Lego movie all the way.
Lego does some amazing things when branching out of their usual domain of toys and knows how to have fun with its own limitations.
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by fireproof78
Lego movie all the way.
Lego does some amazing things when branching out of their usual domain of toys and knows how to have fun with its own limitations.
Please, please actually call this album "An Album Called Leroy: Adventures in Faking This." Or at least one of the two halves.
All 3 possibilities have the most of the ring.
I thought that was the name...
No, it must be the name of the album! It must be so!
I had a blast at the recording of Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid so I am all for John Wayne-my grandmother loves a good Western. I'm sure I can borrow her copy
^^^
Collect all 4 to unlock an X-Box achievement!
Funny story: I picked up the ATOC concept art for a quick read/inspiration while donating plasma.
First of all, some interesting art work and it is amazing to see how much of that art translates on to the screen.
As for the prequels, I guess I hit the acceptance stride, mostly because I have tried to study the films and explore them from a production standpoint, rather than strictly as films. I think George doesn't get why the OT was so popular, why Empire is considered the best, and felt he needed to make his movie, rather than the unfinished work he did in the OT. He always calls those movies "unfinished" and feels the need to show us (like I think Dorkman said) what he always meant to do. And we, the audience, go "Huh? That's what you meant to do?"
I find ATOC enjoyable as a movie (better than TMP, where I literally walked away going that was interesting, but not SW). It has some of my favorite Star Wars moments that I usually skip right to while watching the DVD.
But, the Internet is done with the prequels so maybe I'm just too late for the hate
LeVar Burton weighs in regarding Abrams:
http://www.treknews.net/2013/06/16/leva … ddenberry/
Yes? No?
fireproof78 wrote:Actually, I am surprised that Tolkien didn't have more women his stories, given his positive view of them but, to contrast, he was relating to a time when ladies roles were much different in society. The fact that Eowyn broke with her people's traditions and female role is interesting in of itself. It reflects a little more of Tolkien's attitudes more closely, I think.
Well, Tolkien's original strong woman was Lúthien. She was about as strong as they come. She was an elven princess who fell in love with Beren, a mortal man. When he was captured and tortured by Sauron, she faced him herself. Sauron. The dark freaking lord. With the help of Huan the hound the two of them defeated waves of wolves and a shapeshifting Sauron, beat his ass, made him hand over the keys to the dungeon and banished him from the land.
She healed Beren and the two of them lived like bandits in the forest, very unfitting for a highborn elven lady. Tolkien didn't stop there, though. Like a boss, she helped her lover Beren steal the Silmarils, the most precious jewels ever crafted in Arda, right from the crown of Morgoth himself. The original dark lord, who made Sauron look like a kitten by comparison.
When Beren died fighting off the mightiest of all werewolves, she died of grief, then pleaded to the Valar (the gods) in the afterlife to let her reunite with Beren, at the cost of her immortality. Her sacrifice moved them and both were brought back from death as mortals; the only time that ever happened to lesser beings in Tolkien's mythos. The two lived out their mortal lives and had many children, eventually becoming the ancestors of Elrond and Arwen.
Tolkien requested his wife Edith's grave be inscripted with the name Lúthien. When he died, the name Beren was added to his inscription.
First of all, didn't know that last bit. Makes me want to cry with the beauty of it all.
Also, I need to read all the way through the Similarion. I haven't gotten past the creation story
Holden wrote:
I was dragged by my friends to this piece of Hollywood mainstream garbage and right away I knew I was in for two hours of hell. First of all, I never see movies, I only experience films. Movies are rubbish for the uncultured masses but I went to see this anyway at the insistence of my friends. To make matters worse, they were vehement about seeing it in 3D, or as I like to call it "pleb-o-vision".
As soon as the movie started, the entire audience clapped. I'm not kidding. They actually clapped at a movie screen. I thought the internet was only joking about this sort of thing but the audience clapped throughout the whole movie whenever their peabrains understood the atrociously constructed plot. It was truly an eye opening experience. I have never been surrounded by so many philistines at the same time.
The movie itself was an abomination. Man Of Steel exists purely to make money through merchandise sales and the cheap exploitation of a pre-sold franchise. The entire Superman series has always been commercialized trash that appeals to children. The very fact adults flock to see and discuss this series is revolting. Unsurprisingly, there is no artistry whatsoever in this latest installment. Things blow up, the one dimensional antagonist screams a lot and the characters (I use that term loosely) speak with the cadence of robots, including one groan inducing line by a female soldier about Superman's attractiveness. Speaking of which, most of the audience were on dates and I shudder to think what will happen when they inevitably mate; they're probably already having unprotected sex just as Superman and Lois Lane promoted.
After the end credits rolled, my friends excitedly discussed the nonsense that just occurred on screen with dissection and banter back and forth as if it were a Fellini film. I felt nothing but pity for them. They'll never understand and appreciate cinema like I do; they're doomed to be mindless drones for the rest of their lives.
I drove home by myself as they went to the local diner to further discuss the movie, as if it couldn't be explained with 20 seconds of grunting. As I sit here in retrospective, I truly wonder if the anti-intellectual have fully taken over our world.
Lot of long words in there, miss. We're naught but humble pirates
Alex wrote:Consider Eowyn's story: she is a symbol of feminine strength. In the Middle Earth mythology, that is her role--the idealized feminine realized through struggle. Her entire story revolves around being doubted as a woman and then proving that women can be just as strong, or stronger/more influential, than men. If every woman character did that, it wouldn't matter as much.
