avatar wrote:

Fair enough - doesn't have to be 'normal conventional society goals', but give him some direction. Anything. Just seeing him catatonic or talking bollocks with his deadshit friends (he's clearly brighter) or throwing his money away... I dunno... seems like a lost soul.

Maybe that's sort of what they are going for?

More than that, I'm not sure why everyone is so stuck on "catatonic Jesse". I mean, he was like that for what, maybe 2-3 episodes ("Blood Money" through "Confessions")? At least one of which we barely even saw him on screen? I feel like the mid-season break really screwed with people's heads, because most seem to act like Jesse has been like this for months on end, where in reality it's been a relatively short time on the show. But since it was the majority of what we saw once they got back from the mid-season break, everyone feels like he's been there forever.

avatar wrote:

Here's some more examples... the quest to become accepted by his parents (that subplot went nowhere)

That subplot didn't go "nowhere" -- he tried and failed. He bought the house as a final "fuck you" to break off any contact with them. I mean, it wasn't the most developed plot line in the world, but it had an arc, completed it, and was used to help reinforce why he's been so loyal to Walt as a father figure who actually respects him (at least until recently).

avatar wrote:

make enough dough to impress some chick (Great Gatsby plot)

Other than Walter, is there anyone that Jesse has shown express interest in impressing? Even the girls he's been with, he's never seemed to flaunt or show off. That's not who he is.

avatar wrote:

run his own competing meth lab that's even better than Walt's by first enrolling in a chemistry degree (Good Will Hunting plot)

I'm not sure it was ever spelled out, but I'm pretty sure that Jesse is a high school drop out. Walter noted that he flunked him in Chemistry, and I don't remember them ever saying he retook it to get a passing grade. So even ignoring the fact that Jesse has never really shown the type of ambition that would be required to go this route, practically it seems pretty far fetched.

avatar wrote:

I wish his character wasn't somewhat let down by the writers - becoming mostly directionless in the last season or two - no real motivation for anything, interspersed with random indignant rage.

If Jesse had a goal he was striving towards (e.g. starting a family, entering college, beginning a business, going legit) then it'd be easier to root for him, despite the bad things he's done.

As someone who's known and grew up with guys like Jesse, the idea that he would have a goal -- such as the examples presented -- would make zero sense.

Whether that makes a viewer more and less likely to "root" for him doesn't matter. That's not who Jesse Pinkman is as a person/character. So writing him that way, and sticking with who he is, is the ultimate service to a character. The real letdown would be if the writers shoehorned something contrary to what someone like Jesse would realistically want/do just to make the viewing experience more "standard" in terms of having less ambiguous good guys and bad guys.

avatar wrote:

So what character are y'all rooting for to make it to the very end credits? The whiny son? The comatose wife? The blowhard cop? The catatonic Jesse? The sleazy lawyer?

I can't pick one. They've all become so unsympathetic. I was rootin' for Pinkman, but he doesn't seem to have any goal he's struggling for. I don't even know why he was cooking. The money meant nothing to him.

The whiny son? You mean the teenager with cerebral palsy who's been lied to and manipulated by both his parents while dealing with his parents splitting up then reconciling, all while his father is fighting cancer? Yeah -- clearly an unsympathetic character.

Pinkman started cooking because he was a fuck up who had no legitimate skills and was trapped in a shithole world where drug dealing is seen as one of the only ways to make enough money to get out. He may not care about money now, but he did when it all started. He was never concerned with building an empire, but he always was looking for a payday. Several times he's had "enough" and tried to get out, but was pulled back by Walter or other circumstances...again, Jesse is a bit of a fuck up. The fact that he's been thiiiiiiiiis close to being free and in decent shape several times by now and just hasn't been able to close the deal is probably the most frustrating and heartbreaking things about his character.

Really, despite some of their flaws and some bad moments, really everyone other than Walter and Saul deserve some sympathy. Sklyer's ship is sailing as she gets more and more on board with Walter...maybe she's there now.

Which brings me to this week's episode...

Doctor Submarine wrote:

Hank was willing to offer up Jesse on a platter in order to nab Walt, so I'm not really rooting for him so much anymore.

