1,226

(32 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Perhaps it's because the story has just started and Harry is an 11-year-old with a significant amount of character growth ahead of him?

No, it couldn't be that. Surely any story must begin with the main character in his most mature state with no need to learn or change.

I'll also note that said scene completely contradicts your earlier claim that he is "unwilling to accept anything new," as he quite willingly accepts what he's observed, particularly after McGonagall transfigures. He wants to know how it works, but he accepts that it does.

It's fine that you don't like it. It's just that it would be better to simply state it as your opinion rather than make demonstrably incorrect statements of a factual nature in a flailing attempt to give reasons.

1,227

(32 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Trey wrote:

How odd that Dorkman responded to my post, when it was clearly meant as Brian-bait.  smile

I just wanted to clarify because it sounded like you misconstrued the story. Then after I did I realized there was a humorous connection.

Gregory Harbin wrote:

Imagine if, instead of wonder, those people were examining the situation logically and trying to come to a calm, cold, logical explanation.

There's nothing about rationality that prevents a person from experiencing something with a sense of wonder, you know. It just helps them not jump immediately to potentially false conclusions about the nature of the experience.

And the calm, logical explanation in a Spielberg film would be "aliens have contacted us." It would just take a little more than strange lights in the sky to have a justification for that conclusion.

1,228

(32 replies, posted in Off Topic)

It's worth noting that it's not that magic has been removed from the Harry Potter world or that there's a scientific (or science-as-we-know-it) explanation for everything that happens in the books (in fact, Harry finds himself regularly frustrated by magic's refusal to behave in a way consistent with the laws of physics), it's that Harry's approach to it is to ask questions.

It's a story in essentially the same universe told with different characters (or rather, variations on the existing characters), giving an alternate perspective for humorous effect.

But I can see how that might not be some people's thing. I mean, who DOES that?


http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_RI_WEcFI5gI/SsupoRjrXPI/AAAAAAAAAK0/EAhgrqvJAXk/s400/greetathumb2.jpg

1,229

(32 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I hope you've all enjoyed the latest installment of that other long-running internet serial, Gregory Harbin and the Point He Missed Entirely.

1,230

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

I like the original Mummy. I think it's a solid, fun popcorn movie without too many plot holes (although one can't help but wonder what reasoning would compel the ancient Egyptians to make their worst criminals into pissed-off immortal god-men, but I could probably retcon it if I put my mind to it), which is more than I can say for most summer movies, including Sommers' own subsequent fare. He's made some of my most hated films (VAN HELSING and, lately, G.I. JOE), but I've got some love in my heart for THE MUMMY.

It starts unravelling fast once you get to MUMMY RETURNS, though, and they start just making up powers and backstories left and right.

1,231

(51 replies, posted in Episodes)

We'll make sure to correct that on the anniversary show.

1,232

(111 replies, posted in Episodes)

WE HAVE ALWAYS BEEN AT WAR WITH EASTASIA

/surprised Asylum hasnt done 1984 now that I think of it

//its a number and everything

///give it time

EDIT: Silly me, it's still under copyright, for 10 more years. DAMN YOU BIG BROTHER!

1,233

(57 replies, posted in Episodes)

Down in Front wrote:

That's an interesting point, Fireman Wisconsin.

I'm trying to make you sound like Indiana Jones. That doesn't really work with Wisconsin.

Well, you got the syntax wrong. State goes first.

So Wisconsin Fireman.

Which is either a cartoon character or a porn star name.

1,234

(31 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I just finally saw this this weekend.

Holy shit I cannot wait until we get the chance to hate-fuck this thing on-air.

I watched and loved the cartoon series and even knowing what the basis was, even knowing the longer version, the film's plot made no sense to me.

The interesting thing was that, based on said knowledge, I have to admit that I think Shyamalan made a few smart choices in how he chose to condense action (making Aang's reawakening be what alerts the Fire Nation), or change/clarify stakes (I actually kind of like that the Fire Nation, aside from the most powerful, can't generate their own flame until Sozin's Comet comes), but most of the alterations were arbitrary and dumb, dumb, dumb. Half the time he'd cut a setup but leave the payoff, or vice-versa, and I can't even...I can't even English what I think about the tragicomic attempts at Eastern "philosophy."

Not an exaggeration: this movie is literally as incoherent as THE ROOM. That scene where they show up in an alleyway, have dialogue about stuff that's already happened or unimportant, toss the football around and then leave, having accomplished nothing in story, plot, or character? That is this entire movie.

1,235

(111 replies, posted in Episodes)

I briefly almost got involved in postproduction for 100 Million B.C. (which was actually far more similar to A SOUND OF THUNDER than 10,000 B.C., but anyway) and the budget they were ballparking was $100k, which at the time was their biggest venture evar. And when it didn't bust the block, they decided they weren't going to sink that much into a single project again.

