Ya that looks fun, and if you watch BTS stuff, Liebesman at least comes across as a guy who's always trying, even if most of his movies end up sucking.
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by bullet3
Ya that looks fun, and if you watch BTS stuff, Liebesman at least comes across as a guy who's always trying, even if most of his movies end up sucking.
Given some of the other movies that are getting their own threads in here, having just recently watched it, I felt How To Train Your Dragon really deserves it too.
As I said in the other thread, it's crazy to me that there isn't more buzz and discussion around it, in my opinion this is the biggest-scale movie of the year so far, and by far the largest animated film I've ever seen. The sheer amount of amazing visuals and design work is staggering.
Story-wise, it's really interesting too, and steps way outside the comfort-zone of the template of the original. This kinda ends up being its main weakness, as you basically get 2-full-movies worth of content in 1, and as a result the pacing feels exhausting at times. Still, I genuinely haven't ever seen an American 3d animated film attempt something this grandiose and operatic.
Also, John Powell is back, and cements himself as my favorite modern-day composer, the closest I've seen to a modern day John Williams:
And yet it's fading fast at the box-office, falling way short of stuff like Despicable Me. What gives?
Also, keep in mind, Transformers 4 is likely to open to over 100 million DOMESTIC this weekend (and probably 300 international), despite 3 prior movies that are widely considered to be terrible. Star Wars will have no trouble breaking a billion.
How to Train Your Dragon 2 - The scale of this movie is fucking insane, this is easily the biggest animated film of all time, like Avatar/LOTR in size. I'm amazed there isn't more buzz around this one. Visually its absolutely stunning.
It's weird, I actually really want FIYH to do a commentary on this at some point, because it seems like it does everything that the guys always talk about them wishing movies would do, but at the same time I felt oddly disconnected and didn't enjoy it as much as the 1st one.
The movie's got like 12 different thru-lines going on at the same time, and it's super careful about establishing proper setups and payoffs for all of them. It escalates its stakes like crazy (including some pretty ballsy dark choices), it takes the story in some really unexpected directions and keeps you off-balance for the 1st half, and the climax is both unexpected but makes total sense.
The problem I think is that the movie is just overstuffed. It feels like someone combined both Empire Strikes Back and Return of the Jedi into the same movie, it introduces like 8 new characters, while building on all the existing ones, and it just starts to feel like there's WAY too much going on all at once, to where it starts to get exhausting.
Still really impressive and better than any Pixar movie since Wall-E.
Ya, frankly I think this stuff is insidious garbage polluting pop-culture. I hate their philosophy, I hate this approach to poking at movies, I hate that they're extremely popular to the point that people take them seriously (and they do, I've met many people who point to these videos as some kind of legitimate criticism).
Even beyond that, it's blatant click-bait bullshit, taking the most popular thing of the moment and making a dumb youtube video about it that contributes nothing of value, except that it generates millions of clicks and thousands in ad revenue. It's beyond cynical.
Can we just delete this thread and pretend it never happened? You're simultaneously reminding me that Transformers 2, Everything Wrong With..., and Honest Trailers are all things that exist and are popular, and I just want to close my eyes and go back to sleep.
I guess I'm the opposite of Dorkman, I want to see filmmakers bringing their vision and technique to the party, I want stylization, I want personality. Just because more recently, people like Zac Snyder who have no idea how to use slow-motion properly have driven it into the ground, doesn't mean it's a bad or ugly technique inherently (just like any other technique, they're just tools to tell a story and build emotional engagement).
There's a reason Neil Marshal's 2 episodes feel like they have a pulse and energy to them, and it's not just because they happen to be battle episodes. He understands how to move the camera to build moments, and he also seems to be one of the only directors on the show who can film a sword-fight coherently.
I dunno, I love the show and I get why they've chosen this matter-of-fact stylistic approach (easier on the budget, try to ground the fantasy elements), but on the other hand, I can't help but wish I could see a guy like De Palma tackle the Red Wedding and dramatize the shit out of it.
Again, I'm more critical of it on this point than I'd normally be because True Detective and Fargo have raised the bar for TV direction in my opinion.
Perhaps as their budgets continue to increase they'll be freer to take more chances and be more dynamic with it going forward. The closing shot this season was certainly fantastic.
Ya, my biggest problem with game of thrones is how cookie-cutter and un-cinematic they play things at times. The creators have mentioned how they hate slow-motion and try to avoid it, and to me, despite a crazy impressive scope and VFX work, the execution of a lot of the episodes feels like someone just laying out plot beats onto the table, instead of film-makers executing a concrete vision. They seem to go out of their way to NOT make things dramatic (no slow-mo, no cross-cutting/montage, etc).
