That's where the kinetic energy is coming from.  Considering the vector he was moving towards, he would have had no power with the other leg.

...used in real combat.  Keep in mind this was halfway through the 5th round, with both fighters have won 2 rounds each up until this point.  This move changed the fight, and my face.  Unreal.

]http://espn.go.com/video/clip?id=5928619

1,353

(9 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Well, shit.

1,354

(9 replies, posted in Off Topic)

They tend to follow trends every year.  This year definitely has more geo-political intrigue type films.

1,355

(17 replies, posted in Episodes)

That and child Labor laws.  Poor Shirley Temple was forced to perform in her first film at age -2!

1,356

(9 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Anyone got a link yet?  Dorkman, I'm looking in your direction.

1,357

(30 replies, posted in Episodes)

Oh...so I'm not good enough anymore.

/wrist

1,358

(5 replies, posted in Creations)

in a room its called room tone, outside, its called wildtrack.  This ends my nitpicking.

1,359

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

I've advocated for Dr. Horrible, but I feel like we'd almost have to do another episode with it to justify it.  Maybe the Buffy musical as a double header, but not sure how that would work with sync points.

1,360

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

If we schedule it, one of us could tackle a book each and get really deep into it.

1,361

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

I love all three movies and would be down to tag team it.  Fun idea, we could have one dedicated panelist with a copy of the book sort of following along.  It would be fun to note things like the battle for Helms Deep is like a page long, while the description of the different elven dialects is several pages worth of materials.  Also, LOTR as a franchise means a lot to nerd types so 9 hours of film could give opportunity to everyone talking about Tolkein's influence on individual cast members.  Im sure we could be creative about it.

Also, I totally want to do Psycho.

1,362

(20 replies, posted in Off Topic)

beldar wrote:

I wouldn't want all movies to be like this but i wish there were more of them. It's well made and well acted. To me, nothing about it is slipshod and 'mixtape' talk is a little unfair. It's more original than that.

It doesn't have the flow of some earlier stuff because it's more European, which is ok. The milk farmer scene's slow on purpose. Not like the end of Pulp Fiction where it's full of tension because Jules explains his philosophy, it's just plain slow at the beginning cuz it wants to be the opposite of Transformers 2.  I enjoyed the performances of Christoph Waltz, Diane Kruger and Mélanie Laurent in a different way than Sam Jackson, Bruce Willis and Uma Thurman but just as much.

The revenge ending is too fucked up for me. Not a huge fan of Death Proof because of the revenge angle also. I disagree Zarban, there is no "why." This is an alternate universe story. The American solders are weird because they've never existed like this, and in what-if-Jews-shot-Hitler-in-the-face world that nazi doesn't get to live a cushy life in Long Island without Jewish Brad Pitt carving a swastika on his forehead first.

I've always thought of movies as either art (like Alien) or not art (like Aliens). Not art isn't necessarily a bad thing, in fact i usually prefer to watch Aliens. One of the reasons I like Basterds is because it's art. The Hurt Locker didn't deserve to sweep best picture/director/orig screenplay over this.

Martin Scorsese sez: "[Stanley Kubrick's] films were initially misunderstood. Then, after five or ten years came the realisation that 2001 or Barry Lyndon or The Shining [or Eyes Wide Shut] was like nothing else before or since." QT isn't Kubrick, but he has an original vision and that counts for a lot.


Hmm.  Where to begin.  Firstly I, nor my esteemed colleague Dorkman, has a problem with a scene that is slow paced.  I LOVE the Milk Farmer's scene, and it stands my favorite in the movie.  But there is something to be said for both pacing and resource allocation.  QT's main problem is that he is the biggest fan of his own material.  That's not a slam against him, nor an accusation of egoism, he just loves his reference points so much and has an unbridled enthusiasm for what he does.  The trade off is that many of his scenes are self indulgent, even if it's something that makes the scene work.  The slow burn of tension works perfect with the Milk Farmer, but goes a few beats too long in the German bar.  He could maintain what works in that scene with just a tad bit of self restraint (which, sadly, now that Sally Menke is gone, I honestly don't know if he's going to have any). 

Also, I think its a false choice that movie has to be Inglourious Basterds or Transformers 2.  Believe it or not, there is plenty of real estate between those two landmarks, and there are several ways to navigate scenes in IB so that they don't resemble spazzy robots.

