1,051

(991 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Ya, I can't view it objectively cause Smith was my first doctor, so he just feels right in the role. I will say this though, I don't like the companions at all from Tenants run, the companions for Smith's run have been awesome, and are by far my favorite parts of the show. It also helps that the production values have finally reached a point on this show where they can reasonably pull off the crazy shit they're trying to do without it looking like garbage.

I'm really pumped to see if this season Moffat can pull off the impossible and combine the consistently high quality of individual episodes from season 6 with the kind of very strong season-long arc that season 5 had (which 6 kind of flubbed despite having better individual episodes).

1,052

(569 replies, posted in Creations)

Zarban for president

Tony Scott is on my personal black-list after what he did to Taking of Pelham 1 2 3. That is one of my all time favorite 70s movies, and he managed to completely fuck up every aspect of it, while also making it borderline unwatchable with his editing, stupid stop-motion over-crank bullshit, and ugly-ass color-grading.

Crimson Tide is still great though, I feel like after that movie something just happened to the man, like he started taking lots of drugs, or just flat out lost his mind or something. Everything of his before Crimson Tide tends to be watchable, with Crimson Tide as the peak before a sharp nosedive in quality.

1,054

(991 replies, posted in Off Topic)

High Res version of the awesome season poster: http://www.comingsoon.net/nextraimages/bigwho.jpg

I am so fucking psyched for this season, I have a feeling they're going all out while they still have the current cast all together.

Agreed about the scene with the singing kid, loved how he dropped out the sound-effects for that montage, very Sam Peckinpah.

Also, Batman climbing out of the prison is the best scene out of all 3 movies as far as I'm concerned, Hans Zimmer really kills it in this movie.

1,056

(346 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Ya, fingers crossed china absolutely kicks our ass in the space-tech department, kicking off another space race.

1,057

(5 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Blu-Ray by a long shot. Streaming/Download quality is just nowhere near where it needs to be for me to find it acceptable (even HD streaming, you're getting a file that's a couple of gigs at most, maybe 10-15, versus a 40-50 gb encode on the blu-ray). What's more, I don't see internet infrastructure improving rapidly enough in the next 10 years to the point that companies like Netflix will be able to offer 50 gb files to their millions of users.

Right now, Blu-Ray is indeed the best way to replicate the theatrical experience, they look/sound way better than the alternatives, and you get tons of cool special features.

I also think they're extraordinarily cheap by home media standards. I get most of my blu-rays for under 10 dollars. Compare that with just 20-25 years ago, when laser-disc and vhs tapes could go for 50-80 dollars.

If indeed blu-ray is the last physical home-media format, I'm fine with that and happily buying them up.
As for 4k, I suspect there simply won't be enough of a demand for it that studios will bother releasing more than a couple dozen titles on the format. The fact is, that blu-ray to 4k, you're not getting the kind of noticeable jump in quality that you'd get from dvd to blu-ray, you'd only be able to see differences if you had a screen that was 100 inches or larger.

I'll probably get a few titles in that format if it ever hits, but I don't think it'll be the kind of situation where you are forced to re-buy your movie collection all over again.

1,058

(449 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Speaking of trying to be The Fountain: http://trailers.apple.com/trailers/wb/cloudatlas/

This could either be the awesomeness of The Matrix, or it could be the pretentious boredom of Matrix Reloaded.
Only time will tell.

1,059

(449 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Having not read the source material, if the story is really about a kid and a tiger surviving on a boat, hate to break it to you but that's a pretty cartoony concept. I don't know how you make a dark and realistic movie about that.

1,060

(40 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Ya, while I think the movie has problems on a detail level (it's apparent to me that this was a 3+ hour movie that Nolan had to painfully cut 20 minutes out of to fit the maximum IMAX runtime), I think it completely succeeds on all the important, overarching character and thematic payoffs, to where as a whole I love the damned thing.

I think the people that came out disappointed wanted to see Dark Knight 2, and were sad that this movie trends way more comic-booky than that. The thing is, he already made Dark Knight, the Heat remake with Batman in it, you can't just redo that same formula. The logical thing is to up the stakes and do a big blow-out finish  for the final conclusion,and I have no problem with that.