...no. Not at all.
Alex wrote:Jackson's approach seems to be the opposite: rather than trying to underline a woman's story line in order to outline the genders' strengths, he's poising a preemptive strike by simply throwing in a female character with a lot of screen time but without much depth. It's like he's saying, "See? She has tons of screen time! Don't get mad at me about there being so many dudes!" As if he would be the one to blame in the first place.
I agree that it is a preemptive strike. But, seriously, you can have quantity AND quality with ladies. It's not like you can have 1 woman who is 100% strong or 5 who are 20% strong. You can have lots of great women! Jackson/Tolkein/basically everyone just chooses not to.
Well, we have Tauriel now so I guess we'll get the 100% strong lady again
Although, that flautist in the first movie was pretty strong too
Actually, I am surprised that Tolkien didn't have more women his stories, given his positive view of them but, to contrast, he was relating to a time when ladies roles were much different in society. The fact that Eowyn broke with her people's traditions and female role is interesting in of itself. It reflects a little more of Tolkien's attitudes more closely, I think.
On a bit of a Star Wars kick:
I'm getting CG Star Destroyers coming out of the ocean. No reason.
Googled it. Hasn't been done.
I'm saying: Green light!
This has been bothering me for a while and I need to say something.
In this episode, I make a joke about Padme "asking for it" (i.e to get raped) with the way she dresses in the fireside scene. There's certainly a joke of some kind to be made about the mixed signals going on in that scene -- mainly in Lucas' handling of it -- but in the years since this recording I've grown to realize that so wasn't it.
I've never been called out on this, publicly or privately, so I'm calling myself out. I can't change the recording but I want to go on record here and say -- to anyone who has listened to this or may do so in the future, and is hurt or upset by a misguided attempt at humor of which I've come to be ashamed -- I'm sorry. I hope to do better.
Forgiven without question.
Also, I think the joke is more that Lucas is not exactly a romantic, despite the very romantic/fantasy/adventure setting of Star Wars.
For curiosity sake, what should Padme and Anakin's relationship have looked like? Lancelot and Guinevere? Han and Leia? Do we even care anymore?
If Tim Burton, a man who freely admits he couldn't pick a good story of a crap heap, is your benchmark...
Now, if only the man could get his hands on a Superman movie...
Lucas says that he thinks Abrams "understands" Star Wars. God help us all.
http://www.theforce.net/story/front/Geo … 152597.asp
Could be worse...
Lucas could have been hired on as creative consultant
Withkittens wrote:Thanks for clearing that up, I was curious as to what the "school of douche" definition was.
First of all, I don't watch "movies", I experience films.
edit: The picture wasn't working the way I wanted it too
I'll just say, that the Film School of Douches has now copyrighted the above as their official motto
The movie works pretty well on an emotional level, but the logical and scientific inconsistencies are still rather annoying.
SPOILERAnd the worst thing is that they repeated some mistakes from the previous movie (Red Matter/"cold fusion device", the miraculous "transwarp beaming" technology, promoting a very young officer to captain/chief engineer, Enterprise on the ground/under water, etc.)... Doctor Who runs on such clunky science and logic, but Star Trek shouldn't.There's another thing that bothers me about the Abramsverse - the design aesthetics. The simple elegance that we've known from previous shows is gone. Everything is either flashy and toy-like (the Enterprise exterior and bridge) or grey and ugly (engineering/brewery, dress uniforms, buildings on Earth).
SPOILERThe Vengeance is undoubtedly the most hideous Federation starship ever. The Klingon D4 ships aren't particularly attractive either - the remind me of Transformers movies.
Am I simply to old to appreciate the new "realistic" aesthetics?
Well, the aesthetics of the uniforms is probably a reflection of the attitude of Starfleet and the Federation. That is one thing that I liked was the fact that it explored a theme similar to DS9, where the Federation was under constant fear of an attack from an unknown force. So, I think we see Starfleet moving towards that "military role" and the aesthetics reflect that. However, I will agree that the solid gray of the dress uniforms is bad. Needs more color.
That is a lot of work.
Nice
Eh, too obvious. Lex Luthor is going to be played by someone completely unexpected and, on paper, inappropriate; the internet will froth and rage; then the movie will come out and he'll be amazing and the froth-rage will turn to fellatio and everyone will pretend they had vision all along.
Hugh Jackman!
I tried getting through that review, Marty, but just wasn't impressed with it.
I maintain, in case I didn't say it in this thread, that if this movie were what the reviewer said it was, then it would not work on any level. And maybe for some people this is true.
Personally, I find the characters working very well in this film so I forgive some of the silliness or mindless action bits. Perhaps I'm too forgiving and not willing to take off the rose colored glasses, I'm not sure.
I just feel this movie deserves more credit in some places.
I was going to say, that skull is crazy because it isn't really a skull.
Zarban beat me to it
Trey's other job:
fireproof78 wrote:Withkittens wrote:Isn't this show Canadian?
This whole forum is actually Canadian
Oi'm not Canajen, gov'nah! Oi'm a Cockney chimley sweep!
I think we broke Zarban O_o
Zarban wrote:They're both Canadian, as it turns out.
Isn't this show Canadian?
This whole forum is actually Canadian
Drew Struzan might come back to do the poster for Episode 7: http://voice.fan.tv/2013/01/21/being-hu … er-disney/
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by fireproof78
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.
Currently installed 9 official extensions. Copyright © 2003–2009 PunBB.