Topic: Playing with Structure: "Death Flight"

Let's see if this takes off. If it doesn't, I put the blame squarely on Jeffery.

We're gonna write a movie over the course of nine posts, assuming each post is one third of one act. Let's see how close to a perfect movie structure we can get from the hive-mind.

Instead of letting it play out completely improvisationally, which would be fun but potentially imprecise storytelling, I'm gonna lay out a premise.

"After a catastrophic burst of the lower fuselage resulting in many onboard injuries and maybe death, an international flight is not allowed to make an emergency landing because of a flu virus carton that's been blown open."

We can have discussion between story-posts, but be sure to begin a story post with ***#***, where # is the number, of nine, of the story you're writing. That way it'll be easy to go from one to the next when scrolling through the thread.

This is just a treatment, after all, so posts should be in the one-to-three paragraph range, nothing fancy. Imagine you're laying out ten or twelve minutes of the movie.

Naturally 1-3 or so should introduce characters and situations, somewhere around 3-4 we get our problem, which compounds over 4-6, maybe have a false resolution in there, and then from 6-9 we wrap everything up. If people get a kick out of this, I think it'd be a fun exercise to do every now and then that might also enlighten the commentaries and discussion thereafter.

Teague Chrystie

I have a tendency to fix your typos.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Playing with Structure: "Death Flight"

Wow, neat. I always feel like I'm better at finding payoffs versus setups, so I'm going to jump in towards the end, but this should be interesting.

Last edited by Brian (2010-08-06 17:03:45)

Re: Playing with Structure: "Death Flight"

First, a stab at the basic structure.

There's got to be a someone on the plane who is responsible for the virus sample—which can't be in the baggage compartment or it would be too easy to isolate after landing. It would have to be a deadly strain smuggled aboard to be delivered to a drug lord for nefarious purposes. The mule gets mortally ill immediately to demonstrate the danger, and the virus is therefore known to have contaminated the passenger cabin.

Our heroes should probably be experts on the ground—maybe a crash investigator called in to try to help avert a crash for once and a virus expert from the CDC.

The centerpiece of the film has to be how they actually get the plane down (solving Teague's central conflict). Now, the logical thing to do is to ditch the plane in the water. But if they do that, then our heroes don't have anything more to do. So maybe the structure of the damaged plane would never take the stresses of a water landing.

If they somehow get the disabled plane to a rural airfield where they can quarantine it (piggyback on another plane?), you can then have the mule or some annoying prick escape and turn the story into a manhunt.

Last edited by Zarban (2010-08-06 23:16:32)

Warning: I'm probably rewriting this post as you read it.

Zarban's House of Commentaries

Re: Playing with Structure: "Death Flight"

Awesome!

Teague Chrystie

I have a tendency to fix your typos.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Playing with Structure: "Death Flight"

Alright alright ALRIGHT, hoooooold up a minute. I have to be that guy right now, because no else seems to want to take it up.

Firstly I would like to point out the irony of trying to write a "prefect movie" with the concept of trapped on a plane and aren't allowed to land. I believe someone gave us several good reasons why this would never ever actually happen, in a certain Die Hard commentary.

Alright so that aside, our basic premise so far is that an air borne deadly contagion (It must be airborne to get from the lower fuselage all the way into the passenger cabin, unless of course you want to play the ole "well a piece of shrapnel pierced the carton and then hit someone in the chest" card) is let loose on in an airplane mid flight and, logically, that plane is banned from landing anywhere.

Okay...let me break this down...Air Borne Contagion: A virus needing and using air to survive and spread. And as we all know, planes fly in a completely air free zone where absolutely no infected air can escape and infect the entire planet when the belly of that plane explodes, causing "many onboard injuries and maybe death"....except...wait.....shit.

So we have half an airplane coasting through the skies leaking contaminated air across the entire northern hemisphere as it circles above waiting to be able to land. Oh yeah, smart plan there guys...Are we sure these guys are actually on our side?

But what if the plane stays pressurized you ask? Well well, lets take a look at that one shall we....

So, we have a completely air tight airplane filled with a vicious contagion that spreads through air...alright...how about this...we land the completely air tight plane, that can in no way leak any bad little buggers into our precious safe air, we taxi it over to a really big hazmat tent. Seal it all up nice and tight like you do, and we crack the airplane and VOILA! We have a safe contained virus outbreak.

