Topic: "TOTAL RECALL [2012]" Review by Dorkman (No Spoilers)

X-post from my blog.

I suppose I should start with this: I do not personally hold the original film sacred. Part of it comes from not vibrating on quite the same wavelength as Verhoeven in general -- his brand of ultra-violent "satire" often strikes me as tonally uneven and mean -- but part of it is simply the fact I saw it only within the last few years, too late to have any nostalgic affection for it. I don't hate it by any means, but I'm not constitutionally opposed to putting another spin on the same material. Your mileage may vary depending on your own relationship with the Schwarzenegger film.

Your mileage will also vary depending on how much you enjoyed the following films:

  • BLADE RUNNER

  • MINORITY REPORT

  • THE FIFTH ELEMENT

  • THE BOURNE IDENTITY

  • and THE CORE

If those are films you enjoyed and do not especially mind watching again, you will probably enjoy the new TOTAL RECALL, which doesn't so much mix them all together as simply line them up one after the other in a sort of action film interpretive dance.

In the new TOTAL RECALL, there is no Mars colony. Instead, Western Europe (now the "United Federation of Britain") and Australia (now "The Colony") have been rendered the only inhabitable places on Earth due to some kind of apocalypse of chemical warfare. The Colony is where the underclass of society, the working poor, live their lives in an urban crush whose production design so flagrantly cribs BLADE RUNNER, I actually found myself admiring director Len Wiseman's restraint in not putting fluorescent tubes in the oil-paper umbrellas. They commute every day to the UFB for work, via a giant elevator ("The Fall") which plunges through the center of the planet. The journey takes 17 minutes.

Okay, so this is important: if you cannot get on board with what I just said, do not go see TOTAL RECALL. If you are going to become distracted by the "smoking section" logic of the chemical blight (i.e. it just knows where it's not welcome and keeps to itself) -- or wondering how a world so apocalyptically devastated could summon up the infrastructure and political will, let alone the resources, to build an elevator shaft through the center of the planet -- or aggravated by the impossibility of building said elevator shaft through a liquid mantle which spins at a different rate than the crust, before you even get to objecting about the heat or pressure (the visualized diagrams of The Fall do, at least, have it deflect around the planet's core rather than plowing through) -- if you aren't prepared to count all of that, which is presented in prologue, as an acceptable element of the story's magic bean, don't even walk in that theatre.

If you are willing to shrug and say, "fine," then you'll be treated to a film which does an impression of a number other films but, to its credit, does those impressions really well. Wiseman resists the urge to overstylize that made UNDERWORLD mildly obnoxious. With the exception of the digital "Colin Farrell kills everyone" one-er showcased in the trailer, it doesn't get in your face with the style, making it easy to lose yourself in the action -- which is frequently exciting, if a tad repetitive and overlong.

I would have been willing to sacrifice a minute or two from every action scene (and five from the climax) if it meant time put towards character development, particularly the relationship between Colin Farrell's Quaid and Jessica Biel's Whoever-She-Is. Unfortunately, like so many action-adventure films, the film treats their relationship as something we must simply accept as stated rather than experiencing it for ourselves. The actors are all solid and fun to watch. I love seeing Bryan Cranston everywhere I look right now. They're all, aside from Farrell himself, undeniably one-dimensional -- but then, if the events of the film are just a pulpy adventure fed into Quaid's mind by the technicians at Rekall, they would be. The film plays with issues of reality vs. Rekall about as much as the original did, and even tries to go one better by giving some (not a lot, but some) resonance to Quaid's search for identity and understanding.

I often forget to mention VFX in my reviews, because so many talented people work so incredibly hard on every single movie we've reached a point where top-notch VFX are really only noteworthy in their absence, but the work is so extensive and so consistently good here, I have to take a moment to say bravo. Every sci-fi movie since BLADE RUNNER has dreamed of looking like this.

