BigDamnArtist wrote:

(I'm not familiar with "Ocean Marketing"... any chance of a definition?)

http://venturebeat.com/2011/12/27/ocean … ly-emails/

I'm an administrator on a facebook group named, "I Need an Editor" which is used by producers to pool editors together so that no one goes too long without work.  I have both hired, and been hired several times from this group.  Most of the posts are very to the point.  "Discovery pilot start next week, competitve rate, LA based."  Is a good example.  Today a 25 year old "Owner," of a "Company," posted the following.  Her creative use of quotes and dashes has been retained so that aliens will someday have a reason for killing us all.

"My production company XXXXXXXXX is looking for an editor.  We are LA based and have needs ranging from 1-day shoots, to short films, to web series and will be working on features soon!  We are really looking to 'add someone to our team' - a real 'part of the process' type of editor looking to grow with us - but still in a freelance capacity.

Some of this work would be pro bono, some paid low-budget, some higher.  Obviously as we grow, so do all of our paychecks. 

Beyond working with only us, I'd constantly be putting in efforts to finding you paid work elsewhere to compensate for pro bono work."

Now...there's a lot wrong with that, and I don't think I should have to point out why.  However a couple of the editors on the group gently reminded her that this was a group for paid professionals with immediate gigs with defined start dates.  She was...baffled by this.  After what I thought was a constructive conversation, I looked her up on twitter to try and point her in the right direction.  That's when I found, and subsequently reposted this on the group page (from which she was subsequently kicked out).

http://pics.lockerz.com/s/268478994

728

(449 replies, posted in Off Topic)

vidina wrote:

Man Of Steel trailer doesn't really make me want to watch it. Feels way too melancholy for a superman movie.

There has always been an undercurrent of melancholy to Superman.  He's always lamented the outsider feeling and longed for connection to his Kryptonian roots.  Anytime the Bottle City of Kandor is mentioned, that melancholy is palpable.

729

(28 replies, posted in Episodes)

The book version of "Men Who Stared at Goats," is actually an awesome read. 

Trey turned me onto "Under the Kingdom of Heaven," by John Krakauer, which is a damn fine piece of investigative journalism.

"The Power of Habit," is pretty fascinating.

As a Dad, I have a great deal of respect for the book "Unconditional Parenting."

I dug Joe McGuinesses, "The Rogue," and am equally digging Errol Morris new book, "A Wilderness of Error."

iJim wrote:
Eddie wrote:
iJim wrote:

Perfect movie on every level......historically....


Nope.

You'll have to explain. Because I didn't see anything inaccurate.


*cracks knuckles*

1)  The film makes a point of saying (as in, Daniel Day Lewis actually says on camera) that Lincoln was always against slavery.

On the Senate floor in 1858, Abraham Lincoln says "I as much as any other man am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race."

In his 1860 campaign, he calls John Brown's plan to free and arm slaves, "absurd," and vows to leave slavery as is.

And most damning, up until 1862, Abraham Lincoln had a plan to colonize freed black slaves in Africa and Mexico, because up until the end of his presidency, Lincoln clearly stated that he did not believe freed blacks could live as equals in the US.  By the end of his Presidency, Frederick Douglass did say that Lincoln "had the wisdom to be instructed" in matters of race and after the war ended he called him, "the black man's President."  But while the film insinuates that Lincoln always had this wisdom, in reality he had a very slow evolution.  Frederick Douglass himself just three years prior to his death called him "a genuine representative of American prejudice and Negro hatred." The omission of Lincoln's evolution is a problem for me.  Not because I think Lincoln needed to be bloodied up in the film, but because I actually think it lends strength to his character by showing the capacity to change and evolve a viewpoint, as his did.

2)  The "race against time," was neither a race nor time sensitive.  Lincoln had already pledged prior to the vote on the 13th amendment, that if it didn't pass, he would call congress into a special session in March to vote again, AFTER the Republican majority had expanded, which would have easily given him the votes needed.

3)  The vote tally's of congress were not done by delegates based on state representatives.  This is the House, mind you.  There are districts and states were by no means uniform.

4)  Mary Todd Lincoln was not at the vote

5) The Confederate delegate never made it to DC.

6)  Prior to the events of Lincoln's opening shot, Louisiana, Tennesse, and Virginia, had already dismantled and reformed their state constitution and ABOLISHED slavery on their own.  This is important to note because it reiterates the fact that the 13th amendment was a foregone conclusion.  Lincoln VERY BADLY wanted it passed in his first term, but he didnt need to in order for the future of Black America. 

