1

(473 replies, posted in Episodes)

Holden wrote:

There's always a chance Billy will make a cameo somewhere in the film. Bummer he's not a main character, but I wouldn't completely rule him out.

Saw him at a local convention two years ago. Despite that he was very pleasant to talk to one-on-one, during his panel he seemed to have absolutely no idea where he was, nor did he have that much interest in going super-deep into "Star Wars" discussion (his statements on it were a bit more broad and not as - perhaps - geeky as I think some audience members were hoping for. But luckily the audience was knowledgeable of his other works, which doesn't always happen).

He's still perfectly fit to continue his highly successful voice over career. But I'd be surprised if he managed to pop in for this.

2

(7 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I just did a 2 hour-long presentation about voice over to a packed crowd at my local library. Which seems kind of silly, considering I've only done one professional job. Ugh, New Mexico. But I swear, I know what I'm doing.

Interview with Adriana Caselotti:

I'd say Snow White's voice over perfectly hitting those notes at 70 is pretty damn amazing.

3

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

fireproof78 wrote:

Due to having kids, my last movies watched are usual animated and/or in the family category.

No need to explain. I don't have kids and that's my main genre.

fireproof78 wrote:

That being said, getting to rewatch Mulan from an adult's point of view, filmaking and story, etc. I think the best aspect of the movie is the characters, especially Mulan. Not the conventional "Disney Princess" but a young lady who doesn't need to be rescued but is trying to do the rescuing. I like the aspect that she is far more of a free agent in terms of her decisions and responding to the events she ends up causing.

The other characters are not always as fleshed out, with some caricatures that full characters in the three companions, but they certainly provide some fun and comic relief. 

The film also does a good job of keeping a serious tone as it explores both the lighter side (the camaraderie of soldiers in song) and darker side of army life and war (the destruction and death). Despite being a movie aimed at kids, there are some heavy themes dealt with here, and can provide an opportunity for parents to discuss such things. It isn't simple as it seems on its face.

Keeping in mind that this was released in 1998, there are some technical aspects that are really amazing. If you do watch the film, the part with the Hun army coming down the snow covered mountain, which features an animation program similar to Massive used for the Lord of the Rings armies.

My only complaint is the sometimes lack of sensitivity towards Eastern cultures and beliefs, and  almost pop style music in places.

Overall, it is a 9/10 and a fun movie to watch and rewatch.

This is a wonderful reflection (hah, pun) of "Mulan!" This movie has such an odd relationship within the Disney community (it either inspires immense love or immense hate) and I'm always surprised at that. There's really not much to dislike about it. I kind of see it as a follow-up to "Beauty and the Beast" and a predecessor to "Frozen" with how it treats its female lead. I'm happy that Mulan herself was later inducted into the Disney Princess line, although I hate that rather than focus on her warrior traits, they instead dress her up in make-up and the fancy clothes she only wears, like, once in the film (at least Merida's in the bunch now, and she's not proving so easy to fancy-up). Back to the film, though; it's also beautiful to look at, and very much honors ('nother pun) its source material. It does definitely have a slight lack of sensitivity to the culture it's portraying, but really, what Disney feature doesn't? I'm not saying it's excusable, but certainly nothing new for Disney . . .

Nostalgia Chick hit upon nearly the same points in one of her earlier reviews.

4

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-Mb4YxThx5do/Uu2-U1wJ6zI/AAAAAAAAMkE/j3mbefKcbIw/s1600/Frozen-Sing-Along.png

This was fun. Went with a friend; we took props and made a tame "Rocky Horror"-esque viewing of it with shredded paper "snow" to throw, chocolate for the "For the First Time In Forever" song and carrots to loudly crunch every time they were mentioned. There were only two other groups in attendance, and at least one of them (who sat right behind us) knew it was a sing-a-long (I don't know if this is the case everywhere, but in New Mexico, most people who go to sing-a-longs don't seem to realize that's what they're in for). So that was nice, 'cause they sang very enthusiastically, as did we. That marks the 5th time I've seen it now, so hopefully Disney's getting my message. wink

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-9hNFdtdDDNw/UwP4QbwI06I/AAAAAAAAhic/KQqqqBaaKZk/s1600/serenity-poster-214x300.jpg

So, a little story. I got into "Firefly" quite a few years ago. Not, like, when it was still airing, years ago. But it's been a long while. And I very slowly made my way through the series. Not because I didn't like it, but because I loved it so much that I wanted to get people into it so I'd have others to discuss it with. That ended up backfiring in every instance; the first two people I introduced it to (some friends who were brother and sister) weren't much interested, and instead drifted over to "Buffy." The others I showed it to would watch the entire series plus the movie immediately after I showed it to them. But recently, some good married friends of mine invited me over for a random evening hang-out. Despite already having watched both, they wanted to watch the last episode and the movie with me.