Hank has difficulty handling his anger. This has led to him being an asshole in many ways -- his treatment of Marie when he was injured and his at-all-costs pursuit of Walt. However, is there anyone in their right might who doesn't think his anger is justified? Even a normal person, one who doesn't have a history of being unable to control their anger, would probably react in very similar ways...if slightly less extreme. Yet, because he's willing to let Jesse die or tries to bully Skyler a bit to flip on Walt -- admittedly both uncaring/unsympathetic moves -- he's suddenly as disgusting as Walter or Saul?

Rob wrote:

Now that Hank has looped in Agent Gomez, I wonder just how much he's actually told Gomez.

"Rabid Dog" was another episode of close calls—Hank stopping Jesse just before he torches the place, Hank & Jesse pulling away a second before Walt pulls in. They kind of turned it into the The Conversation during that whole Jesse-wearing-a-wire-and-meeting-Walt sequence.

The only thing I'm not sure Agent Gomez knows is the DVD Walt made. I'd think that he would have told him about it, especially once Gomez stated that he believed Jesse's story. This operation still seemed pretty much on the down low, so telling Gomez about the dvd wouldn't be a major risk -- and gives Hank cover later if it comes out on it's own. But they don't spell it out, and I could see Hank's pride keeping him from sharing what he might hope would be seen as a desperate move once they have Walt anyways.

Speaking of close calls -- can we acknowledge that everything after this point can be pinpointed to Jesse's decision to not talk to Walt? The bald guy not being a hitter was a bit of a throwaway amusement, but if Jesse had walked up to Walter...this could/would likely be all over for Walt. The second he admits to poisoning Brock, and the reason why, EVERYTHING Jesse said on that tape would have credibility. They might not get Walt for everything, but he'd be in jail for sure until his cancer got him and all the details would have been aired out during a trial...Jesse/Hank would have made sure of that.

I'm all for badass-Jesse, and his call to Walt (calling him "Asshole" instead of "Mr. White") was freaking great...but damn, he was SO FUCKING CLOSE to sinking Walt. I'm really curious what sort of plan he has in store -- because it seems clear that whatever it is, it's the driving force to what we are seeing in the flash forwards.

*quick-side note: As a quick magic-bean moment...when Hank and Gomez are talking about how to go after Walt, they mention the pest control place and the Drew Sharp disappearance. I think both of these are solid leads that could factor in later. However, can I just say that part of me laughs at the idea that no one has thought to simply throw an anonymous tip to the IRS about the White's car wash. Tax evasion is how they got Capone, and they would most assuredly would collapse the Whites. Skyler would get busted for not just the car wash, but it would likely force them to look more closely at her previous job and Ted's "accident". Either way, that's not nearly as good a payoff dramatically, but I found it amusing.

avatar wrote:

Was there some clue with the SD card? Hank was out on the balcony with his mate, leaving Pinkman alone with the video camera. Where's the SD card? Hank looks at the camera and says we'll need another SD card. Dunno... might be a red herring.

Not even a red herring. He's merely asking for another SD card because Jesse filled up the first one with his confession. He doesn't indicate the first SD card is missing in any way, nor does he behave as if Jesse's massively important confession is suddenly missing.

Nothing to see here.

Doctor Submarine wrote:

I'm still amazed that, even with only four episodes to go, that flash forward is still a totally mystery. They're really holding out on that one, and I bet we'll never see it coming.

My guess is that we catch up to the beginning of the flash forwards with 2 episodes left. That means 2 episodes of craziness, ending with Walt going on the run. Then the flash forwards happen. Then we get 2 final episodes setting up the crescendo and giving the payoff/aftermath.

Rob wrote:

I badly want to know precisely what Jesse gave them on tape!

I can't wait to see the full tape that Doc mentioned -- but I'd imagine it has "everything" on it. I mean, Jesse isn't the lying type in that sense. He's hurt and scared and angry. When Jesse is a raw nerve, he has no mind to play a game of chess, it's a straight line.

= = = = = = = = = = = =

I had the great pleasure of -- for the first time since watching BB -- watching it with someone else. I got to catch it with Brian while he was in town, and it was awesome to have someone to chat with during the episode.

He also made one of the best observations I've seen so far regarding the episode -- a musing about whether the Skyler hate will continue now that she's "Let Heisenberg be Heisenberg" as it were.

I commented in the other thread that I thought Skyler would go further in order to protect "her plan", especially if the situation seemed within their control. Killing Jesse definitely falls into that category. The way she did it was particularly cold, though. That moment, along with her willingness to dupe Walt Jr., has me thinking she might be willing to go even further than I initially thought.

