Topic: "Brave" review by Doctor Submarine [Mild Spoilers, marked]

Woohoo! The inaugural post for this shiny new board. I'm honored. Anyway, here's a Brave review.

The original post is on my blog here.

Walking into Brave, I was ready to change 2012′s moniker from “Summer of Hype” to “Summer of Disappointment”. The Avengers was a big letdown despite months – years, really – of endlessly oppressive advertising. Prometheus was even worse. What was supposed to be the return of intelligent, thoughtful big-budget science-fiction was an idiotic trainwreck. (Oh yes, I’ll get to Prometheus eventually. Maybe one day when I’m feeling particularly surly I’ll talk about that piece of crap.) Amongst all these hugely hyped blockbusters, I almost forgot about Brave, the new Pixar film. After the godawful mess that was Cars 2, I was less optimistic than ever about Pixar’s future. So I can’t call Brave a disappointment, because I wasn’t that excited for it to begin with. This stems mainly from the awful ads and trailers which gave little information about the plot. From the trailers, I gathered that it was about a Scottish princess who wanted to be free or something. And there was something about a bear, I guess. The trailers were confusing and boring, and worst of all they played up the stupid slapstick, which brought on Cars 2 flashbacks. There was nothing in this movie that looked at all appealing.

But I saw it. I saw it because it’s Pixar. Because even lesser Pixar is better than most other films (besides Cars 2, but that’s the last time I’ll mention that movie). Well, Brave is certainly lesser Pixar. But it didn’t really bother me despite its obvious flaws. I mean, Pixar isn’t really doing anything wrong with Brave. In fact, on any other scale, Brave is pretty damn great. The visuals are, as always, stunning, the score by Patrick Doyle is quite good, the dialogue is mostly good. But Pixar always excels in those areas. Things like that always appear to come easy to Pixar. What people really look for in a Pixar movie is depth of storytelling and character, and that’s where Brave falls short of expectations.

It feels like two movies smashed together. In one, a brash, independent princess must defy tradition and prove that she doesn’t need to be married to be worthwhile. This film brings contemporary sensibilities to a familiar tale, twisting it to create an honest message about empowerment . This sort of thinking is a staple of Pixar filmmaking.  In another, completely different movie, a brash, independent princess clashes with her traditional, conservative mother,

Plot Spoiler Show
but in doing so she curses her mother, and the two must reconcile to break it.
This other film contains heartfelt messages about the importance of family and trust, and the heartwarming conclusion will probably leave tears in your eyes (and your heart). So what’s the problem with combining those two? Beneath the surface, they seem to add up to a classic Pixar film.

Well, maybe that’s the problem. Combining the two seems to be a pretty good idea beneath the surface, but if you look at those two plot descriptions, they have nothing to do with each other. They simply don’t belong in the same movie. I could see one being a sequel to the other, but mashing them into one movie comes across as confusing and muddled. Now, combining the two actually might work, but the film spends far too much time on one to justify including the other, leaving both sections feeling incomplete. Actually, maybe “mashed” isn’t the right word. One film seems to be stacked right on top of the other, like a Lego brick, as if Brave is just a collection of two brief films about these characters, rather than a feature.

And all of this leaves no room for the characters. It seems that Merida and her mother have arcs, but we never really take the time to see them progress. There’s a scene where they try to catch fish which hints at development, but by the end of the film they seem to have completely changed without any impetus for that  change. I guess what I’m trying to say is that, for such a lightweight movie, Brave feels really rushed. And while we’re on the subject of character arcs, for a movie called Brave, being brave doesn’t factor into the plot at all. Merida doesn’t learn to be brave, she doesn’t teach anyone else to be brave. She doesn’t lose her bravery and have to regain it, she’s brave at the beginning and she’s brave at the end. This is more a case of a terrible title. The film was originally called The Bear and the Bow. They should have stuck with that title, it relates more to the plot and it gives off that whole fairy tale vibe.

But despite all this, I didn’t hate Brave. Is it lesser Pixar? Actually, that’s not the word I’d use. It’s lighter Pixar. It maintains the greatness of one of their films on the surface, but there’s not a whole lot going on underneath. I think Brave will be forgotten pretty quickly, especially considering the history that it has to live up to. If it followed Toy Story 3, I’d say that Monsters University looked like a clever spoof/deconstruction of college movie tropes. Following Brave and Cars 2, I can’t help but see it as just a cliche college movie using familiar characters for a cash grab. Like I said last year, it makes me sad to talk so cynically about Pixar. But that’s the shape of things right now.

Last edited by Doctor Submarine (2012-06-27 03:00:35)

"The Doctor is Submarining through our brains." --Teague

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: "Brave" review by Doctor Submarine [Mild Spoilers, marked]

Awesome review, and incidentally, I completely agree with you.

Teague Chrystie

I have a tendency to fix your typos.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: "Brave" review by Doctor Submarine [Mild Spoilers, marked]

I Agree with most of that.  Two things that would make it better: not montage through the mom's relation ship in act 1 & (as said in the discussion today) have the bow pay-off in the climax.  Also the original title, The Bear and the Bow, is better.

"Life is about movies; anything else is a bonus!"- Me   cool

Re: "Brave" review by Doctor Submarine [Mild Spoilers, marked]

Her expertise with the bow does come into play - the arrow shot from atop the horse knocks the axe out of her father's hands and saves her mother.

Imagination will often carry us to worlds that never were. But without it we go nowhere. - Carl Sagan

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: "Brave" review by Doctor Submarine [Mild Spoilers, marked]

I liked Brave, but to be fair, there's a problem with the proportions. A lot of the first act is setting up her skill with a bow, minutes and minutes on end, and the payoff is sort of an afterthought.

It's like putting an arsenal on the mantle, and at the end of the movie one gun falls off, clatters on the floor, and kind of scares someone.

Teague Chrystie

I have a tendency to fix your typos.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: "Brave" review by Doctor Submarine [Mild Spoilers, marked]

Hmmm, granted that I watched this on Christmas day with lots of kids around yelling and doing distractiony things,  but I can't recall the set up being that significant. She's shooting at stuff as she rides around the forest and decorates her bow in her effective adult introduction, but that surely falls under character establishment  rather than specifically putting the bow/skill on the mantlepiece. Further, her archery skill comes into play clearly when she uses it to win her own hand (self-determination), which is a fair enough pay-off, and then the significance of the bow itself is that it's the physical manifestation of her independence that the mother chooses to burn in an angry attempt to get rid of it.

Expecting the archery to payoff in the climax seems to be missing the target (hah!), as it's mostly her bravery in the face of the childhood terror of the 'bear' and her newfound respect of her responsibility that resolves the story, not her wild and wanton free spirit archer.

Last edited by redxavier (2013-01-02 17:39:43)

Imagination will often carry us to worlds that never were. But without it we go nowhere. - Carl Sagan

Thumbs up Thumbs down