So with all that time and build-up, you can imagine my expectations were high. I might need to watch the film again for a more complete assessment, but I can safely say that I was not particularly impressed. It was . . . fine. It exists. I guess. At least I have the show to watch over and over.

http://image.tmdb.org/t/p/w342/nZXNDKb1QWJg0coCWwurna09lUd.jpg

In the same evening as "Serenity," we watched "highlights" from this because we have an obsession with Bad Movies, and Nathan (the husband of the aforementioned couple) seems to have a talent for finding the worst of the worst on Netflix. This did not disappoint. Oh, goodness, it's glorious. Even knowing it was meant to be a parody, it's still . . . just . . . oh heavens. My hands actually locked into positions expressing disbelief for nearly the entire time we watched it. I'm looking forward to our next Bad Movie Night so I can watch it in full with a crowd.

http://static1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20120502043113/filmguide/images/a/a2/Emperors_new_groove.jpg

I was idly browsing Netflix today and, tired from watching Moffat's butchering of "Doctor Who" (yes, I'm being passive-aggressive to avoid a rant), thought this might be a good pick-me-up. Haven't seen it in a long while. Funny as always. Quite possibly Disney's best comedy.

5

(97 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Ahem. Just gonna leave this here . . .

http://www.friendsinyourhead.com/forum/img/harle.gif

6

(1 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I'd like to think, with the Writer's Strike not being a factor here, that this could have the potential to tie up the loose ends and bring the story to a proper close.

But I'm kind of feeling like NBC is viewing this as a jumping off point to restart the series. And if that's the case . . . eh, no. Not unless they've got a long-term plan.

What killed "Heroes" is what also kills lots of other things; origin stories are fun and interesting, and then when you go past that without a plan (or a Writer's Strike takes an axe to your plans), you end up making the characters meander around for a bit, trying to keep true to how you developed them, yet simultaneously wanting to take them in a new direction (which would be a lot of easier if you just scrapped everyone and started over anew). In this instance, as someone on Hypable so fittingly put it:

Season 1 was tight, each character had an arc with a beginning, middle and end that concluded in that final episode. After that, they just wandered around bumping into each other, losing powers, gaining powers, retconing siblings and/or how they have powers, it was just an incoherent mess.

I really liked the original concept of "Heroes" where each season would rotate in a new cast, with some members of the previous cast making cameos or having their roles diminished. And the coinciding online comic was a brilliant way to develop that (if there's one thing "Heroes" consistently had a knack for, it was its supplemental material). But instead the writers listened to the fans (which is rarely ever a good idea) and kept all the beloved first season characters while bringing in new ones, thus having to kill off all of the new ones almost immediately in order to make room for everyone. The only TV show I can think of that had the balls to kill everyone off and start fresh was "Legend of Korra," and it served that show so well to break off immediate ties with its predecessor so it could be its own thing while still holding to the rules of that world.

I'm not saying I won't watch it. I will. But I'd like to think that if this really is the last chance to do this, that it uses its time wisely and with restraint.

Of course, this is network TV, so that probably won't happen.

I also just have to add that, personally, I cannot begrudge a song (especially a Disney song) that inspires so much impressive creativity being produced at such an insane rate, like this:

But I never claimed to be a great expert on music anyway. I just like what I like.

Before I address the original post, I want to say that my responses mostly stem from these bullet points:

  • I find it odd that so many critics jumped on comparing this to "The Lion King." That was not my first thought at all. In fact, my immediate thought is that this film shares a lot with 2007's "Enchanted." Both films are something of a subversion of the Disney formula, acknowledging its faults and working to flip that fixed narrative on its head. "Frozen" obviously takes things a lot farther than "Enchanted," and with more of a loving nod than an air of parody. But up until the beginning of the final act, this film goes to a LOT of effort to make you think you're watching any other Disney movie.

  • The other film I'm reminded of is "Brave," in that changes were obviously made near the end of production; but while "Brave" shows it with a notably patchwork design (I still like the film, despite this), "Frozen" seems to smooth out the creases a bit better, moving at a brisk, exciting pace, keeping all of its characters at least relevant and being considerably less confused in what it's trying to communicate.