Speaking of Walt Jr...I'm really struggling to figure out how he's going to react to all this. I mean, for all the crap we've seen on the show, Jr. has really been put through a lot off camera. He's basically kept in the dark about everything, but also kept at arms length by everyone while trying to deal with his father having cancer. How is he going to react when he finds out the truth, and that not only are his parents terrible human beings, but that they've been lying and in some ways manipulating him for a year. He clearly loves his parents, but is it enough to keep him from disowning them? Will it be enough for him to "buy in" as it were to protect the family? Breaking Bad has done such a great job of keeping character moves believable (even when they aren't, really) but I can't even begin to imagine how a person would handle this sort of revelation, much less how to mold that into a character and plot device. It does seem like at some point he's going to find out -- and I would think that his reaction is going to be a major pivot point of what happens as this show comes to a close.

Either that or he's just super sad and stays on the peripheral as he's done so far. It'd be a little disappointing, but there are so many other major things being tied up I would understand.

This was a lower-key episode in the sense that there wasn't as many "HOLY SHIT HOLY SHIT HOLY SHIT" moments as we've had in this season. However, some of the character decisions -- Jesse confessing to Hank, Skyler's falling to the Dark Side, and Gomez being brought in on the case -- really set the stage in a way that made this yet another amazing episode.

Shit's about to get real.

79

(77 replies, posted in Off Topic)

More notes:

  Show
Am I the only one who got a real kick out of Walt's distraught pacing before recording the video? The acting in the DVD is one thing, but that's just Heisenberg being Heisenberg -- a threat to make a problem go away. The real manipulation was Walt's subtle "I'm troubled by doing this" actions in an effort to bring Skyler along.

I also find it interesting just what kind of whiplash they are setting Skyler up for in all this. I mean, she had the very same plan of just waiting for Walt to die, but her hostility towards her own sister (I do wish they would play this up more, they ARE sisters after all) when Marie suggests Walt kill himself. It's not that she disagrees with the sentiment, as I believe she hasn't really forgiven/forgotten what Walt has done -- it's that she already has her plan and she's somewhat deluded herself into thinking she has a handle on the situation. She is waiting out the clock on her schedule -- one that makes it easier on the kids and guarantees her a massive payout after Walt's death -- and any variation of that plan pisses her off.

But she's in for a very rude awakening. First will be the utterly bogus belief that this is all "in the past" and that her family is actually safe. There's no getting away from this, and Jesse will just be the beginning. However, it seems to me that since she sees it as "her plan" that's endangered, she might react with blinders on regarding her own best interest. Rather than admitting mistake and running from Walt, she may look to push back in an attempt to finally break away from the past (even though it's likely impossible). She did this already when Lydia came to the car wash -- but the stakes are about to get much higher than an ex-business associate stopping by to politely ask if Walter would return to cooking. The question will become: How far will Skyler go to protect her "plan" to wait out the clock in a way that protects her children from finding out what a monster their father is.

The second revelation is if/when she finds out the sheer depth of Walter's darkness. She hasn't really faced any of the crimes directly, and she certainly doesn't know the actions Walt's taken that are truly evil. There's a separation from his actions, even now. Has she really put together the fact that Walt steered the hit towards Hank, as opposed to still thinking it was just Hank's investigation of Fringe in general? Do you think she'll be ok knowing that Walter was complicit in the murder of a child, of that he flat out poisoned one himself?

Again, how far Skyler will go on this path will be key to the final episodes and her eventual fate (Hank spells out as much at dinner).

Lastly, a scene I don't think has gotten enough attention was Walt telling Walt Jr. about his cancer returning. It speaks volumes to just how fucking horrible Walter has become. Walter just willfully destroyed his own son in what amounts to a frivolous power play. It's not like Hank/Marie were going to kidnap his son, or they would have just told him the truth and done so by now. They were simply trying to get him out of the house evening. But rather than allow them even a minor "win" in this game of cat and mouse, Walt manipulated his son with an absolutely crushing blow. The disregard to his son is just breathtaking, even if it's not completely surprising. Credit goes to RJ Mitte, who just flat out nailed it...the slow revelation of the heartbreak and facing something that he knew was coming at some point but somehow you're never prepared for -- it shone a spotlight on the disgusting act Walter had just done.

More and more, I find myself thinking back to the final episodes of "The Shield".