That was a few years ago so things may have changed, though I totally respect Trey opting not to say. But at the time, the budgets for their mockbusters were on the order of $25-50k. Which, if you watch some of the early ones, is frankly higher than you might expect.

1,236

(23 replies, posted in Off Topic)

maul2 wrote:

One of my favorite moments of this was the "Hey I'm Bill Weasley, you were supposed to meet me three movies ago but I wasn't deemed important enough, but I'm here now!"

Yeah. Not to mention that he couldn't have been much older than Harry, even though he's supposed to be a good 10 years older. 

maul2 wrote:

Now, in the movie, the Marauders map is granted a piece of old parchment...about 3 inches thick once it's all folded up.I mean seriously, has anyone counted just how many little fold out doodads and thingamjigs make up that "scrap of parchment", I mean seriously people! And once activated it's a map of Hogwarts granted (That when unfolded is about 6 foot square, very convenient for sneaking around at night, no?)except that everything is all unnecessarily fancy, the entire map is made of words and the names of the people are scrawled out halfway across the thing in weird curling letters. Really? This is the map that 4 misfit boys would have made at school? Really?

While it sounds fine in the books, I'm not sure how a foot-square piece of old parchment could hold the entire grounds of Hogwarts simultaneously and have it all be legible. The fold-out part makes more sense to me, looking at it.

As for the 4 misfit boys, it's unclear how certain enchantments work. Obviously the map generates new information constantly, based on what's around it -- the boys can't very well have programmed "Harry Potter" into the map, after all. For all we know, when you enchant a piece of parchment to display text, it's automatically going to display it in the fancy writing. Maybe you have to do different charms to get different typefaces and the fancy one is the easiest.

maul2 wrote:

Now The Ministry of Magic. In the book it's described as...well a government building...your local city hall, with a few small improvements (Flying letters, fireplaces etc. etc.).

Not exactly:

The door of the telephone box sprang open and Mr. Weasley stepped out of it, followed by Harry, whose mouth had fallen open.

They were standing at one end of a very long and splendid hall with a highly-polished, dark wood floor. The peacock-blue ceiling was inlaid with gleaming golden symbols that were continually moving and changing... The walls on each side were paneled in shiny dark wood and had many gilded fireplaces set into them... halfway down the hall was a fountain. A group of golden statues, larger than life-size, stood in the middle of a circular pool... hundreds of witches and wizards...strode toward a set of golden gates at the far end of the hall...

Harry followed Mr. Weasley through the gates into the smaller hall beyond, where at least twenty lifts stood behind wrought golden grilles.

(Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, American Hardcover edition, pages 127&129)

A kid's jaw isn't going to fall open at your local city hall. It's clearly meant to be an opulent and fantastical space ("hall" as in open gathering place, not hallway) that has become mundane to the wizards who work there but to an outsider is, apparently literally, jaw-dropping.

It's not entirely unreasonable for a government building, either. The halls of the U.S. Congress are pretty impressive, with all the marble and such everywhere. The Ministry hall looks like a combination government building and British Underground station (they're big on the tile). It's just...moreso. Which is well in line with Rowling's description (via Mr. Weasley) of the wizarding zeitgeist as he expresses it at the Quidditch World Cup:

"Always the same," said Mr. Weasley, smiling. "We can't resist showing off when we get together..."

It's not at all that Rowling's vision of the magical world is one just as mundane as ours, but with flying paper airplanes instead of interns couriering memos. The magical world is totally fantastical -- but everyone who lives there is completely desensitized to it. Except Harry, who mostly gets used to it as the years go by but can still be surprised -- as when he first sees the Ministry entrance hall.

I agree that that was the problem in the early (Columbus) films -- any time someone so much as said the word "wand" the music would swell and they'd blow wind and smoke in everyone's astonished goddamn faces. But I really think that starting with Cuaron they've curbed that impulse for the most part, and the big magical moments in the movies pretty much match the ones in the books.

Although I agree that they are racing so fast through the plot that they miss the emotional beats of the story -- and are also hindered, as you point out, by not having sufficient set-up. After his intro in Chamber of Secrets, Dobby appears in books 4, 5, 6, and 7 and provides crucial help for Harry and his friends every time, so in book 7 it feels right that he's helping and it's emotionally wrenching when he gets killed. I think, reading the book, I cried hardest at Dobby's death. But we haven't seen Dobby in a movie in eight years, and last time we did he was kind of annoying, so when he just shows up and then dies right away it's kind of just a hollow moment that feels tacked on.

1,237

(24 replies, posted in Episodes)

Psh, whatever. Narc.

