1,701

(39 replies, posted in Episodes)

I disliked Thor initially, but part of that is probably my theater experience. I was having an allergy attack, and apparently some pollen got under my contact lens because I couldn't open my right eye without the damn thing falling out. So I didn't actually see the last quarter of this movie. Sounded great though!

1,702

(67 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Well, okay. I'll throw in. I think I've got some good question fodder in me. AMA.

My name is Josh, and I live in Connecticut. I am neither a doctor nor a submarine. I am also not in the Navy, despite what the girl at Gamestop assumed when I gave her my email address (are there actual submarine doctors in the Navy? Are they doctors stationed on submarines, or do they doctor the submarines themselves?) I don't do as much movie making as the rest of you guys; my thing is criticism. I write and run a blog called Popcorn Culture which you can see in my signature. I've been doing that for about 2-and-a-half years now.

In real life, I have a pretty odd job. I sell soft-serve ice cream out of trailers at fairs. The hours are long and the pay isn't great, but I meet some fascinating people. Just the other weekend I sold ice cream to conjoined twins. One time a guy asked for a cup of sprinkles, which he poured down his friend's pants. I saw three people in one day wearing Confederate flags as capes. It's going to be great fodder for a book one day. On another note, I have both been hit in the head with a horseshoe and struck in the face with a boomerang.

1,703

(12 replies, posted in Off Topic)

In the US, a university is the word for a collection of colleges. A university might house a college of fine arts, a college of pharmacy, a college of engineering, etc. All on the same campus.

1,704

(2 replies, posted in Movie Stuff)

Very good review. I like the idea of introducing lesser-known films to people through this board.

1,705

(64 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Oh, I like this idea. I've thought about starting a thread like this before, but I never got around to it.

You'll have to excuse the quality of these images. I took them with my iPod's crappy camera.

http://i.imgur.com/75zMK.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/CEEGY.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/ZoMkT.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/2Ayqo.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/xl6CQ.jpg

Woohoo! The inaugural post for this shiny new board. I'm honored. Anyway, here's a Brave review.

The original post is on my blog here.

Walking into Brave, I was ready to change 2012′s moniker from “Summer of Hype” to “Summer of Disappointment”. The Avengers was a big letdown despite months – years, really – of endlessly oppressive advertising. Prometheus was even worse. What was supposed to be the return of intelligent, thoughtful big-budget science-fiction was an idiotic trainwreck. (Oh yes, I’ll get to Prometheus eventually. Maybe one day when I’m feeling particularly surly I’ll talk about that piece of crap.) Amongst all these hugely hyped blockbusters, I almost forgot about Brave, the new Pixar film. After the godawful mess that was Cars 2, I was less optimistic than ever about Pixar’s future. So I can’t call Brave a disappointment, because I wasn’t that excited for it to begin with. This stems mainly from the awful ads and trailers which gave little information about the plot. From the trailers, I gathered that it was about a Scottish princess who wanted to be free or something. And there was something about a bear, I guess. The trailers were confusing and boring, and worst of all they played up the stupid slapstick, which brought on Cars 2 flashbacks. There was nothing in this movie that looked at all appealing.

But I saw it. I saw it because it’s Pixar. Because even lesser Pixar is better than most other films (besides Cars 2, but that’s the last time I’ll mention that movie). Well, Brave is certainly lesser Pixar. But it didn’t really bother me despite its obvious flaws. I mean, Pixar isn’t really doing anything wrong with Brave. In fact, on any other scale, Brave is pretty damn great. The visuals are, as always, stunning, the score by Patrick Doyle is quite good, the dialogue is mostly good. But Pixar always excels in those areas. Things like that always appear to come easy to Pixar. What people really look for in a Pixar movie is depth of storytelling and character, and that’s where Brave falls short of expectations.

It feels like two movies smashed together. In one, a brash, independent princess must defy tradition and prove that she doesn’t need to be married to be worthwhile. This film brings contemporary sensibilities to a familiar tale, twisting it to create an honest message about empowerment . This sort of thinking is a staple of Pixar filmmaking.  In another, completely different movie, a brash, independent princess clashes with her traditional, conservative mother,

Plot Spoiler Show
but in doing so she curses her mother, and the two must reconcile to break it.
This other film contains heartfelt messages about the importance of family and trust, and the heartwarming conclusion will probably leave tears in your eyes (and your heart). So what’s the problem with combining those two? Beneath the surface, they seem to add up to a classic Pixar film.

Well, maybe that’s the problem. Combining the two seems to be a pretty good idea beneath the surface, but if you look at those two plot descriptions, they have nothing to do with each other. They simply don’t belong in the same movie. I could see one being a sequel to the other, but mashing them into one movie comes across as confusing and muddled. Now, combining the two actually might work, but the film spends far too much time on one to justify including the other, leaving both sections feeling incomplete. Actually, maybe “mashed” isn’t the right word. One film seems to be stacked right on top of the other, like a Lego brick, as if Brave is just a collection of two brief films about these characters, rather than a feature.

And all of this leaves no room for the characters. It seems that Merida and her mother have arcs, but we never really take the time to see them progress. There’s a scene where they try to catch fish which hints at development, but by the end of the film they seem to have completely changed without any impetus for that  change. I guess what I’m trying to say is that, for such a lightweight movie, Brave feels really rushed. And while we’re on the subject of character arcs, for a movie called Brave, being brave doesn’t factor into the plot at all. Merida doesn’t learn to be brave, she doesn’t teach anyone else to be brave. She doesn’t lose her bravery and have to regain it, she’s brave at the beginning and she’s brave at the end. This is more a case of a terrible title. The film was originally called The Bear and the Bow. They should have stuck with that title, it relates more to the plot and it gives off that whole fairy tale vibe.

