1,376

(44 replies, posted in Episodes)

Phantom Edit of The Dark Crystal. Have not watched yet, but wanted to post for people interested.

1,377

(1,649 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Drop the s from https.

Edit: That was freaking awesome.

Zarban wrote:
Spork wrote:

How meaningful would Ron's loyalty be if it was never tested?

Testing is great. Failing that test twice demonstrates that his loyalty is not unwavering. How many times does a husband need to cheat on his wife before it's considered infidelity?

So let me get this straight, you hold a confused, conflicted, angry 17 year old's action up to the same measure as a fully grown man in a committed relationship?

Gods, I would hate to be your friend growing up, I don't go out for a movie one day when you ask and woops, bye bye, who needs you, out of your life forever.

He's human. More than that, he's a teenager in incredibly extraordinary circumstances. And you have got to admit, Hermione had to put up with WAY less bullshit (fame related, see previous posts) than Ron did, she never had any reason to want to leave, to be angry at Harry, to have their friendship tested and pushed every single day just  because of the sheer existence of your friend.

From DH, Chapter: The Silver Doe

"There was a pause in which the subject of Ron's departure  seemed to rise like a wall between them. Yet he was here. He had returned. He had just saved Harry's life."

And then later in the scene, after they killed the Horcrux.

"'After you left,' he said in a low voice, grateful for the fact that Ron's face was hidden, 'she cried for a week. Probably longer, only she didn't want to see me. There were loads of nights when we never even spoke to each other. With you gone...'
    He could not finish it; it was only now Ron was here again that Harry fully realized how much his absence had had cost them."

Paragraph later.

"'I'm  sorry,' he said in a thick voice. 'I'm sorry I left. I know I was a- a-'
    He looked around the darkness, as if hoping a bad enough word would swoop down upon him and claim him.
    'You've sort of made up for it tonight,' said harry. 'getting the sword. Finishing off the horcrux. Saving my life.'
    'That makes it sound a lot cooler than it was,' Ron mumbled.
'Stuff like that always sound cooler than it was," said Harry. 'I've been trying to tell you that for years.'
    Simultaneously they walked forwards and hugged, Harry gripping the still sopping back of Ron's jacket.' "

I'm with Darth Praxus on this one, Ron is not useless by any stretch of the imagination, but I don't think he's there to serve the same kind of purpose you want to judge him by Zarbs.

He is there as, not a foil, but at least a sounding board for how screwed up Harry's existence is inside the magic world. Along with being the only one of the 3 who has street knowledge about the wizarding world, (Harry and Hermione both being raised in the Muggle world. Granted he's a bit of an idiot sometimes about some stuff, but hey we all have that friend), he's also the only one that can really give a bit of perspective to us (the reader) about Harry and his fame. He's the friend that always get's shafted because his friend is famous, he always gets shafted because his family is poor. He always get's shafted because he's a bit of an idiot. And there's an incredible amount of tension there that obviously comes to a head in DH, but there's also a very strong friendship there.

So while he might not do much to progress the "plot" of the story, he doesn't have too, he gives us a lot of perspective about the world and the other 2, and in a lot of ways is the most sane of the three. He's, to get incredibly cliched, the heart of the group. Hermione is the brains obviously, and Harry is the courage, but without Ron I think they tend to get very wrapped up in their own heads, Hermione because she is so intellectual and Harry because he is so confused, Ron is always the one that brings the problem back down the dirt level.

Sorry bit of a wandering path of thought in this one, hopefully it makes sense.

1,381

(22 replies, posted in Creations)

Another little short film we did for Christmas.

1,382

(19 replies, posted in Creations)

BIIIIOOOOSHOOOOOOCKKKKK!

-whew- Thanks Trey.

Thought I was losing it for a minute there.

Bullet3 wrote:

Ok, you've convinced me. Well done.

drewjmore wrote:

What strange internet is this?

I- I- I don't understand what's going on...

You're not even gonna like... call me a fag or anything? I just- convinced you? Not even gonna maybe...like... insult my mother or something??

This is so weird.

1,385

(1,649 replies, posted in Off Topic)

CABBAGE ROLLS AND COFFEE!! MMM MMM GOOD!

Raven wrote:

I have a bigger problem with Stone's JFK and all the conspiracy theory stuff that gets passed off as facts.  That's doing more damage than a fake X-men promo.

This.

bullet3 wrote:

Right, but my point is, if you have a direct killing spell, there's no reason not to use that every time, as it's the most efficient way of taking down your opponent. So if you have wizards dueling to the death, ya, it's gonna be them really quickly firing short-burst killing spells at each other, and ya, it's gonna look like a laser-gun battle.

