To clarify: that version of the song isn't even the "in progress" version. It's just a cover of my own song. :-P Might be something I come back to, might not, was just a thing I made on a lark.

I'm realizing now that I've forgotten that people haven't heard the actual song yet. Yeesh. Sorry, folks. I've been livin' with 'em for too long.

Yeah, I'm gonna go ahead and take that down. I'll put it back up once the album's out, so you have somethin' to compare it to. (Might be the same version, might tweak it some more. Thanks Herc!)

For those who got in early, congrats. Told ya it was a bootleg. big_smile

1,502

(7 replies, posted in Episodes)

This is cool.

So, listening to this with fresh ears today, I'm thinking it's an unlistenable mess. Way too many things going on at once. But I had fun makin' it. :-P

It's getting pretty desperate in here, sheesh. Right now Alex and I are lining up a horn section to record a part for Limp Dick Christmas Lights (including Kyle and Gordy from Uncomposed, which, pft, how cool is that) in the next week or two. After that it's just finishing the mixes, which is mostly on Andy's schedule, but we're already close.

...

Anyway, here's a song.

It's worth mentioning that this is not the album cut. The real song is way cooler. (Among other things, we're hiring a horn section for it. Ya dig?) The only thing this has in common with the actual song is the lyrics and lead melody.

Limp Dick Christmas Lights - Gregorian Bootleg Cut

1,505

(38 replies, posted in Episodes)

LatinAlice needs to come to LA so that we can do an incredibly annoying Intermission about musical numbers.

1,506

(255 replies, posted in Creations)

Uploading.

1,507

(38 replies, posted in Episodes)

Church.

*e-hugs*

Hadn't even heard of this, and it doesn't appear to be streaming anywhere or playing in theaters anywhere near me. I'll keep an eye out, though. I like having my humanity futzed with.

1,509

(38 replies, posted in Episodes)

Motherrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

knowwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwssssssssssss


BEST

1,510

(25 replies, posted in Movie Stuff)

I loved it. Though I've come to realize I have a truly awful memory in general, and specifically when it comes to a million characters I've only ever seen in a handful of movies. So the fact that I don't really remember... kind of anything about who anybody is or what just happened in the last movie might have helped.

But under those circumstances, I found it incredibly cool and engaging and much better at maintaining a tone than most movies.

1,511

(38 replies, posted in Episodes)

Sorry the aspect rations on a couple of these have been weird. I'm pinning it down.

1,512

(1 replies, posted in Off Topic)

pimp

1,513

(27 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Here's what I would suggest:

1. Two programs, Skype and Audition. Nothin' else. (Unless MP3 Skype Recorder counts as a third thing, in which case, that too.)

2. Record your audio locally in Audition, and set up MP3SR to only record the co-host's audio, not both of yours.

3. Upon completion, save off a copy of your local recording, just for safety. Then find a "silent" part in your recording — there will be a lot, every time the co-host is talking, you're not — and sample it, run noise removal, do that whole thing. The steps in order are: select a couple seconds of silence, Shift-P, then Ctrl/Cmd-Shift-P. Shift-P samples the audio, C-Shift-P opens the noise removal interface. Here's the settings I use, load that. Select Entire File. Apply.

4. New multitrack session matching your recording settings, bring in your audio. On the track your audio is on, add a quick track preset. (Window -> Effects Rack, if it's not already open.) Set it to Track Effects instead of Clip Effects, and just drop on one of the vocal presets. Try Radio Announcer Voice. It runs a quick compression on your audio, excites the highs and lows, and then runs a limiter on that for further volume management. Done. Don't even have to set it up or tweak.

5. Import your co-host's MP3. Double click on it to go into that track, run noise removal on that. Go back to your multitrack, add the MP3, sync 'em up.

6. Do your editing, if you wanna edit. Hitting R once opens the track razor tool, to make cuts in a track. Hitting R twice loads the session razor, which will make a cut down all the tracks ya got. You'd wanna use that one, because the tracks are synced now. In fact, if you session-razor cut at the point you want to start removing, and then session-razor cut at the point where you want to pick back up on things... switch back to the cursor tool and select both tracks in that "to be cut" area. Shift-Backspace. The selected area ripple deletes, dragging your remaining tracks up to fill the gap.

