You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Active topics Unanswered topics Mark all as read
Friends In Your Discord!
Miss having friends in your forum? We've migrated over to discord! Many of the threads that started here years ago continue on in a new setting.
Come join us!
Search options (Page 70 of 81)
Topics by Invid User defined search
Posts found: 1,726 to 1,750 of 2,003
I've ignored the new generation of portable devices for awhile now (may get an iPad eventually), but is there some reason podcasts now have their own app instead of just using some generic podcast app? I wouldn't listen to many now if that was the case...
Rifftrax did do Casablanca though just to see if it could be done 
DorkmanScott wrote:TIN MAN was awful. I wanted to like it, and I liked the idea, but it insulted the audience's intelligence at every turn.
Like, they'd do a cool subtle thing like have the so-called "Tin Man" of the title be a right asshole, and we're watching going "Oh, he's heartless, I get it. Nice." But then the next thing out of Zooey Deschanel's vapid mouth would be "Have a heart, Tin Man."
I kept expecting the director to stick his baseball-capped head into frame and going "Did you all catch what we did there? Yes? Are you sure? We'll do it again, just in case."
Yeah... my sister loved it, so I gave it a look... it's clearly aimed at those who only know the 1939 film and have little experience with how others have "updated" classics. Which includes my sister, although she's more educated then me in many areas
There's just so much from the books you can play with, and all we got were some short people in the beginning...
With a film like Burton's ALICE it probably depends a lot on what you go in expecting. I avoided it myself, which lets you know what I expect from it 
It's one of those comics where I picked up the first issue or two, saw it was good, but for whatever reason didn't continue. I may go for the collections at some point.
They filmed the "hard core" version after the original X rated release, so yes it probably wasn't her if you can't see her head. It's damned fun, especially as I'm one who before that had only seen her as the sweet girl in Meatballs.
A DVD was released a couple years ago which included all the different versions, although the soundtrack CD was dropped for some reason.
Alice in Wonderland, the X rated musical 
Yeah, the original had our heros killing zombies left and right to clear out a safe area, while the remake had them basically just hiding. There ARE a finite number of zombies in any given area, as word isn't going to travel very far to inform other zombies.
I'm very curious as to why the theatrical cut was so damned short, if Trey was right in noting all those additions. Was getting an extra showing in a day that important for the studio?
Now I have to see if my sister has a copy, as Netflix pulls their copies when Disney lets a title go out of print.
Admit it, the whole project was a cover for reasons to audition women for the lesbian make out scene 
Have a copy of the cartoon theme song hooked up to a big red button, and whenever one of you feels the need to swear at the screen slam your fist into the button and happily sing along 
beldar wrote:To be honest i'm glad Phase II never got made. It would've been awful. Would it have had Kirk/Spock/McCoy? Ilia was already cast for it. I love her (i wish) but not every week, especially it she was meant to replace Spock. Although, a chick from the sex planet offers lots of story ideas. But the FX would've been bad; no better, or worse than TOS. There was no ILM to call in the mid-70s. Or maybe it would've been the best Trek ever, we'll never know.
It had the entire cast from the original show except Spock. His role was divided in two, with a full Vulcan for a science officer (who was interested in emotions) and Decker as the first officer who'd do most of the action stuff. Basically, Next Gen a decade early. As for quality, the early scripts weren't amazing. but you are right about the FX. It would have been about the level of the original show, maybe a bit better. Most of the cost over run for the first movie was the TV effect guys got first crack at the visuals, and they were so bad compared to Star Wars that ILM had millions tossed at them to quickly save the day.
Actually, low budget special effects could have been the saving grace of Phase II. Battlestar Galactica showed high ratings don't mean much if your budget is too high.
beldar wrote:I'll have to check out NotLD. It'll be interesting to see now that i know stuff in this movie is happening at the same time.
Watch the original, and the 1990 remake. In that they assume you've seen the original, and play with that quite a bit (the first half is redone almost shot for shot, then there's character based twists)
The Trek movies are coming? Good news! Just listening to ST: TMP (which i like a lot) will be a riot knowing that the guys don't like it much, but'll still have to somehow do a good commentary.
Wonder if they'll do the original or the "directors" cut. The theatrical cut out character bits to focus on the FX, given that's where all the money went
With luck our Trek experts have lots of background info on how the Phase II tv series morphed into this film.
(speaking of which, for those who aren't total geeks and thus are out of the loop a fan group that has been doing Trek episodes is in the process of adapting the un-produced Phase II scripts. David Gerrold's "gay" episode has already come out, and the next is due around Thanksgiving. <http://www.startreknewvoyages.com/>)
They couldn't finish Tron the first time, as told in the anniversary show, so this is the retry perhaps with a different lineup. It would be interesting to have the first attempt released the same day if you guys saved it, as sort of a bonus feature 
Listened to it again, which reminded me of some things. There's actually two links back to the original Night of the Living Dead in the film. The first, as mentioned, is the fact you're seeing the behind the scenes of the TV station they're watching in Night. The second is easy to miss. As our heros fly their helicopter as daylight hits they fly over an isolated farm house surrounded by good old boys killing zombies- this is suppose to be the house from the first film. It's made more clear in the 1990 remake of Night with Romero produced, which ends with a character looking up at a police helicopter flying over the scene then away.
