2,226

(1,019 replies, posted in Episodes)

On a related note, I'm writing my Ahab/Moby Dick slash fiction even now.

And no, Renee O'Connor! You cannot be in it!

/rule 34

2,227

(4 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I think DIF should make their own Twilight Zone/Outer Limits/One Step Beyond short film, complete with absurdist horror. Here's my effort...

A lowlife man murders a girl, then gets drunk and sees a shooting star in the night sky. When he awakens, the paperboy demanding payment attacks him with a knife. He fights back and the kid flees. The man shakes it off and goes to the corner market, where the grocer accuses him of stealing and tries to kill him. He flags down a beat cop, and the cop shoots the grocer, then turns on the man, saying "And now you've seen too much." And tries to shoot the guy.... He runs away in a panic. He's trapped in a world of murderers!

Voiceover blah blah blah own private hell blah blah blah.

2,228

(1,019 replies, posted in Episodes)

Invid wrote:

It obviously didn't get the buzz of something like Megashark which Netflix quickly got. Is it bad enough to get an official Rifftrax, which might speed up sales? smile

Bad enough?! Bad enough!?! Did you see the trailer?! "I'd strike the SUN if it insulted me!" gives me CHILLS!

Did Tom Skerritt bring that intensity to Mammoth? Did Sir Ben Kingsley bring that caliber gun to A Sound of Thunder? Do you think Eric Roberts could muster a 40-watt bulb to Bostwick's arc lamp for Sharktopus? Hell no! And 'hell no!' I say again!

From hell's heart I stab at thee!!

2,229

(1,019 replies, posted in Episodes)

frankasu03 wrote:

I felt he was short-shifted on screen time.

Word nerd note: "short-shrifted" is the term, from "given short shrift" from "shrive" meaning to take confession and give absolution as a priest, the implication being that a priest who rushes the process may nullify it.

Now go forth and sin no more.

2,230

(313 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Stop the madness!

Top five Monty Python characters, please.

Answerer please proceed to name the next top 5 challenge.

2,231

(51 replies, posted in Episodes)

Nobody risks $200 M of their own money. But regardless, if Emmerich is in deep for his films, then the day will be all the sweeter when audiences get wise.

When people who spent good money on Godzilla and The Patriot and The Day After Tomorrow realize they were made my the same guy, they'll opt out of his new project, and it will be a mega-flop.

2,232

(8 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I love the live chats. I just am no good at remembering when they're happening, and I often don't have the movie available. And I hate to listen to a commentary without seeing the movie.

2,233

(51 replies, posted in Episodes)

But movies like 2012 are huge gambles, not guaranteed money-makers. Carolco tried to make mostly blockbuster films and collapsed after Showgirls and Cutthroat Island drained them.

So it's not like stripping, where you sacrifice your humanity because you know you'll make great money, especially on those little side jobs doing a "private party" for one lonely divorcee, but it's okay because you can feed your little girl, and as long as she's still too young to know what daddy is doing to pay the bills it's not so hard to sleep at night, but as soon as she's old enough for school you are definitely going to quit stripping and get a normal job.

Or perhaps I have personalized the metaphor too much.

The point is, blockbusters need to be good or they can destroy the studio, so people should stop giving Roland Emmerich money. He only makes dumb mega-films, and audiences are slowly wising up, and it's just a matter of time before he makes a mega-flop.

That is, unless he reads this and wants to produce my idea for a blockbuster movie about a team of young time traveling adventurers kept in seclusion by their mysterious leaders so their knowledge doesn't taint their ability to change the past....

2,234

(9 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Oh, man, good one.

2,235

(9 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Plan Nine from Outer Space. Aliens try to take over Earth by raising the dead, and a ragged band of humans discover the secret and try to stop the aliens? Sign me up.

2,236

(93 replies, posted in Episodes)

1080p on a big screen with surround sound is magical, if you ask me. But some people just don't care much about it, like driving a sporty car with a manual transmission.

Myself, I couldn't care less about smart phones and apps and whatnot.

Just, please, don't buy Bose. People who buy Bose are like people who think the Mustang is a sporty car.

Noted

I've long had tags for Teague and Trey on the House of Commentaries, but now I've made tags for every commentator. Now you can easily find exactly which commentaries which person participated in.

Teague
Trey
Michael
Brian
Eddie Doty
Ryan Wieber
Matt Vayda
Matt Hingstman
Cloe Z
Jeff Schubert
Steve Reedy
Anthony Alba
Lowell Cunningham
Ryan Schile

2,239

(15 replies, posted in Episodes)

It's just an old joke about a nameless sculptor. You can find a thousand variations of it on something called the InterGoogle.

2,240

(15 replies, posted in Episodes)

I love, love, love this movie. Thanks for giving me another reason to revisit it.

Sculptor story is bullshit, by the way. And everybody gets Evelyn and Katherine mixed up at the end. But other than that I liked it a lot.

