Topic: Monsters

Saw Gareth Edward's Monsters at Frightfest in London on Saturday. It really is as good as the buzz has been... buzzing. I think the 'Fronters will like it. Very cool film making.

Anyone else seen it yet?

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Monsters

No, but I'm looking forward to it.

Teague Chrystie

I have a tendency to fix your typos.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Monsters

I too am looking forward to it. Gareth's a Minch.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Monsters

http://www.nerdfitness.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/yoda.jpg

Teague Chrystie

I have a tendency to fix your typos.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Monsters

Saw it at the LA Film Festival a couple months ago. Nothing's made me as excited for the future of what indie movies can be than that film.

Talked to Gareth for a bit after a screening - one of the most interesting things he mentioned was  the insane schizophrenic relationship you develop with yourself when you're directing and doing all the effects on something, where you can't really externalize the forces cutting favorite shots and sequences, or demanding 20 hour days for months straight.

Benefits of working at that scale though, is that you're more or less guaranteed success and with minimal involvement. Some people were commenting that they couldn't wait to see him make a movie with a serious budget, but I think that's totally missing the point. Such a beautiful, intimate movie with those kinds of closing scenes would never exist with a 7+ figure budget.

Last edited by paulou (2010-08-31 19:18:10)

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Monsters

Films should be made by love, not producers and studios.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Monsters

It's easy to say that, but it's a naive statement. It's show business. Film is a profligate art form. What are the reported budgets/grosses for your top 10 favorite films?

When you start introducing more money, the stakes change dramatically and there's a huge influx of things that can cloud and dilute the intended artistic vision. There are a lot more people, jobs, and investments that count on a movie to make bank.

For example, imagine your film is acquired, and what you considered to be some of the most intense and visceral moments in your whole movie need to be yanked and cut around since the studio needs to get a rating down to PG-13 to offset the tremendous advertising campaign they're throwing behind your work.

Something like Monsters manages to short this out by keeping the operating costs so low, that no matter what, the profit is guaranteed with a wide enough release. It's uncompromising, operating out of its financial weight class, and fucking awesome.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Monsters

But, and this is the point, it was hard to do.

Teague Chrystie

I have a tendency to fix your typos.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Monsters

Yeah, absolutely. It's a tremendous, face-melting, Herculean accomplishment. Since it's not properly released yet, guess I'm more inclined to talk about what it means rather than what it is. Cuz spoilers?

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Monsters

Interesting and appropriately experimental news regarding the film:

MONSTERS releases theatrically on October 29. However, if you are in an iTunes-friendly country, you can rent it right now, in HD, for $10.99.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Monsters

They're doing that with the Freakonomics movie, too.

From what I've heard, if you've read the book, skip it. Interesting nonetheless.

Teague Chrystie

I have a tendency to fix your typos.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Monsters

Can not wait to see this.

Extended Edition - 146 - The Rise Of Skywalker
VFX Reel | Twitter | IMDB | Blog