Re: Last movie you watched
Knew that was coming
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
I just saw Kingsman, really enjoyed it. The kind of fun movie that doesn't take itself too seriously that most will bemoan for not insisting on forcing a gag every two minutes.
I'm not sure how many of you have access to this, but select IMAX theaters are showing the final two episodes of Season 4 of Game of Thrones (The Wall and The Children).
And seven hells, it was the best movie I've seen in a long time. Even though it was a tv show. And I'd already seen it. Really made me appreciate what a high-quality product GoT is, across the board.
The best part was getting to hear the episodes on a mega-theater sound system. Those opening titles were like melodic thunder.
If you're a GoT fan, worth a look. In fact, I'd be curious to hear reactions from people who aren't GoT fans. There's an extended "previously on Game of Thrones" montage to catch you up on most everything you need to know... and if you just watch The Wall as an hour-long movie about a siege knowing nothing about it at all, you still might dig it.
It's funny that when you put it in the context of the movie landscape, it's light-years better than anything else out there. When was the last blockbuster where people bleed gratuitously when they get hit, tight story pacing, good writing, economy of storytelling (they can't afford to use sweeping CG shots for no reason, so they make each of them count).
Wouldn't shock me if this is HBO testing the waters for eventually doing the series finale as a big summer movie release a week ahead of the TV broadcast.
Holy crap that sounds amazing. Unfortunately the nearest Imax is 2 hours and 200km's of death defying black ice highways away.
Holy crap that sounds amazing. Unfortunately the nearest Imax is 2 hours and 200km's of death defying black ice highways away.
What if Ned and Robert had said that about King's Landing?
BigDamnArtist wrote:Holy crap that sounds amazing. Unfortunately the nearest Imax is 2 hours and 200km's of death defying black ice highways away.
What if Ned and Robert had said that about King's Landing?
Each would have lived a long and happy life.
Sam F wrote:BigDamnArtist wrote:Holy crap that sounds amazing. Unfortunately the nearest Imax is 2 hours and 200km's of death defying black ice highways away.
What if Ned and Robert had said that about King's Landing?
Each would have lived a long and happy life.
Which, we know, cannot happen in GoT.
Lego Movie
Loved it. Quite possibly one of my favourite movies ever. I love the stopmotion real lego approach (right down to the fire, dust, water and smoke) and I loved the story. I think it especially resonates because I recognise myself in the dad. When I watch my nephews play, lego gets mixed up in a weird and wonderful way, and I'm sure that was the way I played. But at some point, themes and these staying separated became important. And that seems strange in the eyes of a child, why confine your imagination so?
Not at all sure what I thought of this one. Some absolutely stunning/haunting visuals, but I can't decide whether it was ultimately great or a meandering bit of not-much-at-all. Shall have to mull it over.
Last edited by Abbie (2015-02-13 05:38:18)
Saw Kingsman, and pretty much what Avatar said above, ditto. Doesn't come together as beautifully as KickAss - some setups seemed to be missing payoffs and vice versa - but overall I had a good time with it. It's got some third-act choices that genuinely surprised me.
And Sam Jackson as a lisping supervillain was certainly a refreshing change of pace.
Rewatched this, having not seen it since the 1995 cinema release.
I LIKE it! It's not superb, and the VFX mostly don't hold up, but in general, I'd watch it again. Robin Williams performs great, the kids too, even Kirsten Dunst performs really good. The story is exactly what you'd think, and I think it pays off quite nicely.
However, after checking out the cast for the spiritual successor, Zathura, I'm skipping that one.
Last edited by Tomahawk (2015-02-14 19:11:41)
Yes, skip Zathura. Kristen Stewart gets frozen in that film (insert your own joke here).
Firefly and Serenity
Mmmm... That's the stuff. I finally got around to watching the series, and then the movie. Shame the show was cut so short, but the movie did a great job of wrapping it up.
Awwwe yeah baby, dat fresh Browncoat smell.
THIRTEENTH FLOOR (1999)
Forgettable VR knock-off we've seen done better many times elsewhere (Tron, Matrix, Inception, etc). The visual style was channelling discount Blade Runner. It was like a pre-viz draft for a better movie still to be made with better actors. The love story was god-awful with zero-chemistry between zero-charisma leads. But always nice to see German actor Armin Mueller-Stahl, who did a bit of Hollywood in the late 90s. What happened to him?
The highlight was an appearance of Frank Lloyd Wright's Ennis House (channelling a Maya temple), which I hope to buy one day, and then you're all invited for a FIYH party.
Ah, so they kept the house from the original movie? Good. I re-watched the live Rifftrax of the Vincent Price version last week with my sister (she missed the original show when it was in theaters). I assume the acid pool was part of FLW's original design.
Alright, my google-fu has entirely failed me. What the hell is an acid pool?
