You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by BigDamnArtist
Yeah totally, it's just an (ex-) Pixar scale type of thing. (I vote we change the Pixar scale to the Starkid scale btw,since we can't really use Pixar scale any more). Although Alaska pretty much destroyed me for a little while when I finished it.
And I will definitely do that, It'll probably take a bit to get there, but I will do that.
EDIT:
@Dudeman: I read Catcher in The Rye a while back, it wasn't...horrible, but I didn't really enjoy it as a novel. It really just felt like an extended character study that got way out of hand. When I finished it was just kinda like, okay...well...moving on with my life then.
I'm doing them in order. So just Looking For Alaska so far.
I'm enjoying Katherines so far (I'm about halfway through), but I can see where you're coming from, it doesn't quite feel on the same level as Alaska.
And Doc, I know eh? That thing is a beast and a half.
I got these for Christmas (Hobbit was an actual gift, HP was an amalgamation of gift cards and cash, but I digress), so they've been occupying most of my reading time. I've also been reading John Green's, An Abundance of Katherines
Yeah, they are even more awesome than you think.
Minecraft
TF2
Bastion (Although not in a while, need to start it up again )
Portal 2
I'm in the midst of working out what I'll be starting up next, but the next couple months are gonna see a lot more games, across a bunch of different genres and styles, coming in.
/Not a single one of you can blame me
And when it comes to technical stuff I agree, 180 rules and types of shots, 3 act structure etc etc, But when film making courses are actually being taught in a way that are telling it's students NOT to think about the movie they are making in any real deep or meaningful way before hand, and that the only way to "properly" run a shoot is to just point the camera wildly at everything in the room and hope it works out in the editing room, something is very wrong I think.
And people wonder why the craft of filmmaking is going down the tubes.
Oh, absolutely, I wasn't trying to say anything else. I just find it interesting how there's such a massive, one end of the spectrum to the other, shift between what you get taught and whats actually a good and proper method for doing it. Cause I mean in school, at least from what I was being told from the teachers, is that you just go in guns blazing shooting everything and anything and then figure it out later, with very little emphasis on actually planning things out and knowing and understanding why you are doing what you're doing in every shot.
Sorry, I'm probably just thinking out loud right now. But yeah, time and experience. Time and experience.
I'm not in the LA area, but if you need any work farmed out, I'm here. I think you have a decent idea of my skills.
I also just got a nice new mic if you need narration type stuff and think my voice would work.
10 years ago? I was...uh...11.
I'll just...be over here. You guys have fun.
It's so bizarre though, coming relatively fresh off the film school wagon, because it's so completely the opposite of what you get taught. In school it's always COVER EVERY FUCKING THING IN THAT ROOM. I actually had a teacher tell me once that "If there's a clock in the room, shoot it, cause you never fucking know."
And I actually went into shooting Lily In The Wind with a very similar mindset to what Sam is talking about, I knew the shots I wanted, I knew exactly what I wanted it to look like. But we had to shoot coverage for everything (Actually part of my grade for the shoot. What a joke), so I wound up spending 90 percent of the day doing that, instead of what I actually wanted to do, and our day was already tight enough as it was.
That's the weird thing about going through a course like that I guess, I'm still not really sure what's BS or not, and this concept in particular has always irked me. It's nice to hear some actual pro's input.
BigDamnArtist wrote:http://soundcloud.com/musicpomplamoose/ … ybe-mashup
Pomplamoose mashing Call Me Maybe and Somebody That I used To Know. Predictably, it's awesome.
Have you heard Dan Deacon's exponential layering of Call Me Maybe? Predictably, it's terrifying.
Dude, I just saw this.
That was amazing, holy crap.
Although at about the 50 second mark or so, it sounds pretty much exactly what my internal monologue is like most of the time. Kinda spooky. (obviously not with Call me Maybe...well...not most of the time...)
Minecraft. Chinese food. Minecraft. More Chinese food. Watch fireworks out window. Minecraft. Watch clock click over to 2013. Sleep. Work. Home. More chinese food. Minecraft.
And that brings us to the present.
Pretty much the status quo.
Wow. In the span of one post, Cloud Atlas went from the top of a list to the very very bottom. I need to get around to seeing that one.
And bullet, I appreciate how surprised you are at the concept that I might be right every once in a while.
You know, I used to really like Basterds, but I watched it again last night and I have to agree with Dorkman. It's much too slow and plodding for most of its runtime. And Hans Landa is far less interesting the second time around. The whole time I was thinking, "Jesus Quentin, we get it, you like movies, can we tell a story now?" Never got that impression during Django.
All of this.
Django Unchained.
And the only other one I can think of this year is Cabin In The Woods.
I have never known a domesticated cat to kill someone.
He might not have managed to finish her off, but one cat I had growing up damn near did his best to shred my sisters legs every time he got the chance.
I liked him.
I could have bought into all that if he hadn't looked like a ball of playdough somebody squished a pair of marbles into for eyes and then covered in baby oil.
I'm not arguing about the character's intentions of menace or whatever, but he was easily the worst created, rendered and comped creature. There is a way to remove something's "Hausian" quality, while also making it look like a thing that actually exists and isn't so clearly a manifestation of a VFX department on acid.
EDIT:
...and I honestly never thought of him as a CG character.
Well I guess that's what it comes down to, because from the frame he appeared on screen I couldn't stop seeing him as a (poorly done) CG creation.
Fine, yes. It's "good-good".
What part of "legitimate, no-strings-attached GOOD" did ja not understand?
Copied over from the chat...
I am so flipping happy Tarantino exsists. I haven't been that pumped walking out of a theater to have just spent 3 hours watching a thing in a long time.
It was just good, like legitimate, no-strings-attached GOOD. And that is a rare thing lately.
Easy my pick for best movie I've seen this year*.
*Keeping in mind I have yet to see Le Mis, so that has the possibility to skew things pretty heavily.
So uh...my sister got me a Tardis mug for Christmas. Yeah, that's right bitches. Be jealous.
Ugh, I preferred getting them all at once and waiting. It's pointless getting like 4 episodes then waiting 6 months.
Sooo can someone explain to me why 1 season had to be spread out over 2 years (and 2 Christmas specials)?
(Haven't seen the Christmas special yet, don't get BBC here)
Saniss: That sounds awesome dude!
And merry Christmas from Red Deer!
I'm getting more Daniel Craig than Fillion.
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by BigDamnArtist
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.
Currently installed 9 official extensions. Copyright © 2003–2009 PunBB.