Teague's story idea of what if once we were the zombies, killing off the smarter life form and taking over, naturally brings to mind one of my favorite Doctor Who episodes Full Circle (4th Doctor, the one where Adric joins the cast). We have a crashed space ship who's inhabitants every few hundred years have to fight off these primitive zombie like creatures who rise up from the swamp. We later find out that the original crew died long ago, and the full cycle is for these quickly evolving monsters to take over the ship, develop the intelligence and culture to treat the tech as part of their religion and history, then get killed by another wave of the swamp creatures.
Given how long it took to get funding for Land, I can't blame for at this point doing a film whenever someone's stupid enough to throw money at him. I can always ignore the final product 
Jeffery Harrell wrote:Finally, a high note: Bring pregnancy tests, and obstetric forceps, a cord clamp and a suction bulb. Because life — we all hope and pray — goes on.
By the same token, birth control until your situation is pretty good should probably be on the list. You'll have to weigh the risks of having a pregnant companion (or being so yourself) on the run verses the risks of the various forms of contraception. A friend of mine died from blood clots due to the pill, and unless you have a harem with you the risk might not be worth it. I doubt you can carry enough condoms to make them worth while 
Romero's DVD commentary on DOTD was recorded as he was trying to get funding for Land. He somehow managed to do 3 new movies in 5 years, which may account somewhat for the last one suffering a bit. Some creations are better if only done once a decade (Stephen King's Dark Tower books were great when he did them whenever his muse [or drugs] told him to, but rushing to do the last three all at once after the accident hurt the final result)
Good one. I noticed this wasn't an enhanced version in the podcast feed, which is fine. We were going old school here 
Couple comments. The X rating was a thing, but the MPAA never trademarked it so unlike the other ratings anyone could use it. That's why they abandoned it for NC-17, but just like the X only a couple "real" films actually took advantage of it.
Dorkman's joke that in the uncut version of the remake all the nude scenes are important to the plot is forcing me to quote an early issue of Dave Sims' Cerebus comic (the last chapter in the first graphic novel collection). An artist is describing his style and subject matter:
"You can't beat breasts when it comes to universal symbols. I did bowls of fruit for years... you ever try using ripe breadfruit to illustrate man's inability to reach harmony with his environment? It doesn't work. But BREASTS! Breasts work! The first thing people ask is 'What is this? Breasts?' You see? Breasts open up a DIALOGE! There is a need to communicate about breasts... their first question is 'What IS this'. Fortunately for my bank account, their second question is generally 'Can you do one of those for ME?' Breasts are even more popular then monsters! Beyond a shadow of a doubt any artist who is not putting breasts in his paintings is cutting himself off from eighty percent of the art-consuming public..."
Down in Front wrote:We've already recorded Sixth Sense, and it'll come out some time in November. We're just neurotic sometimes. We're hyper-critical of ourselves. The doctor says we should just learn to take it easy.
There is some humor in you trying to create a perfect commentary for a low budget horror film where they basically just edited together what they had when the money ran out
I'm going to assume that for now these two will represent all zombie movies so far as your commentaries go, as if you were going to do the series you would have started with the original Night of the Living Dead.
(I actually like the 1990 remake, and it does provide for a better lead in to the original Dawn of the Dead)
Kyle wrote:beldar wrote:I'd make my way to a marina and grab the biggest yacht and travel the oceans until this ZA nonsense is over. Maybe 130ft, big enough that it has a water-maker. Enough weapons for when i have to get food and gas.
This is another decent idea. Best if you can get a few buddies who know how to sail, and then you can travel without needing a ton of gas.
If zombies can't swim there's probably some domestic islands that would be pretty safe, while allowing access to the coast for raiding. Grand Island, between Buffalo and Niagara Falls, would be perfect except getting rid of the four steel bridges would be difficult. You'd even get farm land.
I don't really care about the zombies in the movie, to be honest. It's more the survival aspect I find interesting. I remember when I rented the tape years ago, my father watched it while I was away. He commented in a disapproving way that it was just a lot of pointless killing, to which I replied "And it didn't do the characters any good in the end, did it?" He was a little startled and hadn't considered that the violence had a point. Maybe it doesn't, but that's why I'm interested in hearing your views
That and your takes on low budget film making. I get a kick out of how Romero planned it out, filming in order of importance so that once the money runs out (and it will) there's to guaranteed to be enough in the can to edit into a useable story.
DorkmanScott wrote:I wouldn't mind doing a BLADE RUNNER commentary so someone can explain to me what's any good about it -- without discussing the art direction or visual effects.
For that film it would be like removing the music from a Metalica song and then asking why anyone considers Metalica to be good. Some movies are just more about mood and visuals then plot and characters. There's nothing wrong with thinking in this case that's not enough, naturally.
I'm very aware and appreciative that it's an important film, but like DAWN OF THE DEAD and TRON, I don't know what people are talking about when they say it's a good film.
I like Dawn of the Dead, and am damned interested to hear you guys talk about it.
Would doing the original and the remake the same day work, by any chance? I'm thinking Seven Samurai/The Magnificent Seven, or Yojimbo/A Fist Full of Dollars.
Posts found: 1,726 to 1,750 of 2,003