I will admit my memory is more of a human head on a bird, sort of a harpy, but we are talking 30+ years. I'll have to check out Giant Claw.
(I've just discovered 'Message from Space' on Netflix. Why, oh why, did I never see this as a kid?!?)
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by Invid
I will admit my memory is more of a human head on a bird, sort of a harpy, but we are talking 30+ years. I'll have to check out Giant Claw.
(I've just discovered 'Message from Space' on Netflix. Why, oh why, did I never see this as a kid?!?)
Really, it's no worse than a number of other Doctor Who, and better than the first Tom Baker or McCoy stories. The main beef at the time was the American Violence, where as the exact same scenes done by a UK crew wouldn't have been commented on. The show had the task of setting up a new series for an audience that had never heard of it, yet keeping it in continuity with the original. I did like making the Doctor half human. it's the kind of retcon that actually makes sense (more so than the entire idea of regeneration, which wasn't invented until the 4th Doctor. Doctor 1 was "rejuvenated" into a younger version of himself, and Doctor 2 just had his face changed into #3).
OK, here's mine. Black and white movie. Set, I think, in New York. A giant stop motion bird with a male (?) head is roosting in a skyscraper and eating people. I think it showed up a couple times on the weekend monster movie in the 70's. No, it's not Q.
Favorite story? Gonna depend on mood. The whole e-space trilogy is great. Toss in Earthshock, The Daleks, Genesis of the Daleks, and the above mentioned Silence in the Library.
Favorite Doctor? #6, Colin Baker, which might also answer your third question.
I will go out on a limb and say I liked Adric, the "Weasley Crusher" of Doctor Who.
So long as they lose, I'll be happy. That was one of the fun parts of the show: this small band of rebels had no chance against the Federation, and let the audience know it.
Well that's true - there are a lot of people who want to pay for Game of Thrones, for example, but HBOs business model makes it almost impossible for them to do it, while it's very easy to get the show for free. That's a big fail.
Actually I think HBO looked at the actual numbers, and saw they lost money by selling it the way you suggest. They think they can make more money forcing people to buy the DVD or subscribe to HBO then by letting Netflix rent/stream the show or selling it cheaper. If you have to drop the price so close to free to get those extra sales, there is no point in doing so. After all, the goal is NOT to get he largest audience, it's the get the most money. As you say, those people are going to get it free anyway so HBO is ignoring them.
I think this is the only industry where customers seem to feel that it's their responsibility to try to help producers and distributers figure out how to provide a product that they want to and are able to pay for.
Because entertainment is personal. Everything else that I consume, in the end one thing is about the same as another. It honestly doesn't matter which brand of food I buy, or what what car. So long as they get the job done, they're all the same. With a book, movie, album... I want THAT one, by THAT creator, and I want them to make more. Simple as that. I don't want music that sounds like RUSH... I want new RUSH.
Kickstarter, by the way, only gets you money from those who were going to give you money once you made it anyway. Yes, you get it in advance, and you can thus start from nothing instead of using your own money, but you don't actually make MORE income. It's not a way to increase budgets, or fund things with no existing fan base. They have to already want it.
Oh, now THERE is a good idea! The 5th Pirates movie is actually a reboot of the Oh, God! movies!
I'm not sure I understand how pirating has any impact on either of these models. Time-shifting / ad-blocking / watching on netflix all eliminates the need to track viewers, since you're no longer interested in how many people see it. Netflix doesn't care what you watch, they just care that you pay the fee. If I pay for Netflix (or if I don't) it makes no difference at all whether I pirate something. What matters is that enough people pay in some way to support the production.
But you need a way to justify the argument that making a new show is what is making people pay. If Netflix makes a show and nobody watches, they can save tons of money by not making more shows. If nobody watches it on Netflix but there are tones of pirated downloads... well, what have they gained? Canceling the show again will save money and cost them no lost memberships. However, if they see that a million subscribers are watching every new episode of a series, Netflix could reasonably conclude that those million will not drop their subscription so long as the show creates new content (and that can easily be tracked).
Thus, if you are a Netflix member and watch a show via torrent instead of on Netflix, you would indeed be hurting the show.
Focussing on the people who don't pay is a red herring - producers need to focus on the people who do pay, and figure out how to add enough value so that people do pay.
