Topic: "Hudson Hawk" Review By Zarban (no spoilers)

Hudson Hawk (1991) is a fascinating failure. The cast is great, the plotting is spot-on, the music gag is fun, the humor largely works... and then the villains come in out of a cartoon and the thing goes to hell. It's weird because it could work fine as a kids' movie, but they drop the F-bomb all the time, so it's not meant to be a kids' movie. Yet there are moments toward the end that are so ridiculously cartoony and corny that you just want to slap somebody. And it's all physical stuff, so you can't really blame the writers.

I came to think that the screenplay was quite good and that the director, Michael Lehmann, just completely failed on the execution (like Fran Rubel Kuzui messed up Buffy the Vampire Slayer). Lehmann also directed Heathers, Air Heads, and My Giant, which is quite a mixed bag.

Bruce Willis actually came up with the story with music producer Robert Kraft. Then the screenplay was written by Steven de Souza, who wrote the first couple of Die Hard movies, Commando, 48 Hrs, and The Running Man and—after, I guess, some sort of severe head trauma—went on to write The Flintstone, Street Fighter, and Judge Dredd. He was partnered with Daniel Waters, who wrote Heathers, Ford Fairlane, Demolition Man, and Batman Returns. That's a lot of absurdist high wire acts, most of which are corny failures.

The story involves a burglar who gets out of prison and is dragged right back into the criminal life by people who want him to steal Leonardo Da Vinci art pieces. There are secrets within these art pieces, tho, that lead up to a slam-bang climax. Andi McDowell is a pretty art expert, and Danny Aiello is Willis's old pal and partner. The big cast of bad guys includes James Coburn as the head of the worst CIA team ever and Richard E Grant and Sandra Bernhard as insane and ridiculous madmen bent on world domination.

The first half of the film is pretty well done, with good character work between Willis and Aiello and some fun heist shenanigans. It's the second half where the clownish villains ramp up the camp to absurd levels and it stops being fun or funny.

Shame.

Last edited by Zarban (2013-01-27 03:07:51)

Warning: I'm probably rewriting this post as you read it.

Zarban's House of Commentaries

Re: "Hudson Hawk" Review By Zarban (no spoilers)

The villains really mess up this film almost as much as Willis' ego does. It definitely has it's moments, especially the first act but it's a huge mess in regards to tone. It made me like David Caruso, though, so it's not all bad big_smile

The term 'fascinating failure' is a great way to describe it.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: "Hudson Hawk" Review By Zarban (no spoilers)

If you enjoyed this film with awful villains, Film-O-Tron 5000 believes you might also like:

  • Supergirl -- my, how Peter Cook can't do film acting

  • My Super Ex-Girlfriend -- Eddie Izzard is quite surprisingly terrible

Note: Film-O-Tron 5000 is within 61% of your taste envelope 83% of the time. Your liking may vary. Void where empty.

Re: "Hudson Hawk" Review By Zarban (no spoilers)

fcw wrote:

my, how Peter Cook can't do film acting.

Sacwiwege!

https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSZQFko2-xezcgpS5z892jXDj89i6vA2CoXMB6Eo__jP4ivjCSfxg

Re: "Hudson Hawk" Review By Zarban (no spoilers)

I'm just the messenger. FoT5k is guaranteed never not wrong some of the time.

Re: "Hudson Hawk" Review By Zarban (no spoilers)

If I could like Trey's post three more times, I would. We call that an A+ joke right there. Trey, stay after class to receive your extra credit from Ms. Smalls, the school librarian who just wants to relax after a long day's work.

As for Hudson Hawk, yeah. What Zarban said.

On a mostly unrelated note, after seeing Cloverfield with a few Geekza folks and some old FX buddies, we were sitting in the theater just sort of absorbing what had just happened. Someone in the back asked, audibly, "but why was it called Cloverfield?" To which I replied "Because Hudson Hawk was taken!"

Trey is funnier than me.

Teague Chrystie

I have a tendency to fix your typos.

Thumbs up +2 Thumbs down