2,241

(15 replies, posted in Off Topic)

"I'm the doctor, and you're dysentery." [raises pistol] "And you've just run thru all my patients...."

2,242

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

DorkmanScott wrote:

Development note: the larvae should require a live host. If they only need corpses, it's just a serial killer movie. If the host needs to be live, then the horror comes from his victims being forced to survive as long as possible while being consumed.

I lost track of this thread, but that is a great twist. I was thinking of it strictly as a procedural. Your vision is more Saw-like. Not my thing, but totally doable as low budget horror.

Regarding the subsequent notes: again, step 11 is making it plausible.

2,243

(93 replies, posted in Episodes)

But who is it a "thing" with? Do you mean reviewers? You say that for Cameron it's a gimmick, but look at the countless others who can only write for male leads. Would you call that a gimmick for them?

What I don't understand is how anyone can make The Town or National Treasure or Star Trek or Transformers or the Batman films or any of the Marvel movies and not have them full of strong women, but they do. In fact, in a lot of genre films, it would be trivial to write the female lead completely out of the story.

I hate Avatar, but at least it gave Zoe Saldana something more to do than run a switchboard and nuzzle Emo Spock.

2,244

(15 replies, posted in Off Topic)

beldar wrote:

I see this thread going for a long time. I hope.

"I see this thread going for a long time." [racks shotgun] "I hope."

/I fix

2,245

(15 replies, posted in Off Topic)

"You drink my Yoohoo?! I drink your Yoohoo!" ptow! ptow!

2,246

(93 replies, posted in Episodes)

With the accent or with the acting in general? Because there wasn't a moment in the film where I cared if he lived or died. He was an absolute blank.

That shouldn't be any surprise. Cameron writes women much better than he writes men. Kyle Reese, Corporal Hicks, Abyss's Bud, T2's John, Titanic's Jack... these characters have nothing distinguishing about them. Try Mr. Plinkett's character test: describe them without saying what they wear or what their job is. We like them--if we like them--only because the actors have chops.

Worthington doesn't have chops.

2,247

(3 replies, posted in Creations)

There are loads of cool effects, but I had to watch it a couple of times just to pay attention to them. The direction and performance are pretty compelling.

  • "Last" or "latest"?

  • Was any of this shot upside down and backwards in a water tank?

  • Is Matt the bald douchebag in the spangled shades?

  • Is Cage from Jersey? Or does he talk that way on purpose?

Call to action, training, loss of the mentor, confrontation with the dark lord, setback, and triumph. It's all there in any comedy adventure like The Goonies as it is in high adventure.

As my 7-y-o nephew pointed out, there's not much difference between Star Wars and Scooby Doo.

2,249

(35 replies, posted in Episodes)

Down in Front wrote:

Where did you get the factoid about Sam 2 marrying the original Sam's daughter?

Uhhh [looks upward and to the left] Deleted scenes Easter egg. [shifts eyes]

2,250

(35 replies, posted in Episodes)

There were about 150 clones in stasis, minus the (I think) seven used by the end of the movie. They are all pre-programmed to believe they are Sam Bell, just starting out on a 3-year mission on the moon. When one gets to the end of his 3 years, radiation and perhaps genetic imperfections wreak havoc with his health. He gets in the "return capsule" and is incinerated. A new clone is popped out and told that he just got to the moon but his landing vehicle crashed and he needs several days to recover.

No Sam is uploaded into a new clone. They are independent.

When Sam 2 returned to earth, he immediately became a celebrity, was given US citizenship, and was awarded a huge settlement by the courts. He even married the original Sam's daughter, which was a little weird for everyone.

Corporations in the mining and energy sectors have demonstrated on many occasions that they are quite happy to treat employees with lethal disregard if they think no one will find out or care. To believe that clones would be cheaper than regular people, you have to be willing to believe a couple of things:

  • It is possible to clone a person, raise the clone to adulthood, program it with another person's memories, ship it to the moon, and store it in stasis for years.

  • It is more expensive to identify people willing and able to spend a long period on the moon, train them, send them, pay them, keep them safe, and return them to earth than it is to use disposable clones.

  • It is much more expensive to send people to the moon than to send the occasional supply shipment (H3 canisters, in particular).

There are a few things that might help you believe those things.

  • A regular person willing to go to the moon for a long time might demand an exorbitant salary and retirement package.

  • It might be impossible to keep a person on the moon for a useful amount of time without subjecting them to a lethal dose of radiation.

  • Manned space missions cost about double the cost of unmanned missions, amounting to hundreds of millions each.

  • The company might feel that it can't afford the bad publicity that the loss of a manned replacement crew mission would create.

  • I once cloned my college roommate and raised the clone in suspended animation in our bathtub, feeding him growth hormone and aging treatments until he appeared to be 22 years old. However, I was only able to program him to with Eliza-level AI software, and it became really annoying to hear him constantly say, "Tell me more about your mother." On the other hand, I was working with a very limited budget.