7) Speaking of Black America, where were the Black Americans?  I understand the movie wasn't named Douglass or Tubman but it would have bee nice to ACKNOWLEDGE that emancipation would not have happened without leadership from Black Americans.


Lincoln absolutely gets MUCH right.   In fact, it is simply amazing they didn't even attempt any of the "Brother against brother," or "tragedy," bullshit.  But let's not pretend it's perfect.

731

(80 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I've just been going back to class mostly.  Monday is Escrima, Wednesdays Jiu Jitsu, Saturday Muay Thai.  Before each class I warm up with a light kettlebell routine and after each class I murder whats left of me with battleropes.  I'll start posting tomorrow.

To it's credit, it does not repeat many of the other mistakes of Civil War cinema, but it doesn't get it purely right either.

iJim wrote:

Perfect movie on every level......historically....


Nope.  Mind you I loved the film, but there's some historical bending to be had.  Not that it's a bad thing, but to call it historically perfect is not accurate.

734

(1,649 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I dug the new Delta Rae video as well.

But um....new movie from Shane Carruthers guys.  No idea what the fuck I'm looking at, but I'm in.

735

(670 replies, posted in Creations)

Not really my creations, but certainly my work.   I've got three shows I worked on roughly on the air now-ish.

Abby's Ultimate Dance Competition on Lifetime.  I worked on Episodes 4, 7, and 10.

Airport 24/7: Miami on Travel.  This is the show I had to go live in Miami for for a few weeks.  I worked on kinda everything.

My Ghost Story on Bio.  I did a few segments for them over the summer.  It's airing like mad now.

736

(569 replies, posted in Creations)

Ewing wrote:

I start editing tomorrow. Best case scenario is that I get it done by Christmas.

If you want me to look at any cuts, I'd be happy to.

737

(165 replies, posted in Off Topic)

My Jiu Jitsu coach was a special guest at an MMA event in England some years back, and during a break in between fights was interviewed in the ring.  He was going to tell a funny story about this Korean guy next to him who smelled awful.  He started by saying, "So I'm sitting next to this smelly Asian guy...."

He was immediately booed out of the cage.  Because in England, Asian means being from the Middle East, and a racist stereotype over there is that all people from the middle east do not bath.  He said the Yank equivalent of "So this loud colored fellow..."  Now, is he racist or a bad guy?  Of course not.  But he displayed a certain culutural ignorance for which he is ultimately responsible.  Anyone who has traveled internationally runs the risk of this.

Now take that word I just used.  Colored.  Here, it's an awful phrase that is a leftover term from our deplorable history with slavery.  But let's say you go to South Africa and someone says, "Oh that nice Coloured gentleman," what they would be referring to is a specific ethnic subset of Afrikaners from Cape Malay, of European and Kohsian and/or Bantu decent.  That is a self applied term that has no racial history, and perfectly acceptable.

So my point is, look before you leap, even if only a little.

738

(261 replies, posted in Episodes)

Dorkman edit: no more. We're moving on.

739

(316 replies, posted in Episodes)

Yeah, let's be clear, the island was NOT purgatory.  The idea is that The sideways flashes during season 7 take place in some sort of afterlife, but only after literally hundreds of years later (to catch up with when Hurley and Ben finally croak).  Everything on the island was absolutely real, in terms of the story it told.

Also, because I'm a buddhist nerd, I got a huge kick out of a character being named Dogen.

740

(165 replies, posted in Off Topic)

The James Gunn thing recently reminded me of something that happened with someone else in the public eye, and what was in my opinion, the pitch perfect way of handling it. 

About a year and a half ago, a Professional Wrestler (cue Kyle) by the name of CM Punk was in Australia doing a show.  As a bad guy, or "Heel," part of his job is to antagonize the crowd so that the good guy, or "baby face" can then kick the crap out of him to everyone's applause.  Punk was in the middle of having a sortie with one fan, when the following happened.

It went viral and roughly .8 seconds later, TMZ had it up on it's page, and GLAAD was wheeling the trebuchet's towards WWE's direction.  But less than an hour after TMZ went live with the statement, Punk (who is a self described feminist and has a Rosie the Riveter tattoo on one of his sleeves) issued the following statement:

“I'm glad TMZ posted that video because everybody needs to be held accountable for their bullshit, me included. What I said was bullshit. I'm embarrassed. I own up to being a total douche in this situation and I offer a sincere apology to anybody I hurt with careless words.”

