You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by Trey
Begun, the Disney Star Wars onslaught has.
I expect sometime next week they'll announce the new direct-to-video "Ewok Buddies" series.
Hey Eddie - since it's topical (both here and in the real world) - what's your mother's take on the proposal to lift the ban on women in combat?
I liked Under the Dome until the (surprise!) unsatisfying ending. But up until then it was a solid example of King's "small town gets hit by a supernatural whatsis and everybody goes batshit" sub-genre.
What can I say, that's my favorite King genre - see also Salem's Lot and Needful Things and many of the Derry stories.
I'm rereading 11/22/63 right now, actually. I started because I didn't have anything else handy, and figured I'd pass some time rereading the first part where the character encounters the *ahem* magic bean. And now I'm halfway through already.
Haven't read all of King's recent stuff, but 11/22/63 is my favorite of his from the past decade or so.
I remember it took me quite a while to figure out what HIMYM was...
/thought maybe it was Korean anime
/Himym Style!
We have a thread about Gary Busey. It's a big tent here at DiF.
*takes a random leap at google to see what the above might be referring to*
*pretty sure I found it*
Well, okay.
Buck up, man. There's a damn war on.
This is true - there don't seem to be many examples of the "guy sets out to conquer an enemy, then joins with them to fight back against his own people" plotline, outside the modern era. Other movies with similar elements that I can think of are Little Big Man, Quigley Down Under and Enemy Mine (I give Enemy Mine special props for putting a rather unique spin on the "falling in love with the native girl" subplot. :-)
Supposedly the earliest example of "Wait a sec - Indians are people, too" was Broken Arrow in 1950, which also has a number of elements in common with the Ferngully plotline. From the '50's onward, fighting Indians gradually became less of a thing in Westerns, the genre became more about gunslingers and shootouts.
Even so, there were still occasional throwbacks like Zulu, which was a good old fashioned "let's kill the indigenous for the crime of being here when we invaded" yarn, but those are extremely rare now that empire-building is seen as a mostly negative thing.
Yeah, i recognized the jab for what it was.
All I'll say to that is - I didn't watch Looper with a copy of Syd Field's book and a checklist in front of me - I watched it for entertainment. It was only when the movie stalled for me that I opened the hood to have a look, and darned if I didn't see some disconnected wires.
And other than that little shot, he was much cooler about it all than he might have been... or than other folks would have been.
Johnson clearly enjoys interacting with the audience, he's done it quite a bit with Looper in various ways. My guess is listening to us yammer would be frustrating not because he can't bear criticism, but because he'd want to respond, or correct things we were just wrong about, etc. Which is fine - and it'd be fun to actually do that if he ever wants to. But I agree that Twitter is a poor forum for that kind of thing, it's just too limiting and disjointed for any lengthy discourse.
Even so - just reading through the tweets, I pretty much get why he made the choices he made. I just disagree with a lot of them. Which again is fine - somebody makes a movie, somebody else watches it and has their reaction, good, bad or indifferent. That's the deal. Neither side owes the other anything else.
I'm still glad he got to make the movie he wanted - and I'm glad it was a movie someone wanted to make, as opposed to another soulless paycheck flick like Battleship or Transformers. The movie didn't work that well for me personally but hey, whadda ya gonna do.
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by Trey
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.
Currently installed 9 official extensions. Copyright © 2003–2009 PunBB.