26

(60 replies, posted in Episodes)

Cotterpin Doozer wrote:

I'm probably feeling a little defensive of my second favorite Disney movie because I repeatedly have to defend my favorite Disney movie, The Little Mermaid, from accusations that it's anti-feminist.

...

In fact, I think I would have greater problems with a story that implied that changing the status quo could be so easy. The little I've seen of the sequel, on the other hand, does show Mulan going on to provide an inspiration to other little girls in her village.

But the major reason I don't take issue with the character's exceptionalism is because even if not much has changed in the rest of her world, that doesn't lessen the fact that things have greatly changed for Mulan. She is the character with whom the audience (of primarily young children) is intended to identify, and I don't really find the messaging problematic in that regard.

And at the very least, I give it more credit than Brave; Mulan never apologizes to her father for defying him.

Yup, yup, yup and ditto.

I've heard men criticize The Little Mermaid before and it really bothers me, but it's so hard to put into words why. I'm of the age group that watched it A LOT growing up and it was never my favorite film (I kinda preferred 101 Dalmatians, Cinderella and various other animal centric films.) But to echo Cotterpin, I don't find either The Little Mermaid or Mulan problematic. They both take women and their ambitions and challenges seriously which is a lot more than some "strong female character" movies do. We kind of talked about this on The Avengers thread, but I've been realizing it's much more about how the story respects the woman as a complete person and makes her feel real than it is about how many stereotypes she breaks. The stereotype-breaker movies feel a lot more superficial than the take-the-woman-seriously movies and seem to get a bit more praise for how "groundbreaking" they are in the press, but they don't seem to resonate with actual real-life women as much.

If it's only guys bashing how anti-feminist a movie is and women seem to love it (Twilight, Titanic, The Little Mermaid, etc.) then I feel like something's missing. If that many women love it then there's probably something real and serious in there that our culture trivializes about women. When people take what could otherwise be a thoughtful discussion about women and the arts and turns it into "why women are dumb for liking Twilight", something has gone seriously wrong. There's few things more soul-crushing to a woman than misogyny in the disguise of feminism. Misogyny, in part, minimizes the strength of female voices and their struggles; misogyny in the disguise of feminism practically eliminates female voices altogether. Women and teenage girls in particular have a hard time getting listened to once a man declares something "anti-feminist". If they defend it, the women look unenlightened, backwards and simple. If they decide to agree with the man, they reinforce the feeling that men know best and must decide what is fit for women to experience. That's not to say that men can't recognize mistreatment of women and call society out on it, just that, imo, women should be the key voices in a discussion like that.

That said, I've been trying to figure out why The Little Mermaid works for me (and my sister) specifically for about the past year, since Scriptnotes did an episode on that movie and basically said it was anti-feminist. We decided that it does a few key things wonderfully:

1. The narrative is guided by Ariel's main desire. She wants to be a human and live with the man she's in love with. She makes sacrifices to do this in giving up her family and her main talent, goes up against near insurmountable odds, defeats the villain, reconciles with the father, becomes the master of two worlds, literally gains her voice back and saves the prince in the process, btw.

2. Her voice. She sacrifices her voice *literally* to get what she wants in life and that's something a lot of women can relate to. (My sister really agreed with this part of the story resonating with her, as I recall.)

3. The villain is a woman and uses her insight into Ariel as a woman to manipulate her. She does this by keying into her dislike of her father, her romantic feelings towards this guy, the value Ariel places on her "one talent" and her fascination with the "other world". Disney female villains are a bit of a trope, but I think it's used to especially good effect here. Ursula is a fully realized character with actual motivations that make sense and she stacks the odds against Ariel in a way that makes Ursula look smart while still making Ariel look real, if a bit naive and vulnerable which gives her room to grow as a character during the rest of the movie.

4. The prince has something of a personality. Many 90's girls name Prince Eric as a character they love and why wouldn't they? Unlike other Disney princes, he actually gets to talk! He behaves in a believable, thoughtful and respectful manner towards Ariel and even has a key signifier of Disney main character personhood: an adorable animal sidekick.

