Re: #44 - Disney Buys Lucasfilm
I've got an illogical feeling about this
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
I've got an illogical feeling about this
Am I the only one totally fine with this?
No, I think it's going to be pretty great (assuming it's all locked in).
The 2009 Star Trek was basically a Star Wars movie. And a pretty good one, too, so there's cause for optimism.
Am I the only one totally fine with this?
I think its great, though the Internet has taken the opportunity to flame Abrams for his Star Trek work
@DamonLindelof
Hey, everybody. What did I miss?
You can go about your business Damon, move along. Move along.
I'm good with it. Star Wars needs the same break from decades of canonical dogma that Abrams gave to Star Trek. His Star Trek wasn't perfect, but at least it was fun to watch. Star Wars hasn't been fun since 1983, so he sure can't hurt things any.
Invoking Star Trek as a point FOR Abrams?
Invoking Star Trek as a point FOR Abrams?
Um, yes. Several points for him, actually. Pretty much what Trey said
Actually, its funny, because several forums that I cruise, like tfn (back in the day) and a Trek fan site, all described the New Trek as a Star Wars film.
Last edited by fireproof78 (2013-01-25 06:18:56)
several forums that I cruise, like tfn (back in the day) and a Trek fan site, all described the New Trek as a Star Wars film.
Yeah. Attack of the Clones—a bunch characters you recognize doing shit that's damned exciting but that makes no sense, plus a terrible romance.
fireproof78 wrote:several forums that I cruise, like tfn (back in the day) and a Trek fan site, all described the New Trek as a Star Wars film.
Yeah. Attack of the Clones—a bunch characters you recognize doing shit that's damned exciting but that makes no sense, plus a terrible romance.
Attack of the Clones-yes
Star Trek-no
agree to disagree, but its my opinion.
In other news, I'm skeptical of "The Wrap" site but here is another interesting article:
http://www.thewrap.com/movies/column-po … sive-63006
Love the continuation of Lucas' tale that it was a whole long saga, and that there was originally 9 movies, etc. etc.
/sigh
Now I'm panicking
That's no moon. That's an anamorphic lens flare.
Well, at least Episode III set a precedent for that.
Exterior: LENS FLARE.
I think that there could have been much worse choices. I am definitely interested what Abrams can bring to it. HOPING for a decent script.
I'm good with it. Star Wars needs the same break from decades of canonical dogma that Abrams gave to Star Trek. His Star Trek wasn't perfect, but at least it was fun to watch. Star Wars hasn't been fun since 1983, so he sure can't hurt things any.
Clone Wars is fun, and some of the Dark Horse series are pretty good too (though I realise you are referring to cinematic ventures).
On another note, Paramount must be beaming at this point in time - hordes of curious viewers are going to flock to see Star Trek Into Darkness this summer, eager to see just what all the fuss is about with 'the new Star Wars guy'.
I hope this means Kathleen Kennedy saw Star Trek into Darkness and liked what she saw
Apparently, it was between Abrams and Ben Affleck, I think the latter would have been far more interesting to be honest.
It's official, J.J. is doing Ep VII
http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=99397
So I think it's a safe bet Giacchino is doing the score...
Have you guys heard the news?!
J.J. Abrams is rebooting Stargate!
I'll take it
Am I the only one who's just kinda over JJ? I'm just kinda sick of him.
Nevermind BDA JJ, I still love you!
Argh... jedi *puts fingers down mouth*
I'm guessing my enjoyment of this new trilogy will be dependent on how few Jedi and lightsabres are in it. Spaceships please. All the spaceships.
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.
Currently installed 9 official extensions. Copyright © 2003–2009 PunBB.