And hell, since I'm on a role...

@Zarban: can you please explain to me how crashing an infected plane filled with innocent civilians into the ocean releasing a deadly virus into the air while simultaneously killing most of the people on board, is the "logical" thing to do?

"If they somehow get the disabled plane to a rural airfield where they can quarantine it "

As opposed to the nice big open airstrip half a mile back with a nice smooth runway that we can land on and then move the thing into quarantine?

Sorry guys, but until you can logical explain these massive gaps in logic I'll never be able to buy this a "perfect" movie candidate, hell I probably wouldn't even consider a good movie...unless of course I am miraculously floored by the stunning wit and cleverness of the writing....delivered by Alan Tudyk.



(Please consider that the tone of this was jest but the points I make aren't, I seriously think this entire concept is flawed from the start)

ZangrethorDigital.ca

Re: Playing with Structure: "Death Flight"

maul2 is right, this all feels very fridgey to me. I think we have to start at the premise and work from there.

"After a catastrophic burst of the lower fuselage resulting in many onboard injuries and maybe death

Why? Planes don't normally do that, so why did it happen to this flight?

an international flight is not allowed to make an emergency landing because of a flu virus carton that's been blown open."

Anything that could be described as a flu virus carton would not be on a commercial flight. And smuggling it on would be ridiculous given how tight airport security is these days. It would be far easier and safer to smuggle it other ways, and no sane drug lord would smuggle it by air without very good reason. So, why is it there? And furthermore, as maul2 brought up, why is it keeping the plane from landing?

We need to answer those questions or make some changes before we can move further.

Last edited by ShadowDuelist (2010-08-08 08:44:32)

"ShadowDuelist is a god."
        -Teague Chrystie

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Playing with Structure: "Death Flight"

I have zero problem with the basic premise and here's why.

The bioterror angle Zarb explored is easy, but just to think out loud for a second … what if not? Organs for transplant are carried on commercial flights all the time, as carry-on packages in the passenger cabin.

We open on a narrow, winding road somewhere in the tropics. It's sunset, magic hour. From an aerial shot of rolling jungle-covered hills, we zoom in to a helmeted motorcyclist — obviously a woman, from her skin-tight leathers — tearing down the otherwise empty road.

Suddenly holy shit! There's a water buffalo in the road or something! She lays the bike down, skids a hundred feet down the road head-first into a tree. Smash-cut to black.

We fade in to the rider's POV. It's after dark now, but headlights light the scene with a cold glare. We see what are obviously paramedics working over her, chattering away in unsubtitled local yabber-yabber language. We see them put a mask over her nose, and inject things into her body, but the shot begins to iris out. We cut to a close-up of her face as her eyes go dead.

Next we're in a hospital. She's being rushed through corridors into an operating room. It all looks very normal, but the foreignness of it makes it somehow sinister. We're not sure what's going on; are they trying to save her, or is it something darker? She gets rushed into the OR, they cut the rest of the clothes off of her, then we get a gore-discretion montage of incisions and retractions and dissections, and then wet, dark, not-quite-seen things being dropped into stainless steel basins.

Then we do a continuity cut to a tight close-up on a small styrofoam cooler, about the size of a lunchbox, otherwise nondescript but for the big red official-looking label on it: HUMAN ORGAN. It's being carried through airport security by a young, scruffy-looking guy. He's our protagonist. Think somebody in the Bradley Cooper vein; improbably handsome, but just dorky enough to be plausible.

We're in an international airport, someplace exotic but civilized. Ho Chi Minh City, maybe. We see our guy make his way through security with like zero grasp of the local language, probably all MOS cause we're rolling the opening titles. He finds his way to his gate just as they're closing the door, and flops down in a window seat on the upper deck of the 747, in business class.

There he has a meet-cute with a Vietnamese girl next to him. She's barely legal, maybe 19. Rich parents, sending her to New York to go to school. Her English is terrible, but they flirt and laugh a lot. Because she can't read well, she doesn't realize what's in our guy's cooler. When she asks him, he awkwardly spins it around to hide the label against the bulkhead and changes the subject.

They take off, order drinks — he knows he shouldn't, but it's a long flight, and it's just a beer — and talk. She's gorgeous, and exotic, and clearly into him. We see an obvious mile-high-club opportunity in his future.

