1,326

(30 replies, posted in Episodes)

avatar wrote:

Also, did Cary Elwes  really deserve a steel girder through his head? For being ambitious? Okay, he cut some corners and borrowed another's ideas, but is that an executable offence?

Yeah, that's another problem I have with the film. People who have not done anything remotely evil (and I include Jami Gertz in this) are punished and we are supposed to root for this to happen. The film may be great to look at and a CG jizz-fest but its morals are a bit shite, in my humble opinion.

1,327

(991 replies, posted in Off Topic)

bullet3 wrote:

Ya, I mean don't get me wrong, it's cool to have someone who's able to reason out of situations and outsmart his enemies instead of fighting them, but like you've said, given some of his enemies, I think it's wrong to stick so closely to that rule-book. Too many times in this show the enemies could've easily been defeated half-way through an episode if the doctor just pulled a gun and shot them in the face.

Then there would be no show or they would be half their length. big_smile The point is, the Doctor is a struggling pacifist.  He has been through a war or two and the old him keeps sneaking back through. He can be a violent man but he represses it.

Also, it's a show aimed at kids, that is the main reason why he doesn't shoot people. That sort of thing ain't gonna happen on the BBC on a weekly basis.

I had that Annual!!!!!!!!!

1,329

(991 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Well, my nuts are huge.....

1,330

(991 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Nice. I've seen the Armed Police in action, here, it's quite scary. They never fired the guns, though, so they were probably fake big_smile

Also.....I'm mentioned on Wikipedia!?!?  http://www.thewayiplay.com/mainforum/Smileys/ByronSmileys_001/jawdrop.gif

1,331

(991 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Zarban wrote:


Obviously it's a cultural thing. Even cops in the UK don't carry guns.

Well, apart from the armed ones. big_smile


I didn't think much of this weeks episode. It had its moments but I didn't enjoy it as much as I did last weeks. They had comedy duo Mitchell and Webb and what did they do? Got them to voice annoying 'comedy' robots. They really don't know what to do with a lot of their comedian guest stars. It's like Bill Bailey, Alexander Armstrong and Arabella Weir in last years Christmas episode. I did like Amy doing something useful for a change, 'Neffi' and despite the pathetic 'balls' gag I really enjoyed Mark Williams as Rory's gag. At least they recognised the gag as being rubbish, given that Rory face palmed after it big_smile

And, the Doctor has killed before. Just last week, he blew up some Daleks, for example. And he was pretty murderous towards the Family in that two-parter where he hid as someone else (due to the fob watch).

I thought the point was he needs to pull his jeans up rather than him having an abnormal body? big_smile

1,333

(1,649 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I am proud to say I have never watched it, although I have heard some of the song.

1,334

(21 replies, posted in Episodes)

Hopefully I'm getting the Blu Ray for my birthday next month *fingers crossed*

And Trey should write the intros to these threads more often. Should have said that 3 years ago big_smile

1,335

(18 replies, posted in Episodes)

^ at least that one is better than the 'two suns' one that fooled a lot of people recently big_smile

1,336

(1,649 replies, posted in Off Topic)

In honour of Michael Clarke Duncan, this is one of my favourite bits from the Craig Ferguson Scotland Shows-

1,337

(991 replies, posted in Off Topic)

For anyone wary of clicking on the spoilers without knowing what is being discussed, we are talking aout the new companions name-

Owen Ward wrote:
vidina wrote:

  Show
Also, her name isn't Oswin, it's Sarah(as the companion, at least)

  Show
I thought it was Clara?

  Show
Yeah, it's supposed to be Clara but one story I read calls her Clara Oswin.......

Sarah is too close to Sarah-Jane. Speaking of which, Clara was Elisabeth Sladen's middle name.

1,338

(98 replies, posted in Episodes)

I was just saying random shit.

The Ark kills a rat.

1,339

(104 replies, posted in Episodes)

Excellent stuff, Trey. Huge congrats smile

1,340

(98 replies, posted in Episodes)

And Egyptian children save Indy's life.

