Re: #45 - Unpopular Opinions
I know a couple of music-buffs (like, Berklee students) who are super into Toto.
Who knew.
I have a tendency to fix your typos.
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
I know a couple of music-buffs (like, Berklee students) who are super into Toto.
Who knew.
bullet3 wrote:I agree with this too. I don't like Stewart very much. He does way too much of just playing a ridiculous fox news clip and then making ridiculous faces and yelling.
I like Stewart a lot more than Colbert, though I admire them both a great deal. Although it doesn't seem like it would be the case, Stewart is actually a lot more cutting and incisive in his criticism than Colbert is.
I love them both, altho Stewart sometimes blows things out of proportion in a way not entirely unlike the pundits he mocks. But his staff's ability to put together video showing flip-flopping or hypocrisy puts "real" news organizations to shame.
One thing that bugs me is that Stewart often mocks news channels by showing them all having the same take on a story. Then he'll do a joke about a story and Colbert will follow with the EXACT SAME JOKE.
Last edited by Zarban (2012-11-13 21:51:59)
I never watch Colbert and I very rarely watch the interviews on The Daily Show. I am a fan of Jon Stewart, though.
1) I refuse to listen to the "Sunshine" or "Scott Pilgrim" DIF commentaries. I am bound to their fate and I will risk no hurt to these movies.
2) I really like the going to the mansion part of "28 Days Later" and think it fits in really well with everything that came before it.
3) Eddie and I could hang. I love "Far and Away" and I have never understood the love for Scorsese. His "Journey Through American Movies" is phenomenal. I constantly reference his segment on "the director as a smuggler" when I'm talking to people about film and TV. However, his films aren't that great. Anyone who says that "Goodfellas" should have won the Academy Award for Best Picture over "Dances With Wolves" deserves the syphilis that is clearly rotting their brains.
4) Overall "Jurassic Park" kind of sucks. Sam Neill, Jeff Goldblum, the T-Rex and the "Condors" scene are all great. But the movie as a whole is silly. It's a kids movie that was based on an adult book. As an adult it really doesn't hold up for me.
Last edited by HabeasPorpoise (2012-11-13 22:44:42)
Lion King 1 1/2 is my favorite Disney movie. I like it more than the original.
We're all so ... secretly bad.
Lord of the Rings, be it books or films, bores me.
Maybe it's possible to compile a taxonomy of why differences of opinion exist...
1. People are different (part 1). One's genome may process adrenalin differently so that one person's horror film becomes another's snooze-fest.
2. People are different (part 2). Did the movie 'speak to you' because of all your accumulated influences that define your personality, or leave you cold as you haven't 'travelled' there yet, in real life or in imagination?
3. Encountering a pop phenomenon after it was a thing? It may have went viral/topped the charts in its day, but coming to it a decade afterwards won't have the same effect. You maximize your chances of liking something if its defining/reflecting the zeitgeist. Tone dates. Effects date. Editing styles date. Everything dates.
4. State of mind when seeing it. Are you watching the movie out with your mates after a couple of drinks, or alone after a traumatic break-up?
5. Did you see the movie on IMAX in the sweet-spot, or your iPhone 3GS whilst commuting? Was it 'edited for content' on a red-eye flight with numerous interruptions?
6. Have you overdosed on the movie/song/album/band/TV show? After binging on Jim Beam or chocolate cake, it may turn you off them for life. Why wouldn't it be the same for a movie? You can have too much of a good thing.
7. Peer group pressure. If everyone says 'x' is cool, are you forced to conform? Or are you forced to take the opposite viewpoint just to be different? Does your inner hipster refuse to like mainstream fodder?
8. Wrong age. Stuff is targeted to certain demographics. Why would 30-year olds like stuff made for teens? You can outgrow something you used to like.
9. Geekdom. You've read every article, watched every interview, behind-the-scenes, out-takes, etc. Of course you'll "get it" compared to a novice coming in cold.
10. Culture - why would we like the latest hottest Japanese fad, when we grew up in the west?
There's probably many more...
Last edited by avatar (2012-11-14 01:28:59)
11. EVERYONE ELSE IS STUPID.
At least, that's what the internet taught me.
I LOVE Dollhouse, George of the Jungle, Shrek (Just #1, the rest can go die in a fire), and Space Jam.
And probably my weirdest and dirtiest secret favorite movie... Farce Of The Penguins. I honestly have no explanation for this, I just think it's fricking hilarious, it defies all logical explanation.
11. EVERYONE ELSE IS STUPID.
At least, that's what the internet taught me.
12. Haters gonna hate.
Last edited by avatar (2012-11-14 01:30:11)
I hated Shrek 1 and fell asleep about 15 minutes into Shrek 2—which I NEVER DO.
Whoever wrote the Robin Hood rap/Fiona kung fu scene in Shrek 1 should get shingles.
We're all so ... secretly bad.
Lord of the Rings, be it books or films, bores me.
Thank God for Transformers 1-3 then
I forgot to mention my dirtiest secret: I'm not too crazy about The Hurt Locker. It feels too dry. I have to admit it's still a better movie than Avatar (which totally relies on the 3D gimmick - the whole plot is recycled from old classics).
Lord of the Rings, be it books or films, bores me.
The movies (even the Extended Editions) don't bore me at all despite their length. I'd say they're much better than the books (Tolkien was not a great writer - he was simply a linguist who thought it was necessary to develop a mythology for his languages).
Thank God for Transformers 1-3 then
See, if the Rift War saga by Raymond E Feist were made into films ...
Oh gods....Avatar.