Ironically enough, the plot elements in this movie bug me less than they did in the Dark Knight, because that movie was staying so grounded all the way through that things like big Explosive Barrels on the Ferries looked silly and out of place. This final movie feels more comic-booky to me from the get-go, and so the more outlandish elements gel for me and I don't question them.

I also think that structurally this final installment just feels more satisfying on the whole, because they save the big blow-out action sequences for the ending, instead of the middle (as in Dark Knight). You get all this awesome build-up and one of my favorite movie tropes, the training montage, and then what feels like a 40 minute-long continuous action packed climax.

I do still wish we could get an extended cut to iron out the issues that are there and make it perfect, but for me this is easily one of the best trilogies ever at this point, and this last installment shits all over Return of the Jedi as far as I'm concerned.

That movie was a gigantic pile of garbage. One of the worst things I've ever sat through, and a total desecration of everything that's good about the original Conan.

1,062

(208 replies, posted in Episodes)

Actually, I think I saw the theatrical. I have the original series movie collection on blu-ray, and I believe they are all the theatrical versions (My understanding is that the director's cut is only available on dvd).

1,063

(40 replies, posted in Off Topic)

If this is Prometheus all over again, I don't know if I can take it.

1,064

(40 replies, posted in Off Topic)

This one has me worried. Dave Chen is usually on the mark with his reviews. Really hope Nolan didn't blow the story, I don't know if I could take another dissapointment this summer:

"The Dark Knight Rises is a mess of a film. If The Dark Knight was filled to the brim with weighty ideas, then The Dark Knight Rises‘ cup overfloweth. Director Christopher Nolan, whose previous films have frequently dealt with the darkness of human nature, was not content with creating a light and fun summer actioner. Instead, he has packed his trilogy-concluding film so full of ideas, plot points, characters, emotional arcs, and set pieces that even with a 2 hour 45 minute runtime, none of them has any room to breathe."

http://www.slashfilm.com/dave-chen-dark … ore-131629

1,065

(208 replies, posted in Episodes)

It's funny you mention that, because I just watched Star Trek: The Motion Picture for the first time last week, expecting to hate it, and I actually really, really dug it. I can completely see where people wouldn't like it as it really doesn't have a lot of character work, but what it is, is a genuinely good honest to god hard-sci-fi flick.

I really miss the idea of just having a bunch of scientists working together to try and logically figure out a solution to a problem. No need for random space battles thrown in for no reason. I actually think there's a lot of great sci-fi concepts at play, the special-effects are genuinely gorgeous, I love the Goldsmith score. Frankly, even if it's flawed, The Motion Picture is way more ballsy and admirable than the reboot, which just aims for blockbuster action over ideas. I think it's very fair to say that the reboot is Space Opera, not Science Fiction, and I think that's an unfortunate step down. There's plenty of Sci-Fi action movies already, I'd rather they aimed for something different/more-sophisticated.

1,066

(84 replies, posted in Episodes)

Ugh, it's over as far as I see it. With Incredibles to Ratatouille to Wall-E it seemed like Pixar was really reaching out of the "kid's movie" game and were going to tackle more intelligent, adult stories. In retrospect Wall-E really was the peak of that kind of risk taking (or maybe the first 15 minutes of UP), and now it really is a steady fall back to known properties targeted at kids who will buy toys. I was really holding out hope for a kickass PG-13 pixar movie, but that hope is basically dead now.

1,067

(208 replies, posted in Episodes)

For those interested in an analysis of this reboot from a hardcore Star-Trek fan perspective, I stumbled on the final episode from the Hollywood Saloon, who did a mammoth 4.5 hour discussion, going over a ton of the history of the movies, analysis of the tie-in Countdown and Nero comics for the reboot, and finally a near scene-by-scene discussion of what works/doesn't.

It's interesting to see how much of the plot-issues were addressed in the comics but left out of the movie, and in general I agree with the analysis that the reboot really betrays a lot of what I love about Star Trek, while still being a pretty entertaining movie on it's own terms. http://hollywoodsaloon.com/podcast/STAR_TREK_ZER0.mp3

I'm going to go out on a limb and say that's going to be amazing.