This, I think is the gold standard for handling these scenarios.  No denial, no weaseling.  Just one big, "Yep.  I was an idiot."  I feel like this should be taught on day one of human school.

741

(165 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Just want to say to all involved, I've really enjoyed this discussion here.   It's been a goo dmix of challenging, respectful, and informative. 

Unlike....some other threads....

742

(261 replies, posted in Episodes)

dorkman

743

(165 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Dave, my guts lean this way.  I have to remind myself that my experiences are not everyone else's, nor there's mine.  I think a middle way of resilience for oneself, and empathy for everyone else, is a pretty good goal for society to aim for.  But whereas my father's generation (he was born in 1937) tipped the scale towards having a stiff upper lip probably a bit too much (as my father never acknowledged his PTSD from Nam), I fear this current generation leans too hard towards everyone wearing nerf armor.  I don't know where the proper balance is.  I'm still learning it myself.

744

(261 replies, posted in Episodes)

Clearly he does not go into a screening of the Matrix and see, literally, The Matrix scroll down in 1's and 0's.  But by his own words, all they are are ideas, and to him, ideas should not have a monetary value attached.  They should be free to all. 

I promised myself I wouldn't get sucked back into this.  I woke up this morning and looked at this thread, and it was the same feeling as waking up in a hotel room with my hands covered in blood and no memory of how I got here.  So this is going to be my final word on it.  I don't think he's trolling per se.  But I do suspect he's the type of guy to use a laser pointer to torment his cat in hour long sessions of "catch the floating red dot."

745

(165 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I think we can all agree that it is essentially a case by case basis, and that you never know wether comedy will be either salt or salve to that wound until you've actually made the joke and put it into the ether. 

Cancer is obviously a touchy subject but man, did Tig Notaro absolutely SLAY with her 30 min set at Largo.  It was inspiring, moving, and best of all FUNNY.  Now, does that mean every attempt at humor about cancer will work like Tig's did?  No.  The alchemy that made up her set is not a recipe that can be easily replicated.  But I would rather we live in a world where people like James Gunn (who I was specifically referring to in my earlier post) are allowed to make mistakes, and own up to them, before we throw the baby out with the bathwater like Chris Braak did with his dystopian "Whatever," response.

We're all human.  We're all going to make mistakes, but lets look at patterns before we decide to just abandon someone as an artist because of one stupid fucking thing they said.

746

(261 replies, posted in Episodes)

The fact that you see movies, music, and literature as nothing more than ideas and information says far worse about yourself than any of us ever could.  You are entitled to your opinion, but man do I pity you.

747

(165 replies, posted in Off Topic)

For the record, I am of the opinion that nothing should be taboo in terms of comedy.  Nothing.  That does not mean I'm never offended by something, I certainly am.  But as Stephen Fry likes to say....

"It's now very common to hear people say, "I'm rather offended by that", as if that gives them certain rights. It's no more than a whine. It has no meaning, it has no purpose, it has no reason to be respected as a phrase. "I'm offended by that." Well, so fucking what?"

So yes, I do get offended occasionally (as stated on the commentary, Twilight's depiction of women offends me), but I also recognize that being offended is just a reaction of my ego when I am powerless to actively change something I have moral objection to.  With ALL Of that said, nothing is lower to me than something that is offensive AND not funny.  That makes my blood boil more than anything.

748

(261 replies, posted in Episodes)

There does seem to be a borderline generational sea change to how art is viewed and consumed.   And make no mistake, when you watch a film, listen to a song, or read a book, you ARE consuming it.  The way I was raised, if you consume something, you owe something.  You either believe this, or you don't.

749

(261 replies, posted in Episodes)

No, but it built like a symphony to that one perfect crystalized moment.

750

(261 replies, posted in Episodes)

TheGreg wrote:

Writing a book certainly doesn't cost any more, making an album not much more for sure. Making a film costs a bit more than putting on a play, although I'm not convinced it's a lot more, regardless, that's not the point. Any industry has to figure out a way to make its product viable in the environment it finds itself, not the one it would like to be in.

And here is where you demonstrate your complete ignorance to what goes into making film, television, and theater.