226

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Not every film must be deep smile

"Be assured that a walk through the ocean of most souls
Would scarcely get your feet wet"  'Deteriorata' - National Lampoon

227

(34 replies, posted in Episodes)

The Star Wars porn is, in fact, good. Better than Pink Five in some ways, to be honest. Each two-DVD set comes with a version of the movie with the sex removed, perfect for showing in public. However, for some god damned reason they put an auto playing graphic phone sex ad at the start of that DVD. So, you'll have to have it already cued up on the player before inviting Grandma to watch smile

228

(34 replies, posted in Episodes)

AshDigital wrote:

About Trey's other Asylum movie...  Release the documents or I'll start posting modified posters of all the Asylum films on the internet!

Trey Stokes 18-Year-Old Virgin
Trey Stokes Merlin and the War of the Dragons
Trey Stokes Princess of Mars
Trey Stokes Sharknado
Trey Stokes Titanic II (I'm putting my money on that one)

... jokes aside, kudos.

You forget how Asylum works. I think the titles should be:

3 Stokes 18-Year-Old Virgin
3 Stokes Merlin and the War of the Dragons
3 Stokes Princess of Mars
3 Stokes Sharknado
3 Stokes Titanic II

229

(25 replies, posted in Episodes)

I'm not talking about dubbing over swearing. I'm talking about doing an entire new take of a scene with the cast saying new dialog. In Ghostbusters, the TV version has Bill Murray saying "Well, wasn't that a load of fun" or some such when he comes out of the hotel ballroom, instead of his "We came, we saw, we kicked it's ass!" You can tell he probably only agreed to one take of that version smile He also has a different joke instead of the "dickless" line, with a different setup. In Animal House, they filmed it once with women topless, and once with them in bras. I saw the bra version on TV long before I ever saw the theatrical version. Some of this footage even slipped into the main movie: when the guys are fleeing the Black nightclub on their road trip, the girl who jumps out the car window still has her bra on while it was long gone a scene earlier. Obviously, the editor liked the bra take better than the topless one, and figured nobody would notice. Well, either that, or the girl refused to do the stunt without some protection.

230

(17 replies, posted in Off Topic)

C-Spin wrote:

The Wicker Man - The Christopher Lee one, not the fucking Nic Cage one. Really bizarre, atmospheric film that's genuinely unsettling.

The uncut version, preferably, but I don't know how available it is now. The normal version was sliced to hell by distributors who just wanted the movie to go away, but Roger Corman turned out to have a deteriorating copy of the original in storage. The new scenes improve things immensely.

231

(25 replies, posted in Episodes)

Byshop wrote:

2b) The autoguns scene. For some bizarre reason, these scene was included in a cut that exists in the various broadcast TV cuts even though I'm pretty sure it wasn't in the theatrical version I saw. Yes, I agree with all the points you guys made about these scenes but I liked them because it was an earlier indication that the Aliens weren't just animals and could learn.

It's not uncommon for TV versions of films to have extra scenes included. You have to fit the movie into a certain time slot with commercials, so you either have to cut things out or add bits. Often the added scenes will balance out things you had to cut for content.

(long gone are the days when they would film "clean" versions of scenes for TV, as was done with both Animal House and Ghostbusters)

232

(17 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Try Paperhouse, a good British film from 1988. A girl draws a house, dreaming that there is a sick boy living in it.

On the other end of the spectrum, Sleepaway Camp. Don't read anything about it, just watch it smile

233

(95 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Jp12x wrote:

As for reasons, take The Hobbit. Jackson originally suggested something very different than what has gone to theater. He reasonable wanted a lower budget and 2 movies. A small couple of movies following closely to the book. For 'reasons', it is now a big budget trilogy of epic scale that has very little of the spirit of the book.

You know, it would be fun if Jackson himself made an edit. There's the example of the anime Macross Plus. The creators wanted to do a movie, but the studio funding it insisted on four hour long direct to video episodes, so they could make more money. However, the creators structured their scenes so that after the main job was done, they were able to re-edit things down to their original vision with only a few new bits. The two hour version is much better, although the 4 episodes are also good.

234

(991 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Jp12x wrote:

Invid: I absolutely think Moffat needs a producer or someone to ask him "why?" a dozen times a day. when you have a transient writing staff of 12, the show is likely watered down to mediocrity but adding 1 exec could fix a lot for this show.

There's nothing wrong with a transient writing staff. Classic Who always had writers from other BBC projects coming in to give one story a try (and unrelated scripts accidentally being sent to Who introduced many of their best writers to the show). However, the difference is the person controlling the scripts and the one controlling production were two different people. They would fight over the direction and tone of the show. This didn't always lead to good things, but at least each season was interesting.

Also, the fact you were only doing 6 stories a season (totaling 26 half hour episodes) probably helped.

235

(991 replies, posted in Off Topic)

You know, maybe part of the problem is having the producer and script editor be the same person. Yes, I know, it's the modern way for a TV series to have one show runner who does everything, but that's not the only way to do a series. If there was someone with almost equal power to bump heads with Moffat, we'd probably have a better show.