  • This film is a loose adaptation of Hans Christian Andersen's The Snow Queen and, while it takes many liberties with the source material, it tries to reference it as much as it's able to. So where elements are at their shakiest are often when they're meant to be references to the source material.

With those in mind . . .

Fix One
I'd say the more ideal fix here, as suggested in a later post, would be for Anna to have a negative reaction upon her true memories somehow being accessed (be it Elsa admitting it, the trolls fixing her memories, etc.), which is only amplified by Elsa freezing her heart. This would make her sacrifice for Elsa all the more meaningful (although I still feel it carries plenty of weight with how the film builds the climax). But I like Anna's naivety and unquestioning trust in regards to her sister because it better explains her hasty relationship with Hans.

In an early draft, Elsa and Anna have a (very decidedly anti-princess) bond that's much more prominent throughout the film, but Anna becomes jealous of Elsa due to their parents doting on Elsa out of concern. Anna develops an inferiority complex that causes her to lash out when she confronts Elsa in her ice castle. Listening to the songs that were developed for this version, I can see why this was scrapped. The characters just weren't likeable or worth rooting for. So, because of the way that developed, I can see why we got the Elsa and Anna we did.

Fix Two

You're right on the mark with the intention of the song. The problem Disney faced with "Frozen" is that Elsa in the source material is the villain, and a poorly developed one at that; she's essentially a Slender Man-like entity, and this lack of character proved challenging even to Walt Disney himself when he attempted to adapt the story. She was changed to something of an anti-hero to better suit the story and "Let It Go" is a result of that. In fact, "Let It Go" inspired a lot of changes in Elsa's character when it was proposed for the film.

Up to that point, Elsa was a more extreme anti-hero, akin to what your fix-up suggests she should have been (and, clearly, this was not to the liking of the production team); the alternate ending of the scene where Anna and Kristoff are chased out of Elsa's castle by Marshmallow has Elsa taking things further by conjuring a giant snowflake which she channels into herself in order to unleash a blizzard, ensuring her sister keeps away (I'm assuming this was cut due to the blizzard being saved for the finale). In another draft, she created a snowman army (which Olaf was intended to be a reject of) that attacked Arandelle when they became sentient beyond Elsa's control. I am also fairly sure there had to be a draft where Elsa purposefully put Arandelle into the eternal winter. I think, really, that last concept is all that needed to change to make her transformation more layered; putting Arandelle into winter on purpose would have been a perfect depiction of Elsa misplacing her anger and misusing her powers out of fear. Of course, this requires alterations to Anna's naive view of Elsa (she certainly wouldn't say "She would never hurt me" after that), although as you suggested, there are ways to alter her development without changing that naivety.

As to Elsa not really "letting go" of her fear and anxiety during the song; isn't that the idea? Elsa is, at this point, mistaken in thinking that letting go means letting her powers run loose as she sees fit. She has yet to understand what letting go truly is, or how to do it, which is what she's setup to learn in the film. The song is empowering, but kind of in the way that "Defying Gravity" is in "Wicked" (it is, after all, essentially the same song); the character has power now, which could be positive, but is at risk for being unbridled with it (which Elsa later shows when she nearly kills the two guards attacking her, doing so with notable dramatics).

And regarding the issues with Elsa's powers, nearly every thing she is capable of are references to the Snow Queen's abilities in the original story. The text mentions her being able to do nearly everything the movie shows her doing at some point (yes, even the clothes . . . including the skates); in fact, I'd say that this is the element of the story adapted with the most fidelity. Really, the only one that bothers me is that she can create life, and only because the script makes a point of noting this as a rather big deal (with a notable reaction of shock from Elsa upon the realization) only to drop it later (it only ends up foreshadowing her creation of Marshmallow).

Fix Three

This is heresy. I can't agree with this, especially considering (as Dorkman pointed out) that Elsa is essentially Elphaba from "Wicked." It's pretty choice casting, and I thought Menzel's performance was very clear; she played Elsa as refined, nervous and muted. And the physicality in her voice acting shines through where Elsa is best animated (my favorite moment being her first chat with Anna as adults; a lot of Idina shines through in this scene). It would've been great to give her more material (as Elsa is just as interesting, if not more so, than Anna), but I never thought she left Elsa totally flat.

Fix Four

I only really thought the most egregious example of a character going off model was where you mentioned, in "Let It Go" when Elsa is animated somewhat inconsistently. Otherwise, I had no complaints; I was initially displeased at the character models when pictures were first released (noting, as you did, their similarity to character models in "Tangled"), and if it hadn't been for the snow needing to feel tangible, this would have been perfectly good as a traditionally animated film. But really, I found myself pleasantly surprised by the character animation and how much I could see the actors' personalities shining through them.