It's about this time that we hear an ominous creaking, groaning sound. For serious. It sounds like the Titanic's about to break up. The captain comes on the intercom, delivering a long speech in Vietnamese. The girl tries to translate for him. "Turbulence," she says, finally spitting out the word, grinning 'cause she got it. "That's it? That's all he said? He talked for like three minutes, and you give me one word?" They're laughing about it, but our guy is visibly anxious.

Then the captain starts repeating his little speech, this time in surprisingly unaccented English. (Commercial pilots speak English to air-traffic control; they're good at it, regardless of their native tongue.) But just as he gets to the part about rough air, the window by our guy's seat suddenly, and with absolutely no warning, explodes inward, the seal around the plexi failing catastrophically. It comes inside with the energy of a bomb, practically vaporizing our guy, his new girlfriend and, most importantly, the styro container with the transplant organ in it. That's right, folks, this is Psycho and they're both Janet Leigh.

The bulky business-class seats contain the force of the rupture for the most part, but our until-now presumed protagonists (and our mystery organ) are basically aerosolized, spraying the other passengers in the compartment with a thin mist of blood and tissue. (It'll be tricky to do this graphically enough to get the point across but not so bad we nauseate the audience.) Alarms are going off, oxygen masks are dropping from the overhead, people are start screaming once the second and a half of shock wears off, it's chaos.

But all things considered, it's not a catastrophe. Yeah, two people are dead and an international flight high over the Pacific is in danger, but it's not unprecedented. There are protocols for this kind of thing. All they have to do is declare an emergency, descend to under 10,000 feet so nobody suffocates in the unpressurized cabin, turn around and fly low and slow to the nearest airport. It'll take hours — low and slow, remember — but everybody's gonna be fine.

Until people in the upper-deck business-class cabin start getting sick.

(The contagion is definite blood-borne, and might be airborne through aerosolized mucus and saliva via sneezing and coughing. It's not spraying virus particles out the window as the plane circles, because Viruses Do Not Work That Way, but the way it spreads through the plane makes it clear that it'd be very difficult to reliably contain on the ground in a country with no real disease-control infrastructure like Vietnam. So the choices are let it land and let those guys take their chances, possibly causing a pandemic; get global ATC to divert the plane out over the ocean outside ground-based radar coverage and then covertly shoot it down; or redirect it to the United States where at least CDC containment guys have a chance of keeping the infected people secure, and just maybe curing some or all of them.)

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Playing with Structure: "Death Flight"

Love it.

Maul: That's what a good writer has to do with the terrible premise of a movie they're working with. (And it is a terrible premise; I chose it on purpose. It's the summary of a 70's movie they once did on Mystery Science Theater 3000 that was also called "Death Flight." We're remaking it. smile)

I'm a little surprised by a couple of the points you make in your post. One, that any particular type of movie is more likely to shape up to be a perfect one than any other, when we've established that a perfect movie doesn't have to be Citizen Kane, it just has to land all of its internal arcs gracefully and in a way that makes perfect sense but isn't obvious. 300 isn't on another plane (heyo!) of stupidity, and yet perfect we deem it.

Two, magic beans, yo, magic beans.

EDIT: So, now we need to figure out what variety of sick these people are gonna get, and why, what exactly they're experiencing. We can choose to not tell the audience that detail, but we should know it. We also need to figure out literally how we're gonna tell the rest of this story, because I think Zarban was right, a lot of the coolest stuff will be happening on the ground. Unless we want to make an exploitation movie about people turning into zombie lepers on a plane. (If so, we should tell the marketing people now.)

Teague Chrystie

I have a tendency to fix your typos.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Playing with Structure: "Death Flight"

maul2 wrote:

@Zarban: can you please explain to me how crashing an infected plane filled with innocent civilians into the ocean releasing a deadly virus into the air while simultaneously killing most of the people on board, is the "logical" thing to do?

(Please consider that the tone of this was jest but the points I make aren't, I seriously think this entire concept is flawed from the start)

A certain mustachioed pilot named Chesley Sullenberger landed a fully-loaded airliner in the Hudson Fucking River not so long ago with no fatalities.

As for the flawed concept: that's the point. This isn't a challenge to write a good movie. It's a challenge to write a movie that satisfies all the action plot points within the parameters given by the executive producer.

I'm on board with Jeffery's idea, but I'm not going to be the one to explain to the executive producer that he's changed it from a flu virus to a blood-borne pathogen. The marketing people probably will go nuts, because this is scheduled to come out during flu season, man.