I disagree entirely. There is, as we know only one, one-shot kill spell in the world of HP, THE killing curse as it is so aptly named, and it is such a piece of dark magic that only those fully immersed in the dark arts can A) Use it. B) Want to use it. So the one shot kill thing with magic is out (at least for anyone we would like to continue to respect). Obviously there are indirect ways of killing someone through magic. Which is where I would agrue a lot of the more inventive things we see in the fights start to come in. I would also say that in some ways a lot of what the fights in magic are is out witting your opponent into making a mistake (I don't know much about real fight choreo so Mike or Eddie could probably confirm/deny this, but I imagine there's a similar thing in real fighting) so that you can slip in between the cracks and take them out.

In the fight Mike posted:

"Professor McGonagall moved faster than Harry could have believed: Her wand slashed through the air and for a split second Harry thought that Snape must crumple, unconscious, but the swiftness of his Shield Charm was such that McGonagall was thrown off balance.

There we have, McGonagall attacked first with a swift attack (probably something similar to the one Dolohov used against Hermione in the Department of Minstries), a quick slash meant to take down your opponent quickly. but Snape quickly throws up a shield making it void.

She brandished her wand at a torch on the wall and it flew out of its bracket...

So she switches tactics, knowing any direct attack against Snape is just going to be thwarted with a shield charm. Distraction.

Then it was no longer fire, but a great black serpent that McGonagall blasted to smoke, which re-formed and solidified in seconds to become a swarm of pursuing daggers: Snape avoided them only by forcing the suit of armor in front of him, and with echoing clangs the daggers sank, one after another, into its breast...

First fire, then a snake, then flying daggers, all in the span of about 5 seconds. Chaos. Which one does he protect against? In the end the only reason he survives is a quick reflex.

Flitwick's spell hit the suit of armor behind which Snape had taken shelter: With a clatter it came to life. Snape struggled free of the crushing arms and sent it flying back toward his attackers

Another player has entered the game. Flitwick taking advantage of Snapes confusion and choice of hiding place, turns it against him. Restraining him. So Snape does the only thing he can and blows it apart across the room, most likely in some vain hope that it might do something similar to McGonagall or Flitwick giving him an opening.

When Harry looked up again, Snape was in full flight, McGonagall, Flitwick, and Sprout all thundering after him: He hurtled through a classroom door, and moments later, he heard McGonagall cry, "Coward! COWARD!"

And it works, the flying armour is enough to let him get out of the room.

Now you compare that to what you're saying.

blast

shield charm

blast

shield charm

blast

shield charm

blast

shield charm

blast

Fells like you and I are destined to do this forever.
http://wac.450f.edgecastcdn.net/80450F/comicsalliance.com/files/2011/10/dk11.jpg

bullet3 wrote:

. Like, if Voldemort has to do some fancy spell to get my car to turn into a monster to chase me down and eat me, while he's busy doing that I can pull out a gun and shoot him in the face.

Except any wizard worth his salt will have cast 6 defense spells before you even pull the gun, so any muggle projectile/anything really, can't even get near them while they're doing their fancy charms. Read that Quote that Dorkman posted again. Those aren't super complicated spells that take a lot of time to conjure. Those are split second flicks of the wrist performed by really really damn good wizards/witches. That's something I think a lot of people miss. Most of the magic we see in the first 5/6 books is beginner level, performed by students who barely even have a grasp of the fundamentals. They're essentially doing magic longhand, I mean hell, for most of the series they aren't even doing anything non-vocally.

So when we see REAL wizards and witches in full battle mode, it's fast, it's intense, it's chaotic, it's messy, it's everything under the sun to try and kill that other person while the other person is doing everything under the sun to not get killed, or try to kill back, and it's daaaamn fast. It's supposed to be impressive, this is what real magic looks like in a real world fight.

There's a line in Deathly Hallows about the defense spells they cast around their campsites, something to the effect of having done them so often that even Ron could bbasically do it in his sleep. And there's one right after they escape the Wizard Cops I believe, where they are all panicked, and Hermione is just throwing up defensive spells in a panic and the way it reads it's like a minute and there's 16 different spells up. If I remember tomorrow, I'll try to find the exact quotes because I think it's really telling about how bad they are magic, really, and how much they still have to learn.

1,389

(19 replies, posted in Creations)

Just started up my LP of The Stanley Parable, a very cool game Squiggly mentioned a while back and finally managed to get a chance to play.