Fix Five

The trolls are, once again, a reference to the original story; interestingly enough, in Andersen's version, they are a literal representation of the devil, creating a magic mirror that amplifies ugliness, which shatters into millions of pieces and gets in people's eyes and hearts (which was adapted into Elsa's ability to freeze heads and hearts). I agree that they are sort of a bizarre story element here, although their presence of magic somewhat explains why Elsa's family doesn't ever ask why she has powers or where they came from (apparently this alternate reality of Norway is content to live alongside magic, although is certainly wary of it). Otherwise, if we go with the idea that this is meant to be an "Enchanted"-like element, the trolls are meant to serve as a traditional "wise character" that, in this instance, end up misleading the audience (their number almost exactly parallels Mama Odie's song in "The Princess and the Frog," meant to trick you into thinking that Anna does, in fact, need to kiss someone). But I agree, they're an awkward fit. I myself thought it would've made sense for Elsa's parents to have the trolls train her in her magic. There's also quite the plot hole when they never mention having treated Anna before.

Fix Six

I somewhat agree with this, although I've grown to have a begrudging affection for the lyric, as it fits with the way they built Anna; like Rapunzel, she's essentially a modern-day teenager dropped into a fairy tale setting. I do think it's funny, though, when people claim the songs from both princesses have timeless qualities; the way the two phrase things (e.g. "It's, like, 7:15" and "I know it is totally crazy") are not exactly timeless ways of speaking . . . they'll date those songs pretty fast, actually. But screw it, I'm singing them daily, so I can't really criticize.

Fix Seven

I'd reverse this and say up the Duke's part. As you said, he's meant to be a red herring. More. More, I say! Although perhaps less . . . Alan Tudyk-y? He was a bit too funny to be taken as a serious red herring (although his casting in itself was a red herring, one which I initially fell for). Make him more sinister and you've got yourself an honest-to-goodness shocker when it's revealed that Hans is the mastermind.

Fix Eight

A lot of stage musicals tend to speed towards a climax by act two, favoring dialogue over songs. Although a song from the entire cast during the blizzard sequence would've been pretty awesome, I must admit. And there definitely should've been a vocal reprise, with altered lyrics, of "Do You Want to Build a Snowman" to cement Anna and Elsa's renewed relationship.


Despite all of these "problems," I can't help but have an overwhelming affection for "Frozen," to the point that I'm willing to excuse its flaws. It's one of those movies where, when people critically pan it for its faults, I kind of shrug and go, "Eh, they don't really bother me." Which, for me, is a testament to the movie, as there are not a lot of films that make me do that. For me, "Frozen" has so many good things going for it that its flaws are kind of overshadowed by its successes. And considering I hated "Wreck-It Ralph," that really is saying something; I'm just sitting here eagerly awaiting Jennifer Lee's next move. The ball is in her court.

9

(1 replies, posted in Creations)

Is this okay, me leaving this here? Yes? No? I don't know. It's too late, it's happening.

Hi all. Over at the MuggleNet.com Blog, we're doing an absolutely insane project that's essentially making me want to *headdesk* every evening. It's called the "Wizolympics." Basically, we're doing a Wizard version of the Sochi Olympics (in this concept, the wizards hold their Olympics wherever the Muggles do), with magical versions of various Olympic sports.

The brand new MuggleNet Creative Team is writing the blogs that are released (usually two per day; a qualifying and final round), while I'm leading the audio portion (which we're passing off as updates from the Wizarding Wireless Network), which are released nightly; hence why I kind of want to just lay down and say "SCREW IT!" on a daily basis. Especially considering this is purely a passion project that was implemented way too late for the amount of work that's going into it.

Feel free to critique, although I won't be able to really apply the feedback, as I have to write the scripts very quickly in order to ensure the MuggleNet Audiofictions team can record all the pieces in time (they're scattered across various time zones). That and the Olympics are almost over. I'm well aware that some episodes are better than others, but I just thought after the big Potter marathon, you guys might appreciate this kind of thing.

Anywho, let me know if you're listening and enjoying. Because, honestly, while I love this idea and the resulting product, it's really not generating a strong enough audience to validate its continued existence at the level of work required (even if said existence is only for one more week). So it would be nice to hear . . . something.
:{ )

10

(14 replies, posted in Episodes)

Dorkman wrote:

I assume they recast him less because of his age (though that is the reason given on IMDB) and more to match young Voldemort to Ralph Fiennes.