1,238

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

I liked REDBELT immediately once I realized it wasn't a martial arts movie. It was a movie about martial arts philosophy, a la KARATE KID, but not one you watch for the fight scenes. But of course I'm an admitted kung fu snob when it comes to movie aesthetics.

redxavier: the Donnie Yen movie you're talking about is most likely FLASH POINT. Like you say, I think it works quite well in combination with the usual, well-telegraphed kung fu choreography.

1,239

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

I love REDBELT so hard it's unreal.

1,240

(313 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I picked up the Jim Dale readings of Harry Potter to re-read the books and I hated them. His cadence is all wrong and Hermione's voice (she always says Harry's name "Hauwwweeeeee" like she's about to cry and have a stroke simultaneously) makes me cringe and want to smack her around.

I was despairing of having proper audiobooks until I was informed that Stephen Fry did versions in the UK, and having gotten those all is now well. Hermione sounds like she should, his Umbridge is amazing, and as a bonus his Hagrid sounds exactly like Robbie Coltrane's.

1,241

(1,019 replies, posted in Episodes)

I love his enthusiasm for the reference to Jonah, as though the story of Jonah and the whale is an obscure, intellectual literary reference and not the first Veggie Tales movie.

1,242

(20 replies, posted in Episodes)

Hitler!

1,243

(20 replies, posted in Episodes)

Gay!

1,244

(51 replies, posted in Episodes)

Gregory Harbin wrote:

A studio didn't give Roland Emmerich money. Roland Emmerich made 2012 with his own production company, Centropolis.

Do you have a source for this, or is this just how you think film financing works?

1,245

(23 replies, posted in Off Topic)

maul2 wrote:

an over glamorized, sparkly universe that treats magic like the sort of spectacle that begs to be oggled at and not simply a day to day reality of these characters lives.

This makes it sound, to me, like you stopped watching at Chamber of Secrets. The mundane treatment of magic is one of the most significant aspects Cuaron brought to the series, IMO.

Okay, I'm not sure how to explain this without it sounding lame at first but bear with me.

Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality is an on-going fan fiction story, written by a scientist involved in researching A.I. It's an alternate universe story in which Harry's aunt (who, in this world, he considers his mother) married a scientist instead of a small-minded drill salesman.

Harry is still the Boy Who Lived, still gets his letter from Hogwarts, but insists on applying the aforementioned methods of rationality to every new magical discovery that comes his way.

It's Harry Potter, rewritten from a skeptical angle. Which I love first of all because it makes the point that skepticism isn't about abject denial of things like magic. It's just about an insistence on evidence. When Harry gets his evidence, Harry accepts and assimilates it, even if he doesn't necessarily understand all the implications yet.

The writing style and sense of humor are right in the same vein as Rowling's own, and the sheer absurdity of applying such strict rational sense to a magical world is in itself quite funny even as it makes a lot of sense. There's an amazing scene in Gringotts where Harry considers how easy it would be to game the crude economic system of magical Britain, and his first meeting with Draco Malfoy goes much differently than in the official canon. He drives McGonagall (who in this story takes Hagrid's role of introducing Harry to the wizarding world) completely up the fucking wall, and when he meets Ron at the train station finds him a bit of an idiot. My understanding is that in this fic, Hermione is Harry's school nemesis, though I'm only 7 chapters in.

Anyway, if you like the HP books and critical thinking (and Calvin & Hobbes, incidentally; alt-Harry has a distinctly Calvinish precociousness and "chaotic good" personality), I highly recommend you give this one a read.

http://www.fanfiction.net/s/5782108/1/H … ationality

1,247

(23 replies, posted in Off Topic)

***With the power of love***

no seriously

Actually it's rather more complicated than that and I'm really surprised that Rowling left introduction of the Hallows and the rules involved until the very last book, when she was so conscientious about dropping hints to everything else prior to that.

Although for some reason the introduction of the Hallows didn't feel as left-field in the movie as they did in the book, for me. And I loved the shadowplay animation they did to illustrate the fairy tale.

It's also not clear in the movie -- at least it didn't seem that it would be to someone who hadn't read the books -- that the reason Voldemort seeks the Elder Wand is because ANY wand he attempts to use against Harry will result in Priori Incantatem, not just the wands that share a core. Any, that is, except the Elder Wand.

The stakes could have been clearer, IMO, though as the kids weren't and couldn't do anything to hinder Voldemort's quest to find the Wand, perhaps it would have just made things feel disjointed.

1,248

(23 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Choo-choo.

1,249

(51 replies, posted in Episodes)

Gregory Harbin wrote:

2012 made $800 million, plus DVD sales. That's 600 million dollars more than they spent on it.

One hundred and twenty really good movies can be made with that.

Yes, but more likely, they'll just make four more 2012s.

1,250

(51 replies, posted in Episodes)

In case I didn't get it out clearly, that ^ is the #1 reason I was in such a rage on this particular track.