This includes spoilers to The Shield, FYI:

  Show
One of the most amazing things that The Shield did was have Vic Mackey confess. To EVERYTHING. As a viewer, I saw all the terrible things that Vic had caused, either directly or indirectly. There's a double-edged sword to having people around a character finding out the bad stuff -- it's unlikely they will know EVERYTHING, as I do. A perfect example is Walt's role in Jane's death. Unless he tells someone, no one in the entire universe of the show will know but him and I (the viewer). But when you start peeling back the damage done, part of me wants people to know it all. To find it all out and have the horror of the entire situation roll over them.

In The Shield, Vic Mackey confesses to everything as part of an immunity deal. He gets away with it all, but suddenly everyone he's ever known fully understands the level of corruption and evil that I had been watching play out over the years. It was immensely satisfying to me as a viewer. Watching the face of the woman recording his confession, watching his boss and fellow detective (who kind of hated him) react to seeing all their suspicions confirmed and then some -- it was so cathartic. It was 7 seasons of dramatic irony paying off.

Breaking Bad feels the same way to me at this point. As Skyler and Hank and Marie start to see glimpses of who Walter has become...I want them to find out more. I want Skyler to come face to face with the mental image of Walter dissolving the body of Drew Sharp in a barrel of acid. I want to see Hank's rage when he realizes that Walt himself redirected the Brothers Moncada to Hank in order to save himself. I want to see Jesse's collapse when he realizes that Walt stood in silence as Jane died next to him. I want the light of day shining on all the wreckage Walter has left in his wake.

I doubt there's a way for "everything" to come to light. Plus, as I said, The Shield did a straight up confession and I wouldn't want Breaking Bad to just copy that. I just find myself hoping that they can do something similar in that these people, already outraged and broken down by what they know about Walt, really learning the depths of evil he's become. I/we have been watching this spectacular ruse being built for 5 seasons, and I'm hoping for more than a partial collapse.

If the series so far has been an indicator, I have a feeling I won't be too disappointed.

80

(51 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Jimbo wrote:

I rather see Bryan Cranston as James Gordon than lex luthor have mark strong as lex luthor that would be best

I'd rather see Bryan Cranston play an old/retired Bruce Wayne in a live-action version of "Batman Beyond".

Terry McGinnis would be played by Nicholas Hoult.

81

(77 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Doctor Submarine wrote:

Wait...

  Show
Was the Alaska thing a callback to Jane? I thought they wanted to go to New Zealand.

Huh...

  Show
Actually you are correct. I thought I remember Alaska being part of the discussion before they finalized on New Zealand -- but it's possible I made that up........

However, I looked around a bit on the nets and found this in an interview with Gennifer Hutchison (wrote the episode):

Why does Jesse fixate on Alaska?
He and Jane in their drug-induced haze talk about New Zealand, so for awhile we talked about maybe he’d say New Zealand, but that felt a little more far-fetched. I remember always being in the room and saying, “I just want Jesse to get on a bus to Alaska and get the hell out.” I love Jesse and I want the best for him. Alaska still feels like a frontier in our collective imagination, like just generally a place you can start over and maybe become a bush pilot. It’s so remote and so different from New Mexico. It just felt right.

LINK: http://www.vulture.com/2013/08/breaking … sions.html

82

(77 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Ok, after 3 viewings...some thoughts:

  Show
It was amazing seeing both Hank & Walt attempting to play the father figure to Jesse -- with Jesse rejecting Hank, but (wrongly) accepting Walt. That poor kid really has just been broken down something fierce. His turn, once he realized what Walt had done, was (and I imagine will continue to be) epic.

The throwback to Alaska was just heartbreaking, as well. Of everything he's been through since this all started, losing Jane was what he fell back on. He still blames himself for her death, and while I can't imagine how he'd ever learn the truth, the fact that it was mentioned makes me wonder if he might.

Thinking about the last year-plus, it's really shocking to think about the stuff people have found out and still don't know about Walt's mis-adventures. Each person seems to think he's generally a terrible human being, but they just don't have any idea.

Come to think about it, Saul and Jesse know the most...but I have to wonder how much Saul truly knows. He may know more than anyone other than Walt himself, meaning Saul may actually be the 2nd most morally bankrupt character in this little play (Jesse knows, but is clearly affected by it all). Makes me think Saul will become even more pivotal as we head towards the finale.

Ugh...so much more. But I'm gonna stop there.

83

(77 replies, posted in Off Topic)

So...uh, that happened.

