Re: Inception

Yeah, see, he says things like this:

As a courtly and well-mannered gentleman said to me as we both exited the screening earlier in the week, "It was kind of hard to follow, wasn't it Mr. Simon?"

Indeed it was.

No it wasn't! It's not hard to follow at all! It's not convoluted and it's completely linear, just with some parts of it taking place simultaneously and in a longer timespan -- it's like a fractal structure. And then he says weird shit like this:

And I like the movie a lot when, as Page puts it, it suspends the laws of time and space — when, for instance, a locomotive suddenly and for no reason starts barreling through city streets and, especially, when a city folds in on itself and turns a city block into a kind of giant oreo cookie, without the cream filling in the middle.

WTF? Why an Oreo? The defining aspect of Oreos is the cream filling and they aren't folded over, they're two separate biscuits held together with the filling.

And if he thinks there is "no reason" for the freight train, he was not paying attention even a little to the Cobb/Mal backstory.

YOU ARE SAYING WRONG THINGS MR. CRITIC.

Although I do agree that stuff like that should have happened occasionally for no reason, making dreams an unpredictable and dangerous business, there was a very specific reason that they did happen in the movie as made.

This smacks of a guy who didn't get the movie and is trying to say that it's because there's nothing to get. And to an extent, he's right. There's nothing that complex about it (other than the question of how much of it is a meta-dream), no secret you need to unpack a la THE FOUNTAIN. It's pretty straightforward, if intricately woven. An admitted inability to follow it means that he somehow just didn't understand the material at a fundamental level.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Inception

DorkmanScott wrote:

This smacks of a guy who didn't get the movie and is trying to say that it's because there's nothing to get. And to an extent, he's right. There's nothing that complex about it (other than the question of how much of it is a meta-dream), no secret you need to unpack a la THE FOUNTAIN. It's pretty straightforward, if intricately woven. An admitted inability to follow it means that he somehow just didn't understand the material at a fundamental level.

I agree, although I don't think there's anything wrong with that. If you honestly can't see the 3D picture everyone else can see, you don't see it and will write such. Maybe he was just expecting more, so didn't see the trees for the forest.

I've been reading his reviews for a good 30 years, and for the most part like him. He tends to grade on a sliding scale, where a silly summer film that's stupid fun like The Mummy 2 might get the same or better rating then an Woody Allen film that isn't as good as it should have been (to name one comparison he did make years ago). He had me as a fan when while reviewing some French film where the female lead spent all her time topless on the beach (possibly Paulina on the Beach), he wrote "All that and a plot too!" Being a teen I liked that honesty smile

The Buffalo News TV writer retired after 40 years last month and hasn't been replaced, apart from some columns by Simon who also does Jazz reviews, and I suspect when Simon retires we'll just get syndicated movie reviews. I'll have to enjoy his silliness while it lasts.

I write stories! With words!
http://www.asstr.org/~Invid_Fan/

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Inception

I thought the train was part of Fisher's "kill it with fire" mental defenses. If it's a Cobb machination, then suddenly I'm frustrated that that sort of thing doesn't happen constantly even moreso.

Teague Chrystie

I have a tendency to fix your typos.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Inception

downinfront wrote:

I thought the train was part of Fisher's "kill it with fire" mental defenses. If it's a Cobb machination, then suddenly I'm frustrated that that sort of thing doesn't happen constantly even moreso.

I'd worry the train would be over-done if it was done more-so.  If we're just talking about Cobb's subconscious intrusions happening more often, they are actually riddled through the levels.  Level 1's train was really just an inconvenience and nothing more.  It got in the way, then was gone.  Level 2's intrusions were interfering with Cobb's "Mr. Charlie" gambit and drawing a lot of attention from the subconscious.  Level 3's intrusion killed Fischer.

Again, there's only so much Cobbs' subconscious can actually do since he's not the architect.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Inception

No he's not saying the train should have been done over but something to that extent should have come in during the film.

For instance when they are in the hotel the stakes should have been raised, not another train, but something that would challenge the dreamers.

I also found it hard to believe he wouldn't shoot his wife then and there at the snow level, it felt a bit contrived. He knows very well she's a projection, why would he believe she was real in that instance?

Last edited by SilentBat (2010-07-19 20:42:53)

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Inception

Invid wrote:

I agree, although I don't think there's anything wrong with that. If you honestly can't see the 3D picture everyone else can see, you don't see it and will write such.

Yeah, but what he wrote wasn't "I don't see what everyone else sees," he wrote "I don't see it and anyone who says he does is a lying wronghead."

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Inception

Critics do this all the time. They decide they don't like a movie, so they complain about the first things they can think of off the top of their head.

See: the 'aliens' in AI, or when Ebert complained about the tripod machines in 'War of the Worlds,' and many other examples.

Posted from my iPad
http://trek.fm

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Inception

SilentBat wrote:

No he's not saying the train should have been done over but something to that extent should have come in during the film.

For instance when they are in the hotel the stakes should have been raised, not another train, but something that would challenge the dreamers.