The original TOTAL RECALL was a ridiculous but quirky sci-fi actioner, and the remake is equally ridiculous, replacing quirk with scope and scale. I don't think anyone will develop any deep affections for this film the way they have for the original -- lacking as it is in personality, there's not much to have affection toward. But I don't believe every movie has to change your life, and though TOTAL RECALL didn't engage me intellectually, I didn't find it insulting me either.

It's a perfectly enjoyable few hours of spectacle, worth soaking in on the big screen in glorious 2D. Nothing more -- but nothing less either. Compared to the usual "summer blockbuster," I consider that a win.

Thumbs up +1 Thumbs down

Re: "TOTAL RECALL [2012]" Review by Dorkman (No Spoilers)

Good review; well written; like your style. This movie is already allocated to the "I'll watch it on Netflix" rank, where midnight IMAX screening is the equivalent to five-stars, and 'I'll buy the blu-ray' is three stars and 'I'll watch it on my iPhone on the way to work' is one star.

not long to go now...

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: "TOTAL RECALL [2012]" Review by Dorkman (No Spoilers)

Good review Mike, nice flow. I might catch this in the theatre given your comment on the vfx, it was going to be one I grabbed on disc.

There is one serious, pressing question your review didn't address; is there a woman with three breasts?

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: "TOTAL RECALL [2012]" Review by Dorkman (No Spoilers)

I think there was a good Total Recall remake to be made, because the original is definitely a goofy and crazy approach to a great concept, and you could definitely make a serious version.

The problem is that they haven't made this new version any less crazy (and even less plausible by the sound of that elevator thing)

You're basically trading ultra-violence and humour for really elaborate CG action, and for me, the former is nearly always better in an action movie.

They should've truly thrown out the original movie and made something that felt completely different. I feel like a serious version of this story should be much more like Memento, or Inception, in terms of approach and style. Scale the action WAY back, make it an intense psychological mystery story. Get Nolan, or Alfonso Cuaron, or Fincher to do it. THAT would be a great movie.

As it stands, this remake seems to basically be the same ridiculous approach from the 90s version, but minus all the charm, humour, and violence that make it a memorable movie. So basically totally pointless.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: "TOTAL RECALL [2012]" Review by Dorkman (No Spoilers)

I'd watch a Total Recall remake by someone like Darren Aronofsky.

Len Wiseman? Yawn.

Re: "TOTAL RECALL [2012]" Review by Dorkman (No Spoilers)

I'm tired of good-looking action movies with little or no character and humor. The Island broke my spirit.

EDIT: Where have all the script doctors gone? Honestly, all you need is someone who can write two scenes where the main characters make an honest connection and 8 lines that are funny, and put that in a movie that already has awesome special effects and you've got a cash cow.

Last edited by Zarban (2012-08-06 00:12:12)

Warning: I'm probably rewriting this post as you read it.

Zarban's House of Commentaries

Re: "TOTAL RECALL [2012]" Review by Dorkman (No Spoilers)

Ya, we desperately need hollywood trends to swing back towards the cheesier 80s stuff, cause I am so fucking tired of grim, lifeless action movies.

Fingers crossed for Expendables 2 (and also The Last Stand, if anyone can make an awesome Schwarzenegger movie it's Kim-Je Woon, that guy has an amazing eye for action)

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: "TOTAL RECALL [2012]" Review by Dorkman (No Spoilers)

Dave wrote:

Good review Mike, nice flow. I might catch this in the theatre given your comment on the vfx, it was going to be one I grabbed on disc.

There is one serious, pressing question your review didn't address; is there a woman with three breasts?


I haven't seen the movie......... yet(!).
But, I can only presume from seeing the latest trailer that there is, in fact, a 3-breasted prostitute.
Also, Conan O'Brian did an interview with Kate Beckinsale recently, and she mentioned that her husband(the director) wanted her to play the role of the 3-breasted prostitute when her schedule looked like she wouldn't be able to commit to a more prominent role in the film. But, we know now, that her schedule worked out, and she is in the movie, but, not as said prostitute.