Last edited by Zarban (2010-08-20 21:37:36)

Warning: I'm probably rewriting this post as you read it.

Zarban's House of Commentaries

Re: Playing with Structure: "Death Flight"

I can totally imagine Trey saying that first sentence, it's odd. You channeled the Stokes.

Anyway. Everyone is welcome to throw ideas around the nature of the blood illness and how to carry on telling the story, it's a room write. Ideas don't have to be fully formed, they can just be pieces of sand to be left in the oyster of our...love, I forgot where this metaphor was going. Fucking someone talk about blood illness.

EDIT: Wiki page on Blood-borne diseases.

EDIT 2: And I don't know about you guys, but viral hemorrhagic fevers sound like our princess. What an amazing phrase. Viral hemorrhagic fever. Viral hemorrhagic fever. I'm already psyched for mine!

Teague Chrystie

I have a tendency to fix your typos.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Playing with Structure: "Death Flight"

Ever read "The Hot Zone?" The hard part about telling a story about hemorrhagic fever is making it sound even remotely plausible. Truth is stranger than … and so on.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Playing with Structure: "Death Flight"

Do we want the plane to be the location of the central conflict with "mission control" as a supporting plot? Or is the plane more of a Macguffin and the central conflict happens in mission control? Is our main character on the plane or on the ground? And in either case, what are they trying to do?

If they're on the plane, then they're either trying to (A) Land the plane and/or (B) Stop the disease. If they're trying to land the plane...well, then, we're pretty much talking about Airplane! here. So maybe not so much. And based on Jeffrey's write up, not so much with trying to stop the disease.

When you get right down to it, there's only so much characters trapped on a plane can do and a good story requires characters doing things. So let's put the main action on the ground.

So our guy (or girl) is...what? An air traffic controller? Somebody from the CDC?

Isn't viral hemorrhagic fever the Ebola virus or something like that? The term seems familiar in the context of these kinds of movies.

Re: Playing with Structure: "Death Flight"

We could also go full retard and make it an exploitation film. People just start falling apart because of bullshit science. Add some Wu Tang and funky color correction, cast Bruce, call it a day and rake in the $2 million from DVD rentals.

Just sayin,' it's an option.

If not, I think keeping it on the plane will be the least difficult on the audience...but taking it to the CDC or mission control would be the least difficult on the writers. Easier to convey information to the audience if there's someone there just saying it. We could also have a CDC guy on the plane, who was travelling...with...the...nevermind, not gonna work. If he was there, then there would surely be more to-do about protecting the organ and the passengers.

Unless this is an under-the-radar operation. Maybe in the initial stages of her dissection, they realized she was immune to XYZ, and the doctor who noticed it clandestinely pocketed a chunk of her liver because he knew how much he could make selling it to some black market pharma dude Stateside. It's possible over the course of his traveling with said organ, Bradley Cooper has become sick, and therefore spreads a lot of this virus she was riddled with but unaffected by. (When he, ha, sublimates.) That gives us a bunch of sick people who don't know the antidote is present on the plane.

Teague Chrystie

I have a tendency to fix your typos.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Playing with Structure: "Death Flight"

Yeah, Ebola is one type of VHF. There are a bunch, mostly found in the tropics, but in both hemispheres. For the most part they're incurable, but are treatable with extremely intensive care. There are some antiviral therapies, but generally you heroically treat the symptoms, and the patient has a reasonable chance of surviving. Untreated, they're almost certainly (and horribly) fatal.

I'm kind of charmed by the idea of having a morally ambiguous conflict at the center of the story. On the one hand, there's the ethicist who says we need to land the plane in Seattle as soon as possible, with a CDC team on the ground, in order to both contain the outbreak and save as many of the infected as possible. On the other hand, there's the "they're dead already" pragmatist who says that by ditching the plane in the deep ocean we can definitely solve the problem with no risk to anyone who's not already aboard the plane.

Meanwhile, there's the "is this bioterrorism" angle — small explosion aboard a plane in flight, passengers exposed to a toxin or infectious agent, it's not hard to suspect that the event was supposed to happen at the gate or in the airport. And then there's the "it's a long way to the United States, what if the air crew dies before they get there and the plane crashes over somewhere populated" problem.

So it's a race against the clock, and a prelude-to-war, and a somewhat intellectual debate between two positions that are both right and both wrong.