I require a couple more viewing before I comment on anything.

5 episodes left.

84

(51 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Squiggly_P wrote:

Also, rumour has it that Bryan Cranston is going to be the DC Universe Lex Luthor for a while. Six films at least.

Isn't this a normal Hollywood thing? Signing someone for a potential recurring character for a bunch of appearances, even if there's no current intention to use them that much?

Doesn't automatically mean that there will be 6 films with him in it.

85

(77 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Rob wrote:

Oh hell yes.

spoiler Show

* All these flash forwards of the bearded Walt we've been getting continue to be difficult to decipher. Although (with a nod here to PorridgeGun's above prediction) it's telling that Walt has a full head of hair in addition to the beard, which indeed indicates that his cancer will at some point go away and not be a factor in the home stretch of the story.

* My girlfriend and I have officially started rooting for Hank. I'm kind of ashamed to admit that, but I think this may or may not be what the writers are going for. I view Hank and Jesse as heroes way more than I do Walt. Jesse has a functioning conscience and Hank apprehending Walt could save lives. (After the kid on the bike got killed, I went from disapproving of Walter to hating him. The Walt who killed Gus Fring became a different person—he became Gus Fring, someone who views the deaths of innocents as the cost of doing business.)

Responses to those two comments:

  Show
First, the fact that Walt has hair in the flash-forwards does NOT indicate that his cancer is back in remission -- it only indicates that he's no longer undergoing chemotherapy. That could mean that the cancer is in remission, but it also could mean that he volunteered or was forced to stop undergoing chemo. I would think that being "on the run" would make it pretty difficult to actually get treatments -- hospitals and prescriptions and all...so my guess is that the cancer is simply killing him at this point (giving him even less to lose and therefore more dangerous) because he has no way to get proper health care while being a fugitive who's known to have cancer.

Second, and this isn't meant to be an overly harsh judgement or anything, but it's actually kinda bad that it took you this long to start hating and rooting against Walter. He's only a sympathetic figure through about half of the first season. There are several points later in the first season where he's clearly transitioned into cooking meth as an ego-trip instead of actually taking care of his family -- he's warping the concept of taking care of one's family into an excuse to become the monster he clearly wants to become. He gets progressively worse every season, shedding any pretention that he cares about anyone other than himself (he only cares about his family because "it's what a man does" -- thus again making it about himself).

So really, you (and everyone else) should have  been rooting against Walter for several seasons now. wink

Brian wrote:

I predict:

  Show
Jesse ultimately kills Walt.

My really dark prediction:

  Show
Is that Walt Jr. murder someone before the end of this series. Whether it's Hank or Jesse in an attempt to protect Walter, or whether it's Walter himself out of anger for destroying the lives of everyone else in the family.

bullet3 wrote:

I gotta say it, while Season 5 has been my favorite up until this point, I thought this final cliffhanger episode in particular was super inconsistent and disappointing. Lots of character motivations that don't make sense, and suddenly the show is using time-lapse like crazy and jumping super quickly through pretty important details.

SPOILER Show
So Lydia, who has been paranoid as hell, near nervous breakdown, and begging to leave the business, is suddenly a criminal mastermind who wants to expand operations like crazy despite her company being under investigation? Bullshit. Then Walter, finally decides to get out of the business, despite being megamaniacal and not caring about the money earlier. Ok, I'll give them that one, but you're telling me that A. he's able to just stop cooking without any repercussions from the massive enterprise he just set up? I'm sure they'll get into it more next year, but not even having a scene of him telling Lydia and Todd that he's out seems like pretty important details. And B. Skylar just takes him back, like nothing's happened? She's been shown to be near suicidal and wanting him dead, but the second he says "I'm out",  it's all water under the bridge? Don't buy it.

And I'm really not digging the way the big reveal happens at the end. I'd kind of hoped that Hank would start to put the pieces together through his own detective skills. Having it be just this random object that was barely even setup earlier seems kinda lazy and short-hand to me, although I get what they're going for.

Next...can you tell I have no one to talk to about Breaking Bad in my area?

  Show
I remember Lydia being paranoid and anxious (to the point of being annoying) about everything -- but I don't remember her ever saying she wanted to get out of the business once and for all. Maybe I missed something, but she always seemed like this was a business, and as long as her hands were clean, she was fine with continuing on.