That's a profoundly terrible idea. Found Footage movies usually work on the strength of having an unknown entity as the antagonist. We already know what all these dinosaurs look like, so there's literally no benefit to doing it found-footage (and any action/chase scenes will be garbage).

I still am waiting for a good found-footage breaking into Area 51 movie. Wasn't Paranormal Activity guy making that, what happened to that project?

1,070

(40 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Ya, I booked over a month in advance and the first two days were already completely sold out at my local IMAX. Going to be awful waiting till Sunday to see it as the reviews start coming in.

I think it's going to absolutely deliver, I just love practical fx so much and the fact that he's shooting in full-frame IMAX. Not that it matters, but I really hope it beats Avengers box-office, if only to make a point about analog vs digital film-making.

Also makes you wonder what Nolan will do next. I think it'd be nice to see him do something more smaller-scale, something like The Prestige.

I thought it was going to be terrible based on the trailer and early word of production problems, but the early reviews and clip have me super excited.

1,072

(19 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I whole-heartedly agree with you about the cost === value misconception in audiences. The problem with your alternative of leveraging smaller online communities in a broader sense is that these communities are far smaller than you would think, and they're also the kind of communities that are hesitant to spend money.

Point in case I always bring up is something like Attack the Block, which got a US release after being a hit on the festival circuit. Now this thing was being pimped like crazy by pretty much every major movie website on the internet, everyone was posting rave reviews for it, URGING people to watch this movie, and this went on for probabaly a month of more. And the end result? 1 million box-office domestic. That right there is near the top-end of the amount of money you can get from word-of-mouth online if you're a relative unknown (which Joe Cornish was largely in the US, as were the actors).

Anytime you see a huge "breakout" hit like Paranormal Activity, that didn't happen through online buzz. That happened through an extensive and very smart marketing campaign by Paramount, a marketing campaign that probably cost 10-15 million dollars at the least.

So while the community-targeted approach can work, the amount of money you can realistically get that way is very small, so the scale of the projects is destined to be tiny.

1,073

(7 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Eta 2 years till someone makes a feature-film with this, mark my words. The final results look SO DAMNED GOOD. For such an easy to use tool, the image quality is early Pixar quality.

And the sad thing is they're right. I really don't see this changing anytime soon. If anything, there's constantly more and more theaters worldwide, which just makes the audience bigger and bigger. Why WOULDN'T you continue doing what you're doing if it's working. If I was in their shoes I would objectively have to make the same call.

This is where the idea of "constantly increasing revenues" kills the business. The suits are beholden to their shareholders to make more money every year than the year before, to where movies that make 100 million domestic aren't viewed as blockbusters anymore (when they used to be just 15-20 years ago). No, now you have to make 1 billion worldwide to be considered a big success, so instead of having several moderately successful medium budget flicks, lets throw 200 million at 3 tentpoles and call it a day.

I still don't understand how in the fuck these movies are spending this money either, because it sure as hell isn't on screen. It's like film-makers aren't even TRYING anymore to be resourceful. How the hell do you go into Green Lantern and decide "Naww, we'll do his mask in post, it won't be a problem". That's such a self-evidently terrible idea, like, lets spend 100 million dollars making a rubber-looking mask in Post. Same thing with something like Captain America, where instead of using a body-double with face-replacement, they decided to just film it with Evans and shrink him in post. It ended up looking great, but you can't tell me it wouldn't have been 3 times cheaper and looked just as good if they just did face-replacement.

At least with something like Dark Knight Rises, I see 500 extras fighting on wall-street, and I see Nolan hanging a plane fuselage from a helicopter as he has stunt guys parachuting onto it, but he seems to really be the last holdout still clinging to the old-school big-budget film-making arts.

If there's any hope on the horizon, it's that film-technology/craft/funding has finally trickled down enough in foreign countries that they're now starting to make the kind of movies that hollywood used to. I wouldn't be surprised if some really great more-restrained genre movies come out of Europe/Asia in the next 20 years.