But despite all this, I didn’t hate Brave. Is it lesser Pixar? Actually, that’s not the word I’d use. It’s lighter Pixar. It maintains the greatness of one of their films on the surface, but there’s not a whole lot going on underneath. I think Brave will be forgotten pretty quickly, especially considering the history that it has to live up to. If it followed Toy Story 3, I’d say that Monsters University looked like a clever spoof/deconstruction of college movie tropes. Following Brave and Cars 2, I can’t help but see it as just a cliche college movie using familiar characters for a cash grab. Like I said last year, it makes me sad to talk so cynically about Pixar. But that’s the shape of things right now.

1,707

(109 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Number 1 has basically been confirmed by Ridley. That's why the movie took place on Christmas, etc.

1,708

(21 replies, posted in Movie Stuff)

Cool. This is going to be fun!

1,709

(21 replies, posted in Movie Stuff)

Can we link to our reviews in the posts? Because I've got this blog, and...

1,710

(19 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Too soon?

1,711

(19 replies, posted in Off Topic)

  Show
Need your brother-on-brother murder/suicide fix? Tune in to Nickelodeon right after Spongebob!

Seriously, I don't know how the Nick execs let them get away with that.

1,712

(24 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I liked it fine. I think it felt like two different movies, but that's more because of the switch between directors halfway through production, not the writers. It was heartfelt and earnest. However, I have a thing for redheads, so take all this with a grain of salt. Especially if they happen to be Scottish...

That's how I feel. It wasn't a film that needed to be made, but I'm happy with the version we got.

1,714

(7 replies, posted in Creations)

“A reader lives a thousand lives before he dies," said Jojen. "The man who never reads lives only one.”
― George R.R. Martin, A Dance with Dragons

One of my favorite quotes.

1,715

(23 replies, posted in Episodes)

No DVD version?

sad_tennant

1,716

(109 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Squiggly_P wrote:

It's like instead of pandering down to people with fart jokes, racist humor and pointless scenes of cool over-the-top action, this movie is pandering UP to snobby arthouse critics by giving them pointless metaphor, bullshit philosophy and confusingly bizarre sequences that OBVIOUSLY have to mean SOMETHING...  right?

That's a really great way of putting it. And the internet nerds have fallen for it hook line and sinker.

1,717

(109 replies, posted in Off Topic)

If anything, this has less to do with age and more to do with working in the industry for so long. Maybe for some people making entertainment products is like muscle memory. They don't have to try anymore, so they don't bother. It all depends on what they get handed to work with. Woody Allen makes a movie every single year and occasionally one gets him an Oscar nomination.

1,718

(133 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Is there anything more frustrating than trying to have a conversation with Prometheus fanboys? They are completely convinced that the movie is brilliant if you bother to "look deeper" into it.

1,719

(62 replies, posted in Episodes)

I'm sure I'll find
 lots
of uses for this.

1,720

(133 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Vickers is one of the most bizarre characters. We get these scenes early on where she's all "cold calculating corporate woman" who doesn't care about the lives of her crew, but later on she sleeps with the captain like it ain't no thing.

Jimmy B wrote:

I thought the last half hour of Chronicle was great. Although, who was supposed to have edited all of this together in order to make the film? Did someone steal all the cameras including the one that got lost underground?

I don't think it was a Cloverfield thing, where we are watching footage that has been edited after the fact. I saw it as the cameras being the conduit for the audience. We are watching everything as it happens, and cameras are our way into the world. It's all real-time.

Then again, we don't know how the cave-in happened, so maybe the sequel will have a different answer.

1,722

(133 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I saw it last night. It didn't piss me off as much as it did some other people. It's a very pretty, often exciting movie that is full of plot holes.

1,723

(109 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Review 1.

“And it's also a mess, at least as far as its narrative is concerned. Almost nothing is explained coherently, and the plot has great lapses...The end of the film is both gruesome and sentimental. Mr. Scott can't have it both ways, any more than he can expect overdecoration to carry a film that has neither strong characters nor a strong story. That hasn't stopped him from trying, even if it perhaps should have.“

Review 2.

“Design is a vital element, especially if the audience is to accept anyone’s physically imposing vision of the future, but staggering technical virtuosity – in and of itself – can never replace character and story values. And this realization points out Scott’s fatal flaw...Had Scott cared to extend this lavish attention beyond the film’s settings, we might now be contemplating a fully-realized masterpiece. By falling well short of classic status, given the great potential implicit in the material and the film’s undeniable achievements, the film taps a keener disappointment than would be felt in the presence of lesser ambition and lesser results.”

Review 3.

“He seems more concerned with creating his film worlds than populating them with plausible characters, and that’s the trouble this time.”

Can you guess which of these reviews are for Prometheus? Trick question, none of them are. They're all for Blade Runner, and they were written at the time of that film's release. Is there any reason to believe that Prometheus will garner some sort of respect twenty years from now?

1,724

(30 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I second BDA's incorrect link report, as well as the scrolling thing.

1,725

(133 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I haven't seen it, but I have a question for those of you who have.

To what extent did the visuals redeem the movie?