So... I don't want to turn into the cheerleader that always posts, "lol, great episode guys!"... But I really liked that one. The film vs. digital debate is sort of fascinating, but having only ever done anything digitally, I only have one side of the argument to draw on. While I liked last week's, having not seen either film I did feel a little shut-out, but this one was much more accessible.
You were talking about how there's going to be a generational split with regard to frame-rates and 360 shutter and all that, but I don't think it's even going to be a case of generation. I was recently watching Back to the Future on blu-ray at a friend's house with a few other people, and their TV had the motion smoothing turned on. It was driving me crazy, and I brought it up, and they all looked at me like I was Gengis Khan. I'm a big enough asshole that I paused the movie and fiddled around with their TV settings to turn it off, and was relieved to see it playing back at beautiful 24 fps... But everybody else was like, "Wait... did you change the thing? What's different?" We had in the room an age range from 18 to about 50, so all people who had grown up watching things the same way I did, and nobody but me gave a shit, or even noticed.
My point being that it MAY be a generational thing, but I think it will be between people like the people in this community, not the general population. Obviously six folks in a living room in Maine isn't a large enough sample size to make scientific claims, but we still like anecdotal evidence, right?