601

(26 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Sounded like he thought it explored some interesting themes that don't necessarily get touched on very much, but was let down by the shitty direction.

602

(26 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Sounds like this is another rare case where the Asylum knockoff is a better movie: http://www.dreadcentral.com/reviews/ae- … earth-2013

603

(26 replies, posted in Off Topic)

13% on Rotten Tomatoes, Shyamalan wasn't quite able to match the 6% he got for The Last Airbender, but he's really trying his damnedest (also, the weekend is only just starting, it may yet drop lower).

604

(8 replies, posted in Off Topic)

It walks a fine line. I acknowledge its stupid and ridiculous (the story makes 0 sense), but it does it with just enough self-awareness that it makes it feel like you're laughing with the movie instead of at it. And they don't go too far either, they still treat the characters and macho dialogue sincerely, which I think is crucial. The vibe I get from the last 2 is "we both know this is dumb, but you know this scene is going to be awesome enough for it to be worth it". I think its the closest I've seen modern big-budget hollywood come to replicating the best of the ridiculous 80s action movies. You can watch Commando and say "its dumb and illogical" too, but that doesn't make it not super entertaining and re-watchable (certainly a staple of my childhood). I think tone is key, and I think Justin Lin has really nailed the right balance of humour, sincerity, and ridiculousness to make it all work (excluding Fast 4, which just sucks).

I think the fact that they land in that sweet spot is why they're getting so much attention lately, probably coupled with the fact that American action movies have been dead for like a decade now, burned to the ground by Michael Bay's aesthetics, comic-book movies, and CGI. If a studio is gonna spend 150 million on a dumb action movie, I want it spent on driving a real tank into real oncoming cars instead of Giant computer robots (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SwgnqPhna_I)

605

(8 replies, posted in Off Topic)

^^ I agree they could stand to lose a scene or two in the middle, though for the most part I enjoy all the character banter stuff. The reason I like the action a bit more in this one is that the 3 big set-pieces in this one manage to involve basically all the major characters, whereas Fast Five was kind of just Vin Diesel and Paul Walker. And then for the finale in this one, not only do you have the like 10 good-guy characters all involved in the action, but you have 10 distinct bad-guys too, which the movie has taken the time to setup and establish. I love that kind of shit.

606

(8 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I am a huge proponent of the Fast series as a brilliant action franchise. The mythology and world-building they've managed to do with these movies is kind of crazy (the wraparound elaborate timeline from 3-6 is a stroke of genius). I would say this is one of the great unheralded movie series, except the last 2 have gotten huge praise from critics and audiences, so its not exactly a secret anymore.

This series has also grown to be extremely progressive and good-natured with the last few entries. The team is very multi-racial, there are several tough female protagonists, who don't get objectified by the film-maker,  and all get good character beats. 

Unlike a Michael Bay movie, the action is built around the character dynamics, so there's always stakes involved. Its also extremely well shot, Fast 6 in particular has some of the most impressive action filmmaking I've seen in years. Justin Lin is juggling a dozen characters, all in different cars, criss-crossing through these elaborate action scenes that just build and build, and you always know where everyone is spacially relative to eachother. Really exciting stuff, and done almost entirely practically (look up some behind the scenes online, it is INSANE how much stuff was done for real on this movie).

More than anything, I think this series really understands the expectations of the audience, and plays to them without insulting them. People really sell the screenplay short, when I think its actually pretty great about setting up and paying off multiple character relationships throughout this movie, while also paying off and mirroring things from the past 5 films, AND on top of that retroactively improving previous films in the series by filling in extra character motivations and plot points. In many ways, Fast 6 is the Avengers of the Fast and Furious series, and this movie has hands down the best post-credits tease I've ever seen, simultaneously setting up an awesome sequel, while retro-actively making Part 3 way cooler.

607

(359 replies, posted in Off Topic)

It doesn't help that I saw it within a week of the new Fast and Furious movie, which managed to do a better job of incorporating a large ensemble cast, grounding the action in character relationships, and being progressive in gender and race.

608

(52 replies, posted in Episodes)

The thing that's great about Predator (aside from EVERYTHING), is that its the only time Arnie has been up against a bad guy that's so formidable that you as the audience are thinking he's completely outmatched and is going to die. Terminator 2 is the only other example of this, but in that one he's a robot, so the "pain" aspect is less impactful. In this he's just a guy, and gets the absolute shit beat out of him, which is super rare and makes him an under-dog in the movie.

But ya, Last Action Hero. I actually really, really like that Title. If you think about it, it was weirdly prescient, as the 80s style of action movie would be completely dead in less than 10 years, completely replaced by comic book movies and Michael Bay destructo-flicks.