I think Walter giving up is "meh" believable. I mean, it was pretty clear that the amount of money was more than they'd ever need (or even could use without getting caught). The blow up with Jesse, the things he's had to do in the first half of the 5th season...the idea that he simply saw a way to get out and took it is a leap, but not a huge one.

I think the logistics of him quitting are a bit of a magic bean. I mean, the new cook/distributor would be happy Walter's not cooking anymore, Jesse is gone, Mike is dead, Todd is with Lydia and while Lydia tries to get him back, she's not the type to (at first) strong arm someone into doing something the way the rest of the guys Walter has worked with would. So, you kind of just have to take it at face value that if he simply walks away, no one is really left to tell him what to do. Also, I'm not sure what a scene about him telling Lydia/Todd would really add -- so I'm not disappointed that it wasn't shown.

Skyler hasn't "taken him back like nothing's happened". She's broken and waiting for him to die. She's a subdued prisoner in Walter's world -- but now that she has a goal in mind, all she has to do is endure. The best course of action for her in this situation is to not rock the boat. She clearly doesn't love Walter anymore. While she's not walking around shooting "I loathe you and want you dead" looks at Walter 24/7, that doesn't mean she's forgiven him. Remember, she's a mother. In X amount of months Walter will be dead, she'll be filthy rich, and her family can move on with the rest of their lives out from under Walter's thumb...being agreeable now is about protecting the family unit and keeping everyone (including their children) in the dark about the situation.

The "reveal" seems perfect for the show. Keeping that book, and keeping it in such an accessible area, was the last shred of hubris Walter had held on to after quitting. So of course that's what gives him away...his downfall comes from his underlying flaw. The theme throughout the show has been Walter's decisions, and how his selfishness and ego have destroyed everything around him. He finally steps away from everything -- and the ONE piece he keeps sinks him. Poetic.

Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaand lastly:

  Show
Am I the only one that noticed how Walter's cancer came back as soon as he left the meth cooking business? I think that's an awesome little nod at the fact that all this time it's been the meth business that he's cared about and what he's been "living for", and not his family.

86

(991 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Allison wrote:

"And I thought, ‘well she’s really good. It’s just a shame she’s so wee and dumpy…When she was about to come through to the auditions I nipped out for a minute and I saw Karen walking on the corridor towards me and I realised she was 5’11, slim and gorgeous and I thought ‘Oh, oh that’ll probably work’." -Steven Moffat on the casting process for the new companion

Considering I've yet to find someone, anyone, who started a description of what they like about Amy Pond with anything other than her physical attractiveness...I guess that worked out exactly like he thought.

Chalk it up to yet another thing Moffat did that hobbled the series during his run.

(that's not a knock on Karen Gillian, but rather on the story/character aspects that were likely borne out of the fact that the companion was a model)

Allison wrote:

I hope for another Doctor/Companion relationship like 10/Donna's. I hate all these "you are a mystery I must solve" arcs. I just want someone funny and tough and fairly normal.

THIS. THIS. THIS. THIS. THIS.

I'd also add that the 9/Rose relationship was also more grounded, nor particularly romantic.

87

(991 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Cotterpin Doozer wrote:

I know I'm clearly in the minority when it comes to Rose. She is a fan favorite and a big part of why they were able to successfully bring the show back. But if I'd started watching the show with either series 1 or 2, there's no way I'd still be watching it now. During the episode when the Doctor reunites with Sarah Jane, I wanted to  punch the stupid cow in the throat, and I hadn't even seen any of the classic series at that point. She doesn't  seem like a nice person, and I simply don't understand why the Doctor likes her or why we're supposed to like her.

I assume that means you can't stand Amy then, because her character is so selfish she's downright unlikable for a solid percentage of her run.

88

(991 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Allison wrote:

I love Alex Kingston, but I feel like the Moffat doesn't always know what to do with River. She seems to orbit the Doctor and dispense clues and...not much else.

That's because River Song wasn't a character, she was a plot device.

BigDamnArtist wrote:

...the Doctor being the last time lord, because of a choice he made and has to live with, is THE most interesting aspect of the character. It's why I fell in love with the character and mythology in the first place.

We're in agreement 100% on this.

BigDamnArtist wrote:

But idk, I kinda get frustrated sometimes when there's ANOTHER Dalek episode or Cybermen, I mean there is this boundless, endless universe out there that we could be exploring and we can't get away from these damn guys.

We're also in agreement on this, as well. I'll go one step further though, and note that they've actually ruined some amazing villains by overuse...

