Why would J.J. change a successful formula? Let's just have another vengeful villain wanting to destroy Earth and some bigsplosions
The above was meant to be sarcastic. I'm just as tired of this formulaic approach as you are
I don't hate The Motion Picture either... I appreciate what they were trying to do, even though they ripped off one of their old episodes. The result was an imperfect, but relatively pleasant hybrid of ST-TOS and 2001 (and I'll defend 2001 till my dying day). And the ST-TMP Director's Cut actually improves the movie (unlike some other sci-fi Special Editions that we all know
).
bullet3 wrote:Would it kill them to make a movie called Star "TREK" be about actual exploration?!
Yes
Hollywood prefers to play it safe and rehash the same formula (and the same franchises) all over again. It's easy money.
Exploration? Ridley Scott tried that with Prometheus... sort of. He just didn't know what he actually wanted to explore.
If you ask me, Trek will probably feel Star Wars-y until they get rid of J.J. (maybe they will... he wanted to do Star Wars all along and now he finally has a chance with Episode VII).