I dunno, I'm just riffin'. I'm sure somebody else will have a better idea that any of that.

Also, the more I think along these lines the more it sounds like a season of "24," and I would really, really like it if somebody would push us away from that direction.

Last edited by Jeffery Harrell (2010-08-08 17:17:33)

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Playing with Structure: "Death Flight"

Eh, I say we reach for the brass ring and try to justify everything as best we can, even already acknowledging that the premise isn't the most grounded (HA!).

If we fall short, well, it's a thread on the Internet, we won't have lost much.

Re: Playing with Structure: "Death Flight"

http://img375.imageshack.us/img375/2263/deathflight.jpg


I stole the credits from a Transformers poster.

Teague Chrystie

I have a tendency to fix your typos.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Playing with Structure: "Death Flight"

You even went for authentic livery. Impressive.

The suits are probably gonna make us set the opening in Equatorial Kundu, though, for legal reasons.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Playing with Structure: "Death Flight"

downinfront wrote:

Maybe in the initial stages of her dissection, they realized she was immune to XYZ, and the doctor who noticed it clandestinely pocketed a chunk of her liver because he knew how much he could make selling it to some black market pharma dude Stateside. It's possible over the course of his traveling with said organ, Bradley Cooper has become sick, and therefore spreads a lot of this virus she was riddled with but unaffected by. (When he, ha, sublimates.) That gives us a bunch of sick people who don't know the antidote is present on the plane.

No thoughts on this?

Teague Chrystie

I have a tendency to fix your typos.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Playing with Structure: "Death Flight"

D'oh. Didn't even see it. Did you do a sneaky-sneaky back-door edit of your post?

Anyway. Thoughts. First thing that pops into my head is the implausibility of a surgeon sneaking a tissue sample out of an operating room. That's not a story critique; I'm trying to imagine how he'd do it. The protocol when you're doing path is to send the sample out of the OR immediately, while the patient's still on the table being operated on. So if the surgeon wanted to get the sample out, he'd have to have one of the techs hold it in the OR until the surgery's over … or … I dunno. I don't have that yet.

Can I change my idea? I mean, we're just talking here, but over the afternoon something's popped into my head. Stay on the plane. The whole movie takes place entirely on the plane (modulo establishing exteriors and whatever).

Open with a news-footage montage. There's been yet another major flu outbreak, this time in southeast Asia. Singapore or Hong Kong; someplace with direct flights to JFK. (I'll come back to why this is important.) It's the seventh one in two years, or something, and by far the most deadly. Include stock footage of SARS, bird flu, swine flu. Asian people in masks, overwhelmed hospitals, livestock being destroyed. The virus has been contained, but just barely, and the death toll is in the thousands. Samples of the virus are being shipped to the CDC in Atlanta (and other major centers around the world) for study in the hopes of finding an antiviral vaccine.

We have our guy on the plane, with a double-wrapped cooler. He's a doc, or a medical scientist, or some kind of egghead. Then something serious happens — "a catastrophic burst of the lower fuselage resulting in many onboard injuries and maybe death," say — and there's major chaos. People get flung from their seats, overhead bins fall open, luggage spills everywhere. They're not gonna crash, but as they recover and start identifying the injured, our guy sees that somebody's fallen onto his cooler, bursting it open, and scattering petri dishes, some of which have been broken.

Everybody in the cabin's been exposed to the virus. And it's a 22-hour flight. (Told you I'd come back to that.) That's just enough time for the bug to incubate and divide and spread throughout the plane. When they land, 400 walking flu bombs are gonna scatter in a million directions throughout the global transport system. It's apocalypse in a can.

So our guy does what he has to do. He gets a stewardess, who gets the captain, and our guy says no matter what, this plane absolutely cannot land.

Over the course of the story, we learn that the people on the ground are doing various stuff, trying to find an answer. But we get only bits and pieces via terse radio messages. The imaginations of the passengers run wild, and before long herd mentality sets in. Now the dangers have multiplied. Are they all infected? Are they all dying already? Is the plane going to be shot down? Or are the passengers going to riot and end up forcing the plane to crash through mass hysteria?

Could be an extremely tense little thriller.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Playing with Structure: "Death Flight"

(Er. Except we'd need a reason why the plane isn't simply diverted to a military airfield in Alaska and the passengers put into quarantine and treated. Damn.)