I also found it hard to believe he wouldn't shoot his wife then and there at the snow level, it felt a bit contrived. He knows very well she's a projection, why would he believe she was real in that instance?

The stakes WERE raised in the hotel.  The train was an inconvenience.  It pushed aside some cars and went on its merry way.  It wasn't even going fast enough to be a real danger to them.  In the hotel, Fischer's subconscious was having actual hostile responses to Cobb's projections.  They were becoming aware of him and targeting him when they shouldn't have.  The only person they should have been targeting was the architect (Arthur).  His projections actually made the task much more difficult.  Even more so in level 3, where his projection killed Fischer.

I do agree with you on his hesitation to shoot Mal.  He should know better.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Inception

I'm surprised that everyone is getting so worked up about the last shot. Does it really matter?  The character arc is over. Dream or not, he's clearly happy.

Secondly, the freight train was accomplished by covering an 18-wheeler with a train prop. Fucking. Awesome.

I also felt nothing for the characters. Couldn't care who lived or died before the last 20 minutes of the movie (aside from Joseph Gordon-Levitt on account of his being so sharply dressed).


- Branco

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Inception

No character development which lead to me also not caring about any characters, I found it strange I cared more about money hungry Ken Wantanabe more than Cobb/Dicaprio.

Had some awesome action, a la the zero-g fight. But it also had terrible action, SPECIFICALLY the scene in which Seito/Wantanabe gets shot. At one point there is an armed guy literally standing at the back of the taxi, firing round after round a foot from the people in the back seat. There are also a shit ton other guys all around, and it just never seemed plausible or realistic to me that only Seito gets shot once. Pretty much all the Michael Bay gun fight scenes and chases were done poorly, in my eyes.

I hate that I can't remember one piece of music except the "sync" music.

Ending shot was nothing more than a smack in the face, in my mind it falls but as Branco said, who cares really?

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Inception

Branco wrote:

I'm surprised that everyone is getting so worked up about the last shot. Does it really matter?  The character arc is over. Dream or not, he's clearly happy.

Secondly, the freight train was accomplished by covering an 18-wheeler with a train prop. Fucking. Awesome.

I also felt nothing for the characters. Couldn't care who lived or died before the last 20 minutes of the movie (aside from Joseph Gordon-Levitt on account of his being so sharply dressed).


- Branco

The end is Nolan's little, "Reality is always subjective, motherfuckers! Thank you and good night!" thematic coda, but some are mistaking it for something deeply relevant to the story since it is the last shot of the film.

Last edited by paulou (2010-07-23 19:48:30)

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Inception

I like that theory the best, and like the way you put it the best.

Teague Chrystie

I have a tendency to fix your typos.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

38

Re: Inception

I really enjoyed Inception visually, but the more I think about it I keep thinking of ways it didn't follow it's own rules.

- I was never clear if kicks were done from one level up or from your current level, since either seemed to work. Kicking was introduced as being used from a higher level, but if kicks work from one level up and affect "awake" individuals one level down, why didn't Arthur jump up a level when the van went off the bridge?

- The zero gravity was awesome, but why did lower levels still have gravity?

- If dying when sedated drops you to limbo, how does dying/jumping off a building from inside limbo jump you up a level (for Ariadne) or all levels (for Dom and Saito)? Or is it mostly that you fully acknowledge that you're in a limbo dream and "find yourself" and thus wake up? I think they were kind of going for that, but equating finding yourself with suicide is a bit...odd.

- A 10 second free fall in Earth gravity is about 1500ft, though I think they had 10 seconds after the music until Yusuf hit the edge of the bridge, hence them "missing the first jump". They would have had maybe 2 or 3 seconds after that till the van hit the water.

In the end, I'm actually willing to forgive a lot since it's nearly all in dream space. And it's pretty. And ambitious.

While watching I was actually thinking that Dom was in Mal's dream for the whole time. She knew about the top, so she could make it topple if she wanted to. They made a big point about not letting others hold your totem, and she knew all about his since it has been hers. Also, at one point she's talking about how Dom's "real" life is like a dream with him being chased around the world by faceless authorities while trying to get back to an unseen home. Obviously the ending didn't really carry out my theory, but I thought it made some sense.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Inception

I thought your comment about a ten second fall seemed wrong, so I Wolfram Alpha'd a bit. You're right, and in fact conservative. A 9.7 second free fall would get you 1,500 feet, 10 seconds would get you further.

If we assume the bridge was 100 feet up, the fall would have been roughly 2.5 seconds. 200 feet, 3.5 seconds. 300, 4.3 seconds. Well played, lady.

Teague Chrystie

I have a tendency to fix your typos.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Inception

Phi wrote:

The zero gravity was awesome, but why did lower levels still have gravity?

Outside stimuli only effect dreamers who are 'awake' in the level below.

Posted from my iPad
http://trek.fm

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Inception

But when he goes back into the hotel room everyone and everything is flying around, which made me assume that their bodies in the next level lower would have felt the effect too, no?