236

(95 replies, posted in Off Topic)

BigDamnArtist wrote:
Invid wrote:

I think the difference is, fan fiction is often the equivalent of "if I was the writer of the sequel, this is how I'd do it!" Fan edits can come off as "here's how I would have done your job better."

And when FIYH "fixes a movie" it's different how?

So film criticism is the same as fan fiction. Gotcha smile

237

(95 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I think the difference is, fan fiction is often the equivalent of "if I was the writer of the sequel, this is how I'd do it!" Fan edits can come off as "here's how I would have done your job better."

238

(3 replies, posted in Creations)

Ah, thank you! A message to them has just been sent smile

239

(3 replies, posted in Creations)

Hi all.

Well, I've finished another book. Whee! Now, the fun part of creating an ebook and print version. For that, I need a cover. There is one image I would love to use, a wooden statue possibly representing the Polish Goddess Zywie, but the site I found it on has no information on who owns it, nor contact information for the site owner:

http://slavicmyths.blog.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/00/05/01/77/5017745/files/ziva/ziva5.jpg

http://slavicmyths.blog.com/page/2/

Any help there would be appreciated.

Plan B is to use a photo of a European Roller, a fun looking bird. I have found one on Flicker that looks good, and apparently I can use and modify commercially. The problem? He's sitting on what looks like a metal post with wires. That... doesn't fit the setting smile If someone with photo editing skills could help here, it would be appreciated. Or just a different photo. I need something roughly in the right ratio to fit on a book cover, with some room for the title and my name.

Here's the Flicker link:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/abster35/ … KM9-ceo7Bo

240

(16 replies, posted in Off Topic)

It also might never exist smile The fact the Watch project started after his death could mean it was one of those ideas he had no interest in but which now became possible. One aspect of a company with a strong visionary leader is it tends to stick to that one person's vision. We need more than one company tossing lots of money into R&D, to vary what we get, but at the moment in this area it's only Apple.

Zarban wrote:
Invid wrote:

(Ronald Moore quoting Ellison)“Don’t be a whore!” Don’t write crap because they pay you well. Don’t put your name on something that you know will suck. Don’t sacrifice whatever integrity you have as a writer for a check.

Despite his devotion to artistic integrity, Harlan Ellison doesn't enjoy a sterling reputation.

He did save us from a bad adaptation of the Pern books, though, so that should count for something.

The point of the quote, as Moore seemed to understand it, is when you have choices, take the right one. Naturally, if doing a Corman or Asylum movie is going to be your big break, you take it. But if you don't HAVE to sell out to eat, don't. If you have integrity, try and keep it. (the key point of Moore's quote is "that you know will suck". Obviously, if you think you can do well with it, that's not the case)

242

(1,649 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Heh. I'm not sure how the Deer are in France, but locally they love living in suburban areas. Their population has actually grown as there is no hunting, their only predator being cars. You see a new dead one in the road every day. I had a baby deer jump on top of my car a few years ago on a busy bridge. Slid right off my back window.

A month ago, I came across a mother trying to teach her baby how to cross the street. She did this by standing in the middle of the road at noon, waiting for the line of cars in each direction to just vanish, while her kid stood by the side of the road wondering what the hell his mom was thinking. I finally just tapped the gas, startling them into running away.

243

(1,649 replies, posted in Off Topic)

It's about long legged rats? Cool.

244

(991 replies, posted in Off Topic)

BigDamnArtist wrote:

Y'all are dead to me.

Maybe you'll like us better once we regenerate.

245

(991 replies, posted in Off Topic)

BBQ wrote:

Dude, that ship sailed LONG ago. And as far as offenses of this kind go, this was relatively minor. In the last episode he unscrews a nut/hatch inside a dalek. In the special there's that long, convoluted way the Doctors unlock an old wooden door, and there are countless examples going back through a lot of modern Who (I haven't seen all of Classic Who, but I'd bet they break the rules, too).

For classic Who it pretty much was just for fiddling with electronic things, or turning screws. They took it away from the Doctor during the 5th Doctor's reign, as it made things too easy for the character (and thus harder to come up with problems he couldn't solve instantly). Sounds like they should get rid of it again.

246

(262 replies, posted in Episodes)

The 80's action movie: its rise and fall. For a brief period of time action movies were, if not great, FUN. Why did that start, and why did it end?

247

(356 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I was born a month after Woodstock. All I have to do is throw the movie soundtrack in smile

Hey, I've had dates which didn't last that long smile

I assumed they had at least met. Lots of friends of friends in the entertainment biz.

Interesting episode. It does not sound like the type of documentary I would ever watch, which says much more about me than anything else. Weirdly, while I have no idea who she is, every mention of something I WAS familiar with made me more invested in her story. OK, you taped this at Earwolf. I listen to one podcast from them, How Did This Get Made. So, that made me pay attention. Then she mentioned two of the hosts of that show are assisting her. Oh! Well, that's interesting! If that had been slipped in up front I would have been even more invested. It's stupid, but probably a part of human nature.