5. Did I mention SHE saves HIM in the end? And HE is the one entranced by an evil witch.

6. She looked somewhat unconventional. It's easy to forget this in the age of Pixar red-heads, but a female Disney heroine who wasn't blonde was actually groundbreaking and ushered in a new era of diversity in main characters for the company. The Little Mermaid behind the scenes even talks about the moment when the Disney guys realized this plucky mermaid girl could have something other than blonde hair and how important that moment was for them and the reverberations of that decision. The behind-the-scenes are worth a watch, I'd say, if even just for that moment.

Pro-tip: since there appear to be a lot of dads of daughters on this board I thought I'd share how my dad handled this issue, since it's something I'm really thankful for: He exposed us to variety of movies/stories (all age appropriate) and encouraged us to share our gut reactions to whatever we were watching. He didn't just provide them but watched them with us (even if it was The Little Mermaid for the 100th+ time) and had long thoughtful discussions with us regarding whatever topics came up. He treated what we liked with respect. If we had a particular interest or really enjoyed one specific movie he'd try to find all the other similar movies and present them to us for our judgement. He rarely prescribed movies and when he did they were films like The Karate Kid that were personally important to him and he would share why he loved it and where he was in life when he saw it. That said, he did try to make sure we saw a lot of classic musicals, I think in part because of the wonderfully realized women they portrayed. We were free to like or dislike any movie, but instead of saying "yes, that's the right opinion" or "no, it's not" he would just sit down, look at us seriously and ask "Why don't you like it?" or "Why do you like this movie?" and then, as I said, listen for a long time. This gave us a chance to develop and feel secure in our own opinions and come to feel that our home was a safe place for creative exploration. That meant more to us than any supposed "message" in any movie. I think you'll find that your daughters are naturally going to gravitate towards self-respect, standing up for themselves and movies that respect them as women if you, too, treat them and their opinions, whatever they may be, with respect.

Alright /preachy rant. Thanks for listening. This is probably redundant in places as I've been flying for hours, but it's an important issue to me and I'm glad you guys talk about it.

27

(60 replies, posted in Episodes)

This is maybe my favorite episode you guys have ever done. Really, really good discussion and fixes. I was hoping you guys would get to this movie someday to talk about Pixar and their (supposed) method and etc and it was just great. I hope you guys get around to Wall*e before too long; I'd love to hear some of these discussions carried on a commentary for that movie.

Also, every time you put up a video of you guys doing a commentary I spend a good amount of time thinking that Brian looks exactly like Bradley Cooper to the point that it has actually made me think more highly of Bradley Cooper when I see him on tv.

28

(43 replies, posted in Episodes)

I've spent a lot of time with this movie the past week (working on this setups and payoffs thingy) and even though this discussion is over a year old, I'd like to weigh in.

Bob's arc is that he thinks he'll be really good at family life, but because he's "Superman" and wants to protect his family he can't let them in emotionally and thus, is not the best father and husband he can be.

He's disconnected from his family and they suffer as a unit because of it. That's is his flaw.

Through the course of the movie he realizes that "doing it all" (having a great career, being rich and physically fit) isn't an adequate replacement for being honest and engaged with his family. Even if it means that he needs to depend on them a bit, too, in return. He needs to fight with them, not without them. Excluding them is different from protecting them. Bob's "specialness" is not his problem. Nor is his focus on the past; that's just a symptom of his real problem: his inability to be emotionally present with them.

His arc is summed up in two different moments. The first comes near the beginning, in his first scene with his family where they're all having dinner together. Bob isn't paying attention to them; he's just reading the paper; he starts to get a little emotionally engaged when he hears about his son's issue at school, but the conversation doesn't go well and he leaves the room altogether. Chaos ensues and Helen calls from the dining room, "Bob, it's time to engage!"

At the end, as Bob is starting to learn to fight with his family, but he still wants to protect them and tells Helen and the kids to stay back so he can go and fight the robot. Helen protests, but Bob is adamant, "I can't lose you again! ... I'm not ... not strong enough." Helen finally sees why it's been so hard for Bob to be involved in their family life and reassures him, "If we work together, you won't have to be." Bob says, "I don't know what'll happen." Having finally been honest with her, he is able to bring his family into his battle with the world/robot and they fight and live as one unit.

