You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Active topics Unanswered topics Mark all as read
Friends In Your Discord!
Miss having friends in your forum? We've migrated over to discord! Many of the threads that started here years ago continue on in a new setting.
Come join us!
Search options (Page 60 of 81)
Topics by Invid User defined search
Posts found: 1,476 to 1,500 of 2,003
Hmm, either they relaxed the rules or the Intrepid museum is really expanding. NASA was insisting on an enclosed climate controlled building for the shuttles, which would exclude leaving the Enterprise out in the New York winter next to the salty Atlantic. Museums were also being asked to pay for the transportation themselves 
(I'm all for saving all the orbiters, but I find it heartbreaking that all this money will be spent preserving four copies when the only remaining Spanish American War ship, the USS Olympia, may be scrapped because the Philadelphia museum is out of money)
For a connection between Douglas Adams and Terry Gilliam, there are some as Python as a whole were fans. The original Arthur for example shows up in The Meaning of Life when Death interrupts a dinner party, as well as in Brazil (he delivers the papers to the family when the solders break into the wrong apartment at the beginning).
I've listened to about a half our of the episode so far, which mean about 10 minutes of the movie
I won't actually have a copy until Netflix sends one hopefully Wednesday so I may not finish it today, but I have to say it's interesting to listen to you four talk about the actors when none of you are comparing them to the originals. It's just... well, a foreign concept, as I started with the radio show when it first aired on the local public radio station around 1980 and always heard those voices when reading the books (and the same actors, apart from a new Ford and Trillian, did the TV series). It's like a reviewer of the new Trek movie who has never seen Shatner playing Kirk. I'm getting a kick out of it, but at least one member of the panel should have been familiar with the original (which is Trey's usual role with you kids). Then again, at least all your arguments about the film are different then the ones I would raise!
(and, from the sound of it, Stephen Fry in the audio book is imitating the original Eddie. It wasn't a case where he had to come up with original ways these characters would sound)
Naturally, the very best way is to listen to the original 12 radio episodes 
If we don't have a General Butt Fucking Naked action figure by next Christmas, I'll be very disappointed 
I got back from a quick trip to NYC, and am still recovering from the 7 hour bus trip ($38 each way is a deal, but I could never sleep while traveling). I'm also still recovering from seeing the new Broadway show by the South Park guys. The Book of Mormon, my friends, is amazing. It's simple, but hilarious, and it's the first time I've seen a song get two ovations (one for the song itself, and another for the silent reaction the song had on certain characters). Perhaps the best part from a long term perspective is this is going to be a VERY easy show to mount elsewhere. Expect not just a touring version but local productions as soon as the rights are available 
If they do tackle Miyazaki there'd really only be reason to do one. Not because they're not great, but because not being huge anime fans I doubt they'd be able to come up with more then one movie's worth of conversation
That being the case, I'd go with either Nausicaa or Laputa (Castle in the Sky) for being the best examples. Yes, Princess Mononoke has the Neil Gaiman adapted translation and was the first in US theaters, and Spirited Away was the first to get any real mainstream US theatrical notice, but I say start with the classics. Nausicaa is what made people go "Hey, this TV director can do great original stuff!" (plus it got the infamous US butchering in the form of "Warrior of the Winds")
It's going to depend on what the local conditions are- for example, I expect Israeli security is worse then this for a very good reason. But, yes, for the US this is a bit much and I can't see where it would have stopped any of the terrorist attempts there have been if it had been in place earlier.
In which, if memory serves, nobody in the video actually sang on the song (the real singers were too fat for MTV)
You have to consider the historic reality. Every attempt to do animation in the US for a mainstream adult audience has failed. Every Single One, going back to Fantasia. When Disney said after it flopped he'd never try to do that again, all those who envied his successes followed suit. Oh, now and then you'll get a Fritz the Cat or Watership Down, but they're lucky to break even and the followups never do well.
The sad fact is US audiences don't want non-kids animated films. Even in this day of wall to wall anime, put something like the Cowboy Bebop movie in theaters and it does art house numbers. Oh, Disney has tried. Even apart from the flop that was Black Cauldron, Tarzan was the start of a trend towards more action films that gave us Atlantis the Lost Empire and Treasure Planet... at which point reality set in and they again stopped.
As for Pixar.... they're now working on a John Carter of Mars film. This will be their attempt to do just what you want. They've built up the brand name, secured their future... now it's time to take a huge risk.
The new Sirenia album 'The Enigma of Life' came out the other month, and while I often play them at work I've gone back and listened to the older albums more. I was shocked to find it's now more of a solo project then a band, with Morten Veland not only doing the writing but performing all the music with Ailyn singing. The other two guys will still play on tour though, I think.
