Re: #45 - Unpopular Opinions
Speed Racer is a perfect movie. I don't understand why it didn't get better reviews.
Search your feelings Xtroid, you know it to be true.
Totally agree on Speed Racer Phi.
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Speed Racer is a perfect movie. I don't understand why it didn't get better reviews.
Search your feelings Xtroid, you know it to be true.
Totally agree on Speed Racer Phi.
Is that the My Little Pony version of Shia LaBeouf?
Am I the only one who finds the premise of The Cable Guy compelling? That poor kid raised by a TV set... he's not that different from us. Nowadays, he would feel at home here or at TV Tropes.
The movie could have been executed better, but I think it deserves much more credit than people give it.
Oh I love The Cable Guy. Doesn't get near the props it deserves.
I confess:
Waterworld is pretty much my favourite movie of all time. Oh, that escapism..
I don't understand why Coen-brothers' movies are considered good or funny (Big Lebowsky or Oh brother, where art you). Fargo is rather good though.
Same goes to Woody Allen. His movies are ok (no more), but defenetly not funny to me. He recently made series of romantic movies in romantic european cities. What cities he picks? Paris, Rome etc.. Talking about playing it safe. Who saw that coming?
Speaking of saw: I really like Saw. It has that special atmosphere and that twist always gets me. But only the first one, others are..well, nobody likes others, so here we go..
I also don´t get what´s original or funny in Dave Chappelle. To me, its´all about "Black people - white people" + lots of swearing in between.
My favourite Bond is Roger Moore. He made Cold War fun.
I heard a lot about Community - tv-show. When I saw several episodes, I first thought I made a mistake and picked up some different show. Sadly, I didn't.
I understand most of those are comedies and any opinion on a topic can only be subjective.
But not Saw. Saw is not funny. Saw is serious. And it will get you.
Saw
Last edited by Scooperfield (2012-11-27 19:39:25)
I don't like Roman Polanski... and I like people a little bit less when they confess love for him as filmmaker. I will not divorce the man from the artist. And I like the people who chose to work with him also a little bit less.
I don't like Roman Polanski... and I like people a little bit less when they confess love for him as filmmaker. I will not divorce the man from the artist. And I like the people who chose to work with him also a little bit less.
I think he's a dick. And I lost respect for Whoopi Goldberg when she made that 'not rape, rape' comment. I do like Chinatown, though and I won't defend myself as I don't feel I need to. It doesn't mean I like Polanksi.
And I feel the same way about the singer Chris Brown. He has many adoring female fans who can't get past his looks and voice. Silly little girls. I find him repugnant and will never think what he did is ok. Despite the fact that Rihanna has 'forgiven' him. He's still a cunt.
I do like Chinatown, though and I won't defend myself as I don't feel I need to.
I can't condone what he did (how can anybody condone raping a 13-year-old girl?), but I have to admit some of his movies work really well for me (like Chinatown and Rosemary's Baby).
Consider watching Roman Polanski: Wanted and Desired. Creep, yes (he also had a relationship with an underage Nastassja Kinski), but a creep who tried to get right with the victim and the law and got jerked around.
And it's not like Polanski is the only creep who ever made a movie.
Last edited by Zarban (2012-11-27 23:58:00)
Also worth noting that the charge was not rape, it was sexual relations with a minor - still a crime, yes, and still a bad idea in my opinion, but the "victim" herself never claimed to have been raped.
In a 2003 interview, she mentions that she resented the media, the police, and her parents' actions far more than she ever did Polanski's.
Chris Brown is still a cunt, though, right? Just so we are all clear on that
Yay!
Zarban makes a good point, Polanski is not the only creep to make a film. I would class Victor Salva as a worse person that Polanski. He is an actual genuine registered sex offender. And he made a film for Disney! And he's a cunt.
And if we are talking underage relationships with girls, we should probably talk about almost every rock star from the 70s
Last edited by Jimmy B (2012-11-28 00:15:52)
And it's not like Polanski is the only creep who ever made a movie.
Nevertheless, I still feel a little ashamed for him (many people think he's French, but he actually comes from Poland). Sure, he's really talented (as a director and an actor), but I feel the Polish film industry has forgiven him a bit too easily.
Not to also find another dimension of excuses for Roman Polanski, but also bear in mind that his wife and unborn child were both murdered by The Manson Family and...well, you might become worse at being human yourself.
