You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by Dave
Next time we do something like this we're putting in a little bit of money, using Shotrunner, and breaking the work down so we're not dumping everything on one poor bastard (and then bothering him about when it will be finished).
We're going to organise this shit. Pipeline - we will have it.
Anything we can give you a hand with?
I started playing around with sketchbook pro this evening. I haven't drawn anything in a long time, pretty rusty. Trying to remember how to draw shapes.
It's ok, I'm sure it was warranted.
I love that you have Dapper Dan. Gods I adore that film.
Happy July 1st everyone. Here in the future we have indeed seen road trip, and I can say with a degree of grim certainty that many of us are not going to quit our day jobs to become actors.
Zarban wrote:"Even guys are like, 'If no one's around, I'm totally gonna put the bubble bath in.'"
W—What? WHAT?!
Don't pretend you don't love bath bombs.
And let's not act like we haven't all tucked it between our legs, practiced our falsetto, and played at being "The Lady of the house at her repose".
Ew.
Now go wash your hands.
Teague: Can you show us some of the things you've made from wood?
My name is David. I'm 34, married, and fascinated by all the things.
That's enough about me. Next poster; tell me your favourite story, be it literary, film, game, whatever.
2020 is the RPG for people who watched Bladerunner, and thought "That is my idea of heaven!"
To be honest, I'm more excited about the revamp to the pen & paper system. Cyberpunk 2020 was one of the staples of my later teenage years; friends and I would spend entire weekends gaming on almost no sleep and way too much pizza.
... But CD Projekt RED are making a new Cyberpunk 2020 RPG, AND MIKE PONDSMITH IS RELEASING AN UPDATE TO THE P&P RPG AS WELL!
*swoons*
Dorky gamer orientated video.
I see all the problems we're talking about here, but they didn't bug me too much. I thought it was lovely, but lightweight.
Brave is Pixar's FCPX?
Spoilers follow, it's a very spoilery film.
Sadly, this is no longer true. In Brave's case, the blame has to be laid at the feet of the writers. A multitude of them.
Like Promethius, Brave suffers from a nasty case of the "could have been's", and the dreaded "we're trying to tell too many stories in the same film" syndrome. What we're presented with starts out well, and the first act sets up this strong independent character you could picture leading armies, or conquering great opposition. The second act decides that's a little too adult, and so devolves into a completely different film where the lead becomes a one dimensional character in a fairy tale. The jammy paws of Disney are all over it; from anthropomorphised animals to talking ones, no real stakes or risk, and safe, obvious characters. The weak third act culminates in a mighty ... whimper. You're left wondering if that's really all there was to the film.
Pixar films used to be driven by a clear message, and each film had a theme which the characters explored. Brave doesn't do this; instead we're left with a bleary, unfocused mess, and although it's pretty, it's not compelling. The lead isn't brave, she's just young. Calling the film "teenagers are dicks!" or "bearmum!" would have been more appropriate.
The single worst aspect of the experience was the dedication at the end to Steve Jobs, a man who's laser focus and drive for perfection built one of the most well loved brands in history. Brave is an ill fitting tribute.
I actively disliked Fincher's version of Girl with the Dragon Tattoo so much, that I turned it off half way through. The damn thing bored me to tears! I've seen, and enjoyed the three Swedish films but the US version changes some key events, and the result feels a little too Hollywood.
Nice music, nice title sequence, and some nice framing doesn't make up for an uninspired interpretation of a better film.
If this included discussion of stunt and pyro work, I'd be pretty damn happy.
I like ars.
My problems with the film began almost immediately. A Lord of the Rings-inspired panoramic landscape gives way to a humanoid standing by a waterfall. He drinks some black goop, and then his DNA begins to fall apart, followed quickly by the rest of him. This mess all dissolves into the river, et voilà—the implication is that humans arose because of this. Just five minutes in and my brain is already beginning to push back against this dreck.
I really thought I'd like that, but it really didn't do much of anything for me. It felt a bit like a Wes Anderson film but without his usual troupe of players. Elijah Wood was terrific, tho. I wish Liev Schreiber success in all things—even narrating car commercials—but this doesn't make my list.
It's an odd film really; I understand what you mean, and can see how it would glance off with nary a mark.
It's very subdued, as if it were holding it's breath. All I ask from a film is that it tells me a story which felt like it needed to be told, remembers I want to be entertained, and leaves me with characters I remember and care about. I like that about Everything is Illuminated.
And really, the whole concept of essential viewing is moot in the face of subjective experiences.
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by Dave
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.
Currently installed 9 official extensions. Copyright © 2003–2009 PunBB.