1,390

(20 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Interesting.

1,391

(20 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Not to sound like a dick, but... why do we care exactly?

/knowsnothingaboutwhatsgoingon

1,392

(20 replies, posted in Off Topic)

avatar wrote:

Isonomegasharkopussnadoasteriod

Then sharks.

bullet3 wrote:

As for Deathly Hallows Pt. 1, I'm genuinely surprised that people seem to love that one. I have to wonder if it's just the fact that it stays super faithful to the book, because to me, it does not really work if you're not bringing your knowledge of the books in with you. Dobby's death scene in particular feels woefully unearned, as he's had like 15 minutes of screen-time 5 movies ago, and then another 10 in this one, and suddenly we're supposed to feel like this is some huge moment. If you pretend the books don't exist, I don't think it works as a fulfilling narrative (unlike other "part 1" adaptations like Fellowship of the Rings for example).

Oh shit that was in part 1, wan't it? For some reason my brain decided to lump that in with part 2, but yes, the whole Dobby thing is one of my major points for why the entire film series fails at being movies instead of "Harry Potter, the visual companion".

Well... Okay then, I'm trying really hard to find something redeeming to say about about the movies right now, so I'm not that guy....but I got nothing. Nothing.

1,394

(22 replies, posted in Creations)

Faldor wrote:

If you want to do this as a regular thing you should look into fitting the performers with lapel mics or atleast having some external audio near the stage

Lapel mics unfortunately won't happen (It's not in either of our budgets atm. Hopefully it's something we can look into down the line), but I do have an external shotgun mounted above the stage now. Unfortunately this performance was filmed before I had the mounting gear, so the shotgun is just strapped to the camera.

1,395

(22 replies, posted in Creations)

So some of you might know I've been working/volunteering with a local improv/sketch comedy group here in town for the last year or so. And I am proud to announce we just launched a new youtube series called A Bit Of Bullskit Comedy!

It is going to be an ongoing series of the filmed sketches and improv from their monthly shows. And the first episode just went up!

Enjoy!

Books:

1) Order Of The Phoenix
2) Deathly Hallows
3) Goblet of Fire
4) Prisoner Of Azkaban
5) Half Blood Prince
6) Chamber Of Secrets
7) Philosophers Stone

I know most people probably bawk when I put Chambers and Stone at the bottom, but for the most it's really just due to my preference for the darker, more twisted elements that started to really come in after Azkaban. That, and I also much prefer the longer reads, there's more happening, it's more complex the stories are more epic in scale. So I still love them dearly but they are definitely the 2 that are most aimed at a younger audience, and feel like it. (Which is the point yes, but this a preference list, get over it)

Movies:

1)Deathly Hallows Pt1
2) Philosophers Stone
3) Chamber Of Secrets
4)
5)
6)
7)
8) The rest

Deathly Hallows Pt 1 because I can distinctly remember sitting in front of it go, "wow, they actually finally managed to figure out how to make one of these damn movies" and then the movie ended, and I didn't hate it. And then DH2 came out, and all of that was undone.

Stone and Chambers, because I can still remember when I was too young to have ithem overshadowed by everything that came after it, and I could still enjoy them.

And the rest because it's been too long since I've actually sat down and watched them all in some sort of order to remember what each one was like individually. So they're pretty much all just a big ball of angry in my head.

FireFighter214 wrote:

the timing is what is suspect.

The timing is the point.

Everyone is thinking about JFK right now, it's the anniversary, History/Discovery/every station under the sun is running some sort of documentary/special/conspiracy theory doc of some sort about the assassination, museums are going ape shit with it. Of course they would do it now. They do it any other time and it gets swept under the rug and forgotten, like all of those other ones you had to go look up.

1,398

(956 replies, posted in Off Topic)

http://i.imgur.com/3wnK3NF.png

I don't really watch late night talk shows anymore, but they do still have their moments apparently.

1,399

(1,649 replies, posted in Off Topic)

So perfect, I can't even.

1,400

(991 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Tomahawk wrote:

No. She used her own regeneration energy to heal Smith, she didn't give him spare ones.

Depends on who you ask.

Like I said, "the most prevalent" explanation. We won't know for sure til Christmas.

My guess is they'll pull some wibbly-wobbliness with such a massive influx of regeneration energy being flooded into his body plus something something Tardis energy caused a reset of the regeneration gland.

Because I mean really, if a Time Lord can be created by 2 humans getting it on in a Tardis, nothing's off limits