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Inception

TrowaGP02a wrote:

But when he goes back into the hotel room everyone and everything is flying around, which made me assume that their bodies in the next level lower would have felt the effect too, no?

They weren't floating because they were in free-fall, they were floating because Arthur was in free-fall. The way the rules work, apparently, is that you have to be awake in the level below the one that has the effect.

Posted from my iPad
http://trek.fm

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Inception

Ahh I see what you're saying. Hmmm, I still think no matter how far down you are (maybe except Limbo) you should feel the effects. Ehh, starting to go either way on it.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

44

Re: Inception

I'd be fine with things only affecting one level down, otherwise you'd just have to kick from the top, but I'm pretty sure that they noticed the van hit the railing even in the snow world. Maybe there's a strong muting effect. They were at .95 gravity so you couldn't tell tongue

It's just that they specifically mentioned that the drugs they were using left the inner ear entirely unaffected. Why bother say that explicitly? (Not that falling in dreams has much to do with the physical inner ear, but whatever)

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Inception

Finally got time to watch this beast, and looooooooooved every minute of it. So freakin good.

Not really much to say, you guys have kinda covered it all, and I agree with most of it except for the sentiment that the dreams needed to be more wild and crazy, like normal dreams. Unless you are also suggesting that we change the way the universe is set up (Which is valid, i guess...but then we are just quibbling over artistic ideas), it does nt follow that the "dreams" should have been more wild and crazy. It's really all spelled out in the movie, or maybe that's just the way I put it all together, anyways, this is how I see it.

Basically, the "dreams" that extractors enter are not true dreams, in that they are very VERY tightly controlled to the maximum extent that they can be by the Architect; This is the entire point of the architect, he is there to keep the entire thing normalized. Anyways, in a normal dreams we basically hand our brains over to subconscious and tell it to have fun and try not to break anything, hence the bizarro what the fuck nature of most dreams. But this isn't the case with extractions (Or in this case Inception); in these, the subconscious mind of the dreamer is instead replaced with the very conciseness mind of the Architect. But obviously the mind is not completely predicable and oddities are bound to happen when you start messing with placing someone into another person dream, and hence we get the screaming mobs, the minds self defense.

Now with all that said, would I have loved to see the giant space squid fight a pack of rabid panda tigers? Hell yes!! Except that's not the movie Nolan wanted to make, so he built himself a universe in which these laws make sense and are justified, and god dammit he sticks to them. You can't fault the guy for that.

On the hand, as far as the kicks go, I honestly have no clue. The best I've got so far follows:

Basically I think that the external stimuli only works one level down (On those dreaming as it were), Real Life affects Yousef's, Yousef's affects Arthur's, Arthur's affects the Snowy place and the snowy place affects limbo.

And I am pretty sure, that you can only be kicked from the level you fell asleep in, and then once in that level you can be kicked in the next level up that you fell asleep in etc. Or in this case they plan the simultaneous kick so that they would all be pulled straight up into real life.

Although I'm fairly certain that gets broken a few times...(I still have no idea whats up with Page committing suicide, I'm not really sure how that helps anything.)

Yeah, that's the best I got. Now that could be due to the fact I just pulled a 12 hour animating sprint or the fact that I just don't know. Meh, we'll find out.

(EDIT: @Phi, the snow world didn't notice the van hitting the barrier as a physical thing, they worked it out from the music JGL was pumping into their architect to give them the cue (Hence the comment "No, It's to soon!") so I still hold it only works one level down. Also the inner ear part has nothing to do with faling in the dream, it has to do with the idea, that the inner ear still works in the "real" body, so that when that gets kicked the body feels it, freaks out and wakes the body up from the dream)

Last edited by BigDamnArtist (2010-07-25 16:22:04)

ZangrethorDigital.ca

Re: Inception

When talking to people in real life that like a movie a lot more than you did, you get a lot of chances to refine exactly what it was that I wished there was more of. So in one sentence.

The dreams didn't need to be more wack exactly, but as a heist film, I feel like the movie failed to capitalize on the collide between the exacting logistics required of the heist, and the volatility of the subconscious.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Inception

Bam.

Teague Chrystie

I have a tendency to fix your typos.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Inception

Finally got to see it properly (in a theatre). Wow.

Sadly I picked it from the start but was completely surprised by the imagery. After Momento there are no more surprises!

My take, Mol is implanting a message in Cobb, to get him back. The whole thing is a ruse and Michael Cain is the architect at the root level. Of course there could be no tech at all and it is just the fancifull construct of a comatose mind, al-la Life on Mars.

Alternately I see a sequel, where there is a reveal of the real team but Cobb now cannot reconcile reality.

In addition I would have made more of the elderly getting their youth back and spending decades in tertiary levels of sleep.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Inception

The only thing that annoyed me with the film was limbo. It just doesn't make sense that limbo is shared with everyone, and that Cobb and Mal were the first ones there.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Inception

Michael Caine talked about the ending on a British radio show.

I can do this without spoiling it if you haven't seen the movie, too.

According to him: "It fell."

Teague Chrystie

I have a tendency to fix your typos.

Thumbs up Thumbs down