  Show
The Angels are an example of an AMAZING one-off villain that should have never been brought up again other than by reference. Actually seeing the Angels move in Time of the Angels / Flesh & Stone just destroyed the scariest part of their character -- trying to turn a horror villain into an action villain. And I'm sorry, but the Statue of Liberty being an Angel is like one of those funny quips you throw out in a writers meeting for a laugh, but then drop it because it's too over the top ridiculous to ever actually put into the show.

Same thing with the Silence. Probably a scarier hook than the Angels, what with the ever increasing number of marker counts on the arms. They certainly are built to be a longer running villain than the Angels -- but then they just get turned into the hallow foot-soldiers of some nonsensical religious order? Ugh.

Some examples of good use of villains? Vashta Nerada, in 1 two-parter and that's it. The Beast, again in a 2-parter and gone. The Family of Blood, 2 parter, done. The Empty Child. Satellite 5 & Simon Peg (and Jagrafess). The Dream Lord. The Time Zombies (with a solid twist).

Even the Daleks & Cybermen are great villains, though have simply been overused at this point -- mainly because we keep being told they are all gone then miraculously they return and we're supposed to be shocked (shocked I say!).

I don't claim it's easy developing a new villain for every episode, nor do I think it's impossible to return to a villain more than once (especially when it's a race of villains) -- but how the villain is designed is incredibly important on how you use them and how often you can use them without mangling the character.

I do think it's time to design a new villain in the Dalek/Cybermen mold, intending to use it as a long-term recurring threat. They are basic designs -- genocidal destruction and the destruction of free will -- grand themes of which there are numerous others you could tap to create another equivalent character design.

89

(991 replies, posted in Off Topic)

BigDamnArtist wrote:

The short short version is basically that the Smith series focus less on technological feats and vistas and more on creating an almost modernized fairy tale tone.
http://sfdebris.com/videos/doctorwho/s31e01.asp

He actually sums it up as a transition from Sci-Fi to Fairy Tale. I guess that I agree with SFDebris's assessment that the change isn't inherently good or bad, just different, but I can say unequivocally that I inherently enjoy Sci-Fi more than Fairy Tales -- so to me that's a negative.

But more than that, it wasn't the tone or even the genre shift that bothered me so much about Smith's run. It was that the Doctor was just bumbling and immature. One can be quirky, playful, and even youthful without crossing the line to annoyingly immature, but they leap right over it. Every time the Doctor got all whiney or grumpy or jealous or petty...it's just like "Really, I'm supposed to root for this guy?"

BigDamnArtist wrote:

However, my FAVORITE newwho companion? Rory all the way.

Plus... (coolest scene ever video)

  Show
That scene is already pretty awesome...but it reaches even more epic proportions of Rory's awesomeness when you consider that at this point in the series, he totally human again. He's not a Auton anymore, so he is literally just a regular human being standing on the bridge of a Cybermen ship staring down their entire fleet in search of his wife.

90

(449 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Yeah, I'm pretty sure this clip is the last thing I watch regarding Gravity until I see it in the theater.

This clip/teaser/trailer is so much better that the first one, though. Not only does it show you less of the movie (it really is just 2 min of the film, as opposed to a bunch of clips from different points), but unlike the first trailer there is no sound other than the music and the coms. Cuarón has stated that the movie won't have sound in space, which is great, and this trailer reflects that, while the first trailer didn't.

Either way, can't wait to see this in IMAX 3D.

91

(449 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Here's the newest trailer for "Gravity" -- which I'm actually sort of torn about whether I'm glad I watched it or not. It's god-damned amazing, but it also makes me want to learn nothing more about the movie before it comes out because seeing something like that for the first time on IMAX 3D is an experience I don't want to miss.

92

(162 replies, posted in Off Topic)

IGN game it a positive review and said it was the best Superman movie since the 1979 version.

I'm going in with reasonable expectations of it being entertaining but not amazing. I'm not heavily invested as a Superman fan either, so if it's fun and decent, I'll be happy.

I still haven't seen the first one.

94

(991 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Doctor Submarine wrote:

She was trying to protect Clara so that Clara would live as long as she needed to to accomplish what she needed to.

I'll have to re-watch the latest season, but did the TARDIS ever actually "protect" Clara though? I remember once it wouldn't let Clara in, but that was about protecting itself. Other than that, most of the friction between Clara and the TARDIS never felt like anything other than a foil for adorable banter. Which, I mean, I enjoyed and it was adorable, but it never felt (even in retrospect) that it was a part of some grander story line.