7. The bottom track in your stack (Track 7, appropriately enough), is the Master Track. Anything you do to that track applies to everything. There's a little Sum-To-Mono button on every track, but if you hit it on the Master, you only have to hit it once. Looks like this: ((O)) Hit that, and export.

The result is the same thing you were previously doing, only it sounds a lot better, a lot faster, with a lot less manual labor and software switchery.

Throw in a little bit of effects processing beyond this for warming you up, and it's possible you don't even a new mic.

*shrug*

1,514

(27 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Believe it or not, the following is a controversial statement in some circles: the microphone will only guarantee you about sixty percent of the possible quality-of-output. As in, "which mic do I plug in and talk to?" To get to one hundred percent of the possible quality-of-output, you have to know your stuff in the engineering phase and in the mixing phase. Without knowing your stuff on both ends, a $15,000 microphone will sound virtually identical to a $300 microphone to most people. As in, if people were used to hearing your show with the $15k mic, and you did an episode with the $300 mic, it'd be really unlikely for someone to leave a comment like "what's with the drop in quality?"

Accordingly, if you're fairly solid at engineering your recording for best results, and plussing your audio in the mix for best results, you can make even a fairly low-end microphone sound awesome. (Note for posterity: I do not lay claim to FIYH's audio being awesome. I think it's good, it could be better, and could be better if I spent more time mixing it. I just don't, because I'm lazy and we're past the threshold I cared about quality-wise.)

At a certain point, this conversation should be about your recording and mixing techniques, and not so much about which mic you use.

This is not to say all mics are created equal — it's not even to say all mics within the same general price range are created equal. When we did my album, Andy set up a handful of various Really Nice Mics and had me sing a verse into each of them. It's called a shoot-out. Some microphones just have inherent qualities that vibe well with some voices, and there's a tiny little benefit to be found in isolating the right mic for the right person. But the overall value of the right mic, compared to the overall value of the right setup and mixing, is pretty slight. Especially when we're talking about radio.

This is a long way of saying two things:

1. You can go wrong buying a mic, but it doesn't sound like you're likely to, so don't kill yourself over it.
2. Don't expect the mic to do the work, if better quality is your goal. You can make a shitty mic sound warm.

Our own personal Hagrid, Kyle Mattingly, has informed me that on the Eli commentary... well, I'll let him say it:

Kyle wrote:

You may not wish to be the podcast that questions how many bullets Eli has in his clip, but I DO wish to be the guy who assures you that they're called magazines and clips are totally a different thing.

Yeah, I said clip. I have since been informed that magazines are (as they are in filmmaking!) the thing that already has the useful bits inside of it and is ready to be stuck onto the shooting device. In the case of guns, bullets. In the case of cameras, film. It's a new, ready-to-shoot, hunk of stock.

Clips, on the other hand, are more or less a bullet container. Less of a thing.

1,516

(65 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Fun fact: I still have no idea what this show is about or what network it's on.

1,517

(22 replies, posted in Creations)

Aw shit. I like this guy.

1,518

(27 replies, posted in Off Topic)

After years of fiddling with our setup, the current FIYH lineup is (4x) a Shure SM-58, standard windscreen, $45 boom arm from Guitar center, standard XLR, Behringer Xenyx 1002B mixer board, and a laptop running Audacity. (And a second laptop running vMix and a webcam or two, along with some graphics and line-input.)

I've also got some nice pop filters I've never even used.

I think you can get a 58 in decent shape for sixty or seventy bucks, and it'll last you the rest of your life. It'd last you the rest of your life if you used it as a hammer on off-days.

1,519

(22 replies, posted in Creations)

Those are awesome.

So cool. Thanks for sharing.

1,520

(35 replies, posted in Creations)

I'm glaring at you.

Glaaaaaaare.

1,521

(35 replies, posted in Creations)

JESUS FUCKING CHRIST IAN

AAAAAGHHHHHHHH

You motherfucker. Thanks. I needed this. What a huge kick in the creative ass. I MUST MAKE THINGS.

