I loved Jackson's Kong. I don't know what he could have cut out.
Uh, every word out of Jack Black and Adrien Brodie's mouths?
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by Zarban
I loved Jackson's Kong. I don't know what he could have cut out.
Uh, every word out of Jack Black and Adrien Brodie's mouths?
To this day, some Africans just run the critters down and wait for heat stroke. Then you can walk right up to them.
I did that to a chicken when I was a kid. Very traumatic. Didn't phase grandpa, tho.
Blade Runner bores me to freaking TEARS. ... And even going into a viewing KNOWING that there's a debate about whether Harrison Ford is a replicant or not, I don't see anything in the movie itself that hints one way or the other.
Blade Runner is one film that started out as "meh" and then really grew on me. It's essentially film noir: no one in the film is innocent—not even Rachael. And Deckard is the ultimate human protagonist: he fails.
However, I cannot stand the cuts with the unicorn origami. Since Deckard dreams of unicorns but tells no one, Gaff's use of the unicorn suggests he knows what is in Deckard's dreams, just as Deckard knew all about Rachael's dreams—meaning Deckard is a replicant duped into retiring other replicants. But that utterly ruins the theme of Deckard as the fallible human foil to Roy Batty's subhuman-superhuman.
Worse, why dream of unicorns? They can't be real dreams, like Rachael's were, copied from a real person, so they must represent something. So what does a unicorn represent? Some unattainable fantasy, like extra life? Deckard doesn't have that fantasy—Batty does. But more to the point: the short story is called "Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep". (Deckard once owned a real sheep.) So why not have him dream of sheep?
Gandalf had to talk him into it but Bilbo also got rid of it of his own free will.
I think the notion of Bilbo just sitting on it all those years, and ultimately handing it over with little more than a pout, loses all credibility.
Then again, Tolkein did go out of his way to say that the ring became more powerful and seductive the closer it got to Mordor.
For me, the ring and its influence are consistent, given the modest contrivance it becomes more powerful closer to Mordor. Gollum was driven to murder and madness, but not conquest. (The human ring-bearers, meanwhile, were reduced to Ring Wraiths.) Bilbo is on his way to that same place when Gandalf persuades him to give it up. (See his reaction in Rivendell when he re-encounters it.) And nearly the same thing happens to Frodo, altho he only succumbs at the very end. But Sam faces the ring down in its own domain and beats it. (Note how Galadriel has essentially the same insane fantasy as Sam even tho she only encountered the ring briefly, outside Mordor.)
It's rather similar to the way Malory unfolded the Grail quest: Lancelot and Gawain fail despite being the greatest knights because they were adulterers. Bors comes close but fails because he once succumbed to lust. Percival nearly succeeds but misses because he was once tempted. And only Galahad achieves the Grail because he is the only perfect knight.
I love the LotR books, altho even as a teenager I saw the leisurely attitude Tolkein took toward pacing. His goal wasn't a rip-roaring adventure, tho. It was immersion in this world he created. I adored the languages, the genealogies, and all the other stuff in the appendices.
Jeffery's paragraph is the very hinge of the whole epic. Sam is the one character in all Middle Earth who confronts the power of the ring on its own terms and beats it. Note the phrase "untameable save by some mighty will". Who is that will? It's not Frodo (he succumbs in the end), and it's not Gandalf or Aragorn (they keep away from the ring). It's Sam.
I remember liking the Studebakers in Gattaca, and the bigotry. But the level of security made no sense, and the story seemed to drive the main character rather than the other way around.
What I love about this movie is the way Will Smith and the aliens pull off a straight-up action adventure in the middle of what is otherwise Mars Attacks. And then you've got Goldblum, straddling those two worlds as only Goldblum can.
Make no mistake: I think it's a terrible film. I just love Will Smith.
My money is on the cavemen. They hunted hoofed animals with thrusting spears and wrestled them to death. Unless the astronauts have brought projectile weapons for some reason, it would be a casual slaughter.
Plus, one of the astronauts would inevitably be befriended by the caveman chief's hot daughter and start fighting on the side of the cavemen against the greedy industrialists that sent them on their mission.
I was misinformed. All the ladies in Paris were fully dressed.
Hey, did you know they have this giant frickin' antenna in the middle of the city? Also, they have an arch that doesn't, you know, arch over anything. Crazy town, man. On the plus side: pretty nice subway system.
Sorry I missed it, guys. I look forward to listening later.
