap ends up meaning, but there you go. I wonder if the face-smashing scene was a metaphor for alcoholism or something...

450

(33 replies, posted in Off Topic)