The only way to figure out how to add enough value so that people do pay, is to look at those that don't pay and try and find a way to make them pay. After all, that's your target audience: those who like a show, but aren't yet paying. They're the "undecided voter" of all this. You don't have to worry about the base that's already giving you money, or the haters who will never give you money.
In a way, Netflix now is no different than HBO. They get a monthly fee from you, regardless of if you watch anything. Their goal is to give you enough content that you'll keep paying the fee. Just like HBO started doing original stuff to toss in with their airings of movies, concerts and stand up comedy at the beginning, then TV series, so Netflix is doing the same. The difference is, they know exactly how many are watching the originals, so none of that "the ratings don't tell us everything" excuse. Pirating these shows WILL kill them
Even if everything drops down to 70's BBC budget levels, I doubt it would work
If you remember that chat, you weren't there, man...
Should we point him to Zarban's site, or let him live in ignorant bliss?
... is now going to be a Syfy series.
Sigh.
Naturally, I was going to be leery of any remake. So much of the fun of the original was the chemistry between the actors, and any replacements are going to have a rough time equaling them. But, hey, never know, it could be good... and now it's going to be a first run US Syfy project. Written by some guy from Heroes.
I'll give it a chance. But, really, at this point my only hope is we get a good US DVD release of the original out of this.
They'll be good for human society, I agree. Any nation built on capitalism, not so much. That's probably not a bad thing, but naturally you're going to see pushback.
Reduce scarcity of items people need to live, good.
Reduce scarcity of items people need to sell to live, bad.
When it comes to fan fiction, fan films, etc, there's two components.
1) There's something about a show where you love it, but they're not quite going in the direction you wish they would. You could do it so much better.
2) Nobody is going to go out of their way to read your little amateur story, but make it about Buffy and there are whole sites where you can post it and get tons of readers.
The DVD is waiting in the mailbox, so I've only listened to the intro so far, but... really? Nobody read at least the Tarzan books as a kid? It's amazing how something can keep going for a century as adaptations and the originals become ignored...
Media, people posting rumors to internet forums... I tend to treat all online news as rumor for the first few days.
I think they're looking at the movie and asking why it bombed, when obviously whether or not something bombs does in fact have more to do with the marketing and trailers. I thought the books were great fun, even though I didn't get to them until I was an adult (as a kid, I was "above" SF that wasn't realistic). The ads just looked stupid, so I avoided it.
As for why Avatar did well and this didn't... well, a couple things.
a) Avatar was first. Don't discount this. The Avatar experience was new, exciting. Audiences often give the first to do something a pass, coming down harder on later versions that yes may be better.
b) Nobody saw it, so nobody knew John Cater was better. This is the more important thing. The movie doesn't matter if people don't want to see it. I went to a free preview of Titan A.D. years ago. The audience liked it, the comments coming out being things like "Well, it was better than the live action SF we've been getting". But, it bombed. Why? Animated SF just didn't get people into theaters to even see if it was any good. Disney's Treasure Planet suffered the same fate.
I don't know if this is part of the Classic Who mythology, but I like to imagine that part of the tragedy of being the Doctor is that, while each new regeneration retains the memories of the previous ones, they lose emotional attachment to them.
There's a bit in the great New Adventures book Love and War, where we see the various versions of The Doctor presented as separate aspects who compete somewhat. It's suggested that the Seventh Doctor sort of killed the Sixth because he wasn't taking things seriously and there were important things to do. The incarnations being separate also comes up in how the 4th Doctor becomes the 5th.
As for why he doesn't visit companions, mostly it's for real world reasons although you can naturally retcon it in the show Previous companions are name dropped now and then, but while there were plans to bring some back it never happened apart from The Five Doctors, The Two Doctors, and bringing The Brigadier back for two other episodes.
I've said it before, I'd love for the Doctor to travel with Susan's kids
I am glad the show has gotten, somewhat, away from a single female companion. You do need someone traveling with him, so he can bounce dialog off of them (having him team up with a local can have the same function, true). Male companion, teen companion... hell, maybe a father/daughter combo. Lots of room to experiment, and with luck they'll have decades to try everything
See, this is why you shouldn't have continuity in Doctor Who No epic arcs, no main characters or companions with dark secrets. Make the damned thing episodic again, at least for a decade or so...
That was the joke in Dark Knight Returns. Lots of people probably died, but hey, it wasn't intensional on his part!
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by Invid
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.
Currently installed 9 official extensions. Copyright © 2003–2009 PunBB.