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Playing with Structure: "Death Flight"

But what if it turns out to be a zombie virus? The people on the ground know this, and they do not what that shit in the US, no matter how tight the quarantine. For most of the movie it appears to be what Jeffery described, but just when it looks like they might make it, it's revealed that the military is going to blow the plane once it's over water and people start turning into zombies. However, some of the passengers are shown to be immune to the virus, and, realizing what's happening, are determined to find a way to survive.

"ShadowDuelist is a god."
        -Teague Chrystie

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Playing with Structure: "Death Flight"

I'm very concerned about the frequent discussions of "plausibility" here. Step 1 of screenwriting is deciding who you want horrible/awesome things to happen to. Step 2 is what horrible/awesome things happen. Step 11 is making it plausible.

I say figure out who your main characters are first. Otherwise, you're gonna end up making Snakes on a Plane and casting Sam Jackson as a hail Mary.

I recommend a coked-out lesbian aircraft expert and a fresh-faced lesbian CDC contagion expert trying to turn her life around after a failed traditional marriage.

Warning: I'm probably rewriting this post as you read it.

Zarban's House of Commentaries

Re: Playing with Structure: "Death Flight"

Don't let me drag you down, Zarban. It's just my process.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Playing with Structure: "Death Flight"

I like Zarban's idea.

Teague Chrystie

I have a tendency to fix your typos.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Playing with Structure: "Death Flight"

I feel you can't really have a story about a plane potentially going down and killing everyone on board without having at least one protagonist on board, or somebody intimately connected to your protagonist on the ground - you'll remember Die Hard II put McClane's wife on board one of the planes. So the story should definitely follow somebody on the plane. And when you have one person, unless he's a single pilot locked in the cockpit, he'll need other characters to interact with.

Or maybe that's the way to go - have the story be about the pilot who's flying the plane, a plane full of highly contagious 'Captain Trips' level infected people.  He has to wrestle with the dilemma  - does he sacrifice himself and crash into the ocean, does he attempt to land the plane with the help of ground control and the kind female voice at the other end, or does he follow a mysterious third party who insists that he land at a military base? What does his more experienced 'veteran but passed over for captain too many times' chip on his shoulder co-pilot think? And what about the passengers, who are trying to get into the cabin to stop him from killing them all even though they're doomed?

So you have conflicts set up multiple ways - with himself (he has a family waiting for him), with his copilot in the cabin (an uncertain ally), with the increasingly angry crowd trying to bash their way to him (and who try to sabotage the plane any which way they can), with ground control, and with the military (who come the climax could attempt to force the plane to divert).

Following problem solvers on the ground, who are in no danger themselves, lacks dramatic punch and you have to invent some bullshit reason about why they are doing what they're doing if they don't have somebody on the plane they know. 'I lost my little brother down a well when I was 11 and now I want to save everyone I can'. Reluctant heroes, ordinary people thrown into extraordinary situations, are arguably more engaging protagonists, and the scientist on the ground in his lab isn't in that extraordinary situation (he's just more stressed). It's perfect for a subplot though, the race against time that we return to every few scenes to get a break from the plane itself - although I like the idea of keeping all the action on the plane. We just hear about the scientists from the military guy, is he even telling the truth? And all we have of ground control is this measured and encouraging female voice, who seems to be saying all the rights things but is just a little too good to be true. Heck, it sounds like it's an automated voice sometimes...

As a huge fan of the Outer Limits, I'd have the ending be a real punch in the guts. With the co-pilot, who's become infected as well, forcibly overcoming our younger protagonist and landing the plane at the military base with its promise of a cure. Leaving our young captain tied up, the co-pilot opens the cabin door to see that the rest of the passengers have all died. He walks over and in between their bodies, somewhat horrified since this is his fate and then opens the plane door. He looks out to see an army of fully HAZMAT equipped soldiers pointing rifles at him. They fire and he crumples backwards into the plane where he can be seen by the captain. Soldiers board the plane and as the captain watches helplessly a soldier shoots the moaning co-pilot again in the head. Soldiers walk to the cockpit, pick the captain up and take him away. Outside over the shoulder of his apparent rescuer he sees the soldiers torching the plane with flamethrowers. Wide shot of him being carrried to a large complex of white tents. Roll credits.

Imagination will often carry us to worlds that never were. But without it we go nowhere. - Carl Sagan

Thumbs up Thumbs down