I guess I can see that. Although Voldemort is so warped by the magic he's inflicted upon himself (which is made pretty clear in the films without outright saying it, considering he doesn't have a nose), that in a way it wouldn't have really mattered. It's a real shame, considering Coulson would've returned; I believe I read somewhere that he was disappointed not to be asked back. In this case, I would've voted continuity over physical appearances. But I'm also single and would've made any excuse to get Mr. Coulson back on set, if it were up to me. 'Cause, again. My chances. So high.


Well. Hello, rest of my evening.

11

(449 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I was going to bring up The LEGO Movie, but I was terrified of being mocked. Apparently that wasn't something I needed to be concerned with. big_smile I've pretty much been gabbing about it non-stop for the last month.

My friends and I are planning a "Nostalgic Toy Day" around it; gonna see the movie and then hang-out and play with all of our old toys, video games, etc. I'm pretty sure a LEGO cake will also be involved.

If any of you ever had the pleasure of playing "LEGO Island" back in the 90s (the very first LEGO video game), this seems to take a LOT of inspiration from it (which is a good thing. A very good thing). I'm extremely hopeful, and the clips I've seen so far have not disappointed.

BBQ wrote:

First full trailer for Transcendence. Seems like there's hope for a more nuanced concept than your typical "AI becomes aware" or "Man puts mind into a machine" story line mash up. Hopefully it doesn't pull any punches and sticks the landing -- the two ways movies like this tend to fail.

I got to be an extra in this for what, I believe, was the last day of shooting in Albuquerque (i.e. nobody famous was on set and the crew was, noticeably, on their last legs). A few of my fellow extras did some re-shoots for the gunshot scene featured in the trailer. I played a Silicon Valley techie during a scene where the computers all over the world go haywire. Nothing exciting, but there were some amusing stories that came out of it, at least. smile The trailer definitely captured my interest, though. More so than the plot summary they gave us on the set.

12

(30 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Teague wrote:

Okay, Star Trek people, what on earth is the context of that gif.

Ees a blooper.

BEHOLD! Context.

13

(14 replies, posted in Episodes)

I've listened back to a few of the episodes I was not present for and am finding it awfully hard to come up with anything worth saying, as Michael tends to speak it for me, or Teague references things I already said. However! A few worthwhile things finally popped into my head for "Half-Blood Prince," so I'll start making my mark around here with this episode (I would've loved to have said something for "Prisoner," but I literally have nothing to add to that conversation; y'all took the words out of my mouth. Or, in some cases, used my actual words).

*Ahem.*

Color Correction (at the risk of starting a brawl . . .)
Having recently popped in the disc to watch a few favorite moments here and there, the thing I noticed about the color correction is that it gives the film a darker, less lively tone (which is frequently at odds with the material throughout the film's majority); this book is notably where the dementors officially break loose from Azkaban and begin severely affecting their environment, and I almost wonder if this wasn't part of the attempt to mimic that. Overall, I think it simultaneously works and has problems (the most egregious being Michael’s reference to the scene where the Death Eaters fail to break through the Hogwarts barrier). I also think that the color correction linked with the notably liberal use of soft focus makes for a more fantasy, storybook-like appearance (not dissimilar to the look of The Tale of the Three Brothers sequence featured in the following film) that, in a way, seems inappropriate for this film (where the themes have matured and the Wizarding and Muggle worlds are colliding in an escalating war, making for much more dire stakes); I like it, it just seems odd to be used here in this one instance; I would say it would've been best to consistently utilize this look either pre "Prisoner" (for the storybook feel, although I think that's more the soft lens than the color correction) or post "Chamber" if you want it to be attributed to the dementors.

I also never fail to be peeved that the washed out color wasn’t restored for the “19 Years Later” epilogue in "Deathly Hallows - Part 2." To keep the colors so flat in that scene seemed monumentally inappropriate to me, really more of an egregious sin, considering that the look of the films is so colorful initially, before the stakes are raised (I take more umbrage with “Deathly Hallows – Part 2’s” lighting than this film’s color correction).

Effective/Main Mystery
I’d actually be more critical of the mystery plot in “Order of the Phoenix,” which has almost no pay-off for the viewer/reader. The main mystery is, of course, “what is the ‘weapon’ that Voldemort and the Order are after?” When we find out in the book that it’s a prophecy detailing that Harry must kill Voldemort or vice versa, that was not remotely interesting to me as a reader, as I saw that as inevitable from the start (as, I think, most readers did). The secondary mystery (eliminated from the film, though referenced in a deleted scene) is “who sent the dementors to Little Whinging?” I remember when the solution is revealed that it’s Umbridge, like the prophecy, it didn't shake me at all.