I'm sure I've said it before, but, I fully acknowledge that the story is recycled from about 50 stories that also recycled it from other recycled stories....whatever. I still really enjoy it, because for me at least, the world and the development around it is so completely amazing that I'm drawn into the story of the planet. It's kinda like a really deeply detailed oil painted still life of a bowl of fruit. The foreground is utterly stereotypical and boring that most people would just pass it off as a hack job, but every inch of the background is so richly detailed and every inch of it is filled with so many fascinating little things that you could spend hours just looking at it.
*Sorry...that analogy came off a little more condescending than I intended...I'm just a guy that really enjoys looking at the background and the environment, and taking in every facet of the universe of a movie like that, if you aren't, cool.
Last edited by BigDamnArtist (2012-11-14 02:05:01)
Oh gods....Avatar.
I'm sure I've said it before, but, I fully acknowledge that the story is recycled from about 50 stories that also recycled it from other recycled stories....whatever. I still really enjoy it, because for me at least, the world and the development around it is so completely amazing that I'm drawn into the story of the planet. It's kinda like a really deeply detailed oil painted still life of a bowl of fruit. The foreground is utterly stereotypical and boring that most people would just pass it off as a hack job, but every inch of the background is so richly detailed and every inch of it is filled with so many fascinating little things that you could spend hours just looking at it.
*Sorry...that analogy came off a little more condescending than I intended...I'm just a guy that really enjoys looking at the background and the environment, and taking in every facet of the universe of a movie like that, if you aren't, cool.
Fully agree. Avatar worked solely because of the visually immersive novel 'wow' factor. But Avatar 2 better up the ante in terms of story as the same visuals ain't gonna cut it again.
I'm not so sure about that actually, if he were setting it in the same place, I would probably agree no hesistation. We've already seen the hometree tribe and the hallelujah mountains, and everything that's to do with the forest part of Pandora, not that I wouldn't love to spend more time there and discover more about the place, but we've seen enough that it would be really hard to recapture that absolutely amazement and engagement with the location.
Now, however, if the rumours are true and Cameron is actually setting Avatar 2 in one of the other tribes, specifically an ocean dwelling one (Cameron and ocean life...never saw that one coming) it's a whole new ball game. Everything we see will be something new and amazing and fascinating. And if they can pull it off nearly as successfully as they did for Avatar 1. I'm all on board, story or no.
Of course, if he did manage to knock the story and the universe out of the park, it would definitely be contender for my favourite movie of all time.
Sorry...yeah, I'm a huge universe building geek.
6. Have you overdosed on the movie/song/album/band/TV show? After binging on Jim Beam or chocolate cake, it may turn you off them for life. Why wouldn't it be the same for a movie? You can have too much of a good thing.
I'm reminded of the stages of anime fandom our group came up with long ago.
1. It all looks the same, kids with big eyes.
2. Hey... you know, there's something to this.
3. Wow, if you actually look, every director and character designer has a different style!
4. Cool, I've seen so much anime I can tell which animator the new ones apprenticed under!
5. It all looks the same...
6. Have you overdosed on the movie/song/album/band/TV show? After binging on Jim Beam or chocolate cake, it may turn you off them for life. Why wouldn't it be the same for a movie? You can have too much of a good thing.
I've seen Die Hard and Aliens too many times. I still can see why they're very good movies, but I can't be genuinely entertained by them anymore
I have that feeling with LOTR, same as Eddie mentioned in the episode, which is compounded by the exaggeration of their flaws by repeated viewings. I've also watched Mallrats way too many times.
It's why I'm reticent to watch Avengers again, which leads to:
13. Nostalgia, you might rewatch a film that you loved when you were younger, in a different state of mind, or you associate the viewing with happiness, but come away feeling lukewarm or even cold, such that you end up swinging the entire way to the opposite position on the spectrum - as evidenced by the talk of Chasing Amy in the episode.
I thought LA Confidential was one of the best films I'd ever seen coming out of the cinema, only to find years later that it was actually pretty average. I remember feeling so crestfallen.
It's why I'm reticent to watch Avengers again
It holds up to a second viewing really well.
On the other hand, I revisited The Goonies (a movie I grew up with) and it wasn't nearly as great as I remembered it.
Last edited by MartyJ (2012-11-14 16:57:44)
It's why I'm reticent to watch Avengers again
That's an interesting problem. Reluctance to re-watch something for the fear of ruining the first-time magic. I've had this with old TV shows that I loved when a kid e.g. Blakes 7, Space 1999, Thunderbirds, Hitchhikers. Now they'd all probably just be camp, lame, dumb, and cheap, etc. Humour, in particular, can date fast.
Better not to re-watch ,and preserve the pleasant memories.
I have that feeling with LOTR, same as Eddie mentioned in the episode, which is compounded by the exaggeration of their flaws by repeated viewings.
In a related way, watching old FX movies/TV now released on 1080p Blu-Ray reveals their flaws. What seemed awesome at the time is now riddled with obvious composits, grain differences, etc. The 1980s were full of blue-screen composits and stop-motion that don't date well and take you right out.
That's why every classic film needs to be re-made, over and over again, as each FX studio upgrades their plug-ins
old TV shows that I loved when a kid e.g. Space 1999
It was one of the few Western shows that were aired in Poland during the Communist era. I used to love it... and now it's just a strange 1970s artifact to me. Star Trek and The Twilight Zone still work for me, though (we got those two in Poland as late as 1990s).
What seemed awesome at the time is now riddled with obvious composits, grain differences, etc. The 1980s were full of blue-screen composits and stop-motion that don't date well and take you right out.
Dated visual effects can be considered a part of the charm of old movies. What really takes me out is the CGI added to the original Star Wars Trilogy. I would rather see some matte lines
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.
Currently installed 9 official extensions. Copyright © 2003–2009 PunBB.