As for your assertion that films are either Art or Not Art, I call shenanigans.  Alien is art.  Aliens is Art.  Citizen Kane is art.  Birdemic is art.  Godfather is art.  The Room is art.  It may be bad art, but that is completely subjective.  Think of the worst film you know and I guarantee there is someone so far up that movie's ass they can extrapolate all sorts meaning and symbolism from it.  It may seem silly to you or I, but the only difference in what makes a movie artful or not is personal preference and supposition.  I have seen so called art films and I have seen pure popcorn entertainment, and while my opinions vary, you can't strip the title of art away from one and not the other.  I have, sadly, watched the entire Cremaster Cycle and I have, thankfully, watched all of the Jean Claude movies where there are multiple Jean Claude's (Double Impact, Timecop, Replicant) and damned if I can't tell a bit of difference.

In regards to the Scorcese quote, the reason that time somehow reveals genius, isn't because audiences somehow become smarter, it's because society changes, and the things we as a society seek changes.  Take American Beauty (please!),  In 1999 all sorts of critics slobbered over the cinematic knob of that fucking thing (myself included, in all of my college smugness) and hailed Alan Ball as the next Yates.  Well, a 9/11, two wars, an economic collapse and 4 Twilight Books later, our society has changed significantly.  So much so that I doubt a movie about fussy suburban malaise could even get made now.  As such...how many times do you pop in American Beauty just to watch it?  IB may indeed get more love from folks as years go on.  But if it does, it won't be because people will suddenly, "get it."  It will be because as our generation ages and the next generation matures, that society may find something relevant or reflective in what is going on in the world.

Again, I like the movie, and you certainly are entitled to think its unmitigated genius.  But it's not injustice that not everyone else sees it that way.

1,363

(20 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I do.  Not perfect, but its very fun and lyrical, if slipshod and a lot like trying to transport large quantities of soup in a burlap sack.

1,364

(1,019 replies, posted in Episodes)

Lethal Weapon 2 is actually my favorite.  1 is certainly an underrated classic.

1,365

(14 replies, posted in Episodes)

Loud!  NOISES!

1,366

(14 replies, posted in Episodes)

Mike references the "My First Movie," book, which I own, and heartily recommend.

Good commentary guys.  Really liked this one.

1,367

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

Sun got all up in Bostwick's shit and insulted him.

Oh, look.  Someone named "AstroninjaStudios" (no relation myself of course...there's a space between the two words on MY name) has posted a video of the Sundance screening where Duane refers to Jessica as the Co-Director several times.

1,369

(313 replies, posted in Off Topic)

The shot from I am Cuba.  Handheld, hand crank 16mm Box Camera.  One take.  PT Anderson admittedly stole this shot for Boogie Nights.

1,370

(313 replies, posted in Off Topic)

1) The one take handheld steadi-cam shot that goes into the pool and out in "I Am Cuba"
2) The Trombone shot used on Roy Schneider's face in "Jaws"
3) The computer controlled Dolly/Timelapse of Ellen Burstyn cleaning in "Requiem for a Dream"
4) The Interrotron rig low angle that gets the both Bob McNamara's and Errol Morris' face in "The Fog of War"
5) The first bullet time rig in "Matrix"

The top five Documentaries that don't feel like documentaries.

Keep in mind the Director credit was given by the same producer that took it away.  It went to Sundance with her name as Director.

This is feature directing.  You dont cut demo's and do interviews.  If she claims she's a director, and they go to IMDB and see no Director credit, it kills her credibility.  Likewise if she DOESN'T list it, she loses out on her first Director credit, which is always the hardest to get with real films.

I have video footage of Duane calling her the Director at Sundance.  Youtube?

My old colleague and good friend Jessica Hernandez was hired to edit a documentary about Benazir Bhutto about 2 years ago.  She was promoted to Co-Director of the film (with Johnny O'Hara) by the producer because she kicks ass at her job and was a consumate professional.  She single handedly restructured the movie, and the producer, Duane Baughman, was in no short supply of praise for her.  The film made it into Sundance 2010 where it screened, Duane praised her as "The best editor in America" and got a deal with PBS.  It makes its theatrical premiere this weekend.  Except Jessica's name has been removed from the credits as Co-Director.  O'Hara's name is there...as well as Duane Baughman, now sharing Director credit.  She retains her Editor credit, but she did so much more than that.

The reasons for which are total bullshit.  In a public forum, I'm not sure I'm allowed to say.  Lets just say its equal parts vanity and global politics.  But legally there's nothing she can do.  Even though at Sundance and in all the early press events she's listed as Co-Director, Duane is the one doing all the press.

My question is, what can be done virally to spread the word about this?  She's not after fame or money (it's documentary filmmaking afterall) she just wants the due respect for her work.

1,375

(57 replies, posted in Episodes)

How about, "Nicksconsin"?