1,522

(37 replies, posted in Episodes)

Unless there's some massive tornado in the cloud (haw) or unforeseen legal reason, the video will be around forever. Not sure if it'll be public or not, but if I ever wanted it "gone" I'd just set it to unlisted.

The problem with this particular video is that I forgot to start the video recording at the beginning of the episode, and only remembered when it was nearly time to do the unpause. So you miss the intro stuff. (Which isn't a big deal in this case, as we kinda blazed through it.) YouTube automatically archives the video as it is broadcast, so I do HAVE the beginning of the episode in video form separately — but I tend not to like those as much as the my-end recordings, for two reasons: 1., whenever the event starts (which is set up beforehand, 2:00 p.m. or whatever; the timer reaches zero, and broadcast begins) that's what ends up being in the video forever, so if we're waiting for someone to arrive, the permanent archive of that video episode starts with me playing guitar or whatever, and, 2., if there's an internet blip or the feed goes down for a minute, the permanent archive has a dead spot in it too. So for safety, I record it on my end and upload that.

In unrelated news about this video, though, I look forward to experimenting with the "technological advance" I came up with for this broadcast. Since Trey would rather not be on camera for these things, especially if the video is gonna be archived, I've been coming up with ways to obscure his image so the painting in the attic doesn't get any older. (Or whatever. Something something Oscar Wilde.) This week I got a wild hair up my ass and loaded up my webcam, pointed it at the empty room, frame-grabbed it, removed everything but a blob of empty couch where Trey would be sitting, and overlaid it in my broadcast software above the live webcam feed. Naturally whenever someone passes behind it they get erased, but I think that's kinda fun.

Plus, so long as I'm prepping those blank spots beforehand, we can kinda do anything with that couch spot to amuse ourselves. In my tests the morning of this broadcast, I set Tokes in Trey's seat for the framegrab, microphone and headphones and all. So for the whole show, it would have looked like Tokes was on-mic. Stuff like that. I could even Photoshop something into that seat. Hell, if I gave myself enough prep time, I could even webcam-film myself in that seat with a bag over my head that says "Trey," maybe fidget around a bit, make it a seamless loop in AE, and overlay THAT. Wee-hee-hee!

Yes, this is all very dumb and wacky — I could just as well pan the camera a bit to the left and be done with it — but it's amusing to me and I like being amused. Plus I think there's something to be said for having SOMETHING in that spot for us to be "looking" at. Maybe I'll just Photoshop Christina Hendricks into that spot.

I have fun.

1,523

(37 replies, posted in Episodes)

1,524

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

HBO Go recently added some older made-for-HBO movies to their stable, so I caught up on two I hadn't seen before — The Late Shift and Conspiracy.

The Late Shift is the true-to-the-book account of the "Late Night Wars" in the early 90s, surrounding Carson going off the air and the fate of The Tonight Show, and who would get the job: Leno or Letterman? I had a lot of fun with this movie, in a very Pirates of Silicon Valley sort of way, and with the people in it. The actors playing Dave and Jay both did at least a good job, but the portrayal of Dave is eerily accurate (and sympathetic, just, eery). The guy playing Jay doesn't quite bring it so much, and is also bogged down by a truly grotesque chin prosthetic. Anyway. Not much to this movie, and there was some legal blowback to the book by folks claiming libel, so maybe take it with a grain of salt. But it's fun, and inside-baseball movies always intrigue me. Worth a watch.

Conspiracy I watched on Trey's recommendation, and holy shit you guys. I'll give you the elevator pitch, and then you have to promise me you'll pull it up and give it a watch: historical drawing-room drama, based on transcripts, simply walking the audience through the top brass of the SS getting together to figure out what exactly they're gonna do with all these jews they've been rounding up. Stanley Tucci, Kenneth Branagh, Colin Firth. It's intense as fuck, and it's goddamned riveting. And horrifying. And just... wow. I'm very glad somebody made this movie. Do yourself a favor.

1,525

(16 replies, posted in Off Topic)

You're expanding the form.