Those who would trade liberties for securities, deserve neither liberties, nor securities.
-Benjamin Franklin

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: "TOTAL RECALL [2012]" Review by Dorkman (No Spoilers)

It's PG-13, so if nipples are allowed, it'll be for a split-second and no fondling allowed.
But PG-13 doesn't prevent you from having 1000 bloodless shooting deaths aka 'A-Team violence'

not long to go now...

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: "TOTAL RECALL [2012]" Review by Dorkman (No Spoilers)

I have only a marginal interest in ever seeing this, and even I knew that there was a three breasted woman in it.

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sh … ecall.html

ZangrethorDigital.ca

Re: "TOTAL RECALL [2012]" Review by Dorkman (No Spoilers)

It's interesting that while the overall direction of prudishness has been improving over the last century, around the 1980s onwards, it split i.e. there was a reversal back into puritanism when it came to nudity, but graphic violence continued to get much more frequent & realistic. But recently, both have declined again in mainstream cinema (most tentpoles are PG-13). I was surprised how sanitized TDKR was.

not long to go now...

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: "TOTAL RECALL [2012]" Review by Dorkman (No Spoilers)

avatar wrote:

I was surprised how sanitized TDKR was.

Making TDKR a hard R would improve the movie a lot.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: "TOTAL RECALL [2012]" Review by Dorkman (No Spoilers)

Lamer wrote:
avatar wrote:

I was surprised how sanitized TDKR was.

Making TDKR a hard R would improve the movie a lot.

it's a pity Nolan doesn't do Director's Cuts. It could do with a Hard 'R' (Unrated Blu-Ray?) and maybe a few extra scenes to flesh out  Selena, etc. Wait - that didn't come out right.

not long to go now...

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: "TOTAL RECALL [2012]" Review by Dorkman (No Spoilers)

Given the original story is just a few pages long, and never leaves the memory place, you can adapt the thing any way you want. Hell, from memory, the story is actually from the point of view of the staff, who keep finding more hidden personalities in this guy.

I write stories! With words!
http://www.asstr.org/~Invid_Fan/

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: "TOTAL RECALL [2012]" Review by Dorkman (No Spoilers)

Ya, there's so many different ways you could go with the story. Another reason this was such a criminally missed opportunity. They could have totally started it out like the Arnie version, then have some crazy mind-fuck twist/subversion a third of the way through, and go off into a completely different story.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: "TOTAL RECALL [2012]" Review by Dorkman (No Spoilers)

bullet3 wrote:

Ya, there's so many different ways you could go with the story. Another reason this was such a criminally missed opportunity. They could have totally started it out like the Arnie version, then have some crazy mind-fuck twist/subversion a third of the way through, and go off into a completely different story.

But that wouldn't be playing it safe. That would be taking risks.

$100M+ budget = no risks. Unfortunately.

not long to go now...

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: "TOTAL RECALL [2012]" Review by Dorkman (No Spoilers)

avatar wrote:

But that wouldn't be playing it safe. That would be taking risks.

$100M+ budget = no risks. Unfortunately.

And this is why we can't have nice films. (R.I.P. BIOSHOCK  sad )

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: "TOTAL RECALL [2012]" Review by Dorkman (No Spoilers)

I finally saw this on the plane, it was not a happy experience.

Aside from the hole in the middle of the earth thing, what bothered me the most was

  Show
the inclusion of  scenes that Quaid wasn't involved with, and couldn't have known about.

Part of the enjoyment of the original film was determining if it was an elaborate fantasy sequence or actually happening to the character. In this remake, there are cuts to conversations outside of areas where Quaid could have overheard, or experienced, which changes the entire point of the story. Now it's no longer his fantasy, but a narrative of events which actually happened in that universe.

From the first of these scenes, I was no longer on board with the remake.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: "TOTAL RECALL [2012]" Review by Dorkman (No Spoilers)

Man, those robot cops are useless. They only kill innocent passers-by and never hit their target.

not long to go now...

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: "TOTAL RECALL [2012]" Review by Dorkman (No Spoilers)

My biggest issue was Colin bitching about his life while being married to Kate Beckinsale...

Thumbs up +1 Thumbs down