[Posting from the Hilton in Venice, Italy... tomorrow: Paree, France (where I hear the ladies wear no pants)]
Yes, but it's like when people say "we don't need no steenking badges." They aren't quoting Treasure of the Sierra Madre. They're quoting Blazing Saddles, because that's the movie they heard it in. And for generations, English speakers have studied Shakespeare above all, and cribbed his turns of phrase endlessly.
And so it will be with Mel Brooks in 400 years.
Bugsy Malone is a 70's movie, was released the same year I was born (76). It's awesome though, I still watch it today
Dammit.
I can't think of a bad kid-type movie from the 80s that I love. Some demented people claim that The Goonies is bad, but it's actually one of the greatest movies ever made, so that doesn't count. Big Trouble in Little China widely acknowledged as awesome*. Jumanji is from the '90s. And King Kong is also from the '70s.
How about Flash Gordon? Flash Gordon is from the '80s and is pretty terrible, but I like it pretty well.
* And forces us to contemplate a world filled with Kurt Russell/Kim Cattrall offspring, a world of supermen and wonder women, a world ruled by the wise and mighty. **
** Possibly to be conquered by a horde of Arnold Schwarzenegger/Linda Hamilton offspring.
I've always had a fondness for this piece called "You are Quoting Shakespeare".
And I've long harbored a hope that one day Mr. Burns on The Simpsons would tell Smithers to call for a "taximeter cabriolet".
The one set to "A Little Less Conversation" makes me remember how much I love Keanu Reeves. I just wish I loved his movies as much.
And the same for Elvis, actually. Keanu is like Elvis + Harrison Ford / 5.
If you're a lefty, not only are you gauche, you're also decidedly sinister.
80% of all stories are FRANKENSTEIN. Which of course is just a thinly-veiled clone of SURROGATES.
If you want to group them that way, then you have to hark back to Pygmalion, which means that My Fair Lady and Frankenstein are the "same" story. Now, while that would be an awesome movie, I say the ending counts. As long as Eliza Doolittle does not go on a rampage and have to be brought down by torches and pitchforks, they are different stories. Fundamentally, we're talking about every parent's fear of being a bad parent (Frankenstein) vs every child's desire for independence and fulfillment (Pinocchio).
EDIT: I don't know what I point I was trying to make with that. I wrote it in a rush in an airport concourse.
Strange Days deserves some attention if not love.
Read into the ending what you will, it is still a Hollywood ending. And it's deus ex machina—or machina ex machina, anyway. And it's a Spielbergian advanced race that looks and acts like angels (compare Close Encounters, Crystal Skull). And it's rhinoplastied Pinocchio (that is, Pinocchio without the important part about learning to be good).
Resolved: All robot stories are either Pinocchio or RUR. Discuss.
Wait, are we passing on the bad-to-great one?
The Beatles (pre-Epstein), George Michael, and Madonna matured. The Monkeys learned to play and write. And Styx had a change of members and label (Grand Illusion was their fifth album!).
My friend Erwann also works in the normal film industry
I would have thought that there was a lot of crossover behind the camera, but the audio is always shit in porn. (Or so I've heard.) What's up with that?
I'll have to catch up with it later. I'll be on a cruise ship in the Adriatic.
I heard they were going to do a crossover with CSI and call it CSI: Atlantis, but I've been known to be wrong. [takes off sunglasses]
Yeeeeooooooowwwww! [guitar sting]
Meh. Altho I'm from a small town to the south, I tell people I'm from South Bend, Indiana, because they maybe have heard of that (Notre Dame University and all). But when I went to the Netherlands I told people I was from "around Chicago". You adjust to your audience.
I'm rather more knowledgeable about the UK than the average Joe because I'm steeped in English literature and British comedy. Even so, I view all of Europe like vintage Universal horror movies: an English-speaking, tweed-wearing, castle-owning, steam-train-riding pastiche.
On the other hand, more than one Dutchman said to me, "Chicago? Oh! Al Capone!"
Top 5 movies you'd like to check out but haven't because you think you won't like it.
Schindler's List
One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest
Glengarry Glen Ross
Gone With the Wind
Rebel Without a Cause
As a rule, I don't like prison movies or war movies, so Schindler's List is really daunting. And I've seen enough clips of most of these that I just think they are probably not my cup of tea.
Next: Top 5 super-powers (comic book, not country)
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by Zarban
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.
Currently installed 9 official extensions. Copyright © 2003–2009 PunBB.