I'm assuming it's not some sort of James Bond-esque villain trap.
Alright, my google-fu has entirely failed me. What the hell is an acid pool?
I'm assuming it's not some sort of James Bond-esque villain trap.
You know, I just realized I confused House on Haunted Hill with the film 13 Ghosts, assuming 13th Floor was the same thing, all because of that picture In the Vincent Price film House on Haunted Hill, there's a covered acid pool which will turn a person into a plastic skeleton.
Star Trek Into Darkness.
Yep, I revisited it. I'm mildly adjusting my opinion, just due to the pacing of the film. The film can't be bothered to slow down enough for the emotional moments. I still find the characters very interesting, though, and quite enjoyable overall.
6/10
I finally saw The Grand Budapest Hotel. I generally enjoy Wes Anderson's movies (even though I can't explain why), and can understand why they wouldn't be everybody's cup of tea. But I can immediately see why this one was so well-received by most people. I thought it was absolutely lovely
(And I immediately bought the soundtrack. Haven't done that in yeeeears.)
CITIZENFOUR
Important subject matter, but bland documentary. Any other subject matter, and this would have been boring. Why should Laura Poitras get the credit (Oscar, etc), because this subject sells itself. How do you tell the difference between Cinéma Vérité and laziness / incompetence?
If you compare it to Finding Vivian Maier (also in the running for Best Doco), you have the opposite situation: trivial subject matter (a weird nanny took good photos) but a brilliant documentary. My vote, if I had one, would go to John Maloof.
Anyway, if you're interested in the fact that the NSA if spying on you without your permission or official acknowledgement, I recommend the PBS Frontline doco: the United States of Secrets...
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline … f-secrets/
There's also a recent (last week) discussion of CitizenFour here (with Edward Snowden on Skype) here... hosted by David Carr (who died just hours later)....
http://timestalks.com/laura-poitras-gle … owden.html
Important subject matter, but bland documentary. Any other subject matter, and this would have been boring. Why should Laura Poitras get the credit (Oscar, etc), because this subject sells itself. How do you tell the difference between Cinéma Vérité and laziness / incompetence?
It doesn't matter which it was. The end result is what matters.
Also, I think Citizenfour is amazing and this shot is one of the best things cinema gave us in 2014.
Last edited by Doctor Submarine (2015-02-18 05:09:27)
CITIZENFOUR
Important subject matter, but bland documentary. Any other subject matter, and this would have been boring. Why should Laura Poitras get the credit (Oscar, etc), because this subject sells itself. How do you tell the difference between Cinéma Vérité and laziness / incompetence?
If you compare it to Finding Vivian Maier (also in the running for Best Doco), you have the opposite situation: trivial subject matter (a weird nanny took good photos) but a brilliant documentary. My vote, if I had one, would go to John Maloof.
Anyway, if you're interested in the fact that the NSA if spying on you without your permission or official acknowledgement, I recommend the PBS Frontline doco: the United States of Secrets...
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline … f-secrets/There's also a recent (last week) discussion of CitizenFour here (with Edward Snowden on Skype) here... hosted by David Carr (who died just hours later)....
I don't think I could disagree with you more if the Hadron Collider created a whole pocket universe that housed all infinite disagreement.. And I'm sorry to say this, but criticizing a director's efforts because "the subject sells itself," is incredibly ignorant of the process and lazy in and of itself. I wish I had half the balls she had. Every time her camera turned on, she ran the risk of being arrested. Every time she boarded a plane, every time she sent an email, she had the spectre of arrest hanging over her. I found the film the opposite of bland, and the fact that she managed to weave in a bit of a love story is impressive of itself.
To be this reductive of a film that has a very deft directorial hand is something else.
I don't think I could disagree with you more if the Hadron Collider created a whole pocket universe that housed all infinite disagreement.. And I'm sorry to say this, but criticizing a director's efforts because "the subject sells itself," is incredibly ignorant of the process and lazy in and of itself. I wish I had half the balls she had. Every time her camera turned on, she ran the risk of being arrested. Every time she boarded a plane, every time she sent an email, she had the spectre of arrest hanging over her. I found the film the opposite of bland, and the fact that she managed to weave in a bit of a love story is impressive of itself.
To be this reductive of a film that has a very deft directorial hand is something else.
Sure, but the risk has to do with the subject of the documentary. I'm critiquing the style of the documentary which seems to be to just simply switch the camera on and point. Anyone could have done this with little documentary experience. For example, why do we have to see Snowden comb his hair for ages? What about actually imparting information? The Frontline documentary did this a lot better on the same subject.
By contrast, the Vivian Maier documentary had a tougher subject to sell us to make it interesting, and therefore is a more impressive achievement as a documentary, in my opinion.
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.
Currently installed 9 official extensions. Copyright © 2003–2009 PunBB.