1,341

(1,649 replies, posted in Off Topic)

There's a couple of better ones on the blog itself- http://mofarahrunningawayfromthings.tumblr.com/

1,342

(98 replies, posted in Episodes)

TheGreg wrote:

I'm not really sure it's about when it's set - I mean, it would be possible to make a film set in the 30s without that. What bothers me about it is that all of the non-white characters are either punchlines to a joke or painful stereotypes. Yes, Temple is worse. But everyone, from the comical Nepalese, the naive Indians, the comically jovial or bungling Arabs etc etc are shamefully shallow. The Germans are, of course, all scheming villains, but I can forgive that.


Is it possible for a film set in the 30s not to have racial stereotypes in it? Especially one based on the old serials and pulp novels of that time? Actually can you name a film either from the 30s or set in the 30s that doesn't have a racial stereotype of some sort? Genuinely curious.

Like I mentioned, I'm not saying 80s films didn't have racial sterotypes and some dodgy material but I think the setting in Raiders for example it kind of makes more sense. I cringe at some racism and homophobia in 80s films (Soul Man step on up, you too Sixteen Candles) but it doesn't bother me in Raiders because of the period setting.

1,343

(991 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Invid wrote:

Also, with regard to the 11th Doctor's first season (it's season 31, not 5 smile), I like the theory that it was an attempt to reboot the show, throwing out much of the new stuff RTD had brought in. Season 32 was to get rid of the "mythic" Doctor, the figure known the universe over. Which is interesting as Moffat was the one who did most of the newer stories that created that myth. Almost as if, now that he was running things, he realized, "Whoops!"

Is it a theory? I think it was absolutely an attempt to reboot the show, no question. Moffat may have added stuff in previous series but he wasn't in charge, he could only really add what RTD wanted him to add. Maybe now he's like 'fuck it, my show, my rules'. Although he's Scottish so he quite possibly added 'ya bawbag' or 'ya cunt' at the end of it.

1,344

(98 replies, posted in Episodes)

I don't think it has racism because of when it was made but because of when it was set.

And the second film is waaaaaaay more racist big_smile

I am actually hoping what you remember is not The Goodies as I want to see your version big_smile

You said it was show that was not Monty Python and the Goodies often got (unfairly) compared to that troupe. It was the first thing I thought of when I read your post. You also said you just got the end so maybe the guys as bunnies caught your dad's attention? Our minds play trick on us sometimes, you may have added bits and changed a lot in your mind over the past 25-30 years.

Or it's just a major coincidence that a British show from the '70s ends almost the exact same way as a British show you remember from the 70s big_smile

That would be The Goodies episode 'Invasion of the Moon Creatures' from 1973. It's on youtube but in 3 parts and what you are talking about is in part 3.  The Goodies was full of 'what the fuck' moments.

Part 1-http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r4JsNetyS6M
Part 2-http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=evtm39kvIsg
Part 3-http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GlS1etHeo7g

1,348

(17 replies, posted in Off Topic)

He loves bird-watching too and had a show on UK TV about it once. Of course, I remember seeing Bill for the first time in this which I was a huge fan at the time but now realise it's a bit shit but still- Sci-Fi game show!-

John Cleese on The Muppet Show-
http://i1251.photobucket.com/albums/hh555/shiftybench/cleesekermit.jpg

The Beatles Meet Ali-
http://i1251.photobucket.com/albums/hh555/shiftybench/beatlesali.jpg

The meeting of great creative minds......

http://i1251.photobucket.com/albums/hh555/shiftybench/RKufF.png
....oh, and George Lucas too, I guess big_smile

1,350

(30 replies, posted in Episodes)

I haven't listened to the DiF comm, but Jamie Gertz had no reason being in the film. She wasn't a horrible person that made you want Bill Paxton to dump her and go back to Helen Hunt. I actually felt sorry for her a wee bit at the end. They could have left her character out altogether and nothing would have changed.

Fun fact of the day: The film was edited in the UK to get a PG rating, I think there were two f-bombs muted.