Re: 2010: Moby Dick.

Eddie Doty

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: 2010: Moby Dick.

Re: 2010: Moby Dick.

Oh, then it was twenty in a fifteen.

*blink*

I just remember it was five mph over. I was very drunk and slinging glass and soap socks.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: 2010: Moby Dick.

By the way, if you're a Time/Warner cable subscriber, 2010 Moby Dick is now available On Demand. 

You'll find it very near the top of the list... smile

Re: 2010: Moby Dick.

Just awesome. We're all wondering in the office what they use for the VFX... I'd like to think Maya & Nuke but I have The Fear that it's Lightwave or Cinema4D...

And lots and lots of splash footage to screen over everything smile

That said, we have all decided the VFX are AWESOME.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: 2010: Moby Dick.

I know a lot of those guys are Lightwave users. Don't know what they use at Asylum.

And I will bitch slap you with my Lightwave dongle.

pimp

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: 2010: Moby Dick.

Lightwave and Fusion are their weapons of choice.   

However, I did my shots with AE because it's the only comp software I know, fortunately for me they also have AE in-house.

Re: 2010: Moby Dick.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: 2010: Moby Dick.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: 2010: Moby Dick.

36 (edited by Trey 2010-12-01 13:43:30)

Re: 2010: Moby Dick.

This just in:  Asylum's campaign to have people put 2010: Moby Dick on their Netflix queue has resulted in a "larger than normal" DVD order from Netflix.

So, Moby should be available from Netflix very soon, thanks to all of you who helped game the system.    In the words of Captain Ahab - HA!

/edit:  oops, actually that was just one word.

Re: 2010: Moby Dick.

"fu-ses."

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: 2010: Moby Dick.

One question I don't think you answered in the episode, Trey, is would you do it again?

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: 2010: Moby Dick.

It was his first feature film, how can the answer be no?

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: 2010: Moby Dick.

Beldar brings up a good point -- Invid, I think maybe you could clarify your question.

Do you mean "if you could go back in time, knowing what you know now, would you still take the gig," or do you mean "If the Asylum came to you tomorrow, saying they really liked 2010: MOBY DICK, and offered you 1985: BIG BROTHER AND BIGGER RATS, would you say yes"?

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: 2010: Moby Dick.

The second. Was it a good enough experience with enough of a pay check to do twice, or is it something no sane person would say no to the first time or yes to the second?

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: 2010: Moby Dick.

My answer is a conditional yes.   

There's a lot I like about what the Asylum does, and the best thing is that they make movies.  I've got three potential "real" projects that have all been mired in months of negotiations now.  It'll be a great day if any of them actually happen, but the waiting is maddening, and they may never happen at all.    But in the case of Moby (and most Asylum projects), it's "we're shooting a movie next Monday, you wanna direct it?"  and boom, done.   And my favorite part of the process is being on set, no matter how bad and desperate and crazy it gets.   Post-production is just the necessary evil that comes afterward.  So if that call came again tomorrow, I might indeed say yes again.   

That being said, an even better scenario would be if I wrote the movie myself, because then I'd know what the heck I was making and have a chance to give it some thought beforehand.  And now that I know  the Asylum post-pipeline, I could shape the project from the ground up, so the post was more manageable.   And finally, it'd be nice to get some say in the crewing - while the vast majority of the Moby crew were great, there were a few weak links that were in over their heads and that cost us time.

Assuming Asylum would ever allow any of those things, or ask me to direct again anyway, of which I know not of their plans.  smile

But the paycheck alone would not be a draw.   I've actually been doing freelance fx work for the Asylum lately - 'twas just my luck that Moby was the last project they did with a two-person fx team, now they've tripled the in-house personnel and even farm out additional shots to folks like me - and being an Asylum fx contractor pays better than directing.  smile

Re: 2010: Moby Dick.

ZangrethorDigital.ca

Re: 2010: Moby Dick.

If the movies with better fx don't bring in more money, I wonder how long that will last smile

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: 2010: Moby Dick.

Re: 2010: Moby Dick.

47 (edited by Matt Vayda 2010-12-03 08:00:04)

Re: 2010: Moby Dick.

Re: 2010: Moby Dick.

The only "Warner" connection I'm aware of is that Asylum movies almost always end up on Time-Warner/Comcast PPV, there's even an internal "Time Warner deadline" for every film, that's when it gets submitted to TW for review and, hopefully, acceptance.

So maybe they've got some kind of distribution arrangement with Warner for other markets like iTunes as well, but I'm just guessin'.

49 (edited by switch 2010-12-03 15:52:07)

Re: 2010: Moby Dick.

since you've said you shot MD on the Red Trey, I was wondering what lenses did you guys use for this production?

P.S. I pretty sure my punctuation is off on this post...

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: 2010: Moby Dick.

One of the areas where my movie-making knowledge is lacking is the topic of lenses.   I happily lean on the DP to deal with that, I just say stuff like "let's go wider" and they do something with pieces of glass that makes the picture embiggenate.  This is clearly some kind of dark wizardry and it frightens me.

So if you're looking for an answer like "we used the Canon Wogambo kit with a custom spleetch extender" then I can't help you.  Unless what I just said sounded like it could be true, in which case we'll go with that.   

But if you were looking for a more general answer, then I can say it looked to me like the same kinda lens package that I've seen being used on other shoots. So once or twice during the shoot I would get sneaky and say something like "let's try this with a 50" as if I knew what the hell that meant.   If I didn't like the result, then I would say "hmm, nah, let's go wider".  It seemed to work, and I recommend this clever trick to all directors.

Also, the lenses were all kept in a gray metal box with some writing on it, if that helps?