I understand what you're saying Eddie and I know you're not actually defending him but I doubt the horrible death of his family made him suddenly develop a penchant for underage girls......
I have t-shirts older than the child he intoxicated and sodomized. He's scum and won't get a penny of my money while he's alive. And get out of here with the, "he isn't the only one." I won't pay to watch Powder either. A scum is a scum is a scum.
And it's called statutory rape, Trey. Let's not pretend it was anything different.
Oh I make no apologies for the crime. It involved drugs and was non-consensual, so that, Whoopie, is rape rape. His family tragedy—and even growing up a hunted, orphaned Jew in WW2 Poland—don't do much to change that.
He clearly deserved prison time, and the girl's lawyer agreed to probation only to avoid more trauma. But the judge was going to renege on the plea bargain to look tough in the press and throw the book at him.
Given that the victim feels he's suffered enough, I think it's pointless to act like Polanski deserves more than 35 years of punishment as an outcast and fugitive (albeit one with a mansion).
Last edited by Zarban (2012-11-28 03:24:55)
Given that the victim feels he's suffered enough, I think it's pointless to act like Polanski deserves more than 35 years of punishment as an outcast and fugitive (albeit one with a mansion).
I don't want to argue too much on this point, cause I can see it either way. But I'm not shedding any tears for a guy who lives a plush life in France and still gets to make movies with relative impunity. France isn't a prison. I don't consider 35 years of that to be a punishment of any kind, really.
But that's me.
Given that the victim feels he's suffered enough, I think it's pointless to act like Polanski deserves more than 35 years of punishment as an outcast and fugitive (albeit one with a mansion).
And an outcast with half of Hollywood behind him......
Safe place! safe place! I thought you said this was a safe place!
Few more unpopular opinions:
* My favorite director is John Sayles. I've taken a lot of shit for that although I don't think this forums will give me any grief over that one.
* My all time favorite movie is Lone Star. It's the movie I would most like to have made myself.
* I think Matthew McConaughey is not a bad actor (But I'll admitt he has made his share of stinkers). I like Nick Cage for that matter too.
* My go-to-movies when I'm sick... Indiana Jones (Not unpopular), National Treasure, Sahara, Romancing The Stone and The Mummy.
* I like the The Young Indiana Jones Chronicles.
* I like the Tales of the Gold Monkey.
* My favourite vfx commentary to a movie is the Volker Engel commentary to ID4.
* I liked both the Lost and BSG endings.
Last edited by AshDigital (2012-11-28 19:07:30)
I liked the ending to Lost, I just didn't like a lot of season six as a whole. I thought it was a beautiful and fitting end but to this day I see that some people still think they were in Purgatory the whole time and none of it happened. Which is annoying
The Lost ending wasn't bad at all, the show had much bigger issues. I rewatched it recently from beginning to end - it sometimes feels like the writers simply didn't know where they were going. When multi-season arcs are considered, I think nothing beats Babylon 5 (it feels very consistent, maybe except Season 5... but that's only because the show was canceled and then un-canceled).
The Lost writers knew the last scene as soon as they knew Jack was going to be the main focus. It was originally going to be Kate and Jack was going to get killed in the pilot and be played by Michael Keaton. I'm pretty sure they didn't know time travel was going to get introduced or what the smoke monster was, that got changed along the way for sure. They did always say they had an ending so I believe they had planned the following things in advance- SPOILERS FOR LOST BELOW
One season of flashbacks were not really going to be flashbacks and that some of them will get off the Island
The last season would be another misdirect and again it wouldn't be flashbacks
That last scene and some leave the Island, apparently for good.
I doubt all that Jacob/Man In Black stuff was there from the start. Or the fact that they were going to totally screw over John Locke as a character.
Anyone looking for a quick runthrough of what the Lost writers knew when (in the context of telling the story of the show's origins) should read this excerpt from Alan Sepinwall's book The Revolution was Televised:
http://www.grantland.com/story/_/id/867 … igins-lost
On topic of unpopular opinions: I think having a big detailed plan for where your story is gonna go beyond what you're writng right now is vastly overrated. By this I don't mean that you shouldn't think ahead, you should just be wary of locking yourself in too much. Especially when writing television.
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.
Currently installed 9 official extensions. Copyright © 2003–2009 PunBB.