Incidentally, right at the end of that conversation, Helen jokes "We're super heroes. What could happen?" which pays off a joke set up at their wedding, when a young, very confident Bob also said, "We're super heroes; what could happen?"

So ... sorry?? This is a perfect movie.

Nice! That's awesome! There's a book that does that for each of the Harry Potter books and the series overall. Always fun to see somebody using that concept.

Oh cool, thank you for the suggestions! I'm trying to make a list for weeks where I lack inspiration.

If anybody else has a good candidate, let me know.

I've been kind of working on setups and payoffs charts like these for a little over a year and had a bunch of half started ones. I have some extra time on my hands now, so I decided to finish a few of them off and needed some place to put them, thus a new blog.

So far I've got: Back to the Future (which you may have seen already)
                      Contagion
                      Apollo 13

It's really interesting to see the different pattern and shapes they make. I've been trying to keep the formatting roughly the same so that it's easy to compare them.

I'd like to post on the blog about once a week with something, whether it's a setups and payoffs chart or something similar to do with charts and stories. Anyway, hope you like it!

32

(473 replies, posted in Episodes)

You know, I'm sitting here re-watching Galaxy Quest and it's striking how similar the crew on this movie looks to the new cast of Star Wars. 

Seriously, though: Star Wars and Galaxy Quest

33

(473 replies, posted in Episodes)

Maybe Andy Serkis will play a female alien. That would be cool.

34

(30 replies, posted in Episodes)

I just remembered the other movie that fits in this category PLEASANTVILLE. Two late Gen X kids (Reese Witherspoon b. 1976 and Tobey Maguire b. 1975) go back to the late 50's/early 60's and invent the consciousness revolution while coming to terms with their own apathy.

Also, as an easier summary, I thought I'd try to find one movie that sums up the youth of each generation.

Lost Generation - Horse Feathers (The Gen X before Gen X)
G.I. Generation - Babes in Arms
Silent Generation - Rebel Without A Cause/American Graffiti
Baby Boomers - Forrest Gump
Gen X - The Breakfast Club
Millennials - High School Musical
Homeland Generation - ...too early to say, so far they just have CARS, but boy those Artist gens love cars the way Hero gens love musicals.

35

(30 replies, posted in Episodes)

FWIW, the history cycle thing that Trey referenced is from the book The Fourth Turning.

The four types of generations are:
Hero - G.I. generation --> "the greatest generation" and Millennials (tend to be cannon fodder in their youth and like musicals)
Artist - Silent Generation --> Neil Armstrong, Gloria Steinem, Paul McCartney (they go to the moon and make the good music) -- also the generation type being born right now in the USA which is usually called the Homeland Generation
Prophet - Baby Boomers (tear down the establishment only to rebuild it as adults, get to grow up listening to the good music)
Nomad - Gen X (born when having kids was unpopular and have kids right when the economy goes south, tend to like art infused with technology like video games and superhero movies)

Here's a friendly chart of the types.

BLAST FROM THE PAST is interesting in this light because it's basically the story of a Silent Gen/Baby Boomer who has to learn to get along with Gen X kids in the 90's. The opposite is BACK TO THE FUTURE, where a Gen X kid has to get along with Silent Generation teens in the 50's. Somewhere in the middle is the original FREAKY FRIDAY where a Gen X kid (Jodie Foster b. 1962) trades bodies with a Silent Gen mom (Barbara Harris b. 1935) in 1976.

They remade Freaky Friday in 2003 with Boomer/Millennial dynamics, but it didn't seem to have the same dramatic generational tension as the original. Maybe because those two generations tend to get along alright without help?

I liked:

1. Independence Day - Ya'll are so excited, it's fun to listen to. Lots of trivia, as well.
2. Back to the Future - Same as above. (And Galaxy Quest.)
3. The Heroine's Journey - So many lightbulb moments in this in one half hour!
4. Titanic/Apollo 13 - Lots of trivia and just reacting to the movie. They're a couple of the first episodes I listened to, so, nostalgic for me.
5. The Dark Knight - Convinced me you guys react to movies similarly to the way I do. Nice to hear someone else explain why this movie didn't work as well for me as it apparently did for the general public.