DorkmanScott wrote:Matt Vayda wrote:I managed to come up with a few titles that seem to play a similar identity card to Body Snatchers.
There's also "The Puppet Masters" -- the book, at least. I heard the movie made rather a botch of it but never saw it.
There also have to be some films about clones/robots that are basically the same story but with a different magic bean.
I think if anything modern genre movies tend to do even less explaining, relying on the now-established tropes to get you most of the way and throwing in the tidbits about their universe's particular spin as necessary.
Asian horror films tend to be worse at that, often figuring that the character involved would never know what the hell was going on so there's no reason for the audience to either.
redxavier wrote:I've only seen the movie. And as you can imagine, I didn't see what the fuss was about.
To be honest, the story may not have aged well. What was new and innovative in 1980 has been stolen from by everybody over the decades to the point where the original might not be that funny if you're coming to it late. Still, forget the books and check out the first two radio shows and the 6 part TV series. The books to me only work once you have the actors voices in your head, as the dialog was written to be HEARD.
maul2 wrote:I've actually been thinking about this a lot the last couple days, and i think that if there was ever to be an even remotely faithful translation of Hitchhikers it would need to incorporate the narrator in a major way, because when you're reading the books he essentially is an entire character to his own. And considering the level to which DA leans on the narrator/guide to fill in the backstory of various events it would be incredibly hard to do without him, and if a director were to truly embrace that concept it could only make the film stronger in my opinion.
That's what the TV series did, as well as the original radio show. Really, the fact the original story adapted so well to three very different formats is amazing
Also...said film would need an insane VFX budget in order to do any of it justice, like the scene where Arthur and Ford first get picked up by the Heart Of Gold, the books description is these massive vistas of light and sound that can barely be comprehended by the human mind...and in the 2005 we get...a...uh, a talking couch. Um, yeah.
Actually, for the joke to work we still shouldn't see it. What works as a throwaway audio gag probably doesn't when presented visually.
Wait... has anyone seen the original four since then?
Some thoughts on the actual movie
I never had a problem with the ending and the woman suddenly becoming a pod person, because I think in my mind he was carrying out the replica who was weak from being born and not the real one. For all we know he hiked an hour or so to get to the farm.
For a similar case of studio interference, there's The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari from 1920. While I think there's some debate, it seems the producers insisted on a wrap around story to put all the weird stuff into the mind of a madman which made it more acceptable (similar to making all the Oz stuff a dream, which it isn't in the books)
It's a movie that may have suffered from overdevelopment, or even the fact Douglas Adams was still around. He'd written four versions of that opening (radio, book, TV, computer game) and probably figured he'd get it out of the way quickly so he could move on to the "good stuff". Someone starting fresh in another decade would probably end up producing a better film.
(oh, if some of you haven't heard the new radio shows that adapt the later books, keep it that way)
I assume someone has done a version where the Beast is female? Or wouldn't "Hollywood Ugly" ever be ugly enough for the film to work?
There was a thread in a USENET movie newsgroup about the upcoming film, where someone commented on how you never see a hero openly say "screw the little people" as they do in the Atlas trailer. My reply was most of us ARE the little people, so such feelings aren't going to have us rooting for the hero 
That said, there may well be a number of Rand-ish films out there, but libertarians are so anti-Hollywood they've never bothered to hunt them down or lumped them into a genre.
switch wrote:Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles. The first movie, and the CGI one TMNT... There really is no case to make other than I just enjoyed myself while watching these flicks.
See, I think the first movie is honestly good. Maybe it's just because it goes back to the comic and takes it seriously as opposed to the first cartoon, or the great Henson suits. And they had the perfect Casey.
I'd like comments on which movie better reflects the philosophy of Ayn Rand, the Incredibles or the upcoming Atlas Shrugged 
It would be fun to tackle. King did the adaptation himself, and did a rather good job of cutting subplots and combining characters in ways an outsider probably wouldn't. Not perfect by any means, there's probably a lot you could go into.
Zarban wrote:Down in Front wrote:I don't understand how the people talking in the mangled interviews were able to book "three laughing gigs a week."
We professional laughers often do... um... "private shows." I'm not proud of it, but it's a living.
Laughter is the best form of birth control.
fcw wrote:Would you be surprised if, in the mysterious future, fans of commentaries will make movies that go with whatever you are talking about in each episode?
It would resemble the animation some guy did of stories his little daughter told (they showed a couple before a live Rifftrax show)
Might be a case where the DVD used soft subtitles for the German and the studio forgot to give Netflix the TV version with burned in subs.
Posts found: 1,476 to 1,500 of 2,003