While Snape was certainly an obvious and somewhat disappointing choice to be the “Half-Blood Prince,” I think the book at least handles it with notably more grace and depth than the film, dropping hints that the film does not. Like I mentioned frequently in my interviews with Teague, the movies just aren’t that interested in the mystery plots of their source material. The only one that really excels at that is “Deathly Hallows – Part 1,” but nearly all of the work that film does to setup the pieces is completely disregarded in “Part 2.”

Most Attractive
Just a personal side note. As someone who falls under the category of “interested in gentleman,” my pick for most attractive cast member (despite that I very much like Daniel Radcliffe) goes to Christian Coulson (a.k.a. Tom Riddle in “Chamber of Secrets”). Have you seen that guy? Dang, he still looks almost exactly the same. I’ll never understand why they recast him for “Half-Blood Prince.” If Shirley Henderson can play Moaning Myrtle at 30-something years, Coulson could’ve definitely still convincingly played Riddle in this film. Also, he plays for my team. So, ~*yay*~. ‘Cause, you know. I totally have a shot at that.

14

(431 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Teague wrote:

http://www.friendsinyourhead.com/forum/img/harle.gif

Cuarón is also, apparently, a dragon, according to the way I'm moving my hands there.

15

(431 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Dave wrote:

Hi Michael, welcome aboard. Favourite Ghibli film (porco rosso is the only correct answer)?

I need to re-evaluate "Porco Rosso." I was a bit too young when I saw it (my only viewing) to really digest it properly (I think I was taken aback at how mature it was; I blame Disney for how they marketed it to me). My favorite of their works is most definitely "Howl's Moving Castle" (although I must admit I have a soft spot for "The Cat Returns").

Dorkman wrote:
Lupinpatronus wrote:

My worst injury was in high school when my kneecap popped out of place and I was out of commission for a month.

Hey, me too! Traumatic dislocation-five!
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_73Ll0Gh1I0M/SgK_M_4FWqI/AAAAAAAAAvc/RtT1WNyYMeE/s400/scrubs_todd_five.jpg

Right back at you, sir. I'm starting to think we might be twins. For cereals.

16

(431 replies, posted in Off Topic)

A handstand! For me? big_smile You're too much.

*Confetti.*

17

(431 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Hi! I'm Michael Harle.

I'm currently unemployed, but am an aspiring voice over artist, who moonlights in various library/bookstore jobs.

I found the show because I'm also a volunteer staff member of MuggleNet.com, where I host two podcasts (Audiofictions & Alohomora!); I was one of many MuggleNet staff interviewed for the What Are You Doing, Movie? 24-hour Harry Potter marathon (I was the East Indian guy in the snappy purple shirt who couldn't stop praising Alfonso Cuarón). I very much enjoyed the opportunity to chat with Michael and Teague about a film series that's very important to me (I kept telling people that they "spoke my language"), so I figured I should come over here and play a bit more (and I worried that if I didn't, Teague would cry. Srsly, you guys).

My worst injury was in high school when my kneecap popped out of place and I was out of commission for a month. I have weak ligaments in my knees, so that's great.

I like my pizza with pepperoni. On occasion with green chile ('cause New Mexico). I really only like pizza from Village Pizza here in town, so I'm kind of worried about what's going to happen when I move.

As far as I'm aware, I don't have a sister. But I am adopted, so it's possible . . .

To flesh myself out beyond the questions asked, I have a degree in Cinematic Arts from the University of New Mexico, with a minor in Theater, as there is no degree for voice over, so I figured knowing the history and inner workings of the industry I want to be in would be the next best thing. My favorite movie of all time is "Contact" (1997), that movie everyone forgot 'cause they were too busy freaking out about "Titanic" (which, incidentally, I'm fairly lukewarm about). I'm also a great lover of Disney (their movies, not so much their business practices), Studio Ghibli, and various classics. I am, apparently, in very high demand amongst my friends to see movies with. If you get me talking about one I've seen, we'll probably need to sit down and order something to eat. And then go somewhere else for dessert.

Outside of movies, Harry Potter kind of rules my life. I also like LEGOs. Ooh, and 90s nostalgia bombing. And books, on the rare occasions that I get to read them. And guys. Guys are nice, too. Someday, I'll get me one of those.