The first three have been on my phone, I think, for about two years. Great for airplane rides.

Story-time with Trey episodes are fun, too.

I tend to recommend the video on the homepage. It explains the show well, esp. the Indiana Jones clip.

Recommendations would depend on the person, but in general The Heroine's Journey is a nice quick introduction to you guys, what you do and which movies you talk about. Back to the Future is a solid episode, as are Super 8, Raiders, Galaxy Quest, The Sting and Spiderman 1 & 2. There are others, of course. ...You guys have done a LOT of movies.

37

(84 replies, posted in Episodes)

everythingshiny wrote:

I enjoyed "Holy Musical B@man!" but I didn't really get all of the jokes - enjoyed Joe Walker in the lead though, and loved his "Dark, Sad, Lonely Knight" number:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uv_gZMyAY2M

YES. That song is genius. For me it really expanded the boundaries of what a number in a musical can sound like.

38

(84 replies, posted in Episodes)

Starkid does parody musicals better than just about anybody.

"Someone cut off my ear ... because they didn't like my face." - Sherrezade in Twisted

Maybe the B@man musical is more up FIYH's alley.

39

(23 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Inception is the closest thing I can think of.

I can't remember if it paid of all of its setups perfectly, but it definitely jumped immediately into the public conscious/imagination. It checks all the boxes on casting, score, screenplay and especially effects. It wasn't just surprising, it had the quality of "surprising-ness". Even when you know the road is about to flip back and become the sky, it still makes your jaw drop just a little bit which makes it more re-watchable. And it was definitely iconic. It took about a week for the word "inception" to have a whole new meaning in English (or at least American English). It hit the mainstream hard and a few cult fan-boys even harder. So yeah, Inception (2010) is my nomination.

Time will tell, I guess, though. I wonder if longevity of appeal should be a requirement for a "perfect movie".

40

(670 replies, posted in Creations)

My sister and I put this together. It's about the setups and payoffs in Back to the Future.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1a5lBTvO5UQ

41

(21 replies, posted in Episodes)

It really does feel like Christmas when you ask for a movie in the chat and then two weeks later it happens.  big_smile

I really, really love this movie. It's gone from being on my top of 2011 list to maybe top 10 of all time, for me. Your commentary, though, made me realize I don't really know why I like it so much. The best explanation I came up with for myself is that, like someone said in a review of The Social Network "It's a high IQ movie that gives you an IQ high."

That said, I'd only put this movie in the roughly 90th percentile of perfect-movie-ness.  The Marion Cotillard subplot is the most problematic for me, as well. I was so glad to hear you guys say it needed a button. That was part of what made me sit down a few weeks ago and start analyzing the individual arcs of the (bazillion) characters in this movie.

For her it looks like this:

Leonora is in Geneva,
      discussing the clusters at the WHO,
              goes from Geneva to Hong Kong and starts researching the initial victims,
                       Leonora hears about village and guy’s sick mom,
                              confirms Beth and Japanese guy had contact at casino,
                              confirms Beth had contact with Ukrainian woman and Kawloon guy and,
                       hears about man’s village and dead mom and is kidnapped,
               Leonora in in village with kids, takes placebo, finds out what it is,
      refuses to go back to Switzerland and leave the village with the placebo
(needed: her returning to the Village as one of them)

It's kind of, almost a chiasm. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chiastic_structure

It's a shame they don't have just like 5 seconds of her going back there and appearing over the hill at the village. That would fix so much of that subplot, although the weird tonal change of her discovering who the index patient was to the kidnapping thing would still remain. : /

Also, I'd always assumed she made it back to the village in time to warn them before they all got sick. It'd be a good Rorschach type test for optimism vs. pessimism or something.

(Edited because I hit submit too soon, blarg. ... and can't spell.)

Hey, I enjoyed reading that!