Tomahawk wrote:

Tell you what, when you come back in 50 years after making a TV show making no retcons, we'll talk.

I'm ok with a certain amount of retcon action...especially considering the nature of the show -- both it's longevity and dealing with time-travel. The thing is, the specific continuity issue I'm talking about isn't based on something that was created 50 years ago. It happened LAST SEASON.

  Show
On a more fundamental level, I'm not sure what the cutoff point would be exactly, but there is a point where creating a character that's supposed to have been around and effecting outcomes "all along" becomes sort of ridiculous. I'm not sure how long a show has to run before that story idea loses credibility, but clearly 50 years and 26 seasons was past that line, for me at least.

[edited to hide something that might be considered a spoiler]

95

(991 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I woke up today with a sore neck, and I thought I just slept on it wrong. Then I came back to read this thread and realized it was from the all the whiplash retcon action.

96

(38 replies, posted in Episodes)

If there was ever a movie I wish I could have sat in with y'all on, it would have been this one.

Demolition Man is one of my favorite movies. At first it comes off as a standard 90's "Action-Comedy", but once you realize it's actually an incredibly clever satire on both society & it's own film genre...it just goes to another level.

97

(991 replies, posted in Off Topic)

BigDamnArtist wrote:

Yo this is my cousin Jimmy the Time Lord, I know we've never mentioned him before, but he's living here now.

Hah...like Doctor Who has neeeeeeeeeeeeever done that before.

Oh, and btw:

  Show
Was I the only one that caught how Clara totally smashed the continuity from "The Doctor's Wife"? If you recall, there was this exchange between The Doctor and Idris (the TARDIS in humanoid form):

Idris: Did you ever wonder why I chose you all those years ago?
The Doctor: I chose you. You were unlocked.
Idris: Of course I was. I wanted to see the universe, so I stole a Time Lord and I ran away. And you were the only one mad enough.

Yet, in this season's finale...Clara is the one who chose which TARDIS the Doctor took. What was a really intriguing little exchange that created a sense of mystery and connection between the Doctor and the TARDIS...nevermind!

Inserting a character 20+ seasons into a storyline that is now magically supposed to have "always been there" throughout the entire show is audacious enough, but as soon as she hip-ly stopped the 1st Doctor was like "Hey, take this TARDIS instead!", I about threw something at the TV. The Doctor's Wife was one of the best Smith episodes, if not one of the best modern Who episodes...and to just piss all over one of the most mysterious and interesting plot points created in that episode just...ugh. *shakes head*

98

(991 replies, posted in Off Topic)

fireproof78 wrote:

I think they need to introduce another Time Lord (not the Master) for the Doctor to play off of.

Nah. One of the most interesting aspects of the Doctor (to me, at least) is the concept that he's totally alone.

The Master as a one-off wasn't too bad, but it suddenly starts losing it's impact if they start bringing back the Time Lords. I get annoyed enough when it's the Daleks or Cybermen every 3rd or 4th episode.

I feel like the show needs a refresh in more ways than just a new Doctor, at this point.

99

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

It's not like it'd be the first time a director failed, or that a real life limitation like a guy acting while on a horse caused a foul up.

The book was ambiguous, so my only real opinion on it was that the end of the film was also supposed to be ambiguous. If you loathe the idea of him being dead and the reigns thing merely being reality bleeding into the film, then it's just as ambiguous to say that he was mortally wounded and going off to die vs. being regularly wounded and fine.

Again...I shrug.

100

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Zarban wrote:

That's a myth. I was waiting for it, but he's clearly reining his horse as he rides over the hill.

That doesn't mean he'll survive the wound, but he's definitely not dead.

It's never specified in either the book or the film whether Shane is dead, mortally wounded, or simply wounded.

Honestly, I don't have a stake in which it is...but I'd note that just because the actor was reining the horse to stay on it during the shot doesn't mean the story wasn't supposed to be that he was dead. Those sorts of "mistakes due to real life" crop up all the time, especially in older films.

There's also the argument that he's mortally wounded, so even if he may be technically alive as the movie roles credits, it's the same as if he was dead.

But again...it's not specified in either the book or the movie. There is no answer, and I've never seen an interview from the author that identified his thinking/intentions on the subject.

//shrug