609

(52 replies, posted in Episodes)

Dorkman mentioned JCVD as the other action-hero spoofing their persona movie. I will re-iterate that it's well worth seeking out as a fascinating meta Van Damme film, where he basically says he's done nothing of value with his life, fucked up multiple opportunities by being arrogant and into drugs, and feels he hasn't earned any of the acclaim he's gotten. It's actually quite original, I can't really think of any other actor who's stepped back and made such a critical film deconstructing their own life and career.

610

(359 replies, posted in Off Topic)

And not to harp on this, but Iron Man 3 follows from a series of light-hearted, light-on-story action comic-book movies, while STID follows a series with a long history of interesting and original sci-fi storytelling

611

(1,019 replies, posted in Episodes)

That's a great article. The end product may have ended up flawed, but I think Last Action Hero was way ahead of its time, and most of it holds up pretty well. I think if there's a disappointment its just that under the right circumstances it could've been a genre masterpiece (if the movie-within-the-movie was a believable B-action movie that the kid is navigating, the way the original script apparently was planned). As it is, its enjoyable and has a lot of memorable sequences, certainly not anything those involved should be ashamed of.

612

(649 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I thought its 1PM Chicago time, isn't that 10AM West Coast? Bah, figures I got it off by an hour.

613

(649 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Can you PM/email me the link also?

614

(359 replies, posted in Off Topic)

You disappoint me Dave

615

(649 replies, posted in Off Topic)

That should be 10 AM pacific time if I'm not mistaken, which is perfect for me, am in

Your great work on Eddie's documentary proves you have what it takes to make an awesome album, we're all behind you on this.

617

(346 replies, posted in Off Topic)

This is the movie SpaceX consulted on, for what its worth

618

(133 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Facts of life, US is pretty much always at war with someone, at least this time we're using technology to minimize the collateral damage. I'll take drone strikes any day of the week over ground invasion, where you're looking at massive civilian casualties, not to mention ripple effects that can cause instability and civil war.
Morally right it may not be, but we never really have been.

619

(649 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Faldor wrote:

There won't be a recording Wednesday but who would be around on Sat to talk Into Darkness and another topic to be decided?

I'm down

620

(649 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Are we doing just TNG, or TNG and the abrams movies, or ...?

621

(133 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Welcome to Down in Front

622

(133 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Speaking of which, between pissed off Danny Glover, crazy Gary Busey, and asshole Bill Paxton, Predator 2 is totally worth doing as well. I heartily endorse a double episode of Predator and Predator 2.

http://www.chud.com/nextraimages/pred2b.jpg
http://ionetheurbandaily.files.wordpress.com/2011/07/danny-glover-predator-2.jpg
http://www.beyondhollywood.com/posterx/predator2_3.jpg

623

(649 replies, posted in Off Topic)

No, its really my fault for bringing it up, I just suggested it on the off chance people were free today, lots of the regulars weren't hence we didn't do it. I think the Wednesday times have been working out alright so far, and in general I defer to Faldor's scheduling availability as he's been the one putting in the time to edit these things.

624

(649 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Nope, didn't happen. I think we'll record it at whenever the next regular podcast is

625

(359 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Trey wrote:

Next weekend's results will really tell the tale, but even so, the "what went wrong?" post-mortems are already underway.

Its going to get crushed next weekend when Fast Six and Hangover 3 hit, both domestically and abroad (Fast and Furious movies are huge internationally). Part of me wants to feel good that they aren't being hugely rewarded for what isn't a very good movie, except that I don't think the things I dislike about it hurt the box office at all. Cinemascore was an A, most people seem to be positive about it, and the fans like me who think it drops the ball all still saw it. This looks more like a case of 2 things, a poor release date (sandwiched between Iron Man 3 and Fast Six), and a ceiling on how large of an audience you're going to get for a Star Trek movie.

I think the real lesson they should be taking from this is that a giant expensive explodey blockbuster is not the right approach, make it about the story, and scale back the budget. There is NO reason Star Trek movies should cost 200 million dollars. If we're lucky they'll take the series away from Abrams/Bad-Robot and let someone who actually understands the series have a crack at it. I think more than anything this movie shows a lot of the weaknesses of Abrams' re-imagining to begin with, by highlighting and magnifying the problems of the first movie. Star Trek should be a fun character driven series about space explorers, NOT an explodey check-your-brain-at-the-door set-piece driven action movie.

If we're lucky they give it to a new set of writers and do some kind of exploration story. I could also see them trying to cut costs and doing a present-day time-travel story a la Voyage Home, that could work because it would force them to hang the movie on the cast interactions (which are the best part about the Abrams movies) and downplay the action/conspiracy stuff.

Unfortunately, given the way Into Darkness goes, it seems likely that what they really want to do is a space war movie against the Klingons, and I think that's again not what this series should be about.