Interesting that you made Beru Anakin's sister. I kind of liked the step-sibling relationship in George's prequels, myself. Made it easy to understand Owen's tense feelings towards Anakin.

Just out of curiosity, how old are you picturing Anakin to be in Episode 1?

Oh, and how the heck do these people have holographs, spaceships and laser swords but not ultrasounds?! I mean seriously.

43

(56 replies, posted in Episodes)

You know, it might be worth mentioning that I was late to the theater the first time I saw AOTC and this could be part of why I like it so much. Next time you watch the movie consider starting at the shot of the assassin bug crawling in the window. Starting with the chase scene helps with the pacing, you lose the initial murder attempt and awkward reunion scene and bonus: very little Jar-Jar left over.

44

(56 replies, posted in Episodes)

redxavier wrote:

I get the impression this was due in part to Hayden Christensen? Apologies if it's not, just that over the years I've interacted with quite a few female fans of Star Wars who seem to like the prequels almost solely because of him at first, going positively gaga over him. Seems teenage girls respond to the angst-ridden, bad boy character as well as the pretty face.

No apologies necessary, but PSHAW, NO. Ewan McGregor is the cutie in that one. Hiiiiisss beeaaaard.

In all honesty, no, is was not Hayden so much as Padme. (Though, I can see how some girls would be smitten with him.) I don't know if it's politically correct or whatever but I really responded to the "I'm a powerful lady and I've got important war-stopping things on my mind, but I'm in love with this guy and he's kind of an idiot, but I really like him and don't know what to do about it" bit.

For the way I watch love stories the attributes of the guy aren't actually that important. As long as he's decent enough (Anakin is admittedly borderline, here) to believe that she would fall for him, then he's good enough and the story can work. It's more about how the woman deals with being in love with the guy. Does she reject him/pursue him/wait for him. What does she give up for him? What risks does she take by accepting him? That's the more interesting and romantic thing. And Attack of the Clones has a lot to offer on that front.

Aside from the romance, though, I just really like the atmosphere of the movie. Visually, I find it stunning with the waterfalls, the rain with the ocean clone aliens, Obi-Wan dodging laser beams in the asteroid field, and Padme's outfits are some of the most majestic of all the Star Wars costumes. Across the Stars is beautiful.  And Obi-Wan gets to run around playing detective with R4! Sigh. I love it.

45

(449 replies, posted in Off Topic)

You guys might like this. It's coming to LA at the end of June/early July.

Persistence of Vision: "the greatest animated film never made"

46

(56 replies, posted in Episodes)

You know, it's taken a few years for me to come to terms with this, but *deep breath* Attack of the Clones is my favorite Star Wars movie. (Which is not to say it's the best SW movie -- that's Empire, but it is my favorite.) When I want to watch Star Wars this is the one I put in.

I agree that the writing is terrible. It didn't used to bother me so much as a teenager, but I with a decade's distance from my "WHOA, so THIS is Star Wars" moment in 2002, I can see how y'all were disappointed. So yeah, hate on it all you want, but this was the one that made me fall in love with the SW universe.

Fun fact: The exact moment when Trey says the movie finally gets going in the arena is the exact moment when I check out, think "well the movie is basically over" and go to the kitchen for food.

A couple questions about the [redacted] Android app. Will it continue to work? Should I uninstall and re-install it if/when there is new one?

I like that there is the potential to say WAYDMinute. And high five to Kyle for coming up with the name!

(I regret to say I have no technical skills to offer at present, but maybe I can help with the fundraising bit?)

Either @FIYHpodcasts or @FIYHguys would be good twitter names I think.

49

(469 replies, posted in Episodes)

Unfortunately, I think one of the rules was that it couldn't be a derivation of the old name. But that is a fun one.

50

(469 replies, posted in Episodes)

redxavier wrote:

I still don't buy that someone has even actually trademarked it

If you do a search on the US Trademark site http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/gate.exe?f=s … :jtl32.1.1 of Down in Front, you do indeed find a live patent.

Also, curiosity got the better of me and I reverse-whois-domain-looked up ya'll and saw the new name and I would like to be the first to say that I approve.  tongue  Good solid choice.