It's not really a fair complaint given most of it is probably for budget reasons, but it's hard, especially coming off something like True Detective, which feels like a 10 hour-long cohesive cinematic vision, whereas Game of Thrones feels squarely like a TV show most of the time.
Ya it's their most watched show of all time domestically, and that's not even getting into the fact that it's INCREDIBLY popular overseas and brings in lots of money that way.
There's no way this thing gets less than 7 seasons at a minimum.
The real fun part is that starting next season we're really into uncharted territory for many of the storylines, so book-readers finally get to just enjoy watching the show and being surprised.
Ya that kinda stuff doesn't bother me, but the Stannis thing is a clear place to me where they screwed up the execution of the moment. Like, even if they wanted to have this scene with Mance and do the attack in episode 10, they should have at least milked the moment, make it look like this is it, Jon is about to get stabbed and then bam, horns. They try and fail in my opinion, the way the film grammar is used (combined with how early in the episode it is), I don't think even a casual audience will actually think that Jon is going to die right then and there.
It bums me out because that was my favorite moment from Book 3, but I guess when you're juggling 200 steak knives at the same time, you're bound to drop one every now and then
Still think they dropped the ball by having the Stannis arrival in this episode instead of episode 9. I always pictured it as a "Gandalf saves Helms Deep in the last inning" moment. The way it ends up playing out in this finale, it's almost a non-event, instead of the "fuck yeah Stannis" moment it should be.
Rest of the episode was great though. I haven't seen a classic 60s-style stop-motion-looking skeleton fight like that since Army of Darkness.
The Descent is bloody fantastic. One of the best horror films ever as far as I'm concerned.
Doomsday I think is a misfire. It wants really hard to be a John Carpenter action movie, but it just never gels together. Each 3rd of the movie is a completely different movie awkwardly crow-barred in, and the action is really sloppy and shaky so you can't really follow it.
If you like his Game of Thrones stuff, you should check out Centurion (it might be on netflix), as that's probably his closest stuff to his work on Game of Thrones.
Prisoners was a movie that ultimately kinda pissed me off. It's well directed, well acted, the cinematography is amazing, but it also feels incredibly calculated, hollow, and shallow. I think there's HUGE leaps of logic throughout that they use to try to give you a surprising ending. It also feels pointless, like I don't really detect much of a central theme or opinion or anything. It's like it wants to pretend it's an epic David Fincher-style crime movie like Seven or Zodiac (especially given it's almost 3 hours long), but it's just going through the motions and doesn't actually have a point of view or solid story to tell.
This movie is awesome, loved it!
Impressive as all hell technically too. Elysium had 2 mech-suits, this thing has like 10-20 real actors in suits running around in most of the action sequences, and they look great. The B-roll on it is pretty nuts actually:
Very easy:
Charles Bronson - Mr Majestyk, Once Upon a Time in the West, Red Sun, The Mechanic, Violent City, Hard Times, Death Wish
The man is a legend with far too many to list, and never phoned in a performance, even when Cannon films started putting him in terrible movies in the late 80s.
The cuts in the fight are probably necessary cause the actor isn't an actual martial artist, he can't do that stuff in extended takes.
I thought the fight was awesome personally.
First Class is like half of a fantastic movie, and then half of a lame teen movie. Any time it's Magneto or Xavier doing stuff, it's fantastic, but then all the side-mutants it introduces really suck, and Jennifer Lawrence is AWFUL. I think she's a terrible Mystique, and the writing of the character does her no favors.
Still, you get great moments like Magneto lifting the submarine. Probably my favorite beat from any of these movies.
I'm more bothered with this when it comes to action roles. How nice would it be to have a woman action hero having to fight to save her boyfriend instead of vice-versa? I can think of very few examples, and one of them is Pink Five
I think the real version will be amazing though, I was really digging how it sounded on your making of materials
I think the fact that we're un-ironically talking about the merit and "life" of franchises, instead of talking about stories and characters, speaks volumes about the tragic state of big-budget filmmaking today.
I think you should commit and only post on the forums in pen from now on.
Also, this would never work for me, as I have the penmanship of a kindergartner (seriously, my driver's license signature looks like a 5 year old drew it)
Man, that soundtrack really is great
Teague, did Eternal Sunshine work for you? Wondering as Her covers a lot of the same territory (in a superior and more interesting way in my opinion)
Weird, as someone who loves the Keanu version and thinks of that as my version of the character, this looks terrible. Weird tone, none of the gritty "fuck this bullshit" fatalism Keanu brought to it (where's the smoking?), boring cinematography.
Conan is a masterpiece of visual and musical storytelling, and when it does have dialogue, it makes it count. It was also clearly a huge influence on LOTR.
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by bullet3
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.
Currently installed 9 official extensions. Copyright © 2003–2009 PunBB.